* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Host resource supplies influence the dynamics
Survey
Document related concepts
Chagas disease wikipedia , lookup
Rocky Mountain spotted fever wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Sexually transmitted infection wikipedia , lookup
Onchocerciasis wikipedia , lookup
Dirofilaria immitis wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
Leptospirosis wikipedia , lookup
Oesophagostomum wikipedia , lookup
Herpes simplex virus wikipedia , lookup
Eradication of infectious diseases wikipedia , lookup
Visceral leishmaniasis wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Sarcocystis wikipedia , lookup
African trypanosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
310 Host resource supplies influence the dynamics and outcome of infectious disease Val Smith1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 Synopsis Pathogens and their host organisms share a wide range of resource needs that are required to support normal metabolism and growth. Because the development of infectious disease on or within the host involves the processes of invasion and resource consumption, competition for growth-limiting resources potentially may occur between pathogens and cellular or sub-cellular components of the host ecosystem. Examples from the plant, animal, and microbiological literature provide unambiguous evidence that external resource supplies to the host organism can have profound effects on the outcome of infection by a broad diversity of bacterial, fungal, metazoan, protozoan, and viral pathogens. Introduction Animals, plants, and their associated pathogens share a wide range of resources that are required to support their metabolism, growth, and reproduction. In fact, the infected host can be viewed as a growth medium (Garber 1960): the ability of the host to respond to invasion by a pathogen, and the microbial invader’s ability to replicate and proliferate, both require constant provision of the essential inorganic and organic molecules required for their metabolism and growth. The internal pools of many of these essential resources are strongly dependent upon their external availability for host consumption, and the strong possibility thus exists that the supply rates of resources to the host organism can potentially influence the population growth of a diverse array of viral, bacterial, fungal, protozoan, and metazoan pathogens (Smith 1993a, 1993b; Smith et al. 2005). In this article, infection is viewed as a pathogenic invasion of the host ecosystem and the subsequent development of disease is considered to be an ecological phenomenon that involves the ecological processes of invasion, competition, and consumption of resources (Bohannan 2000). Pathogenesis is thus considered here to be an ecological process in which a pathogen first colonizes and then persists on, or within, the host, producing a population sufficiently large, active, and well located to exert a pathological effect (Costerton et al. 1987). Because requirements for many key resources may be identical for many host organisms and pathogens, I focus on the effects of resource availability on growth of the pathogen. Examples suggesting strong control by nutrients of the outcome of infection are provided for a diverse set of plant and animal hosts, and I also speculate briefly on the implications of host nutrition for the management and treatment of disease. Effects of resource availability on plant diseases Terrestrial plants Disease can play an important role in determining the structure and function of terrestrial plant communities (Alexander 1990; Burdon et al. 2006), and emerging new plant pathogens pose threats to conservation and public health (Anderson et al. 2004). Walters (1985) suggested that consideration of the physiological and biochemical aspects of the host/pathogen interaction is crucial not only for understanding the nature of plant disease, but also for the development of effective control measures. I suggest that an understanding of ecological relationships between the host plant and its pathogens may be equally important. Resource competition is frequently cited as a common interaction among plant-associated microbes (Bell et al. 1990), and Newman (1978) has suggested that competition for nutrients and light can influence the interrelationships between the plant and its associated microflora. For example, strong correlations between shoot weight, shoot nitrogen concentration, and rhizosphere bacterial abundance observed by Turkington et al. (1988) From the symposium ‘‘Ecology and Evolution of Disease Dynamics’’ presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 3–7, 2007, at Phoenix, Arizona. 1 E-mail: [email protected] Integrative and Comparative Biology, volume 47, number 2, pp. 310–316 doi:10.1093/icb/icm006 Advanced Access publication June 1, 2007 ß The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: [email protected]. 311 Host resource supplies and infectious disease Fig. 1 Relationship between the severity of leaf blight and experimental nitrogen supplies (kg N/ha) to onion plants. Data from Gent and Schwartz (2005). suggest that plant-associated microbial activity is strongly influenced by the supply of resources to the host plant. Effects of availability of nutrients and light on susceptibility of vascular plants to pathogens have indeed been widely reported (Snoeijers et al. 2000; Solomon et al. 2003; Roberts and Paul 2006). The well documented sensivity of plant diseases to availability of resources can sometimes present a major dilemma in food production. Fertilizers are applied worldwide to enhance growth of agricultural crops and to maximize harvested yields. However, if fertilization with nutrients also increases the likelihood and the severity of key plant diseases, then determining the optimal level for applying fertilizers can become complex. For example, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Allii (leaf blight) infections of onion plants have been found to be strongly dependent upon availability of nitrogen (Fig. 1). Severity of leaf blight (as indexed by the relative area under the disease-progress curve, RAUDPC) increased sharply with increasing rate of N-fertilization (Gent and Schwartz 2005). Similarly, the severity of yellow-rust disease of winter wheat is linearly dependent upon nitrogen content of the leaves (Neumann et al. 2004). Mukherjee et al. (2005) observed similar effects of increasing nitrogen availability on the severity of rice blast, a leaf disease caused by the pathogenic fungus Pyricularia grisea. However, evidence for contrasting effects of plant mineral nutrition can be found in studies of take-all, a root disease of cereals and grasses caused by infection with the fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Deficiencies of nitrogen and phosphorus have been implicated for more than 60 years as factors in the susceptibility of wheat to this very Fig. 2 Relationship between severity of take-all disease and different levels of supply of urea and superphosphate (kg/ha) to winter wheat. Data from Brennan (1992). costly pathogen, which can, in extreme cases, result in complete losses of a planted crop (leading to its common name, take-all). Unlike the three leaf diseases discussed earlier, experimental research by Brennan (1992) suggested that increasing availability of soil resources decreases the severity of take-all root disease (Fig. 2): fungal infection was consistently reduced by P-fertilization in all but the zero N-controls, and N-fertilization led to reductions in severity of disease in all treatments. Freshwater and marine phytoplankton Recent evidence suggests a role of resource availability in the dynamics of pathogens in aquatic ecosystems as well. For example, Bruning (1991a, 1991b, 1991c, 1991d) and Bruning et al. (1992) found pronounced effects of light and of availability of phosphorus on the epidemiology of infections of the freshwater diatom Asterionella formosa by the chytrid fungus Rhizophydium planktonicum Canter emend. In an experimental test of the effects of chytrid fungi on natural populations of Asterionella, Kudoh and Takahishi (1992) found that it was possible to alter the outcome of initial infection by altering light availability to the algal cells. Although these results in part may be explained by mass-action effects associated with changes in the probability of encounter between the host and pathogen (Kudoh and Takahashi 1992), direct effects of resource supply are unquestionably involved as drivers of the dynamics of this host– pathogen system. The growth rate of the chytrid population is, for example, strongly coupled to lightdriven variations in the host cells’ intrinsic rate of population growth. In addition, both P-limitation and light-limitation modify production and infectivity of 312 chytrid zoospores, and alter the developmental time of sporangia; conditions of moderate limitation of phosphorus or light favor the development of a chytrid epidemic (Bruning 1991a, 1991c; Ibelings et al. 2004). Viral infections of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic phytoplankton are sensitive to resource availability as well. For example, ecological stoichiometry theory (Sterner and Elser 2002) predicts that success of infection and postinfection viral production should be depressed under conditions of high carbon : phosphorus (C : P) supply conditions, due to insufficient intracellular phosphorus for the production of P-rich viral particles. Clasen and Elser (2007) tested this hypothesis using laboratory cultures of the green alga Chlorella NC64A, and confirmed that postinfection production of PBCV-1 virus was strongly affected by the host cells’ C : P ratio. Overall, infected Chlorella in the high C : P treatment produced 91% fewer viruses than did the low C : P treatment. Similarly, Wilson et al. (1996) found that strong limitation by P greatly restricted replication of cyanophages infecting the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. WH7803. In a study to determine whether local nutrient availability affects the switch from lysogeny to lytic viral production, McDaniel and Paul (2005) reported inverse relationships between local primary productivity levels and cyanophage induction in natural populations of Synechococcus sp. Future research on aquatic viruses thus should consider nutrient availability and the physiological condition of the host, in order to better understand both the distribution and ecological significance of viruses in freshwater and marine ecosystems (Clasen and Elser 2007). Effects of resource availability on animal diseases The structure and function of animal populations, including human populations, can be strongly influenced by infectious disease (Real 1996; Hudson et al. 2002). Many wildlife species serve as major reservoirs for pathogens that potentially threaten both domestic animal and human health; in addition, emerging wildlife infectious diseases pose a substantial threat to the conservation of global biodiversity (Daszak et al. 2000). Moreover, the activities and dynamics of pathogenic organisms can have ecosystem-level implications (Thomas et al. 2005). Strong nutritional interactions can occur between pathogens and their metazoan hosts (Crompton and Nesheim 1982; Crompton 1991). Bush et al. (2001) offer an outstanding overview of this literature and conclude that frequently parasites can be enormously V. Smith successful in this interaction. In this section, I provide examples that demonstrate very strong nutritional modulation of the outcome of viral, bacterial, protozoan, and metazoan infections of vertebrate animals. Viral infection Nutrients have long been known to influence animal host resistance of animal hosts to infection (Field et al. 2002), but recent work suggests that not only can the host’s nutritional status affect the immune response to viral infection, but it can also affect the viral pathogen itself (Beck and Levander 2000). In their mouse model of coxsackievirus B3 infection, a benign viral strain was found to become virulent and caused myocarditis in both selenium-deficient and vitamin E-deficient mice. This change in pathogenicity was attributed to nutritionally-induced mutations in the viral genome, which converted an avirulent virus into a virulent one. Once these genomic changes occur, even mice with normal nutritional status are at risk of developing myocarditis after infection. Bacterial infection Because both host and parasite share a common and finite pool of nutrients, an invading parasite must compete for these nutrients in order to obtain the structural resources and energy resources needed to complete its life cycle (Bush et al. 2001) in the face of the host’s immune response. One key shared resource is the supply of carbohydrates, which provide both carbon skeletons and energy for the host’s anabolic and catabolic pathways. Using a mouse model of disease, Peck et al. (1992) examined the role of host nutrition in the outcome of infections with the intracellular pathogen Salmonella typhimurium. Female A/J mice were fed diets of four different contents of carbohydrate, lipid, and protein, and two daily feeding rates (100% and 50%); after 3 weeks the mice were injected intraperitoneally with Salmonella, and mortality was followed for 2 weeks. When all data were considered (Fig. 3), mouse mortality increased linearly with increases in carbohydrate supply rate beyond an apparent threshold of 456 g/kg. Conversely, mortality tended to decrease consistently with increases in percent protein in the host’s diet. However, mortality response to dietary percent protein varied with the host’s total caloric intake (data not shown), suggesting possible effects of the protein:energy supply ratio on the outcome of disease (Smith and Holt 1996). Host resource supplies and infectious disease Fig. 3 Relationship between percent mortality and dietary carbohydrate supply (g/kg) in a rodent model of Salmonella typhimurium infection. Data from Peck et al. (1992). 313 Fig. 4 Relationship between maximum percent parasitemia and protein content of the diet in a rodent model of malaria. Data from Eridisinghe et al. (1981). Protozoan infection Rodent malaria, which often proves to be fatal, usually develops in rats following infection by the virulent blood pathogen Plasmodium berghei (Crompton and Nesheim 1982). However, unlike the bacterial example discussed above, protein restriction can protect rats against mortality from the effects of this protozoan pathogen. For example, Eridisinghe et al. (1981) provided infected animals with isocaloric diets containing four different protein levels (0, 4.2, 8.5 and 17%), provided as casein fortified with L-methionine. As can be seen in Fig. 4, the degree of parasitemia increased strongly and nonlinearly with increasing dietary protein; furthermore, 80% mortality was observed at 17% protein, but no mortality occurred at lower levels of protein supply. The cause of this pronounced sensitivity of P. berghei to the host’s protein supply is not yet completely understood, but Keshavarz-Valian et al. (1985) concluded that both the quantity of dietary protein and the quality of its amino-acid composition can have profound effects on the susceptibility of mice to malaria. However, strong effects of the protein:energy supply ratio were observed in a second set of experiments: mortality at the 17% protein level could be sharply reduced from 93% to 33% by cutting the host’s total caloric intake by half. Parasitic worm infection Keymer et al. (1983) used a CFHB rat model of disease to examine the effects of carbohydrate nutrition on the body burden and fecundity of the acanthocephalan parasite Moniliformis dubius. Each rat was infected orally with one of five dose Fig. 5 Relationship between total worm burden and dietary fructose levels in a rodent model of infection by the parasitic worm, Moniliformis dubius. Data from Keymer et al. (1983). levels of cystacanths, and was allowed to feed ad libitum on one of four isocaloric diets containing different carbohydrate contents (1, 2, 3, and 12% fructose). After 5 weeks these animals were sacrificed, and their worm burdens were evaluated. Like Salmonella, this metazoan parasite responded positively to increases in the host’s carbohydrate supply rate. The total worm biomass per rat was hyperbolically related to dietary fructose level (Fig. 5). Moreover, total egg production by all female worms resident in the host’s gut responded even more sensitively, increasing almost 25-fold over the range of dietary fructose (Fig. 6). Increasing dietary carbohydrate supplies thus increased the host’s parasite burden and disproportionately increased the number of propagules that could potentially be transmitted into the local environment. 314 Fig. 6 Relationship between total egg production and dietary fructose levels in a rodent model of infection by the parasitic worm, Moniliformis dubius. Data from Keymer et al. (1983). Implications and conclusions The evidence presented in this brief overview suggests that supplies of resources to the host can play a key role in determining the outcome of infectious diseases in plants as well as in animals (Smith 1993a, 1993b). Such a conclusion is perhaps not surprising in view of evidence that the regulation of gene expression in response to changes in nutrients is common and well-documented in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (De Caterina and Madonna 2004) and that there is remarkable universality in gene expression across the tree of life (Ueda et al. 2004). Given the demonstrated sensitivity of diverse infectious agents to nutrient availability, it should logically follow that the regulation of critically important nutrients in the host’s external supply, or controlling the size of the host’s internal nutrient pools, could be used to limit growth of pathogens and thus to alter the outcome of disease. In the case of plants, Roberts et al. (2004) have developed models to account for the interactions between rate of addition of nitrogen, nitrogen source, and disease in determining optimal levels of spring N-fertilization for the cultivation of winter wheat. In addition, it has been found that the severity of rice blast can be controlled by manipulations of availability of soil silicon: experimental studies by Hayasaka et al. (2005) suggested that maintaining a SiO2 content of at least 5% in the rice plant can control this disease at the nursery stage under any conditions. Carefully crafted manipulations of resource availability thus could potentially become an increasingly important tool in the future management of economically important plant diseases. V. Smith It is certain that knowledge of nutritional interactions between mammalian hosts and their associated pathogens can help inform the practice of human and veterinary medicine. Since the 1940s, we have relied heavily upon the use of antibiotics and antivirals in order to control many of these diseases. However, the incidence of drug-resistance by pathogens is increasing worldwide; our arsenal of effective antibiotics is dwindling rapidly and many diseases remain for which drug treatments are expensive, limited in availability, or even nonexistent. New approaches to the management and control of infectious disease thus are badly needed. It is also important that we begin to identify and to clarify the mechanisms through which variations in nutrition modify the severity and outcome of disease in both plant and animal hosts. The exact nature of these resource-mediated mechanisms may prove to differ greatly between plants and animals. Among animals, these mechanisms may also differ with the presence and the degree of sophistication of any innate and adaptive immune responses. In the special case of vertebrate animals, Smith et al. (2005) have suggested that the external nutrient supply to the host can alter the postinfection outcome by (1) interacting with pharmaceutical agents being taken by the host; (2) causing stimulatory or inhibitory effects on host physiology and homeostasis; (3) causing stimulatory or inhibitory effects on components of the host’s immune system (indirect ecological effects through predator–prey interactions); and (4) causing stimulatory or inhibitory effects on the growth and proliferation of the pathogen itself (direct ecological effects on limiting resources and host–pathogen resource competition). As the essential resource requirements of mammalian hosts and their pathogens become better quantified, it should become possible to make predictions concerning the nutrient supply ratios and the nutrient supply rates to the host that will result in the most favorable disease outcome (Smith et al. 2005). For example, the presence of iron-binding proteins in both vertebrates and invertebrates is testament that a strategy of withholding iron is a crucial component of innate immunity in animals (Ong et al. 2006). Weinberg (1998, 1999) has for more than two decades demonstrated the critically important role of the management of iron in treatment of disease, and I believe that his ecological viewpoint can be expanded to other key nutrients as well. I strongly agree with Costerton (2004), who suggested that good things happen when medical scientists can apply time-tested Host resource supplies and infectious disease concepts from ecology to help better understand the severe challenges experienced by their patients. It is thus heartening that significant changes may be underway in the area of clinical nutrition. In a recent invited review, Jeejeebhoy (2004) noted that it has been common practice since the 1970s to apply the concept of hyperalimentation, in which hospitalized patients are fed 40–100% above their basal metabolic rate, in order to avoid the weight loss associated with critical illness. In contrast, however, he emphasized that there are observed benefits to the permissive underfeeding of critically ill patients. There is evidence that hyperglycemia increases the risk of infective complications and controlled trials of preoperative nutrition suggests that patients receiving 1000 kcal above the basal metabolic rate tend to exhibit increased postoperative infectious complications. Both of these observations are broadly consistent with the data shown in Fig. 3–6, which suggest the ecological outcome of many bacterial, metazoan, and protozoan diseases can potentially be shaped using careful modifications of the mammalian host’s dietary supplies of carbohydrates and protein. Acknowledgments This work was supported by NSF grant DMS–0342239 to VHS. I thank Yang Kuang for the invitation to participate in this SICB symposium and for helping develop and promote this collaborative disease research program. Conflict of interest: None declared. References Alexander HM. 1990. Dynamics of plant–pathogen interactions in natural plant communities. In: Burdon JJ, Leather SR, editors. Pests, pathogens and plant communities. London: Blackwell. p 31–45. Anderson PK, Cunningham AA, Patel NG, Morales FJ, Epstein PR, Daszak P. 2004. Emerging infectious diseases of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 19:535–44. Beck MA, Levander OA. 2000. Host nutritional status and its effect on a viral pathogen. J Infect Dis 182(Suppl 1):S93–6. Bell CR, Moore LW, Canfield ML. 1990. Growth of octopine– catabolizing Pseudomonas spp. under octopine limitation in chemostats and their potential to compete with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2834–9. Bohannan BJM. 2000. Effect of resource supply rate on host–pathogen dynamics. In: Bell CR, Brylinsky M, Johnson-Green P, editors. Microbial biosystems: new frontiers. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology. Halifax, Canada: Atlantic Canada Society for Microbial Ecology. p 595–601. 315 Brennan RF. 1992. Effect of superphosphate and nitrogen on yield and take–all of wheat. Fertilizer Res 31:43–9. Bruning K. 1991a. Infection of the diatom Asterionella by a chytrid. 1. Effects of light on reproduction and infectivity of the parasite. J Plankton Res 13:103–7. Bruning K. 1991b. Infection of the diatom Asterionella by a chytrid. 2. Effects of light on survival and epidemic development of the parasite. J Plankton Res 13:119–29. Bruning K. 1991c. Effects of phosphorus limitation on the epidemiology of a chytrid phytoplankton parasite. Freshwat Biol 25:409–17. Bruning K. 1991d. Effects of temperature and light on the population dynamics of the Asterionella–Rhizophydium association. J Plankton Res 13:707–9. Bruning K, Lingeman R, Ringelberg J. 1992. Estimating the impact of fungal parasites on phytoplankton populations. Limnol Oceanogr 37:252–60. Bush AO, Fernandez JC, Esch GW, Seed JR. 2001. Parasitism: the diversity and ecology of animal parasites. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Burdon JJ, Thrall PH, Erickson L. 2006. The current and future dynamics of disease in plant communities. Annu Rev Phytopathol 44:19–39. Clasen J, Elser JJ. 2007. The effect of host Chlorella NC64A carbon:phosphorus ratio on the production of Paramecium bursaria Chlorella Virus–1. J Phycol 52:112–22. Costerton JW. 2004. Microbial ecology comes of age and joins the general ecology community. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:16983–4. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, Dasgupta M, Marrie TJ. 1987. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol 41:435–64. Crompton DWT. 1991. Nutritional interaction between host and parasites. In: Toft CA, Aeschlimann A, Bolis L, editors. Parasite–host associations: coexistence or conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p 228–57. Crompton DWT, Nesheim MC. 1982. Commentary: nutritional science and parasitology: a case for collaboration. BioScience 32:677–80. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. 2000. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife––threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287:443–49. De Caterina R, Madonna R. 2004. Nutrients and gene expression. In: Simopoulos AP, Ordovas JM, editors. Nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics. Vol. 93, Basel: Karger. p 99–133. Eridisinghe JS, Fern EB, Target GAT. 1981. Dietary suppression of rodent malaria. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 75:591–3. Field CJ, Johnson IR, Schley PD. 2002. Nutrients and their role in host resistance to infection. J Leukocyte Biol 71:16–32. Garber ED. 1960. The host as a growth medium. Ann NY Acad Sci 88:1187–94. Gent DH, Schwartz HF. 2005. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and seed contamination on epiphytic populations of 316 Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. allii and development of Xanthomonas leaf blight of onion. Online. Plant Health Progr doi:10.1094/PHP–2005–0331–01–RS. Hayasaka T, Fujii H, Namai T. 2005. Silicon content in rice seedlings to protect rice blast fungus at the nursery stage. J Gen Plant Pathol 71:169–73. Hudson PJ, Rizzoli A, Grenfell BT, Heesterbeek H, Dodson AP, editors. 2002. The ecology of wildlife diseases. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ibelings BW, De Bruin A, Kagami M, Rijkeboer M, Brehm M, Van Donk E. 2004. Host parasite interactions between freshwater phytoplankton and chytrid fungi (Chytridiomycota). J Phycol 40:437–53. Jeejeebhoy KN. 2004. Permissive underfeeding of the critically ill patient. Nutr Clin Pract 19:477–80. Keshavarz-Valian H, Alger NE, Boissonneault GA. 1985. Effects of p–aminobenzoic acid, methionine, threonine and protein levels on susceptibility of mice to Plasmodium berghei. J Nutr 115:1613–20. Keymer A, Compton DWT, Walters DE. 1983. Parasite population biology and host nutrition: dietary fructose and Moniliformis (Acanthocephala). Parasitol 87:265–78. Kudoh S, Takahashi M. 1992. An experimental test of host population size control by fungal parasitism in the planktonic diatom Asterionella formosa using mesocosms in a natural lake. Arch Hydrobiol 124:293–307. McDaniel L, Paul JH. 2005. Effect of nutrient addition and environmental factors on prophage induction in natural populations of marine Synechococcus species. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:842–50. V. Smith Roberts RK, Walters JT, Larson JA, English BC, Howard DD. 2004. Optimal nitrogen fertilization rates in winter wheat production as affected by risk, disease, and nitrogen source. J Agr Appl Econ 36:199–211. Roberts MR, Paul ND. 2006. Seduced by the dark side: integrating molecular and ecological perspectives on the influence of light on plant defence against pests and pathogens. New Phytol 170:677–99. Smith VH. 1993a. Resource competition between host and pathogen. BioScience 43:21–31. Smith VH. 1993b. Implications of resource–ratio theory for microbial ecology. Adv Microb Ecol 13:1–37. Smith VH, Jones TP II, Smith MS. 2005. Nutrition and disease: an ecological view. Front Ecol Environ 3:268–74. Smith VH, Holt RD. 1996. Resource competition and within– host disease dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol 11:386–89. Snoeijers SS, Pérez-Garcı́a A, Joosten MHAJ, De Wit PJGM. 2000. The effect of nitrogen on disease development and gene expression in bacterial and fungal plant pathogens. Eur J Plant Pathol 106:493–506. Solomon PS, Tan KC, Oliver RP. 2003. The nutrient supply of pathogenic fungi: a fertile field for study. Mol Plant Pathol 4:203–10. Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Thomas F, Renaud F, Guegan JF. 2005. Parasitism and ecosystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mukherjee AK, Mohapatra NK, Suriya Rao AV, Nayak P. 2005. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow–blasting resistance in rice. J Agr Sci 143:385–93. Turkington R, Holl FB, Chanway CP, Thompson JD. 1988. The influence of microorganisms, particularly Rhizobium, on plant competition in grass–legume communities. In: Davy AJ, Hutchings MJ, Watkinson AR, editors. Plant population ecology. London: Blackwell. p 343–66. Neumann S, Paveley ND, Beed FD, Sylvester-Bradley R. 2004. Nitrogen per unit leaf area affects the upper asymptote of Puccinia striiformis f.sp.tritici epidemics in winter wheat. Plant Pathol 53:725–32. Ueda HR, Hayashi S, Matsuyama S, Yomo T, Hashimoto S, Kay SA, Hogenesch JB, Iino M. 2004. Universality and flexibility in gene expression from bacteria to human. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:3765–9. Newman EI. 1978. Root microorganisms: their significance in the ecosystem. Biol Rev 53:511–54. Walters DR. 1985. Shoot:root interrelationships: the effect of obligately biotrophic fungal pathogens. Biol Rev 60:47–78. Ong ST, Ho JZS, Ho B, Ding JL. 2006. Iron–withholding strategy in innate immunity. Immunobiol 211:295–314. Weinberg ED. 1998. Patho–ecologic implications of microbial acquisition of host iron. Rev Med Microbiol 9:171–8. Peck MD, Babcock GF, Alexander JW. 1992. The role of protein and calorie restriction in outcome from Salmonella infection in mice. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr 16:561–65. Weinberg ED. 1999. The role of iron in protozoa and fungal infectious diseases. J Euk Microbiol 46:231–38. Real LA. 1996. Sustainability and the ecology of infectious diseases. BioScience 46:88–97. Wilson WH, Carr NG, Mann NH. 1996. The effects of phosphate status on the kinetics of cyanophage infection in the oceanic cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. WH7803. J Phycol 32:506–16.