Download Comparison of Classical and Operant Conditioning

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Self-control wikipedia , lookup

Perception of infrasound wikipedia , lookup

Empirical theory of perception wikipedia , lookup

Social norms approach wikipedia , lookup

Symbolic behavior wikipedia , lookup

Stimulus modality wikipedia , lookup

Social perception wikipedia , lookup

Adherence management coaching wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Comparison of Classical and Operant Conditioning
Classical Conditioning
Elicit, Respondent Behavior
Pavlov, Watson & Rayner
Involuntary, automatic
Key Terms
Key People
Response
Acquisition
Associating events (stimuli); CS
announces UCS
Extinction
CR decreases when CS is
repeatedly presented alone
Subjects develop expectation that
CS signals the arrival of UCS
Cognitive
Processes
Biological
Predispositions
Natural predispositions
constrain what stimuli and
responses can easily be
associated
Operant Conditioning
Emit, Operant Behavior
Skinner
Voluntary, operates on
environment
Associating response with a
consequence (reinforcer or
punisher)
Responding decreases when
reinforcement stops
Subjects develop expectation that
a response will be reinforced or
punished; they also exhibit latent
learning, without reinforcement
Organisms best learn behaviors
similar to their natural behaviors;
unnatural behaviors instinctively
drift back towards natural ones
Conditioning can come in two forms – Classical and Operant
Classical conditioning occurs when a previously neutral stimulus (NS) elicits (causes) a response after
being paired with a stimulus (UCS) that automatically/naturally elicits (causes) a response
Operant conditioning occurs when an emitted (produced by the animal) behavior becomes associated
with an environmental effect/consequence (reinforcer or punisher)
Reinforcers encourage the repetition of a behavior whereas punishers discourage the repetition of a
behavior
Both reinforcers and punishers come in “positive” and “negative” flavors. If you think of it as “adding
to” or “taking away” (rather than “good” or “bad”), you’ll be more likely to understand these concepts…

Positive Reinforcement is when a rewarding environmental consequence (e.g., receiving payment
for producing an art style) follows a behavior and makes it more likely to occur

Negative Reinforcement is when the removal of an aversive environmental consequence makes a
behavior more likely to occur

Positive Punishment is when an aversive environmental consequence (e.g., incarceration) follows
a behavior and makes it less likely to occur

Negative Punishment is when the removal of a rewarding environmental consequence (e.g.,
taking away car privileges for a teenager) makes a behavior less likely to occur