Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Basilar Membrane Vibration in the Gerbil Hemicochlea CLAUS-PETER RICHTER, 2 BURT N. EVANS, 1 ROXANNE EDGE, 1 AND PETER DALLOS 1 1 Departments of Neurobiology and Physiology and Communication Sciences and Disorders, Auditory Physiology Laboratory (The Hugh Knowles Center), The Institute of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208; and 2Zentrum der Physiologie, J.W. Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany INTRODUCTION Propagation of mechanical disturbances (traveling waves) along the basilar membrane in the cochlea has been studied experimentally for about half a century. As the traveling wave proceeds along the cochlea, from base toward apex, tones of different frequencies produce waves that rise in amplitude at different rates and attain their maxima at different locations before extinguishing. Thus the traveling wave functions as a spatial spectral analyzer. Further, the speed of transmission of the wave along the basilar membrane is slow compared with the propagation velocity of sound in fluid. von Békésy (1928, 1960) first experimentally observed the traveling wave on the basilar membrane of human cadaver ears. Such waves also have been described for other classes. Beside mammals, a traveling wave has been found in birds (Gummer et al. 1987; von Békésy 1960) and alligators (Wilson et al. 1985). For mammals, the quantitative properties of traveling waves are now well established (Rhode 1971; Robles et al. 1986; Sellick et al. 1982; von Békésy 1960). For all cases, the direction of wave travel is from base to apex. Efforts to evoke wave travel towards the basal end of the cochlea, by moving the ‘‘stapes’’ to the apex, have not been successful. Regardless of the position of the stapes or artificial stapes, the wave propagation is in a baseto-apex direction (von Békésy 1928; Wever and Lawrence 1954). The explanation of this phenomenon is that no matter where acoustic energy is delivered into the cochlear fluids, traveling waves occur after the energy is transmitted to the inner ear fluids, and the direction of wave travel is determined by the mechanical properties of the basilar membrane (von Békésy 1928). The basilar membrane possesses exponentially graded stiffness, so that the base is some 100fold stiffer than the apex (von Békésy 1960). Thus wave propagation is evidently unidirectional toward the more compliant region when input energy is delivered via the surrounding fluid. The simple notion of resonance of the basilar membrane is based on the assumption that the longitudinal tension of the membrane is negligible. However, the question of whether longitudinal coupling is present in the basilar membrane is controversial (Vôldrich 1978; von Békésy 1960). Existence of longitudinal coupling has been supported experimentally by von Békésy (1960) and has been considered in some cochlear models (Allen and Sondhi 1979; Wickesberg and Geisler 1985). Inclusion of longitudinal coupling in cochlear models broadens the tuning curve at its tip, as demanded by experimental observations. In other words, longitudinal coupling is incorporated to make modeling efforts conform more closely to physiological observations (Wickesberg and Geisler 1985). However, minimal longitudinal coupling in the basilar membrane has been observed experimentally (Vôldrich 1978). Furthermore, other modeling efforts of the basilar membrane suggest that inclusion of longitudinal coupling reduces the tuning predicted by the model (Allen and Sondhi 1979). A lack of longitudinal coupling in the basilar membrane would not permit propagation of energy in the basilar membrane itself. Consequently, in this case, all acoustic energy has to be coupled through the cochlear fluids. Interesting questions of how energy corresponding to internally generated signals, such as otoacoustic emissions is back-propagated to the stapes or how combination tones are distributed remain largely unanswered. In the case of combination tones, it is assumed that energy is generated at one place on the basilar membrane and propagates as a traveling wave to the basilar membrane site with a characteristic frequency equal to that of the combination tone (Goldstein 1968; Siegel et al. 1982; Smoorenburg 1972b; Zwicker 1955). The interesting question is whether propagation of energy through the basilar membrane might play a role and whether the propagation is unidirectional. Questions of bidirectional propagation of energy and of 0022-3077/98 $5.00 Copyright q 1998 The American Physiological Society / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys 2255 Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 Richter, Claus-Peter, Burt N. Evans, Roxanne Edge, and Peter Dallos. Basilar membrane vibration in the gerbil hemicochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 2255–2264, 1998. Excised gerbil cochleae were cut along the mid-modiolar plane (hemicochlea). Along one-half turn of this preparation, fluorescent microbeads were placed on the basilar membrane (BM). The BM was vibrated with click stimuli (50 ms) produced mechanically by a piezo pusher. The stimulus delivery probe could be positioned either more apical or more basal from the beads. Vibration patterns were measured with a wide bandwidth photomultiplier from the movements of the beads. When the probe was positioned more basal, the responses to click stimuli were brief, damped sinusoids. According to the fast Fourier transforms (FFTs) of the averaged time wave forms, the best frequency between successive beads decreased toward the apex (0.8 octave/ mm). Sharpness of tuning of the normalized FFT spectra (NQ10dB ) on average was 1.5. Response amplitude at a fixed input level, measured at different beads away from the stimulation site, dropped exponentially (58 dB/mm). In addition, for each individual bead, amplitude dropped linearly with decreasing stimulus intensity. In experiments where the stimulating probe was placed more apical, two major properties were observed: first, beads revealed only the spectral components present in the motion of the probe. Second, magnitude reduction of the displacement of the cochlear partition was greater, on average 155 dB/mm, indicating a lack of significant propagation in the reverse direction. 2256 C.-P. RICHTER, B. N. EVANS, R. EDGE, AND P. DALLOS METHODS Hemicochlea For a detailed description for the method refer to Edge et al. (R. M. Edge, B. N. Evans, M. Pearce, C.-P. Richter, X. Hu, and P. Dallos, unpublished data). The method is reviewed briefly as follows. After an intraperitoneal injection of a lethal dose of pentobarbital sodium (150 mg/kg), gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus; of age 18 days-2 mo) were killed. After decapitation, the head was divided in the medial plane with a razor blade and the bullae were removed. The bulla was opened and the cochlea was exposed in balanced Hank’s salt solution (HBSS). After fixation of the bony inner ear with acrylic to a screw attached to a ball-joint manipulator, the cochlea was cut along the modiolar axis into two parts. One of the resulting hemicochleae was used for the experiments. Experimental procedures were approved by the National Institutes of Health and by the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board. On the basis of histological reconstructions of the cochleae, the distances of the cut edges from the basal end of the basilar membrane were estimated. By adding the length between the beads and the cut edges of the hemicochleae to the distance of the cut edges from the base, a distance measure for the beads from the basal end of the cochlea was obtained. The span between the cut edges and the beads was determined through the microscope. Thus it was possible to estimate the corresponding in vivo best frequencies for the cut edges and beads according to the published frequency-place maps for the gerbil (Echteler et al. 1989; Müller 1996; Schmiedt and Zwislocki 1977). Fluorescent beads Fluorescent beads of diameters 6, 10, 20, and 90 mm were purchased from Polyscience (Warrington, PA). Single beads were picked up with a micropipette by application of gentle suction to the pipette. After the micropipette was close to the bead’s destined place, suction was released and the bead detached from the electrode and deposited onto the basilar membrane (Fig. 1). Experimental setup The experimental setup consisted of an upright Leitz microscope (Leitz, Ergolux AMC) equipped with fluorescent epi-illumination and a dual port viewing head. Light emitted from a mercury lamp (Leitz/HBO 100 W ultra-high–pressure mercury lamp) was used to illuminate the fluorescent beads via the epi-illuminator. The / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 excitation wavelength for the beads was 511 nm, the emission wavelength 538 nm. Pictures of the preparation on the microscope stage could be taken with a cooled CCD color camera (Optronics, DEI-470) through one port of the viewing head. A photomultiplier (Leitz, MPV compact) was used to measure the intensity of the light emitted by the fluorescent beads. The optical field was limited by a rectangular aperture of approximately the size of the beads. The aperture could be rear-projected onto the specimen plane. The signal measured by the photomultiplier was proportional to the distance by which the fluorescent beads moved in and out of the aperture of the photomultiplier. For testing the photomultiplier, a calibration pipette with a fluorescent bead glued to its tip was mounted to a piezo pusher (PZL 007, Burleigh) and was placed on the microscope stage. The displacement of the pipette was parallel to the optical plane. During the experiments, the hemicochleae were attached to a ball-joint manipulator. The ball-joint manipulator then was transferred into a stable metal hemisphere filled with HBSS and placed into a hole on the microscope stage. Initially the surface of the metal hemisphere and the surface of the microscope stage were parallel. The cochlea on the ball joint manipulator then was oriented so that the basilar membrane was parallel to the optical axis and perpendicular to the surface of the microscope stage (radial view). The ball-joint manipulator then was fixed tightly with a set screw. This, however, did not allow monitoring the vibration patterns of the beads except at the cut edge of the hemicochlea and necessitated reorientation for beads further away from the cut edge. Final adjustments in orientation of the preparation were achieved by tilting the metal hemishell. The hemishell was angled such that beads close to the probe and beads further in were visualized at the same time (Fig. 2). An imaginary line perpendicular to the surface of the basilar membrane and parallel to the surface of the hemishell was used to determine the angle for the trigonometric correction. The angle b was measured between the surface of the microscope stage and the surface of the hemishell. Then a Å p /2 0 b (Fig. 2). Trigonometric corrections were made to obtain the transverse component of basilar membrane vibration c from the measured oblique motion of the beads relative to the optical axis of the microscope a; c Å a/sin a. Rotation around the optical axis was minimal and was not considered in the corrections. Once the preparation was oriented, the stimulation probe was brought to the basilar membrane until the bead at the tip of the glass pipette contacted the subsurface of the basilar membrane (facing scala tympani). The basilar membrane reflected the light emitted from the fluorescent bead at the tip of the electrode. Thus contact of the probe to the basilar membrane could be detected easily by visual inspection while advancing the probe. The angle of the stimulation probe was almost perpendicular to the subsurface of the basilar membrane in the experiments. For measurements, the aperture of the photomultiplier was placed over half of the surface image of the beads. Transverse motion of the basilar membrane lead to maximum light intensity change by the bead moving in and out of the aperture. Positioning was achieved by moving the entire microscope stage in the optical plane. The orientation of the slit then could be optimized by rotation of the photomultiplier around the optical axis. Photomultiplier Frequency response properties and sensitivity of the system were determined respectively with a light emission diode ( LED ) and a fluorescent bead ( 90 mm diam) attached to the tip of a micropipette. The micropipette was fixed to a piezo pusher ( PZL 007, Burleigh ) and could be displaced by known amounts ( between 2 nm and 5 mm) . FREQUENCY RESPONSE PROPERTIES. A red LED was focused on the photomultiplier using the upright Leitz microscope. The signal for the LED was forward biased by a DC voltage of 2.5 V and modulated by a ternary noise stimulus (100-mV peak). 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 longitudinal coupling in the basilar membrane are addressed in the present experiments. A suitable preparation for these investigations is the ‘‘hemicochlea.’’ A cochlea, cut in two along the mid-modiolar plane (Hu et al. 1995), allows access to the basilar membrane at the more basal or more apical cut edges of an individual half-turn. Fluorescent spheres, located along a half-turn of the hemicochlea, can be used to evaluate response properties at different locations along the basilar membrane while the latter is driven mechanically either at a more basal or more apical site. The advantage of the preparation, in comparison with in vivo measurements, is the possibility of evaluating the propagation of energy along the basilar membrane in two directions, from base to apex and vice versa. Furthermore, it is possible to obtain measures of vibratory patterns at several locations in the same preparation. The drop in response amplitude of the different beads with increasing distance from the stimulation probe serves as a measure of longitudinal coupling. BASILAR MEMBRANE MECHANICS IN HEMICOCHLEA 2257 FIG . 1. Video view of one turn of a hemicochlea. A fluorescent bead ( Ç20 mm) is located on the basilar membrane with a photomontage. the sequence (i.e., the 2nd half of the waveform was the same as the 1st one but of the opposite sign). For the frequency range (0.13–22 kHz), no drop in magnitude (Fig. 3A) and no phase shift of the response signal could be detected (Fig. 3B). This indicates flat frequency response behavior of the measuring system, at least °22 kHz. The corner frequency of the measuring system was determined by the rise-time of the response of the photomultiplier to a voltage step applied to the LED. The time to reach 63% of the maximum response was 1.5 ms which corresponds to a corner frequency of Ç106 kHz. MINIMUM DETECTABLE RESPONSE AND LINEARITY. The amplitude of the photomultiplier response to a sinusoidal movement (100 Hz) of the fluorescent bead decreased linearly down to ¢10 nm with decreasing motion of the bead (Fig. 4). Stimulus A micropipette with a 90-mm fluorescent bead attached to its tip with acrylic was mounted on a piezo stepper (PZL 007, Burleigh) and used to deliver mechanical stimuli almost perpendicular to the plane of the basilar membrane. A micromanipulator was used to advance the piezo and the stimulation probe to the basilar membrane until mechanical contact was observed. Subsequently, during the experiments, the basilar membrane was moved by mechanical pulses of the probe toward scala vestibuli. Time waveform of the displacement for one probe, loaded by the basilar membrane, is shown in Fig. 8A. The corresponding frequency spectrum is plotted in Fig. 8B. The maximal amplitude of the probe movement when electrical square pulses (50 ms, 1–3 V) were applied to the pusher was between 0.4 and 1.2 mm. FIG . 2. Sketch shows the basilar membrane with a bead placed onto it. Preparation is angled to visualize beads that are further in from the cut edge. First, the basilar membrane is aligned at the cut edge to be parallel to the optical axis ( a Å 907 ). After further tilting of the preparation, the basilar membrane is no longer parallel to the optical axis. The angle between basilar membrane and optical axis is p /2 0 a. Size of the actual movements detected by the photomultiplier (PTM) thus are reduced and require correction. Actual amplitudes of the bead’s movement c is the movement measured by the PTM, a divided by sin a. / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 Data analysis Responses measured by the photomultiplier were fed into an anti-aliasing Bessel filter (corner frequency 20–30 kHz). Subsequently, the filtered response was sampled by a DAS50 board at a sampling rate of 1 MHz. Off-line analysis included visual inspection of the time waveforms and determination of frequency response using a FFT of the analogue signal. The FFTs were normal- 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 The response of the photomultiplier to the stimulus was measured to determine magnitude and phase properties of the system. A pseudorandom ternary noise sequence with a flat magnitude, and zero phase response up to roughly half of the sampling rate of 90 kHz (Møller 1981; Zierler 1959) was generated via a programmable waveform generating board (Metrabyte, AWFG-2). The ternary noise used here was generated with three amplitude levels ( 0a, 0, a) and a recursive algorithm with memory (n Å 6), resulting in 728 (or 3 n 0 1) amplitude level transitions per period. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) was performed with 728 points and resulted in n Å 182 nonzero odd frequency components. The (182) even frequency components were zero, reflecting the odd (inverse-repeat) character of the waveform around the middle of 2258 C.-P. RICHTER, B. N. EVANS, R. EDGE, AND P. DALLOS ized to their maximum amplitude. The frequency of the maximum of the ratio between beads’ FFT and probe’s FFT was designated the ‘‘best frequency.’’ To measure the bandwidth of the obtained FFT spectra, a normalized sharpness (NQ10dB ) has been defined (best frequency of the FFT spectrum/bandwidth of the normalized FFT spectrum at a magnitude of 0.32 peak). The logarithmic decrement q of the vibration patterns of the cochlear partition was calculated as described by von Békésy (1960, page 458): q Å ln (i 2 /i 1 ), where i 2 /i 1 denotes the amplitude ratio between successive response cycles. RESULTS These experiments were performed to study basic mechanical vibration properties of the BM. Therefore, mechanical pulse stimuli were applied directly to the BM in 22 hemicochleae. Responses to such stimuli were used to determine filter properties and damping of the BM vibration at different locations along a hemiturn. The stimulus probe was placed either at the basal cut edge (n Å 17; cut edge closer to the basal end of the cochlea) or the apical cut edge (n Å 9; cut edge closer to the apical end of the cochlea). Thus energy propagation and drop in response magnitude could be studied in two directions. Reliability of measurements DATA ACQUISITION. As described in METHODS, both bullae were removed after killing the animals and the cochleae / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 FIG . 4. Response properties of the photomultiplier measuring system to the motion of a fluorescent bead mounted on a piezo pusher (PLZ007, Burleigh). Sinusoidal bead movements (frequency of 100 Hz) of different amplitude were measured. Linear decrease of the measured magnitude down to Ç10 nm was obtained. 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 FIG . 3. Response properties of the photomultiplier measuring apparatus. Magnitude-frequency plot of the responses to an iso-intensity light stimulus from a light emission diode (LED; A). Corresponding phase plot (B). Response properties show flat frequency response for the measuring system at least °22 kHz. were exposed and cut in the mid-modiolar plane. These procedures took Ç30 min. Thereafter, fluorescent beads were placed on the basilar membrane at different locations along a half-turn. The placing of the beads, the positioning of the preparation on the microscope stage and the placing of the probe to vibrate the basilar membrane took on average 154 min (range: 30–390 min; standard deviation: 39 min). After the hemicochleae were placed, the data were acquired within an average time interval of 75 min (range: 16–151 min; standard deviation: 12 min). REPEATED MEASUREMENTS. Repeated measurements which were done within the time interval of 1 h did not show changes in the best frequency. However, there was variation in the amplitude obtained (Fig. 5). Here two examples are shown, HCoRev1 and HCoRev2. They revealed a scatter in peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.48 { 0.16 mm [characteristic frequency (CF) changed from 2,750 to 2,500 Hz, which equals 0.14 octaves] and 0.36 { 0.06 mm (no CF change was detected). Examples of FFTs of the time waveforms are shown in Fig. 5. In example HCoRev1, the amplitude decreased after the first trial but then remained almost constant. However, in HcoRev2, the amplitude was initially constant but the last trial showed an increase. One reason for the observed changes in amplitude might be due to possible changes in light intensity from the mercury lamp used to excite the fluorescent light. Despite the scatter in amplitude found in repetitive measurements, the results did not show a systematic increase or decrease in vibration amplitudes. VARIABLE LOAD OF THE BASILAR MEMBRANE. In three experiments, the influence of a change in the load on the vibration probe by the basilar membrane was tested. For this purpose, the location of the probe, which initially was positioned by eye, was changed by altering the DC voltage to the piezo pusher. Thus the position was changed {1.5 mm relative to the initial position. Increasing the tension of the basilar membrane slightly increased the vibration amplitude, whereas retraction of the probe decreased the vibration amplitude at an approximate rate of 0.6 dB / mm BASILAR MEMBRANE MECHANICS IN HEMICOCHLEA 2259 FIG . 5. Fast Fourier transforms (FFTs) of the responses obtained from fluorescent beads when the basilar membrane was vibrated mechanically by a probe. Two examples were obtained from the 1st turns of 2 different cochlear preparations (HCoRev1 and HCoRev2). Frequency of maxima of the plots is not changing significantly within the time interval. At best frequency, amplitudes of the responses are not systematically increasing or decreasing. Note, in HCoRev1 a decrease occurs after the 1st trial, followed by nonsystematic changes. However, in HcoRev2, an increase occurs at the end of the measurements. ( Fig. 6, right ) . Detaching of the probe from the basilar membrane resulted in a further decrease in vibration amplitude ( Fig. 6, left ) . This drop could be measured at any of the beads located along the hemiturn. The frequency spectrum of the vibration was not affected by different loads to the basilar membrane. Stimulus is basal to site of measurement Examples of time responses and FFTs are shown for three preparations in Figs. 7 and 8. Impulse responses appeared as brief, filtered damped sinusoids. The frequency of this sinusoid was specific to a given fluorescent bead’s location. The time waveforms obtained from different beads revealed a decrease in frequency of the oscillations with increasing distance of the beads from the stimulation probe (Figs. 7A and 8A). Corresponding FFTs showed that the vibration pattern at any bead was tuned, reflecting a distinct best frequency (Figs. 7B and 8B). According to the FFTs of the time waveforms, the shift in best frequency between successive beads was between 0.3 and 1.7 octaves/mm, on average 0.8 octave/mm (n Å 20). A slight, nonsignificant decrease of the CF-shift was found with increasing distance from the / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 FIG . 6. After the stimulation probe was placed against the basilar membrane under visual control, the probe’s position was varied, and the corresponding vibration amplitude was monitored. Increasing the load on the basilar membrane (positive numbers, right) slightly increased the vibration amplitude, whereas small retraction of the probe (negative numbers, right) from the basilar membrane led to decreased vibration amplitude as measured by the movements of the beads located on the basilar membrane. Detaching of the probe from the basilar membrane further decreased the vibration amplitude (left). When the probe is further withdrawn from the BM but still immersed in scala tympani, vibration amplitude further decreased. For the latter case, the energy required to vibrate the basilar membrane is transmitted through the fluids. 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 base. The NQ10dB of the obtained response curve was between 0.6 and 2.7, on average 1.5. A small, nonsignificant decrease in NQ10dB was attained with increasing distance from the base of the BM ( n Å 32). Response amplitudes to stimuli of different intensities obtained from individual beads dropped linearly (Fig. 9). Reduction between successive peaks of a given sinusoidal response was measured and the logarithmic decrement ( q) was computed. q was between 0.16 and 1.8, on average 0.6 (n Å 30). The decay of the amplitude at different beads away from the stimulation location could be described as an exponential drop of Ç58 dB/mm (Fig. 11A). To determine whether energy is mainly propagated via the fluids or the BM, a hole was made into the arcuate zone (between stimulus delivery and measurement sites) using a glass pipette. If energy is propagated by the BM, this ‘‘cutting’’ of the BM should decrease the vibration amplitude significantly. This manipulation lead to an immediate drop of the response amplitude by 7.8 dB beyond the cut. A bigger decrease in response magnitude is expected if pectinate zone and tectorial membrane could be separated as well. FFT spectra of the sinusoidal responses showed the same frequency distribution before and after the cut of the basilar membrane. Only the magnitude of the FFT spectra decreased. Interestingly, beads placed in four hemicochleae revealed no tuning. Aside from magnitude scaling, time waveforms and FFTs at the different beads were essentially identical to the responses obtained from the stimulation probe. For these 2260 C.-P. RICHTER, B. N. EVANS, R. EDGE, AND P. DALLOS cochleae, the drop in magnitude of the bead movement was 19 dB/mm for iso-intensity stimuli (Fig. 11C). FIG . 8. A: example of nonnormalized time waveforms obtained at beads located in the 1st turn of a gerbil hemicochlea (preparation HCo112). Distances are from the basal end of the cochlea. B: FFTs of the time waveforms shown in A. showed a reduction of response amplitude of 15 dB/mm (Fig. 11C) with increasing distance from the probe. This is in reasonable agreement with responses from beads obtained in the hemicochlea which did not show tuning (19 dB/mm). Therefore, for the latter cochleae, it is surmised that the beads were only loosely attached to the basilar membrane and did not reflect its vibratory properties. Stimulus more apical to site of measurement Time waveforms obtained from 26 different beads placed in nine different cochleae reflected the properties of the stimulation probe. A shift in frequency of the oscillations with increasing distance of the beads from the stimulation probe was not observed (Fig. 10). The reduction of the amplitude was on average 155 dB/mm (Fig. 11B). Beads in a glass tube Experiments to mimic fluid properties in the hemicochlea in the basal turn were carried out. Beads were placed in a glass tube (length: 3 mm; diameter: 0.68 mm) and immersed in a dish of HBSS. A probe similar to that used in the hemicochlea experiments was placed in front of the opening of one end of the glass tube. Again, electrical square pulse stimuli were applied to the piezo pusher. A mechanical click response was produced by the stimulus delivery probe. The beads located along the longitudinal axis of the glass tube / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 FIG . 9. Stimulus intensity vs. vibration amplitude measured at several beads. Data for 5 representative preparations are shown. Thick line represents linear response. 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 FIG . 7. A: normalized time waveforms obtained at beads located in the 1st turn (preparation HCo116) and 2nd turn (preparation HCo142) of 2 different gerbil hemicochleae. Distances are from the basal end of the cochlea. Distance of the probe from the basal end of the basilar membrane was 3.5 mm (HCo116) and 7.6 mm (HCo142). B: FFTs of the time waveforms shown in A. Magnitudes are normalized to the maximum value. Response curves showed a NQ10dB of 1.0, 1.5, 1.5, and 1.2 (from left to right). An orderly shift of the maxima of the magnitude plots occurs with lower frequencies corresponding to more distal points. BASILAR MEMBRANE MECHANICS IN HEMICOCHLEA 2261 FIG . 10. Time waveforms (A) and corresponding FFT spectra at beads located in the 1st turn when the stimulation probe was placed more apical to the measuring site. For these experiments, energy propagation from the apex to the base was studied. Spectral response properties obtained at all beads reflected that of the stimulation probe. Drop in vibration amplitude for this preparation was Ç140 dB/mm, but interestingly Ç190 dB/mm from probe to 1st bead. DISCUSSION Overview Experiments in the hemicochlea revealed some of the passive mechanical properties of the gerbil inner ear. Direct mechanical vibration of the BM with mechanical pulse inputs showed band-pass responses for different beads located along the BM. The responses to broadband stimuli were brief highly damped sinusoidal waveforms with different frequencies. Normalized sharpness of the response curves ( NQ10dB , on average 1.5 ) , shift in best frequency ( on average 0.8 mm/ octave ) , and logarithmic decrement ( on average 0.6 ) were determined from the responses. From cochleae in poor condition or from in vitro cochlear preparations, similar results have been obtained by others [ guinea pig : best frequency: 0.8 kHz, NQ10dB : 0.94 ) ( Rhode 1973 ) ; squirrel monkey: best frequency: 8 kHz, NQ10dB : 1.4 ( Rhode and Robles 1974 ) ; guinea pig : best frequency: 8 kHz, NQ10dB : 0.94 ( Rhode and Cooper 1993 ) ; chinchilla: best frequency: 10 kHz, NQ10dB : 1.8 – 2.0 ( Ruggero et al. 1992 ) ] . Thus aspects of the present findings coincide with the results of other groups, reflecting the operation of the passive cochlea. However, the logarithmic decrement q was better in the present set of data ( 0.6 ) than / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 FIG . 11. Drop in peak to peak amplitude of the time waveforms vs. distances of the beads from the stimulation probe. A–C: each data point represents 1 bead used for measurements, each type of symbol represents 1 preparation. A: stimulus probe was located at the more basal cut edge of the hemicochlea. B: probe was located more apical. For the symbols with a downward arrow, no response could be measured. Each point with a downward arrow shows the noise amplitude obtained at the beads’ location. C: small symbols represent beads that only reflected the spectral properties of the stimulation probe (thick line). Large open diamonds show beads in a glass tube (thin broken line). 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 that found by von Békésy, between 1.4 and 1.8. Ruggero et al. ( 1992 ) showed a q of Ç0.09 in a living animal and a q of Ç0.5 post mortem and at high sound pressure levels. Because the logarithmic decrement increases with post mortem time, the q might be a measure for assessing the condition of the preparation. A frequency place map for the hemicochlea has been developed using the FFT results of the bead responses and the distances of the beads from the basal end of the basilar membrane (Fig. 12). Compared with in vivo frequency place maps based on horseradish peroxidase (HRP) staining of single fibers with determined CF of adult animals (Echteler et al. 1989; Müller 1996), the frequency place map in the hemicochlea was shifted Ç1.4 octaves toward lower frequencies. According to the literature, the frequency place map in a dead cochlea shifts Ç0.5–0.9 octaves (Rhode 1973; Rhode and Robles 1974; Ruggero et al. 1992). These data were obtained within the first hour after death. However, a decrease in the characteristic frequency as a function of time after death has been described in BM vibration amplitudes (Rhode 1973; Rhode and Robles 1974) with a shift 2262 C.-P. RICHTER, B. N. EVANS, R. EDGE, AND P. DALLOS of Ç1.4 octaves toward lower frequencies. In the present experiments, the mean shift of 1.4 octaves of the BM frequency place map, then might be explained by the times after death for the measurements, which were usually 3.0 h (range: 1.0–6.5 h) after killing the animal. The scatter of the data presented for one location (same distance of the bead from the basal end of the basilar membrane) also may be caused by the differing times between killing the animal and data acquisition. For an isolated preparation, the cochlear amplifier is probably not active. In the present experiments, a linear magnitude response versus stimulus intensity was found (Fig. 9). Therefore the nonlinear behavior of basilar membrane vibration patterns is missing. This finding is in agreement with cochleae in poor condition or excised cochleae (Khanna and Leonard 1986; Rhode and Robles 1974; Ruggero et al. 1992). Direction of energy propagation In the present preparation, propagation of energy on the basilar membrane from base toward apex and vice versa could be investigated. As shown, tuned BM vibration patterns were observed if the basilar membrane was stimulated more basal than the location the vibration of which was measured by the behavior of the beads. In none of our experiments could we detect a tuned vibration pattern of the BM if energy propagated from the apex to the base. The question, whether a traveling wave from apex to base is sustainable in the cochlea was addressed by von Békésy ( 1928 ) . He moved the stapes to more apical positions in the cochlea, but he never saw a traveling wave running from apex to base. However, in his experiments, he investigated the whole cochlea, including at least the fluids and the basilar membrane properties. The acoustic energy in his experiments was coupled to the basilar membrane through the fluids. No matter where introduced, this acoustic energy propagates in the scalae with the speed of sound / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 FIG . 12. Frequency-place map obtained from the beads measured in the hemicochlea [h , 11.2 mm Å 100%] in comparison with the in vivo frequency place map published by Müller (1996) [thick line; animals with age of 2–4 mo; 11.1 mm Å 100%], Schmiedt and Zwislocki (1977) [thin line; 12.1 mm Å 100%] and data point obtained by Echteler et al. (1989) ( ∗ ). and thus provides an essentially instantaneous pressure gradient across the basilar membrane. This pressure gradient sets the membrane in motion and a well-behaved traveling wave results as an aftereffect. Direct experimental investigation of wave travel for the case when energy is directly conveyed to the basilar membrane has been lacking. Thus potential reverse propagation properties only have been investigated partially. In the present experiments, based on direct mechanical input, no locally tuned vibration of the BM could be observed if energy propagated toward the base of the basilar membrane. As a consequence, one may surmise that in the case of otacoustic emissions of any sort, direct propagation of energy through the basilar membrane seems unlikely. Local sources of vibration on the basilar membrane could probably couple directly into the scala vestibuli fluids and the resulting pressure would drive the stapes footplate. Delay times for evoked otoacoustic emissions of ú10 ms ( for review see Probst et al. 1991 ) remain unexplained, inasmuch as they cannot incorporate a ‘‘reverse traveling wave’’ time delay. The situation that energy has to be somehow propagate from apex to base in the cochlea might be similar for distortion products. In this case, two tones of frequency f1 and f2 (f1 õ f2 ) are applied simultaneously to the ear, generating intermodulation distortion (colloquially called combination tones), including f2-f1 , 2f1-f2 , and 2f2-f1 (for a historical review, see Goldstein and Kiang 1968; Plomp 1965; Smoorenburg 1972a). The component 2f1-f2 is audible in a restricted frequency region below f1 (Goldstein 1967; Plomp 1965; Smoorenburg 1972a; Zwicker 1955), and it is highly dependent on the frequency separation of f1 and f2 (Goldstein 1967). There is experimental evidence that combination tones are generated at one place on the basilar membrane and propagate to the basilar membrane site with characteristic frequency equal to that of the combination tone (Goldstein 1967; Siegel et al. 1982; Smoorenburg 1972b; Zurek and Sachs 1979). Such an origin is consistent with the presence of combination tones in recordings of cochlear microphonics (Gibian and Kim 1982), responses of cochlear nerve fibers (Buunen and Rhode 1978; Goldstein and Kiang 1968; Kim et al. 1980; Siegel et al 1982), and basilar membrane measurements (Nuttal et al. 1990; Rhode and Cooper 1993; Robles et al 1990). In these cases, judging from the present set of data, the dominant coupling of energy is through the fluids and not via the basilar membrane. The findings of the present experiments showed a drop in vibration amplitude of 155 dB/mm from an apex to base direction. Thus propagation of energy through the basilar membrane from apex to base is unlikely. Interestingly, and in harmony with the above, in a simple transmission line model it has not been possible to set up a traveling wave running in the direction of high to low compliance. In four of the cochleae, no tuned response properties at the different beads were obtained. For these cochleae, the drop in response amplitude of the beads with increasing span from the vibration probe was similar to the drop in response amplitude of beads placed in a glass tube. The suggestion is that these beads were not attached to the basilar membrane and therefore did not reveal its vibration properties. Rather, the beads were attached loosely or floating, reflecting the BASILAR MEMBRANE MECHANICS IN HEMICOCHLEA We thank Dr. M. A. Cheatham for discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by National Institute of Deafness and Other Communications Disorders Grant DC-00708 and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant Ri 699/5–1. / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 Address for reprint requests: C.-P. Richter, Northwestern University, Frances Searle Building, 2299 North Campus Dr., Evanston, Il 60208. Received 8 May 1997; accepted in final form 8 January 1998. REFERENCES ALLEN, J. B. AND SONDHI, M. M. Cochlear macromechanics: time domain solutions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66: 123–132, 1979. BUUNEN, T.J.F. AND RHODE, W. S. Responses of fibers in the cat’s auditory nerve to the cubic difference tone. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64: 772–781, 1978. DE BOER, E. Mechanics of the cochlea: modeling efforts. In: The Cochlea, edited by P. Dallos, A. N. Popper and R. R. Fay. New York: Springer Verlag, 1996, p. 258–317. ECHTELER, S. M., ARJMAND, E., AND DALLOS, P. Developmental alterations in the frequency map of the mammalian cochlea. Nature 341: 147–149, 1989. ERDREICH, J. Intermodulation product pair 2f1 { fh : masking and growth. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62: 1252–1255, 1977. GIBIAN G. L. AND KIM D. O. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2-f1 ) and (2f1-f2 ). Hear. Res. 6: 35– 59, 1982. GOLDSTEIN, J. L. Auditory nonlinearity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41: 676–689, 1967. GOLDSTEIN, J. L. AND KIANG, N.Y.S. Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2f1-f2 . Proc. IEEE 56: 981–992, 1968. GUMMER, A. T., HEMMERT, W., AND ZENNER H.-P. Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: its crucial role in frequency tuning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 8727–8737, 1996. GUMMER, A. T., SMOLDERS, J.W.T., AND KLINKE, R. Basilar membrane motion measured in the pigeon with the Mössbauer technique. Hear. Res. 29: 63–92, 1987. HU, X., EVANS, B. N., EDGE, R., AND DALLOS, P. Organ of corti micromechanics studied in a hemicochlea. In: Abstract for the ARO Meeting, 1995, p. 753. KHANNA, S. M. AND LEONARD, D.G.B. Relationship between basilar membrane tuning and hair cell condition. Hear. Res. 23: 55–70, 1986. KIM, D. O., MOLNAR, C. E., AND MATHEWS, J. W. Cochlear mechanics: Non-linear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nervefiber responses and in ear canal sound pressure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67: 1704–1721, 1980. MØLLER, A. R. Neural delay in the ascending auditory pathway. Exp. Brain Res. 43: 93–100, 1981. MÜLLER, M. The cochlear place-frequency map of the adult and developing mongolian gerbil. Hear. Res. 94: 148–156, 1996. NUTTAL A. L., DOLAN, D. F., AND AVINASH, G. Measurement of basilar membrane tuning and distortion with laser doppler velocimetry. In: The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing, edited by P. Dallos, C. D. Geisler, J. W. Matthews, M. A. Ruggero, and C. R. Steele. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1990, p. 288–295. PLOMP, R. Detectability thresholds for combination tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37: 1110–1123, 1965. PROBST, R., LONSBURY-MARTIN, B. L., AND MARTIN, G. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 2027–2067, 1991. RHODE, W. S. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49: 1218–1231, 1971. RHODE, W. S. An investigation of post-mortem cochlear mechanics using the Mössbauer effect. In: Basic Mechanisms in Hearing, edited by A. Møller. New York: Academic Press, 1973, p. 49–67. RHODE, W. S. AND COOPER, N. P. Two-tone suppression in distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 66: 31–45, 1993. RHODE, W. S. AND ROBLES, L. Evidence from Mössbauer experiments for nonlinear vibration in the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55: 588–596, 1974. ROBLES, L., RUGGERO, M. A., AND RICH, N. C. Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output-functions, tuning curves and response phases. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80: 1364 – 1374, 1986. ROBLES, L., RUGGERO, M. A., AND RICH, N. C. Two-tone distortion products in the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea. In: The Mechanics 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 vibration patterns of the stimulation probe transmitted by the fluid. Drops in vibration amplitude for the beads placed in a tube or in a hemicochlea without tuned behavior were similar, 15–19 dB/mm. In contrast to this slope, the attached beads showed a decrease in response magnitude of 58 dB/ mm (probe more basal) or 155 dB/mm (probe more apical). The latter two values are significantly greater than the small attenuation provided by the fluids alone. It is likely that the numbers reflect mainly basilar membrane properties. Although longitudinal coupling is present, it behaves as if it were small and unidirectional. In other words, mechanical energy within the basilar membrane propagates more efficiently toward the apex than toward the base, but in either case with significant attenuation. Another interesting question is, whether the asymmetric drop in BM vibration amplitude can be used to improve modeling efforts? As pointed out by de Boer (1996): ‘‘a most important point which has not been clarified satisfactorily, concerns the mutual mechanical coupling of elements of the organ of Corti in the longitudinal direction.’’ Longitudinal coupling has been neglected for the cochlear partition in the ‘‘classical’’ models. However, existence of longitudinal coupling in the basilar membrane has been supported experimentally by von Békésy (1960) and has been considered in some cochlear models (Wickesberg and Geisler 1985). Inclusion of longitudinal coupling in cochlear models broadens the tuning curve at its tip as demanded by experimental observations. Poor results in some modeling efforts, when longitudinal coupling is present, may be due to the fact that coupling in the BM has been assumed too high. Based on the present results, it is conceivable that small longitudinal coupling has to be considered to improve modeling. In summary, the hemicochlea is a novel preparation, useful for the study of certain passive mechanical properties of the mammalian cochlea. These experiments showed spectral maxima of different frequency along the cochlear partition but only for propagation in the direction from base to apex. This is true, independent of whether the acoustic energy has been fed through the fluids (von Békésy 1928) or directly by vibrating the basilar membrane (present experiments). Propagation of acoustic energy through the basilar membrane appears possible because small longitudinal coupling was observed on the basilar membrane. This energy propagation via the basilar membrane itself can be demonstrated when the energy coupled via the fluids is negligible. Due to the open scalae, the fluids in the hemicochlea are effectively ‘‘grounded.’’ Interestingly, the propagation of energy is greater toward the apex compared with propagation of energy toward the base. This is undoubtedly due to the graded impedance of the basilar membrane, whereby energy flow can occur only from less compliant regions toward more compliant ones. Even in the favored direction, longitudinal coupling is small as ascertained from the decrease in vibration amplitude with a rate of Ç58 dB/mm. 2263 2264 C.-P. RICHTER, B. N. EVANS, R. EDGE, AND P. DALLOS / 9k28$$my06 J380-7 VÔLDRICH, L. Mechanical properties of basilar membrane. Acta Otolaryngol. 86: 331–335, 1978. VON BÉKÉSY, G. Zur Theorie des Hörens, Die Schwingungsform der Basilarmembran. Physik. Zeits. 29: 404–429, 1928. VON BÉKÉSY, G. Paradoxical direction of wave travel along the cochlear partition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27: 137–145, 1955. VON BÉKÉSY, G. Experiments in Hearing. New York: McGraw-Hill Book, 1960. WEVER, E. G. AND LAWRENCE, M. Physiological Acoustics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ., 1954. WICKESBERG, R. E. AND GEISLER, C. D. Longitudinal stiffness coupling in a 1-dimensional model of the peripheral ear. In: Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms, edited by J. B. Allen, J. L. Hall, A. Hubbard, S. T. Neely, and A. Tubis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985. WILSON, J. P., SMOLDERS, J.W.T., AND KLINKE, R. Mechanics of the basilar membrane in Caiman crocodilus. Hear. Res. 18: 1–14, 1985. ZIERLER, N. Linear recurring sequences. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 7: 31– 48, 1959. ZUREK, P. M. AND SACHS, R. M. Combination tones at frequencies greater than the primary tones. Science 205: 600–602, 1979. ZWICKER, E. Der ungewöhnliche Amplitudengang der nichtlinearen Verzerrung des Ohres. Acustica 5: 67–74, 1955. 04-10-98 07:56:52 neupa LP-Neurophys Downloaded from http://jn.physiology.org/ by 10.220.32.246 on May 2, 2017 and Biophysics of Hearing, edited by P. Dallos, C. D. Geisler, J. W. Matthews, M. A. Ruggero, and C. R. Steele. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1990, p. 304–311. ROBLES, L., RUGGERO, M. A., AND RICH, N. C. Two-tone distortion in the basilar membrane of the cochlea. Nature 349: 413–414, 1991. RUGGERO, M. Systematic errors in indirect estimates of basilar membrane travel times. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67: 707–710, 1980. RUGGERO, M., RICH, N. C., AND RECIO A. Basilar membrane responses to clicks. Adv. Biosci. 83: 85–92, 1992. SIEGEL, J. H., KIM, D. O., AND MOLNAR, C. Effects of altering organ of corti on cochlear distortion products f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 . J. Neurophysiol. 47: 303–328, 1982. SCHMIEDT, R. A. AND ZWISLOCKI, J. J. Comparison of sound-transmission and cochlear microphonic characteristics in Mongolian gerbil and guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61: 133–149, 1977. SELLICK, P. M., PATUZZI, R., AND JOHNSTONE, B. M. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea-pig using the Mössbauer technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72: 131–141, 1982. SMOORENBURG, G. F. Audibility region of combination tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52: 603–614, 1972a. SMOORENBURG, G. F. Combination tones and their origin. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52: 615–632, 1972b.