Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The International Symposium to Commemorate the New Start of JETRO “ Toward an East Asia Free Trade and Economic Zone” The Emerging Economic Entity of East Asia Keynote Address by Osamu Watanabe, Chairman and CEO of JETRO 26 November, 2003 at Keidanren Hall I would like to extend my heartfelt appreciation to all of you here today, including Senior Vice Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Shinya Izumi and Vice Chairman of the Japan Business Federation (Nippon Keidanren) Kenji Miyahara for finding the time to attend this symposium commemorating JETRO’s new start. I am delighted that we have been able to hold this symposium with the participation of so many outstanding individuals, including Prof. Motoshige Itoh of the University of Tokyo. JETRO, since its inception in 1958 as a government-affiliated corporation, has spent the years dealing with the demands of different eras, moving from export promotion to import promotion. On October 1 this year, JETRO was reborn as an independent administrative agency. Although the implications of this change are many and varied, to put it in simple terms, whereas the daily running of JETRO and management of its costs and budget had been left to the government to oversee and implement, the new JETRO now receives mid-term goals from the government and is left to compile its own plans, but with the responsibility of attaining those goals and ensuring that the results are successful. Our success in achieving these objectives will be stringently audited by an evaluation committee established at the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. The results of the audit will even determine my salary and bonus as chairman and CEO of JETRO. It is now incumbent on the staff of JETRO to work diligently and under principles of self-responsibility, and to take the credit for successes and take responsibility for failure. It is my intention to expend all efforts toward working together with the staff of JETRO, responding to the various needs of the new organization and complying diligently with the wishes of our clients. In this endeavor, I would like to ask you for your continued support and encouragement. Although I just entered JETRO in July of 2002, my relationship with Asia goes back much further. Beginning in 1964, I worked at the former Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) for 35 years. One of the periods that remains etched in my memory is the Asian financial crisis of 1997 to 1999; I am well aware of the trials and hardships this caused for the countries of many people gathered here today at this conference. At that time, I was an administrative vice-minister at MITI and, although the period was a tough one domestically, I recall working very hard to formulate Japan’s policy for providing assistance to our Asian neighbors. With the cooperation of many of you here, as well as the initiatives of the individual countries, we overcame the crisis. So today, I take this opportunity to express my respect for the steady development achieved in the years since. I subsequently left my post at MITI. Since last year, as a member of Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi’s Task Force on Foreign Relations, my colleagues and I have shared the responsibility of formulating a series of proposals concerning economic partnership agreements with ASEAN countries and a number of Asian foreign policy issues. So, given my long and close relationship with Asia, I am very much looking forward to a fruitful and incisive symposium. First of all, I would like to discuss the current situation concerning the Japanese economy. For a long period now, people in all sectors in Japan have been enduring hardship. But I believe that after more than ten years of recession, the Japanese economy is in the final stages of moving towards recovery. However, it should be noted that on two occasions in the 1990s, it appeared that Japan was moving to recovery and on both of those occasions the recovery failed to materialize. But the third time is a charm, as we say, I feel that we will achieve a true recovery this time. Years of restructuring by the private sector are now bearing fruit. Revenues and capital investment are both on the increase. However, while the results of restructuring are having a positive effect mainly on large companies, the results have yet to permeate small and medium enterprises, or SMEs. In the two times when the Japanese economy failed to recover in the 1990s, the Japanese government had thought that the economy was about to turn around and hastily introduced financial reforms from a macroeconomic perspective, and also moved to correct the nation's massive fiscal deficit. Private-sector companies, including consumer (city) banks and others, also saw the economy picking up and scaled back or even discontinued their restructuring efforts. As a result, the disposal of non-performing loans and other restructuring came to a halt. This time, however, at the very least for another year or two, we need to see continued macroeconomic and structural reforms, coupled with corporate efforts to dispose of non-performing loans and engage in restructuring without changing course. This is the lesson that we must learn from Japan’s two previous failed recoveries. It follows that the process of reducing non-performing loans will continue for another year or two, and naturally this will have a deflationary effect on the economy. I hold the belief that the Japanese economy will recover and that a thriving economy will be with us a year hence, or possibly a year and a half from now. These are the vital steps that I believe need to be taken if we are to lift the economy. However, I also believe that once we cross that bridge, there will be bright signs on the horizon. This is the feeling I have gotten over the last two years or so, as companies put new business models in place to leverage integrated operations in East Asia, which has not only stimulated corporate activity, but also generated profits. Senior Vice Minister Izumi has already spoken of rapidly increasing economic integration and intra-regional trade in East Asia. When the Japanese economy hit rock bottom in the autumn two years ago, we heard many theories about the threat from China and the hollowing out of Japanese industry. But since then, large, medium-size and small companies have come to the realization that if business is taking place in China, then it should be engaged and profits made. The issue was no longer one of a threat posed by China, so companies large and small began to vigorously expand their businesses in China. This was a step that in my view had taken two years to come to fruition. Japan’s cumulative investment directed into Southeast Asia is at 3.5 times the level of that in China. Japanese companies have sought to maximize profitability by formulating strategies according to which products could be best produced domestically, China or the ASEAN region. This does not only apply to large companies. Small and medium-size companies also are starting to invest based on their own judgment. I get the impression that this strategy is already starting to be profitable. In the first session of the symposium today, Prof. Itoh will lead a discussion on corporate strategy in the East Asian business sphere. Corporate strategy does not only apply to Japan and is not only about Japanese companies. All companies are currently in the process of creating new business models for East Asia, a new center of growth. I expect this to be a tremendously interesting session. We often hear the phrase “China+1” (China plus one) these days. I believe that in Japan as well, the key to the future will be network creation, and China+1 is a strategy for networked production. At the same time, however, consumption is also rapidly expanding in the region, so great expectations are also being placed on the region as a future consumer market. According to the JETRO White Paper on International Trade and Investment, the middle classes in China and ASEAN are increasing substantially. Middle class here refers not to the super rich, but to individuals whose income level is expected to increase. In China, the middle class is defined as a monthly income of 2,100 yuan, or about 30,000 yen a month. In terms of purchasing power parity, this corresponds to a monthly income of 170,000 to 180,000 yen per month in Japan. This group is expanding rapidly and already comprises about 10 percent of China’s urban population of 400 million. They are now buying consumer durable goods and cars. Including China, the NIEs and all ASEAN countries, the region’s middle class stands at around 140 million, compared with a total population of 1.9 billion, and it is rapidly expanding. It is important, therefore, that Japanese companies expand their integrated business operations in the region to take advantage of economic growth and realize greater profitability. I have heard it said recently that the Japanese economic recovery and the upturn in business are largely dependent on exports. I also hear that this indicates that domestic demand remains weak. While there is certainly some truth to this, it is somewhat misleading to talk of exports to Southeast Asia. In a sense, they are no longer exports. Instead, the region Japan once considered its economic sphere has given way to an East Asian region that is more like a huge domestic market. Accordingly, the production of goods in Japan and their export to China or Southeast Asia should be seen less as a function of export and more as a domestic Japanese activity. Goods that are produced in Southeast Asia and imported to Japan also should not be conceptualized as imports, but rather as the domestic transfer of goods due to the integration of economies. Discussions about export-led demand and weak domestic demand are of little meaning for the new unified-business model that has appeared in East Asia. Given such economic realities and the fact that economic integration is already with us, what should governments and countries pursue? One of the greatest challenges is to accelerate economic integration in an institutionalized manner, such that national borders form no barrier to policy. From 2005, ASEAN and Japan are expected to enter into comprehensive economic partnership negotiations. In December this year the ASEAN-Japan Commemorative Summit will be held in Tokyo. I strongly expect it will be announced that countries such as Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand will enter into bilateral free trade agreement (FTA) negotiations with Japan. I expect that Indonesia will also enter into preparatory discussions. With the benefit of its long history, the ASEAN economies have already realized the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) and are steadily moving in the direction of increased competitiveness for the region as a whole, while removing the cross-border barriers. I believe it is important for the members of ASEAN not to act like ten individual countries, but to remove barriers and become a unified region, one that is mutually complementary and competitive for regional stability. Asia’s future economic development and stability rely on this to a large extent. This is why in the various economic partnership programs between Japan and ASEAN, Japan must work to accelerate these programs and expand its assistance, not only in countries that have been fast to develop, but also in newer members of ASEAN, as symbolized by the Mekong Region Development. Japan should play a significant role in assisting such countries. The Institute of Developing Economies (IDE) compiled a report detailing the future recovery track for East Asia. It was a joint project carried out with top economic research organizations from the ten ASEAN countries over the past year and a half. We submitted the report in July and it was announced to great acclaim at the ASEAN Economic Ministers and Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan Consultations (AEM-METI) in September. Mr. Yamazawa, the former head of the IDE, will be joining us for the second session to present the report and hopefully trigger a vigorous discussion with our ASEAN research institute representatives. It was decided that from this December a forum for FTA negotiations with the Republic of Korea would be launched. China, which has already concluded a framework agreement with the countries of ASEAN, will probably move towards a China-ASEAN FTA from June next year, at a speed that will outpace Japan. I think these are encouraging signs, because I have no doubt that Japan, the Republic of Korea, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan and the ASEAN 10, possibly all of East Asia, will in the near future—possibly sooner than we expect—conclude an East Asia Free Trade Agreement to enable an active flow of people, goods and money. What role can Japan play? This is an important question for the future of Japan. It is most regrettable that in October this year Japan failed to conclude an FTA with Mexico although negotiations are ongoing. Regrettably, it appears that the parties stumbled at the final hurdle, failing to reach an agreement on farm trade issues. After the recent Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit, Prime Minister Koizumi stated clearly that structural reforms should continue in Japan, and that the Japanese market should not be closed to agricultural products. Japan must constantly bear in mind the issue of agricultural products as an essential element of its domestic structural reforms. Moreover, Japan and its agricultural policies must not impede the realization of a regional FTA. It is important for an East Asian FTA to be concluded without delay. The United States is also moving in the same direction in the Americas, where a number of FTAs are being concluded to advance economic development and expand investment. The EU, meanwhile, is expanding from 15 members to 25. With these two emerging axes in sight, East Asian countries should move toward their own economic integration, which would also help the Japanese economy to grow and regain its economic vigor. The piece of pie that Japan stands to gain from such independent economic vitality could be used, at least in part, to enhance the competitiveness of its domestic agriculture. For example, it could be used to provide money or compensation to farmers that fall victim to increased competition, and thereby facilitate once-seemingly impossible structural reforms in Japanese agriculture. The reason for delays in economic integration and FTAs is because such a mechanism has not yet been realized, so I believe that such reforms require political initiative. Japan can do more. Once an East Asian Free Trade Area is achieved, Japan will have to continue to demonstrate leadership and work actively as a co-leader in global economic management. Japanese companies must establish networks that would facilitate their shift into higher value-added industries, leading-edge technologies and service economy, creating new networks that will enable other members of East Asia to move into fields that Japan once focused on. The shift will require, however, that Japan attract outstanding people, capital, technology and know-how to make this vision a reality. This task must be achieved promptly, which is why Prime Minister Koizumi announced his plan to double foreign investment entering Japan. JETRO is actively dealing with these challenges. Firstly, we actively assist Japanese companies already operating, or showing interest, in the East Asian market. But moving into new markets can be very difficult, so JETRO provides assistance in various ways, including support for intellectual property protection. Secondly, JETRO leverages its think-tank resources centered on the IDE for enhanced cooperation with economic research institutions in the ASEAN region. With the proposed East Asian free trade area in mind, I think that a study on the desirable trade and investment rules between Japan and China, the two major Asian countries, whose combined GDPs represent 80% of East Asia’s total GDP, and their influence on the both countries, as well as one on the entire Asian region, should be conducted. I firmly believe that an East Asian FTA and free trade area could be materialized far quicker than anyone thinks. I would also like to promote taboo-free agricultural structural reform . Already a study group has been initiated to see if some of Japan’s excellent products, such as rice, vegetables and fruit, could be exported abroad, and this has gained the attention of agricultural cooperatives and farmers across Japan. JETRO will actively pursue the possibilities of agricultural structural reform. Thirdly, JETRO is seeking to provide robust support for industrial development in East Asia. JETRO has helped countries in the region develop their small and medium-size companies and expand their supporting industries through activities such as supporting the “One Tambon, One Product” project in Thailand. We are expanding such assistance, especially for ASEAN's newest members. In this context, we believe it is extremely important—particularly for the CLMV countries, namely Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam—to comprehensively pursue the Mekong Region Development project. Of course, the government of Japan is providing support through official development assistance (ODA). But private-sector investment is also needed if the CLMV countries are to develop their economic independence. It is incumbent upon Japanese companies to take an interest in the region, but at the same time these countries must nurture their SMEs and supporting industries to attract investment. JETRO is partnering with Japanese companies to provide support for this undertaking. We are also making every effort to encourage Tokyo’s interest in the Mekong Region Development. We will also strive to support capacity building, to ensure that business people in the CLMV countries are competent in international business. There is much to do. While we have made achievements, we must continue to press forward with everyone’s strong support and encouragement. The next one or two years will be pivotal in the establishment of an East Asian business sphere. Speed will be more important than quality or quantity. If we fail to act promptly, both Japan and East Asia will lose the win-win game and East Asia will not be able to compete with the Americas or the countries of Europe, which have already embarked upon integration. We must channel our energies and make haste. Today’s two sessions will facilitate discussion in these areas. As one of the symposium organizers, I sincerely hope for a vigorous debate that all participants find worthwhile. Thank you very much.