Download Western Society of Weed Science, Albuquerque, New Mexico

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

No-till farming wikipedia , lookup

Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup

Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup

Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup

Bifrenaria wikipedia , lookup

Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup

Island restoration wikipedia , lookup

Assisted colonization wikipedia , lookup

Renewable resource wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup

Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup

Human impact on the environment wikipedia , lookup

Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup

Conservation agriculture wikipedia , lookup

Habitat wikipedia , lookup

Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Western Society of Weed Science, Albuquerque, New Mexico. March 10-12, 2009.
Skurski TC, Maxwell, BD, and Rew LJ
Assessing plant community and environmental covariates of Bromus tectorum presence.
The concept that the impacts of non-indigenous plant species (NIS) will vary across different
environments has been supported in recent research. Understanding how biotic and abiotic
conditions influence plant communities is an important step to predicting where on the
landscape NIS are likely to have the greatest impact. We conducted an in-situ manipulative
experiment to test the response of plant community richness to four treatments: manual
removal of B. tectorum, ground disturbance to mimic that caused in the manual removal plots,
herbicide application (fall application of Plateau at 10 oz/acre). We hypothesize that the
response to treatments will vary across the landscape. In order to gain mechanistic and
predictive insight into impact variability, eighteen covariates were examined in relation to
community response to experimental treatments. Four treatments: control, manual removal,
ground disturbance and herbicide application, were applied to replicated paired plots across
four natural plant communities. The covariates were a combination of indirect or distal factors,
such as aspect, and more direct environmental variables, such as soil nitrate levels. Significant
positive relationships were found between the change in richness and diversity and the
following variables: probability of NIS occurrence, aspect, soil pH, percent organic matter in the
soil, nitrate (ppm) in the soil, and percent clay in the soil, meaning lower levels of these
predictor variables were correlated with reductions in richness and diversity. Significant
negative relationships were found between the change in richness and diversity and annual
radiation, distance to road, and percent sand in the soil, meaning lower levels of these
predictor variables were correlated with increases in richness and diversity. Non-significant
relationships were found with elevation, slope, initial percent cover of B. tectorum, soil
phosphorus, soil potassium, and percent silt in the soil. Identifying significant environmental
correlates with NIS impact and response to treatment will help guide weed management
prioritization, as well as provide mechanistic insight into plant community dynamics.
Assessing Plant Community and Environmental Covariates
of Non-Indigenous Plant Impacts
Tanya C. Skurski, Lisa J. Rew, Bruce D. Maxwell
Land Resources & Environmental Science: Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
a range of environments, reported
negative impacts, target of
control programs
•Family: Poaceae
•Often invasive
•Fruits injurious to
livestock
•May increase fire
frequency
Manipulative field experiment
Two types of “neighbor manipulation” approaches are utilized to
measure the competitive effects of NIS: weed removal and weed
addition8. We conducted a weed removal experiment and
measured the change in plant species richness, diversity, and
exotic-to-native cover over time. For this analysis, change in
species richness was used as the metric of impact.
Map Habitat Suitability by Species
NIS presence Slope, Aspect , Elevation, Veg. Habitat Type,
Distance from road, Distance from trail,
Disturbance type
site 1
low impact
potential
site 2
1. Determine whether significant correlations exist
between the impact of downy brome and
environmental variables.
2. Determine whether significant correlations exist
between the impact of downy brome and biotic
conditions
y = 0.3236x – 4.313
R2 = 0.3523
p = 0.000272
5
0
-5
100
150
200
250
300
10
5
0
-5
0.01
0
-5
10
12
change in per plot species richness
5
y = 3.189x – 20.467
R2 = 0.1398
p = 0.0321
5
0
-5
6.2
14
6.4
Balsam BROTEC
Probability 0% - 10%
Habitat suitability
for downy brome
Bromus tectorum
Tammy BROTEC
site 3
Probabilities 0% - 10%
10% - 20%
site 4
###
0 % - 10%
10% - 20%
20% - 40%
40% - 60%
60% - 100%
Big Creek BROTEC
Probability 0% - 10%
No Data
N
0
6.6
y = 0.12846x – 1.123
R2 = 0.3523
p = 0.000237
5
0
-5
40
change in per plot species richness
10
30
y = 0.1.249x – 2.2917
R2 = 0.3731
p = 0.000160
5
0
-5
2
y = 0.4764x – 1.184
R2 = 0.3099
p = 0.000766
5
0
-5
10
12
3
4
5
6
7
soil organic matter (percent)
10
8
7.2
10
50
Change in richness ~
percent clay in soil
6
7.0
Change in richness ~
soil organic matter
soil nitrogen (percent)
4
6.8
soil pH
Change in richness in ~
soil percent nitrogen
20
0.05
10
initial species richness
10
0.04
14
16
Change in richness ~
percent sand in soil
10
y = -0.177x + 14.393
R2 = 0.1955
p = 0.00998
5
0
-5
60
65
70
75
80
85
percent sand in soil
Conclusions
Wilson Creek BROTEC
Probability 0% - 10%
10
y = 0.6482x –3.266
R2 = 0.2454
p = 0.00338
8
0.03
change in richness ~ soil pH
10
6
0.02
habitat suitability for downy brome
Change in richness ~
initial richness
4
y = 129.5x – 2.276
R2 = 0.3523
p = 0.00105
percent clay in soil
###
Objectives
10
2
#BALSMCEMAS1INO543261UT156234
high impact
potential
Change in richness ~
habitat suitability for downy brome
Change in richness ~ aspect
change in per plot species richness
Experimental sites stratified across a range of habitat
suitability Using logistic regression, presence/absence data, and
a suite of environmental variables, habitat suitability was
predicted by Rew et al. (2005)9 for downy brome. To explore the
relationship between impact and habitat suitability,
experimental sites were stratified across a range of suitability.
Determined best model using AIC
exp( 0  1 x1  ...i x j )
P( y  1| x j ) 
1  exp( 0  1 x1  ...i x j )
##
low species
richness
low habitat
suitability
Change in richness after manual removal of
downy brome had no correlation (p < 0.05)
with:
· distance to road
· annual radiation
· elevation
· slope
· downy brome cover
· soil phosphorus
· percent silt in soil
aspect
##
high species
richness, high
habitat
suitability
Change in richness after manual removal of
downy brome was negatively correlated
(p < 0.05) with:
•percent sand in soil
change in per plot species richness
•Annual grass
change in per plot species richness
Selection criteria: presence across
Hypotheses
Environmental variables (i.e. aspect) and, more
generally, habitat suitability, are significantly
correlated to NIS impact.
Biotic conditions (i.e. species richness) are
significantly correlated to NIS impact.
•Monocot
Change in richness after manual removal
of downy brome was positively
correlated (p < 0.05) with:
•aspect
•habitat suitability for downy brome
•initial species richness
•soil pH
•soil nitrogen
•soil organic matter
•percent clay in soil
change in per plot species richness
Mechanistic insight
If impacts of NIS vary across the landscape and with
biotic conditions, understanding the relationship
between those variables and impact can provide insight
into the mechanisms of NIS impacts in plant
communities.
Prioritization for management
Land managers need to know where NIS are likely to
have the greatest impact in order to prioritize their
management efforts. If a significant relationship exists
between environmental variables or biotic conditions
and impact, knowledge of where those predictive
variables and conditions are found on the landscape can
be used to prioritize management.
Study Species
change in per plot species richness
Rationale
downy brome (Bromus tectorum)
change in per plot species richness
What drives the impacts of non-indigenous species?
There is a long-standing ecological debate over the
relationship between species richness and invasibility
suggesting, on the one hand, that richness repels
invasion1,2,3, and on the other, richness facilitates
invasion4. Biotic determinants of non-indigenous plant
species (NIS) invasion may also influence NIS impacts.
Species rich communities may experience greater
impacts. Environmental variables5,6 and resource
availability7 are also considered important factors in
the establishment and impacts of NIS.
NIS = non-indigenous plant species
Results
Methods
Background
10
20 Miles
Analyze downy brome impact (change in richness) against
biotic and environmental variables
To determine whether significant correlations exist between
downy brome impact and environmental and biotic variables, we
examined pairwise correlations between the post-treatment
change in richness and fifteen covariates.
One year after removal, we found significant correlations
between the impact of downy brome and site richness, habitat
suitability, aspect, and soil physical and chemical properties.
These data suggest habitats more amenable to downy brome,
with greater species richness and more resources, are more
likely to experience a greater impact from its establishment.
Future Directions & Implications
We will continue to monitor the response to downy brome
removal over time. Future results will strengthen our
understanding of the mechanisms behind downy brome impact
and be used to help guide management decisions.
References: 1. Elton, C.S. (1958) The ecology of invasions.
Methuen, London, UK. 2. MacArthur, R.H. (1970) Species-packing and competitive equilibrium for many
species. Theoretical Population Biology 1: 1-11. 3. Tilman, D. (2004) A stochastic theory of resource competition, community assembly and invasions. PNAS 1010: 1085410861. 4. Stohlgren, T.J., Barnett, D.T. & Kartesz (2003) The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:
11-14. 5. Mason, R.J. & French, K. (2008) Impacts of a woody invader vary in different vegetation communities. Diversity and Distributions 14: 829-838. 6. Hacker, S.D.
& Dethier, M.N. (2006) Community modification by a grass invader has differing impacts for marine habitats. Oikos 113: 279-286. 7. Davis, M.A., Grime, J.P., & Thompson,
K. (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J of Ecology 88: 528-534. 8. Adair, R.J. & Groves, R.H. (1998) Impact of
Environmental Weeds on Biodiversity: A Review and Development of a Methodology Biodiversity Group, Environment Australia, Canberra, Australia. 9. Rew, L.J., Maxwell,
B.D. & Aspinall, R. (2005) Predicting the occurrence of non-indigenous species using environmental & remotely sensed data. Weed Science 53: 236-241.