Download Chemical polymerization of aniline in phenylphosphinic

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Peptide synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Glass transition wikipedia , lookup

Size-exclusion chromatography wikipedia , lookup

Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Fatty acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup

Butyric acid wikipedia , lookup

EXPOSE wikipedia , lookup

QPNC-PAGE wikipedia , lookup

Hepoxilin wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 70 (10) 1169–1182 (2005)
JSCS – 3354
UDC 66.095.26+547.551.1:678.85
Original scientific paper
Chemical polymerization of aniline in phenylphosphinic acid
NICOLETA PLESU1*, GHEORGHE ILIA1, GEZA BANDUR2 and SIMONA POPA2
1Institute
of Chemistry of Romanian Academy, Mihai Viteazul Bul. 24, 300223-TimiÕoara,
Romania (e-mail: [email protected]) and 2University “Politehnica” TimiÕoara,
BocÕei No. 6, TimiÕoara, Romania
(Received 20 August, revised 1 December 2004)
Abstract: The chemical polymerization of aniline was performed in phenylphosphinic
acid (APP) medium using ammonium peroxidisulfate as the oxidizing agent, at 0 ºC
and 25 ºC. The yield of polyaniline (PANI) was about 60–69 %. The polymerization
process required an induction time 8–10 times greater than in other acids (hydrochloric, sulfuric). The average density of the obtained polymer was 1.395 g cm-3 for
PANI-salt and 1.203 g cm-3 for PANI-base. The acid capacity of PANI depends on the
synthesis parameters and the maximum value was 15.02 meq/g polymer. The inherent
viscosity of PANI was 0.662 dl/g at aniline/oxidant molar ratios >2 and 0 ºC. The oxidation state was a function of the synthesis parameters and lay between 0.553–0.625,
as determined from UV-VIS and titration with TiCl3 data. The PANI samples were
characterized by measurements of their density, inherent viscosity, conductivity, acid
capacity, FTIR and UV-VIS spectrum, and thermogravimetric data.
Keywords: chemical oxidation, aniline, phenylphosphinic acid, conducting polymers, polyaniline.
INDTRODUCTION
Studies concerning the field of conducting polymers have opened up new and
attractive domains of applications, due to the possibility of the synthesis of this
new generation of polymers which combines the mechanical properties and attractive processability of traditional polymers with the electrical and optical properties
of electronic conductors.1–21
PANI is a conducting polymer which can easily be synthesized by both chemical and electrochemical methods and seems to be the most studied due to its simple
synthesis and its environmental stability. The general formula of PANI is the same
structure in all cases and consists of a succession of reduced benzenoid nuclei and
oxidized quinoid nuclei, but the method of oxidation affects the performance of the
polymer and the reproducibility of the synthesis. The properties of PANI depend
*
Author for correspondence. Tel: 0256/491818, fax: 0256/491824
doi: 10.2298/JSC0510169P
1169
1170
PLESU et al.
on the monomer/oxidant molar ratio, pH, reaction temperature, nature of the used
acid, the mode of doping and the structure of the monomer (presence of substituents). An important aspect of PANI synthesis is the nature of the acid. The role of
the acid dissociation constant, pKa, is known; in PANI, the protonation equilibrium
involves the quinoid nucleus having two imine nitrogens with pKa1 = 1.05 and
pKa2 = 2.55,6 therefore any acid is suitable as a dopant if its pKa value lies in this
range. Any acid having a pKa around the value of the anilinium ion (pKa = 4.60)
would be suitable as the solvent and prevents overoxidation.1 Thus, the properties
of conductive PANI are affected by the type of the employed dopant ion. The most
preferred method of synthesis is to use either hydrochloric or sulfuric acid with ammonium peroxydisulfate as the oxidant.1–3,13–17 The synthesis has also been carried out in organic acids.1,19,22 The use of large anions as dopants increases the solubility of PANI.23,24 The conductivity of PANI is closely related to the redox state
of the polymer, the pH of the working medium and the type of the dopant anion.6
The type of dopant anion affects the stability, electrical conductivity, polymerization kinetics and yield of the polymer.7 The synthesis and characterization of PANI
doped with different anions are critical since many properties of the final polymer
are greatly influenced by the nature of the dopant ion.
In this study, the chemical polymerization of aniline was performed in the
presence of aqueous solutions of phenylphosphinic acid, APP, the use of which has
not been mentioned in the literature. The PANI samples were characterized by
FTIR, UV-VIS, density, inherent viscosity, conductivity and acid capacity. The oxidation state of the PANI samples was determined by titration with TiCl3 solution
and from UV-VIS data.
EXPERIMENTAL
Chemicals
Aniline, freshly distilled and cooled to – 4 ºC, phenylphosphinic acid (C6H5PH(O)OH, APP,
Aldrich), ammonium peroxidisulfate (Merck), ammonium hydroxide and N,N-dimethylformamide
(DMF) were used.
Preparation of PANI-APP
PANI was obtained by oxidizing aniline in aqueous APP solutions with ammonium peroxidisulfate as the oxidizing agent. The mole ratio aniline/oxidant (A/O) was 1; 1.33; 2 and 4, and the aniline/APP ratio (A/APP) was 1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4 (1; 0.5, 0.33; 0.25), at 0 ºC and 25 ºC. The procedure was
the same for all samples: first the aniline salt was formed by the dropwise addition of aniline (0.1 mol
L-1) to an aqueous solution of APP, under continuous stirring and precooling. To this solution, a
precooled aqueous solution of ammonium peroxidisulfate (0.025 – 0.1 mol L-1) was added dropwise
under continuous stirring. The stirring was stopped after 24 h and the PANI was recovered by filtration
and washed several times with a dilute APP solution. The resulting PANI was dried under a dynamic
vacuum for 24 h. The product was converted to PANI-base form with ammonium hydroxide.1
Characterization
The IR spectra were recorded in KBr pellets. The UV-VIS spectra were measured in DMF using a Specord M42 spectrophotometer. The conversion was calculated from grams of dry polymer
CHEMICAL POLYMERIZATION OF ANILINE
1171
without purification ´ 100/g aniline. The oligomer fractions (containing oligomeric and secondary
products) were determined by the difference between % conversion and % dry polymer after purification. The yield (%) represents the grams of dry purified polymer per 100 g aniline.
The oxidation of aniline is exothermic, hence the temperature of the reaction mixture can be
used to monitor the progress of the reaction. The temperature–time profile is well reproducible and
was obtained using a high precision thermometer. It was more suitable to determine the induction
time from the temperature–time profile, than from the maximum temperature. The induction time
represents the time required to reach half of the total increase of temperature during the exothermal
step. The inherent viscosities of 0.01 % solutions of the PANI samples doped with APP in sulfuric
acid were determined using an Ubbelohde viscosimeter. The densities of the PANI samples were determined by the picnometer method, in decaline. The electrical conductivities were measured on
press pellets by the two-probe method.
The acid capacities of the polymers were determined from the quantity of sodium hydroxide
(0.005 mol L-1) required for the titration of the polymer samples. The PANI powder was suspended
in water and titrated by sodium hydroxide in a closed cell under nitrogen. The titration was performed very slowly, with incremental addition of 0.2–0.5 ml, and the delay between two consecutive additions required for pH stabilization was 15 min. The pH measurements were performed with
a CG 841 SCHOTT instrument using a SCHOTT GERATEN N 2041A glass electrode. Three determinations were performed for each sample. The acid capacity, reported for 1 g of polymer, was determined from the neutralization curve.
The oxidation state of PANI was determined from the relative proportion between benzenoid
and quinoid rings in the polymer chain. This method is based on the quantity of hydrogen needed to
transform the quinoid rings in benzenoid rings (the conversion of emeraldine to leucoemeraldine).
Experimentally it consists of the titration of PANI dissolved in acetic acid (80 %) with TiCl3. It is
known that the conversion of emeraldine to leucoemeraldine requires a theoretical quantity equal to
0.543 % H/gram emeraldine.25 The oxidation state was also determined from the UV-VIS absorbance spectrum of the polymer solution in DMF. The thermal analysis of the samples was performed
with a TG 209 instrument (Netzsch) at a heating rate of 25 ºC/min in the temperature range 20 to 990
ºC, in a nitrogen atmosphere and a DSC 204 instrument (Netzsch) in a nitrogen atmosphere in the
temperature range 20 to 500 ºC, at a heating rate of 25 ºC/min.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The oxidative polymerization of aniline in APP is an exothermal process. An
S-shape temperature–time dependence was observed (Fig. 1). The oxidative polymerization of aniline in acid media presents three distinctive stages. The first is
slow and independent of the temperature. The active species in the polymerization
process are formed during this stage. The second stage is faster and temperature dependent; polymer is formed due to propagation. The post-polymerization stage
(third stage) is also temperature dependent, and the polymer undergoes protonation-deprotonation, and oxidation-reduction processes.
The obtained temperature–time profiles for the polymerization of aniline in
APP indicated a long induction period, 8–10 times longer than the synthesis under
the same condition in AS or in other known acids, mentioned in the literature (hydrochloric, picric).8,14,20,23 The induction time was determined from temperature–time dependence and represents the time required to reach half of the total increase in temperature during the exothermal step. Thus, for PANI obtained at an
aniline/oxidant ratio of 1.33 and an aniline/acid ratio of 1/2 at 0 ºC in AS, the in-
1172
PLESU et al.
duction time was 6.9 min, while in APP under the same condition, it was 65 min.
With increasing synthesis temperature, the induction time decreases, hence, in
APP under the same condition but at 25 ºC, the induction time was 55 min.
Fig. 1. The temperature–time profile for aniline polymerization at an aniline/oxidant mole ratio
of 1.33 and an aniline/acid ratio of 1/2 in AS at 0 ºC, in APP at 0 ºC and 25 ºC (secondary axes,
filled triangle).
UV-VIS spectra recorded during the polymerization process in APP indicate
an absorption peak at 720 nm. This peak appears after the induction period necessary for the formation of cation-radical species, able to initiate the polymerization
(Fig. 2). With time, the intensity of this peak increases, during the evolution of the
polymerization. The broad absorption band, which first appeared between 700 and
840 nm, becomes narrower.
Fig. 2. The absorbance spectra during the polymerization of aniline with an aniline/oxidant mole ratio
of 2, and an aniline/APP mole ratio of 1/1, at 0 ºC,
for different times of polymerization: at (1) 80 min,
(2) 85 min, (3) 90 min, (4) 100 min, (5) 115 min.
The induction time depends on the synthesis parameters. Comparing the
absorbance at 720 nm when different APP concentrations are used (Figs. 3 and 4) it
can be seen that the polymerization starts fastest in the aniline/APP 1/1 solution.
This is in accordance with the results of Lux,23 i.e., the polymerization is suppressed in more acidic media. This is mainly attributed to the protonation of the an-
CHEMICAL POLYMERIZATION OF ANILINE
1173
iline. The degree of protonation increases with increasing acid concentration.
Thus, the degree of aniline protonation is lowest at an aniline/APP ratio of 1/1 and
highest at an aniline/APP ratio of ¼ (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. The absorbance at 720 nm versus
time with an aniline/oxidant mole ratio of 1.33 for different aniline/APP mole ratios.
Fig. 4. The induction
time versus the aniline/oxidant and aniline/APP mole ratio,
at 0 ºC.
It increases with increasing APP concentration as a result of the slow formation of cation-radicals. The oxidation process of the protonated species is more difficult compared to that of unprotonated ones, and decreases linearly with increasing oxidant concentration (i.e. decreasing aniline/oxidant mole ratio).
With increasing amount of oxidant (decreasing aniline/oxidant mole ratio) and
decreasing quantity of acid in the solution (Figs. 5 and 6), the rate of polymerization
of aniline in APP solution increases. The polymerization rate can be assessed by the
differential method in percent per minute from the conversion versus time profile,
and is equal to the slope for a particular moment of the polymerization.
The IR spectra of PANI recorded in pellets indicate the presence of five characteristic peaks for all samples at 1580 cm–1, 1490 cm–1, 1307 cm–1, 1145 cm–1
and 826 cm–1, which agrees with literature data.9,10,21
1174
PLESU et al.
Fig. 5. Polymerization rate versus time
for different aniline/oxidant mole ratios for an aniline/APP mole ratio
of 1/1, at 0 ºC.
Fig. 6. Polymerization rate versus time
for different aniline/APP mole ratios
and for an aniline/oxidant mole ratio of 1.33, at 0 ºC.
The peak at 3232 cm–1 in each curve is attributed to N–H stretching vibrations. Its
intensity is very sensitive to the concentration of APP, and increases with increasing
acid concentration. The peaks at 1580 and 1490 cm–1 are attributed to quinoid and
benzenoid ring deformations, and are present in samples of PANI obtained by chemical means. Their positions are independent of whether the PANI is doped or not.
With increasing concentrations of acid and oxidant, the experimental data
show: a decrease of the intensity of the peak characteristic of benzenoid rings at
1500 cm–1; an increase of the intensity of the peaks due to quinoid rings at 1375,
1150, 1560–1570, 1470–1490 and 1630 cm–1; a decrease of the intensity of the
peak at 1630 cm–1 due to overoxidation which results in a decrease in the amount
of the quinoid structure and the appearance of characteristic peaks of benzoquinone at 885, 944, 1080, 1313 and 1654 cm–1.
The intensity of the peaks ascribed to benzenoid and quinoid rings are qualitatively the same for an aniline/oxidant ratio in the range 2–4. The aniline/acid ratio used
was between 1/1 and 1/2. The obtained PANI is, as a result, in the emeraldine form.
1175
CHEMICAL POLYMERIZATION OF ANILINE
UV-VIS spectra of the PANI base were recorded in N,N-dimethylformamide.
The spectra allowed the detection of the absorption maxima of polyaniline salt or
base. PANI has absorptions due to the p – p* transition of the benzenoid ring at 333
nm, characteristic for the most reduced form of PANI, polyleucoemeraldine; the p
– p* transition of the quinoid ring at 627 nm, characteristic for the partially oxidized form of PANI, polyleucoemeraldine form. Further oxidation to the fully oxidized form, polypernigraniline, results in a blue shift of the p – p* transition of the
quinoid peak at 430 nm (due to the formation of semiquinoidic nuclei) and a band
at 844 nm (due to the formation of an exciton centered on the quinoid nuclei).
The yield in PANI, its conductivity, inherent visocosity and density at different aniline/oxidant ratio and aniline/APP are summarized in Table I.
TABLE I. The yield in PANI, conductivity, inherent viscosity and density of PANI in dependence on
the polymerization conditions
No.
sample
1
A/O* A/APP**
4
1/1
Yield %*
Conductivity
S cm-1
Inherent
Density/g cm-3
viscosity/dL g-1
0 ºC
25 ºC
0 ºC
25 ºC
0 ºC
25 ºC
0 ºC
25 ºC
52.61
54.82
0.07
0.06
0.625
0.601
1.395
1.436
2
2
58.38
60.83
0.49
0.39
0.589
0.547
1.395
1.438
3
1.33
62.29
64.91
0.56
0.44
0.567
0.495
1.396
1.442
4
1
66.71
68.51
0.78
0.62
0.494
0.465
1.396
1.427
5
4
48.91
50.96
1.92
1.06
0.638
0.582
1.398
1.431
1/2
6
2
53.74
56.00
1.15
0.91
0.612
0.577
1.387
1.452
7
1.33
54.30
56.58
0.62
0.49
0.582
0.535
1.391
1.456
8
1
57.78
60.21
1.10
0.87
0.523
0.502
1.395
1.458
9
4
46.79
48.76
1.68
1.07
0.655
0.598
1.399
1.451
1/3
10
2
52.06
54.25
0.89
0.70
0.632
0.519
1.396
1.460
11
1.33
51.67
53.84
1.89
1.10
0.588
0.519
1.394
1.453
12
1
53.97
56.24
0.92
0.73
0.547
0.515
1.396
1.457
13
4
44.42
46.29
0.44
0.35
0.662
0.598
1.398
1.461
1/4
14
2
44.45
46.32
1.25
0.99
0.645
0.54
1.395
1.458
15
1.33
48.47
50.51
1.80
1.11
0.592
0.488
1.396
1.460
16
1
49.41 51.49
1.45
1.03
0.554
*A/O – aniline/oxidant; **A/APP – aniline/acid phenylphosphinic
0.453
1.396
1.458
The observed average yield was about 65 % in APP. The polymer yield increased
almost linearly with decreasing aniline/oxidant ratio. The density determined for the
polymer samples shows that the average value was about 1.395 g cm–3 for the
PANI-salt and 1.203 g cm–3 for the PANI-base. The viscosity decreased significantly
for aniline/oxidant ratios lower than 2. With increasing amount of oxidant in the reac-
1176
PLESU et al.
tion medium, the concentration of formed radical cation increases and the resulting
polymer chains are shorter, hence, the inherent viscosity is lower (Table I).
The conductivity shows a small tendency of increasing with increasing acid
concentration (Table I) and decreasing with increasing induction time (Fig. 7).
A higher value of the electrical conductivity was obtained in more acid media
Fig. 7. Conductivity
of PANI samples versus the induction time
for different aniline/APP mole ratios,
at 0 ºC.
(Table I). The conductivity increases with increasing proton concentration in the
aqueous acid media, due to the formation of doped polymer, and due to the existence
of a remanent quantity of acid retained by the polymer chain.1,2,11 At aniline/oxidant
mole ratios < 2, the inherent viscosity of the PANI samples is higher (higher molar
masses), and the conductivity should also be higher, because the electrical conductivity increases with increasing polymer chain length. It was experimentally observed that the molar mass of the PANI had almost no effect on the electrical conductivity. Such a behavior has been theoretically predicted for the cases when the
charges hop from one polymer chain to another. These hops are faster compared to
the life-time of the charge on the chain, i.e., when interchain transport occurs more
readily than intrachain transports and decreases with the reaction temperature.12,17
The oxidation state of PANI was estimated by calculating the intensity ratio of the
peaks at 620 nm and 320 nm (IQ/IB) in each UV-VIS spectrum of the polymer samples
and by the percent hydrogen necessary to reduce the PANI samples (Table II).
The ratio of quinoid and benzenoid units (i.e., C=N/C-N) was calculated on
the basis of the following equation (Eq. 1).
A large quantity of oxidant favors the oxidation of the polymer chain and allows the formation of a polymer in an advanced oxidation state (pernigraniline)
with an increased amount of quinoniminic rings.
The oxidation state (Y) of the obtained polymer was about 0.583 and both
methods gave appropriated values which indicates that the PANI synthesized in
APP was obtained in the emeraldine state (Fig. 8).
1177
CHEMICAL POLYMERIZATION OF ANILINE
TABLE II. The IQ/IB ratio, acidic capacity and percent of hydrogen per gram polymer in dependence of the polymerization conditions
No. sample
A/O*
A/APP**
1
4
1/1
2
2
3
1.33
4
1
5
4
1/2
IQ/IB
meq/g polym.
0 ºC
25 ºC
0.75
0.83
% H/g dry polymer
0 ºC
25 ºC
0 ºC
25 ºC
0.78
13.0
12.76
0.61
0.646
0.84
13.67
13.24
0.612
0.652
0.76
0.77
13.96
13.36
0.632
0.654
0.67
0.68
10.55
10.04
0.645
0.664
0.73
0.74
13.48
13.01
0.62
0.650
6
2
0.86
0.88
14.05
13.51
0.624
0.655
7
1.33
0.92
0.94
14.34
13.76
0.559
0.661
8
1
0.52
0.53
14.53
13.98
0.662
0.667
9
4
0.74
0.75
13.77
13.33
0.635
0.665
10
2
0.89
0.91
13.96
13.92
0.637
0.674
1/3
11
1.33
0.61
0.62
14.53
14.07
0.662
0.680
12
1
0.74
0.75
14.82
14.30
0.669
0.681
13
4
0.32
0.53
13.96
13.40
0.647
0.67
14
2
0.44
0.55
14.44
13.89
0.65
0.673
15
1.33
0.63
0.64
14.91
14.25
0.668
0.682
16
1
0.87
0.89
15.2
14.44
0.672
0.684
1/4
*A/O – aniline/oxidant; **A/APP – aniline/phenylphosphinic acid
(1)
The acid capacity of the samples represent the quantity of base (meq) necessary for the neutralization of one gram of dry polymer and was determined from titration curves. With increasing quantity of oxidant and decrasing amount of acid,
the acidic capacity decreases (Table II).
Solubility tests in solvents such as NMP, DMF, DMSO, indicate an enhanced
solubility of doped PANI samples obtained in APP compared with the samples obtained in sulfuric acid (AS) under the same conditions. The highest solubility was
obtained for PANI samples synthesized at aniline/oxidant mole ratio 2, aniline/acid
mole ratio 1/2, at 0 ºC (Table III).
The increase in the solubility was attributed to the presence of the voluminous
phosphinate anion, which is able to undergo much stronger polymer–solvent interactions than polymer–polymer ones.
1178
PLESU et al.
Fig. 8. Oxidation state of PANI samples
versus the aniline/oxidant mole ratio at an
aniline/APP mole ratio of 1/1.
TABLE III. Solubility data of doped PANI samples obtained at an aniline/oxidant mole ratio of 2,
and an aniline/acid mole ratio of ½ at 0 ºC
Dopant
Solvent
NMP/g
l-1
DMF/g l-1
DMSO/g l-1
AS
–
0.042
0.006
APP
0.521
0.106
0.232
The thermal stability of the polymers was studied by TG and DSC; the TG
curves for some samples are presented in Fig. 9.
In general, the thermal behavior of PANI samples shows a characteristic
“three step” weight loss, as can be seen from the DSC curves illustrated in Fig. 10,
which show the endothermic peaks associated with mass loss.
During heating up to 150 ºC, the weight losses associated with the residual water present in all the PANI samples, lie between 5.98 % for PANI-AS (Fig. 9 curve
A, B) and 8.82 % for PANI-APP (Fig. 9 curve C, D).
The water molecules are able to occupy dopant sites in polyaniline, hence, the
residual water cannot be assumed to be humidity because all the samples were
dried before the TG measurements. This process has also been observed by other
authors.4,7,11,12–14
The weight loss in the temperature range 150 ºC to 400 ºC varied between 1.09
and 33.24 % for the PANI samples obtained in AS and doped with HSO4– ions and
15.56 and 24.20 % for the PANI samples obtained in APP and doped with APP.
They are related to loss of dopant and degradation of the formed oligomer chains.
Increasing the amount of oxidant in the reaction medium results in shorter polymer
chain and, thus, the weight loss became higher. The use of a large amount of oxidant induces polymer degradation. With increasing acid concentration, and temperature of synthesis, the weight loss increases, due to an increase of the content of
CHEMICAL POLYMERIZATION OF ANILINE
1179
dopant in the polymer samples. In the same domain, the PANI-APP samples
showed two inflexion points, corresponding to the decomposition of the dopant.
APP (Fig. 9 curve E) remains stable up to 200 ºC, subsequently, the APP starts decomposing gradually up to 410 ºC, with two maximum decomposition rates at
239.0 ºC and 401.5 ºC and with a weight loss of 60.86 % in this domain. The maximum weight loss (24.20 %) was observed for the PANI-APP obtained with an aniline/oxidant mole ratio = 1 and an aniline/APP ratio = 1/2 at 25 ºC, and the minimum loss (15.56 %) was observed for the PANI-APP obtained with an aniline/oxidant mole ratio = 1.33 and an aniline/APP ratio = 1/1 at 0 ºC.
In general, both the decomposition temperature and the weight loss are affected by the molar mass, and decrease with decreasing molar mass. The thermal
stability of PANI synthesized in APP is lower than that obtained in AS. For example, for PANI-AS obtained at an aniline/acid ratio of 1/1 and an aniline/oxidant
mole ratio of 1.33, the temperature corresponding to Dm = 50 % was 988.1 ºC, and
for PANI-APP synthesized under the same conditions, it was 489.2 ºC. The 50 %
(Dm = 50 %) weight loss for the PANI-AS samples obtained at an aniline/acid ratio
of 1/1 and an aniline/oxidant mole ratio of 1.33 and 2 occurs at 988.1 ºC and 877.1
ºC respectively. This is in accordance with the inherent viscosity values, which are
related to the molar weight. It was observed that the decomposition process occurred at higher temperatures with increasing aniline/oxidant mole ratio, due to the
corresponding increase of the molar weight, as can be seen from the inherent viscosities (Table I). For the samples synthesized at the higher temperature, 25 ºC, the
50 % (Dm = 50 %) weight losses appear at lower temperatures compared with the
corresponding sample synthesized at 0 ºC, due to the smaller molar weights; the
differences were between 200 ºC and 300 ºC. In this case, the temperature assigned
to the maximum decomposition rate varies between 230 ºC and 300 ºC.
All PANI samples indicate the first endothermic transition at approximately
130 ºC, as can be seen in Fig. 10.
The first peak corresponds to the evaporation of water trapped inside the polymer or bonded to the polymer chain. The second and the third peak correspond to
endothermic transitions due to the loss of acid dopant (AS and APP) and due to the
decomposition of polymer chain starting around 400 ºC, respectively.
Comparing the TG data with the DSC data, only for the PANI-APP samples
prepared at 0 ºC, did an additional peak at about 240 ºC appear (Fig. 10 curves C,
D), which does not correspond to the weight loss recorded on the thermograms.
The presence of this peak can be assigned to the interaction of PANI and dopant, in
this case APP, because this additional peak was not observed with the PANI-AS
samples.
The maximum rates of weight loss observed on the thermograms correspond
with the endothermic peaks on the DSC traces.
1180
PLESU et al.
Fig. 9. Thermogravimetric curves for A: PANI – AS (A/O = 1.33, A/AS = 1/1, 0 ºC); B: PANI –
AS (A/O = 1, A/AS = 1/1, 0 ºC); C: PANI – APP (A/O = 1.33, A/APP = 1/1, 0 ºC); D: PANI –
APP (A/O = 1.33, A/APP = 1/2, 0 ºC); E: APP; F: PANI – AS (A/O = 2, A/AS = 1/1, 0 ºC).
Fig. 10. DSC curves for A: PANI – AS (A/O = 1.33, A/AS = 1/1, 0 ºC); B: PANI – AS (A/O = 1,
A/AS = 1/1, 0 ºC); C: PANI – APP (A/O = 1.33, A/APP = 1/1, 0 ºC); D: PANI – APP (A/O =
1.33, A/APP = 1/2, 0 ºC).
CONCLUSIONS
The experimental data show that PANI with a conductivity of 1.5 S cm–1 could
be synthesized in APP. The polymerization process requires an induction time
8–10 times higher that in other common acids. The average yield was about 57 %.
CHEMICAL POLYMERIZATION OF ANILINE
1181
The average density of the PANI-salt was 1.395 g cm–3 and that of the PANI-base
1.203 g cm–3.
The acid capacity of the PANI samples lay between 13.16–15.02 meq/g polymer.
The inherent viscosity of the PANI samples have maximum values (0.625 –
0.662 dl/g) at an aniline/oxidant mole ratio >2.
The UV-VIS and titration with TiCl3 data show that the oxidation state of the
obtained polymer was about 0.583.
IZVOD
HEMIJSKA POLIMERIZACIJA ANILINA U FENILFOSFINSKOJ
KISELINI
NICOLETA PLESU1, GHEORGHE ILIA1, GEZA BANDUR2 i SIMONA POPA2
1Institute of Chemistry of Romanian Academy, Mihai Viteazul Bul. 24, 300223-TimiÕoara, Romania and 2University
“Politehnica” TimiÕoara, BocÕei No. 6, TimiÕoara, Romania
Izvedena je hemijska polimerizacija anilina u fenilfosfinskoj kiselini (APP)
kori{}ewem amonijum-peroksidisulfata kao oksidansa na 0 ºC i 25 ºC. Prinos polianilina (PANI) bio je oko 60–69 %. Za polimerizacioni proces bilo je potrebno
indukciono vreme 8–10 puta ve}e nego u drugim kiselinama (hlorovodoni~noj, sumpornoj). Odre|ivawe gustine uzorka polimera pokazalo je 1,395 g cm-3 za PANI-so i 1,203 g
cm-3 za PANI bazu. Kiselinski kapacitet za PANI zavisi od parametara sinteze, a
maksimalna vrednost bila je 15,02 meq/g polimera. Inherentni viskozitet PANI bio je
0,662 dl/g pri molskom odnosu anilin/oksidans > 2 i na 0 ºC. Oksidaciono stawe je bilo
funkcija parametara sinteze i imalo je vrednost izme|u 0,553 i 0,625 i odre|eno je na
osnovu podataka iz UV-Vis spektara i titracije sa TiCl3. PANI je karakterisan merewima gustine, inherentne viskoznosti, provodqivosti, kiselinskog kapaciteta, FTIR,
UV-Vis spektroskopijom i termogravimetrijom.
(Primqeno 20. avgusta, revidirano 1. decembra 2004)
REFERENCES
1. D. C. Trived, “Polyanilines”, in Handbook of Conductive Molecules and Polymers: Vol 2: conductive Polymers, Synthesis and Electrical Properties, H. S. Nalwa Ed., Wiley, London, 1997,
pp. 503–566
2. W. S. Huang, B. D. Humpfrey, A. G. MacDiarmid, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1, 82 (1986) 2385
3. A. Kitani, M. Kaya, J. Yano, K. Yoshikawa, K. Sasaki, Synth. Met. 18 (1987) 341
4. T. Ohsawaka, T. Kabata, O. Kimura, Synthetic Metals 29 (1989) E203
5. Li. Yongfang, Y. Baozhen, Y. Jing, Y. Cao, Q. Renyuan, Synth. Met. 25 (1988) 79
6. C. Menardo, M. Nechtschen, Rousseau, J. P. Travers, Synth. Met. 25 (1988) 311
7. A. G. MacDiarmid, J. C. Chiang, A. F. Richter, Synth. Met. 18 (1987) 285
8. P. M. Beadle, Y. F. Nicolau, E. Banke, P. Ronnon, D. Djurado, Synth. Met. 95 (1998) 29
9. S.-M. Park: “Electrochemistry of p-conjugated polymer”, in Handbook of Conductive Molecules
and Polymers: Vol 3: Conductive Polymers: Spectroscopy and Physical Properties, H. S. Nalwa
Ed, Wiley, London, 1997, pp. 429–461
10. M. Zagorska, A. Prori, S. Lefrant, “Spectroelectrochemistry and Spectroscopy of Conducting
Polymers", in Handbook of Conductive Molecules and Polymers: Vol 3: Conductive Polymers.
Spectroscopy and Physical Properties, H. S. Nalwa Ed., Wiley, London, 1997, pp. 183–215
1182
PLESU et al.
11. T. Nakajima, T. Kawagoe, Synth. Met. 28 (1989) C629
12. J. Stejskal, A. Riede, D. Hlavata, J. Prokes, M. Helmstedt, P. Holler, Synth. Met. 96 (1998) 55
13. N. Adams, P. J. Laughlin, A. P. Monkman, Synth. Met. 76 (1996) 157
14. G. Boara, M. Sparpaglione, Synth. Met. 72 (1995) 135
15. Y. Cao, A. Andreatta, A. J. Heeger, P. Smith, Polymer 30 (1989) 2305
16. A. Ray, G. E. Asturias, D. L. Kershner, A. F. Richter, A. G. MacDiarmid, A. J. Epstein, Synth.
Met. 29 (1989) 141
17. S. Li, H. Dong, Y. Cao, Synth. Met. 29 (1989) 329
18. T. L. A. Campos, D. F. Kersting, C. A. Ferreira, Surf. Coat. Technol. 122 (1999) 3
19. W. Ajr Gazotti, M.-A. De Paoli, Synth. Met. 80 (1996) 263
20. P. N. Adams, P. J. Laughlin, A. P. Monkman, A. M. Kenwright, Polymer 37 (1996) 3411
21. I. Kulszewicz-Bajer, J. M. Sobezak, J. P. Hasik, Polymer 37 (1996) 25
22. J. E. Abuqueque, L. H. C. Mattoso, D. T. Balogh, R. M. Faria, J. G. Masters, A. G. MacDiarmid,
Synth. Met. 113 (2000) 19
23. F. Lux, Polymer 35 (1994) 2915
24. D. W. Hatchett, M. Josowicz, J. Janata, J. Phys. Chem. B, 103 (1999) 10992
25. A. G. Green, A. E. Woodhead, J. Chem. Soc. 97 (1910) 2388
26. E. Erdem, M. Karakisla, M. SaHak, Eur. Polymer J. (2004) (in press)
27. J. Prokes, M. Tharkova, D. Hlavata, J. Stejkal, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 78 (2002) 393.