Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Molecular Microbiology (2007) 65(3), 583–589 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05826.x First published online 3 July 2007 MicroOpinion Bacteria between protists and phages: from antipredation strategies to the evolution of pathogenicity Harald Brüssow* Chemin de la Chaumény 13, CH-1814 La Tour de Peilz, Switzerland. Summary Bacteriophages and protists are major causes of bacterial mortality. Genomics suggests that phages evolved well before eukaryotic protists. Bacteria were thus initially only confronted with phage predators. When protists evolved, bacteria were caught between two types of predators. One successful antigrazing strategy of bacteria was the elaboration of toxins that would kill the grazer. The released cell content would feed bystander bacteria. I suggest here that, to fight grazing protists, bacteria teamed up with those phage predators that concluded at least a temporary truce with them in the form of lysogeny. Lysogeny was perhaps initially a resource management strategy of phages that could not maintain infection chains. Subsequently, lysogeny might have evolved into a bacterium–prophage coalition attacking protists, which became a food source for them. When protists evolved into multicellular animals, the lysogenic bacteria tracked their evolving food source. This hypothesis could explain why a frequent scheme of bacterial pathogenicity is the survival in phagocytes, why a significant fraction of bacterial pathogens have prophage-encoded virulence genes, and why some virulence factors of animal pathogens are active against unicellular eukaryotes. Bacterial pathogenicity might thus be one playing option of the stone–scissor–paper game played between phages– bacteria–protists, with humans getting into the crossfire. predation (Brüssow, 2007). Eating is in a way the first commandment of the laws of thermodynamics imposed on organisms. If you do not eat, you will starve to death (with the loss of your somatic cells), and if you do not find a mate, your germ cells are lost. The interest in food is perhaps the most vital force in biology because sexual organisms evolved relatively late in evolution, coincident with the appearance of eukarya. Eating When investigated at a biochemical level, microbes collectively demonstrate metabolic capacities that dwarf that of animals (Lengeler et al., 1999). Animals are in the terminology of feeding modes chemoorganoheterotrophs, which is but one of the four major nutritional types of microorganisms. Even when each bacterial species masters only a small part of this biochemical versatility, they have learned to complement their biochemical shortcomings in many nutritional interactions with their physical and biological environment. Bacteria are the inventors of photosynthesis, they discovered N2 and CO2 fixation, and methanogenesis evolved in Archaea. These processes go well beyond feats of nutritional biochemistry and represent key chemical reactions of geochemical importance. Bacteria have also found creative solutions to starvation. When leaving exponential growth in a rich medium, bacteria go into a stationary growth phase, which, in the laboratory, leads relatively quickly to cell death. However, many bacteria in nature are chronically on a small diet (Rappe et al., 2002); they do not divide very frequently (from once in a month to a year in the ocean or the sediment, respectively, Schippers et al., 2005), and are thus exquisitely adapted to long-term survival in the relative absence of food. Only few animals have comparable starvation solutions (e.g. tardigrade’s anabiosis state). Three driving forces explain the behaviour of many organisms: the quest for food and for sex, and the avoidance of Predation Accepted 8 June, 2007. *For correspondence. [email protected]; Tel. 0049 21 944 34 24. In nature, starvation is therefore a less likely cause of death for bacteria than predation. One predator is smaller © 2007 The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd E-mail 584 H. Brüssow Fig. 1. Phage–bacterium interaction. The attack of a bacteriophage on a Gram-positive bacterium is documented in a time series of electron microscopy ultrathin sections of Lactobacillus plantatum infected with a large Myovirus of the SPO1 phage family. A and B. Phages with empty and full head adsorbed to the target cell. C. Demonstrating how the phage crosses with its tail structure the large cell wall to inject its DNA into the cytoplasm. D and E. Cytopathic effects with convoluted membrane systems developing in the infected cell. F. The breakdown of the cell wall and the release of the cytoplasm (G). The figure is from Chibani-Chennoufi et al. (2004), with permission from American Society for Microbiology. than bacteria: these are viruses that carry the telling name bacteriophages (‘bacterium eaters’) (Fig. 1). Phages are a global player (Fuhrman, 1999): it is currently estimated that 90% of the ocean biomass is prokaryotic and that phages lyse about 20% of the bacterial biomass every day (Suttle, 2006). The other big killer is protozoa, singlecelled eukaryotes that graze on bacteria (Sherr and Sherr, 1987). Over long averages, phages and protozoa each cause about half of the bacterial mortality, but at any given time point and specified place, either one or the other predator might dominate the bacterial killing (Fuhrman and Noble, 1995, Suttle, 2006). Phages and protozoa leave few room for predator bacteria such as Bdellovibrio, individual hunters that drill a hole into their bacterial prey and multiply intracellularly somewhat like phages (Sockett and Lambert, 2004), or myxobacteria that show a wolf pack-foraging strategy by socially secreting digestive enzymes on their bacterial prey. origin (Forterre, 2006). For example, the genome of Escherichia coli phage T4 is certainly not derived from its bacterial host: the guanosine-cytosine content of the two genomes differs dramatically, only few T4 and E. coli proteins share sequence similarity, but on tree analysis, they are placed on branches that diverged before the separation of bacteria from eukarya (Miller et al., 2003). It is thus not farfetched to surmise that some phages are as old as bacteria. In fact, one might even speculate that some phages (note that phages are not monophyletic) might derive from ‘life’ forms that predate LUCA, the last universal common ancestor, which is postulated at the root of the universal tree of life. The genomes of phages are so varied, covering double- and single-stranded DNA and RNA, that one gets the impression that they are remnants of genomes at an experimental stage before LUCA settled for double-stranded DNA as the universal genetic repository (Forterre, 2005). Antiquity arguments Arms race Bacteria are collectively very old; their origin goes back 3 billion years ago. At that time, prokaryotic Archaea were around, but not eukaryotic grazers. Archaea are very special: as far as we know, they never tried out photosynthesis, they did not develop into pathogens, and they do not prey on bacteria. Thus, for half of their evolutionary history, bacteria were apparently without major predators – but was this really the case? This picture of a predator-free Arcadia is probably incorrect. Bacteriophages do not leave fossils, but genome sequencing of bacteriophages points to their ancient Long before Darwin, the book of Genesis formulated, apparently overlooked by creationists, the basic principles of modern biology: ‘be fruitful and multiply’ and ‘replenish the earth and subdue it and have dominion over every living thing that moveth upon the earth’ are poetic formulations of the selfish gene concept. However, Nature has built-in checks and balances to prevent uniformity in life. Monoculture has the inherent risk of narrowing genetic diversity, which could lead to the extinction of entire ecosystems in a changing world. The essence of biology is genetic variability such that Nature still has promising © 2007 The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 65, 583–589 Bacteria between protists and phages 585 models up her sleeves to cope with the most dramatic environmental changes. Predation has important biological functions to maintain variability. Let’s again look to the T4/E. coli couple. To escape infection, bacteria must sense the presence of foreign DNA within their cytoplasm and destroy this alien DNA. Fittingly, one hot spot of genetic variability between E. coli strains is in restriction/ modification genes (Milkman, 1999), which distinguish between genetic self and non-self and destroy invading DNA not carrying the appropriate modification signals. T4 phage has an answer to this onslaught – it contains one of the most heavily modified DNA genomes known and is resistant to the action of most restriction endonucleases (Karam, 1994). The arms race is on. Let’s take another example: the receptor for many T4 phages on the E. coli cell is the surface-exposed lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecule (Karam, 1994). The bacterium can thus escape from its phage predator by changing the chemical identity of LPS. It is probably not a chance event that a second hot spot of genetic diversity between E. coli strains is in the LPS genes (Milkman, 1999). In T4-like genomes, the antireceptor genes are likewise a hot spot of genetic diversification (Tétart et al., 1998) – again we see the genetic footprints of an arms race. Truce However, Nature has also inbuilt safeguards that allow some organisms a temporary rest from this genetic arms race. Low-abundance bacteria can become invisible to their predator phages when they slip under a critical threshold of 104 specific cells per millilitre (Wiggins and Alexander, 1985). Marine ecologists developed the ‘killing the winning population’ concept (Wommack and Colwell, 2000). Phages amplify only on the successfully outgrowing clone thriving to numerical dominance in a given ecological setting. Phages force down the winner and, as they cannot attack minority clones, phages thereby enforce genetic diversity in the environment. The threshold is also in the interest of phages, as it also prevents an overzealous phage from driving its host, and thereby also itself, to extinction. There is a second safeguard to phage overkill: as phages cannot multiply well in starved cells (Los et al., 2007), the malnourished cell is spared from death. Phages that happen to infect a starved cell can go into a kind of dormancy (pseudolysogeny in T4) until bacteria resume growth with the arrival of new food. E. coli phage lambda goes a step further by integrating its genome as a prophage into the bacterial chromosome. Lysogeny gives the phage a rest from the ‘divide et impera’ lifestyle of virulent phages and a long-term chance for survival under conditions not allowing to maintain an uninterrupted infection chain. Coexistence Ironically, phage lysis increases bacterial growth by feeding non-infected bacteria with the cell content released by the infected cell (microbial loop) (Wommack and Colwell, 2000). DNA from decaying bacteria and their phages can become an important N and P source for bacteria that have found a good C source (e.g. Vibrio on copepod exoskeletons). Vibrio might develop competence primarily for nutrition and only secondarily for genetic variation (Meibom et al., 2005). In contrast, if bacteria are grazed by protists, most of their biomass is shifted to animals further up in the food chain. Lysogeny is more than a temporary peaceful coexistence between phage predator and bacterial prey. By becoming part of the bacterial chromosome, the prophage takes a new genetic identity. If it wants to get a lift by the bacterial cell as a hitchhiker, it must cooperate (Canchaya et al., 2003). We should not be surprised to learn that phages carry useful genetic functions for the bacterial cell. In Firmicutes, these lysogenic conversion genes are frequently located near the phage attachment site and might be the result of imprecise excision of the prophage from the previous bacterial genome. As phages are not tightly limited by species boundaries (Pajunen et al., 2001), the bacterial cell can explore a much larger DNA sequence space with phages than they can with conjugative plasmids. There is indeed good circumstantial evidence that phages had a major impact on the evolution of bacterial chromosomes (Canchaya et al., 2004). In addition, phages have spread photosynthesis genes between their bacterial hosts and have thus influenced the evolution of photosynthesis (Sullivan et al., 2006). Finally, bacterial pathogenesis has apparently evolved with the help of phages (Brüssow et al., 2004). To appreciate the latter link, we must go back 1.5 billion of years. Antigrazing strategies Palaeontologists dated the first ecologically diversified protist world at about 1.5 billion years ago (Javaux et al., 2001). Then, a new situation emerged for bacteria: both viral lysis and protist grazing now threatened them. After being engaged in a long arms race with phages, bacteria had to ‘design’ strategies against grazing protists (Fig. 2). Molecular data support the antiquity of the interaction between bacteria and amoeba: intracellular chlamydiales encode an enzyme that steals ATP from amoeba. This bacterial gene diverged c. 1 billion years ago at the eukaryotic radiation time (Greub and Raoult, 2003). If you look into contemporary ecosystems, you see that bacteria have found a number of solutions to the protist problem (Matz and Kjelleberg, 2005). Small protozoa prefer prey in the 1–3 mm size range. Growing to oversize helped © 2007 The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 65, 583–589 586 H. Brüssow as an antipredation strategy. These bacteria become unpalatable, and protists reject the prey a few minutes after their ingestion. Armour makes you clumsy – so other bacteria use instead high motility combined with small size to reduce their grazing mortality. In our context, the most interesting antipredation strategy is toxin production. The bacterium is ingested and releases the toxin after digestion. Ingestion of a few toxin-producing bacteria can kill the predator protist, which then releases its cytoplasm into the medium, which then feeds the bacteria in the vicinity of the protist (Matz et al., 2004). Such an altruistic behaviour is theoretically possible in a clonal bacterial population. In this way, an antipredation strategy even opens up a new and rich food source. This double advantage would actually represent a strong positive selection for toxin-carrying bacteria. With respect to toxin production, it seems that bacteria have teamed up with their old predator phage against the new protist predator. The origin of bacterial pathogenesis Fig. 2. Protist–bacterium interaction. Top: Uninfected Acanthamoeba trophozoite as seen by electron microscopy. 3500¥ magnification. Centre: Acanthamoeba trophozoite in the process of phagocytosing the ‘crescent body’ (arrow), the infectious development stage of Parachlamydia acanthamoebae (strain Hall). Bottom: Acanthamoeba trophozoite 36 h after infection with Parachlamydia acanthamoebae (strain Bn9) (pictures kindly provided by Gilbert Greub, Institute of Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland). bacteria to get out of the target zone. Another bacterial solution to the grazing problem is based on masking. In fact, amoeba need to recognize a surface structure on the bacterial prey to start the phagocytosis process. Recent experiments showed selective feeding of gut amoeba on Salmonella belonging to different LPS serotypes (Wildschutte et al., 2004). Bacteria could here again play the same trick they used to escape from phage predation, namely by varying LPS surface molecules. Armour is another solution against predation, and the protein S-layer surrounding many bacteria has been interpreted As protists gave rise to animals, the phage–bacterium coalition was carried into animals. In fact, there is some circumstantial molecular evidence that choanoflagellate protists are at the root of the metazoa tree (King and Carroll, 2001) and that choanoflagellates gave rise to choanocytes in sponges. Interestingly, sponges suffer remarkably little damage from microbial infections. They probably owe this resistance to two principles: antimicrobial chemicals that they elaborate, and amoebocytes that patrol the sponge body for invading microbes apparently since Precambrian times (Li et al., 1998). Amoebocytes resemble amoeba protists morphologically, and the phagocytosis feeding mode is the same in both cell types (Fig. 3). This antibacterial patrol system of an animal body was so successful that it was maintained in higher animals. Amoeba-like phagocytes travel through our body and screen it for bacterial intruders, and are actively called to sites of bacterial invasion. Recall, however, that some bacteria have learned to defy phagocytic protists and even to use them as food source (Fig. 2). With the evolution of higher organisms, bacteria have tracked animals as a suitable food source (Brüssow, 2007), leading to the evolution of bacterial pathogenicity. Notably, a major theme of bacterial pathogenicity is the survival of the ingested bacterial pathogen within phagocytes (Boneca et al., 2007). It is thus not farfetched to postulate that bacterial pathogenicity evolved from the antipredation/food quest conflict between bacteria and protists. In support of this hypothesis is the observation that pathogenic bacteria frequently target very fundamental cellular processes that have a complement in protists. Indeed, medical microbiologists can study pathogenesis using amoeba as model systems, © 2007 The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 65, 583–589 Bacteria between protists and phages 587 Fig. 3. A mammalian neutrophil white blood cell has engulfed a bacterium in a phagocytic vacuole (panel A white frame). Subsequently, intracellular granules fuse with the phagosome and discharge their contents (arrows) to form a phagolysosome (B). In addition to this intracellular killing mechanism, activated neutrophils release fibres called neutrophil extracellular traps that fix and kill bacteria and yeasts (C). The picture is from Urban et al. (2006), with permission from Blackwell Publishing. demonstrating the antiquity of these interactions (Molmeret et al., 2002). Similarly, cell biologists can study some aspects of cancer in microbial yeast cells. Phages have played an important role in this process, as revealed by prophage genomics. I will illustrate this with two examples. Prophages from Streptococcus pyogenes encode a hyaluronidase that facilitates spread of the bacterium along the connective tissue of the patient (‘flesh eating bacterium’), prophage DNase destroys neutrophil extracellular traps (Fig. 3) that should immobilize invading bacteria (Sumby et al., 2005), and finally a large number of prophage-encoded superantigens overstimulate the immune system, thereby effectively paralyzing its action against the invader (Banks et al., 2002). Prophages from Staphylococcus aureus encode toxins (e.g. PVL) that induce apoptosis in neutrophil leucocytes (Genestier et al., 2005). Some S. aureus prophages include a battery of genes against the body defence collectively known as an immune evasion cluster (Van Wamel et al., 2006). This cluster includes an enterotoxin, which downregulates a chemokine binding site on monocytes; a staphylokinase, which binds defensins; a chemotaxis inhibitor (CHIPS); and a complement inhibitor (SCIN) (Rooijakkers et al., 2005). Here, prophages direct a coordinated assault on the immune system of the human and animal host. This is certainly not an isolated case. Prophages from enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli, as well as from Salmonella typhimurium, help orchestrate the takeover of the enterocyte in the mammalian and avian intestine (Tobe et al., 2006). In other cases, the very toxin that causes the characteristic symptom of the infectious disease is prophage-encoded: cholera toxin and diphtheria toxin are famous examples (Waldor and Mekalanos, 1996). Thus, it seems that bacteria sandwiched between two predators, namely phages and protist grazers, recruited the predator that concluded at least a temporary truce with them (prophages) to fight the protist grazers. Phages had already experience with this strategy, as they must elaborate antipredation measures against superinfecting phages (‘immunity functions’) to avoid sharing their bacterial food source with other parasites. In association with their host bacterium, phages opened up new food sources for themselves by feeding the lysogenic bacterium. Prophages became popular in some bacterial pathogens; some strains of the E. coli O157:H7 food-borne pathogen carry so many prophages (n = 18) that one can nearly speak of a phage in bacterial disguise (Fig. 4), underlining the intimate coalition between phages and bacteria. Outlook As nature is very playful, evolution is never a one-way road. Some protists have discovered that, capturing bacteria as metabolic slaves, instead of digesting them, might be even more profitable. In this way, cyanobacteria probably became the chloroplasts of photosynthetic eukaryotes. Becoming an intracellular bacterium relieved the phage predation pressure: while cyanobacteria are the vulnerable prey of many cyanophages (Angly et al., 2006), viruses that infect chloroplasts are not known. Bacteria resisting amoeba found in their eukaryotic host a widespread aquatic reservoir, an evolutionary crib to evolve genes that allowed them to later resist human macrophages and a shelter when enclosed inside the amoeba cyst (Greub and Raoult, 2004). Apparently, just going from two- to three-player relationships in the evolutionary predator–prey game opens up numerous stone– scissor–paper playing options. These are not necessarily theoretical games. Evolutionary thinking in medicine (‘Darwinian medicine’) might actually also lead to new practical approaches exploring infection control with phages (‘phage therapy’) or domesticated bacteria (‘probiotics’ in bacterial replacement therapy). © 2007 The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 65, 583–589 588 H. Brüssow Fig. 4. A phage in bacterial disguise? The graph shows from the inside to the outside the genomes from the enterohaemorrhagic E. coli strains O157 Sakai and EDL933, the laboratory E. coli strain K-12 and the uropathogenic E. coli strain CFT073. All contain multiple prophage sequences (depicted as red rectangles proportional to their size). The figure is from Canchaya et al. (2003), with permission from American Society for Microbiology. References Angly, F.E., Felts, B., Breitbart, M., Salamon, P., Edwards, R.A., and Carlson, C. (2006) The marine viromes of four oceanic regions. PLoS Biol 4: e368. Banks, D.J., Beres, S.B., and Musser, J.M. (2002) The fundamental contribution of phages to GAS evolution, genome diversification and strain emergence. Trends Microbiol 10: 515–521. Boneca, I.G., Dussurget, O., Cabanes, D., Nahori, M.A., Sousa, S., and Lecuit, M. (2007) A critical role for peptidoglycan N-deacetylation in Listeria evasion from the host innate immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 997– 1002. Brüssow, H. (2007) The Quest for Food: A Natural History of Eating. New York: Springer Science Publisher. Brüssow, H., Canchaya, C., and Hardt, W.-D. (2004) Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 560–602. Canchaya, C., Proux, C., Fournous, G., Bruttin, A., and Brüssow, H. (2003) Prophage genomics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67: 238–276. Canchaya, C., Fournous, G., and Brüssow, H. (2004) The impact of prophages on bacterial chromosomes. Mol Microbiol 53: 9–18. Chibani-Chennoufi, S., Dillmann, M.-L., Marvin-Guy, L., Rami-Shojaei, S., and Brussow, H. (2004) Lactobacillus plantarum bacteriophage LP65: a new member of the SPO1-like genus of the family Myoviridae. J Bacteriol 186: 7069–7083. Forterre, P. (2005) The two ages of the RNA world, and the transition to the DNA world: a story of viruses and cells. Biochimie 87: 793–803. Forterre, P. (2006) The origin of viruses and their possible roles in major evolutionary transitions. Virus Res 117: 5–16. Fuhrman, J.A. (1999) Marine viruses and their biogeochemical and ecological effects. Nature 399: 541–548. Fuhrman, J.A., and Noble, R.T. (1995) Viruses and protists cause similar bacterial mortality in coastal seawater. Limnol Oceanogr 40: 1236–1242. Genestier, A.L., Michallet, M.C., Prevost, G., Bellot, G., Chalabreysse, L., and Peyrol, S. (2005) Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin directly targets mitochondria and induces Bax-independent apoptosis of human neutrophils. J Clin Invest 115: 3117–3127. Greub, G., and Raoult, D. (2003) History of the ADP/ATPtranslocase-encoding gene, a parasitism gene transferred from a Chlamydiales ancestor to plants 1 billion years ago. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 5530–5535. Greub, G., and Raoult, D. (2004) Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin Microbiol Rev 17: 413– 433. Javaux, E.J., Knoll, A.H., and Walter, M.R. (2001) Morphological and ecological complexity in early eukaryotic ecosystems. Nature 412: 66–69. Karam, J.D. (ed.) (1994) Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press. King, N., and Carroll, S.B. (2001) A receptor tyrosine kinase from choanoflagellates: molecular insights into early © 2007 The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 65, 583–589 Bacteria between protists and phages 589 animal evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 15032– 15037. Lengeler, J., Drews, G., and Schlegel, H.G. (eds) (1999) The Biology of Prokaryotes. Stuttgart: Thieme/Blackwell Publisher. Li, C.W., Chen, J.Y., and Hua, T.E. (1998) Precambrian sponges with cellular structures. Science 279: 879–882. Los, M., Golec, P., Los, J., Weglewska-Jurkiewicz, A., Czyz, A., Wegrzyn, A., et al. (2007) Effective inhibition of lytic development of bacteriophages l, P1 and T4 by starvation of their host, Escherichia coli. BMC Biotechnol 7: e13. Matz, C., and Kjelleberg, S. (2005) Off the hook-how bacteria survive protozoan grazing. Trends Microbiol 13: 302–307. Matz, C., Deines, P., Boenigk, J., Arndt, H., Eberl, L., Kjelleberg, S., and Jurgens, K. (2004) Impact of violaceinproducing bacteria on survival and feeding of bacteriovorous nanoflagellates. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 1593–1599. Meibom, K.L., Blokesch, M., Dolganov, N.A., Wu, C.Y., and Schoolnik, G.K. (2005) Chitin induces natural competence in Vibrio cholerae. Science 310: 1824–1827. Milkman, R. (1999) Gene transfer in Escherichia coli. In Organization of the Prokaryotic Genome. Charlebois, R.L. (ed.). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press, pp. 291–309. Miller, E.S., Kutter, E., Mosig, G., Ariska, F., Kunisawa, T., and Ruger, W. (2003) Bacteriophage T4 genome. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67: 86–156. Molmeret, M., Alli, A.O., Zink, S., Flieger, A., Cianciotto, N.P., and Kwaik, Y.A. (2002) icmT is essential for pore formationmediated egress of Legionella pneumophila from mammalian and protozoan cells. Infect Immun 70: 69–78. Pajunen, M.I., Kiljunen, S.J., Soderholm, M.E., and Skurnik, M. (2001) Complete genomic sequence of the lytic bacteriophage phiYeO3–12 of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O: 3. J Bacteriol 183: 1928–1937. Rappe, M.S., Connon, S.A., Vergin, K.L., and Giovannoni, S.J. (2002) Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade. Nature 418: 630–633. Rooijakkers, S.H., Ruyken, M., Roos, A., Daha, M.R., Presanis, J.S., and Sim, R.B. (2005) Immune evasion by a staphylococcal complement inhibitor that acts on C3 convertases. Nat Immunol 6: 920–927. Schippers, A., Neretin, L.N., Kallmeyer, J., Ferdelman, T.G., Cragg, B.A., Parkes, R.J., and Jörgensen, B.B. (2005) Prokaryotic cells of the deep sub-seafloor biosphere identified as living bacteria. Nature 433: 861–864. Sherr, E.B., and Sherr, B.F. (1987) High rates of consumption of bacteria by pelagic ciliates. Nature 325: 710–711. Sockett, R.E., and Lambert, C. (2004) Bdellovibrio as therapeutic agents: a predatory renaissance? Nat Rev Microbiol 2: 669–675. Sullivan, M.B., Lindell, D., Lee, J.A., Thompson, L.R., Bielawski, J.P., and Chisholm, S. (2006) Prevalence and evolution of core photosystem II genes in marine cyanobacterial viruses and their hosts. PLoS Biol 4: e234. Sumby, P., Barbian, K.D., Gardner, D.J., Whitney, A.R., Welty, D.M., and Long, R.D. (2005) Extracellular deoxyribonuclease made by group A Streptococcus assists pathogenesis by enhancing evasion of the innate immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 1679–1684. Suttle, C.A. (2006) Viruses in the sea. Nature 437: 356–361. Tétart, F., Desplats, C., and Krisch, H.M. (1998) Genome plasticity in the distal tail′ fibre locus of the T-even bacteriophage: recombination between conserved motifs swaps adhesin specificity. J Mol Biol 282: 543–556. Tobe, T., Beatson, S.A., Taniguchi, H., Abe, H., Bailey, C.M., and Fivian, A., (2006) An extensive repertoire of type III secretion effectors in Escherichia coli O157 and the role of lambdoid phages in their dissemination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 14941–14946. Urban, C.F., Lourido, S., and Zychlinsky, A. (2006) How do microbes evade neutrophil killing? Cell Microbiol 8: 1687– 1696. Van Wamel, W.J., Rooijakkers, S.H., Ruyken, M., van Kessel, K.P., and van Strijp, J.A. (2006) The innate immune modulators staphylococcal complement inhibitor and chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus are located on b-hemolysin-converting bacteriophages. J Bacteriol 188: 1310–1315. Waldor, M.K., and Mekalanos, J.J. (1996) Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding cholera toxin. Science 272: 1910–1914. Wiggins, B.A., and Alexander, M. (1985) Minimum bacterial density for bacteriophage replication: implications for significance of bacteriophages in natural ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol 49: 19–23. Wildschutte, H.D., Wolfe, M., Tamewitz, A., and Lawrence, J.G. (2004) Protozoan predation, diversifying selection, and the evolution of antigenic diversity in Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 10644–10649. Wommack, K.E., and Colwell, R.R. (2000) Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64: 69–114. © 2007 The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Molecular Microbiology, 65, 583–589