Download Psychopathological differences between Asperger syndrome/normal

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Depersonalization disorder wikipedia , lookup

Emil Kraepelin wikipedia , lookup

Munchausen by Internet wikipedia , lookup

Factitious disorder imposed on another wikipedia , lookup

Schizotypy wikipedia , lookup

Mental disorder wikipedia , lookup

Schizoaffective disorder wikipedia , lookup

DSM-5 wikipedia , lookup

Conversion disorder wikipedia , lookup

Causes of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup

Schizophrenia wikipedia , lookup

Thiomersal controversy wikipedia , lookup

Autism Speaks wikipedia , lookup

Glossary of psychiatry wikipedia , lookup

Autism wikipedia , lookup

Floortime wikipedia , lookup

Dissociative identity disorder wikipedia , lookup

Causes of autism wikipedia , lookup

History of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup

Externalizing disorders wikipedia , lookup

Child psychopathology wikipedia , lookup

Autism and working memory wikipedia , lookup

Discrete trial training wikipedia , lookup

Global perceptions of autism wikipedia , lookup

Sluggish schizophrenia wikipedia , lookup

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders wikipedia , lookup

Empathizing–systemizing theory wikipedia , lookup

Geir Bjørklund wikipedia , lookup

Autism therapies wikipedia , lookup

Spectrum disorder wikipedia , lookup

Epidemiology of autism wikipedia , lookup

Pyotr Gannushkin wikipedia , lookup

Autism spectrum wikipedia , lookup

Asperger syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Diagnosis of Asperger syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
‘Psychopathological differences between Asperger syndrome/normal
IQ, no language impairment autism spectrum disorder and schizotypal
disorder in an adult sample’
Introduction
The purpose of this study is to identify psychopathology (psychiatric symptoms) that can
differentiate between Schizotypal Disorder (SD) and Asperger Syndrome (normal IQ, no
language impairment Autism Spectrum Disorder) (ASD) in young adults. With our present
knowledge, the differentiation between ASD and SD can be difficult, as they both present with
social difficulties, odd (but not psychotic) behaviour, and a 'feeling of not being as everyone
else' (1).
Background
SD is a non-psychotic disorder within the Schizophrenia Spectrum (in ICD-10) (1, 2), and has
a prevalence of 3.9 % in adult samples (3). Autism Spectrum Disorder, a pervasive
developmental disorder (including Asperger Syndrome) (1), has a prevalence of 1 % (4).
SD is typically diagnosed in young adults, whereas ASD typically is diagnosed in childhood.
However, the ASD symptoms sometimes first become invalidating in young adulthood, where
social demands exceed the individual's capacity. In these cases, patients with symptoms
corresponding to ASD, are also seen in Adult Psychiatry.
Unfortunately, the fact that ASD most often is diagnosed in Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry,
together with ASD treatment being a municipal responsibility (and the Mental Health Service is
not), makes the experience with seeing and diagnosing ASD in Adult Psychiatry scarce (5).
Similarities between the two conditions, as stated above, are seen in both social dysfunction
(2, 6, 7) and cognitive impairments (8), and studies suggest that patients presenting with
symptoms corresponding to ASD in Adult Psychiatry, are either overlooked (9, 10), or
diagnosed within the schizophrenia spectrum (9, 11). Whether this ‘mismatch’ occurs due to
differences in diagnostic tradition, diagnostic inexperience with ASD in Adult Psychiatry, or in
fact represents an overlap between the two conditions, is not yet fully explored (8).
Historically there has been an on-going debate regarding the correlation between ASD and
schizophrenia spectrum disorder (6, 8). The debate is still present today, both in the everyday
clinic and academically, as the topic recently is raised as a future focus area in the
Schizophrenia Bulletin (12).
Diagnosis
It is highly relevant to refine the psychopathological description of the two conditions. A better
understanding of what constitutes ‘the core’ of them both, significantly sharpens our
differential diagnostic possibilities. As it is not possible to take a blood sample or a brain scan
to aid psychiatric diagnosis, the description of present psychopathology is the only way to
diagnose psychiatric illness. An accurate diagnosis is crucial for a relevant treatment and
rehabilitation plan for the individual patient (13), as the diagnosis guides the help and support
offered, both in the mental health services and in the municipal system.
Further, the biology of these conditions is not yet fully known, and to properly guide neuropsychiatric research, high diagnostic accuracy is imperative (14, 15).
In the overall context of this study, both diagnostic domains are considered to be spectrum
disorders, i.e., SD is considered as a non-psychotic disorder in the schizophrenia spectrum,
and Asperger Syndrome as an early emerging developmental disorder, in the Autism
Spectrum. However, as ICD-10 is the principal diagnostic system used in Denmark, ICD-10 will
be the diagnostic point of reference in all available clinical material. Therefore this study will
refer to the diagnostic criteria defined in ICD-10, when including participants.
Altered self-experience
Within the schizophrenia spectrum alterations in (self-)experience are known to be present (2,
16). These experiential alterations are described as a loss of first-person perspective (17, 18),
i.e. for these patients the experience of him-/herself as a subject is disturbed. This means that
the form and structure (rather than content) of the patients’ thoughts and experiences is
altered (15).
These alterations are considered highly specific for the schizophrenia spectrum (16), and are
therefore not thought to be present in equal amounts and/or distribution in ASD. If this
assumption is true, an examination of anomalous self-experiences would be valuable to aid
clinical differentiation between SD and ASD. However, equally important is if there would prove
to be no significant difference in level of self-disorder, as this possibly would call for a revised
diagnostic tradition (8).
The patient's own experience of illness
Essential for characterizing the schizophrenia spectrum, is the patients experience of an
altered existential pattern (the schizophrenic autism (19)), a loss of natural evidence (20, 21),
that impregnates every aspect of the patients being (19, 22). By the patient, this is often
described as a change, a new state, which is essentially different for how it was before. The
examination of altered experiences enlightens this altered existential pattern, and describes
how the patient experiences him- or herself, and his or her world.
The ASD diagnosis and research has long been guided by observed (rather than experienced)
deficiencies in social interaction, communication and behaviour (the classic triade) (23, 24). In
the later decades, the ASD research has shifted focus towards ‘lack of sense of central
coherence’ (deficits in the ability to create meaningful contexts from information available in a
given situation) (25), direction of thought (self versus others) (25, 26) and the lack of ability
to predict other people’s beliefs, desires and intentions (theory of mind) (27). Still however,
the ASD patients’ own experience is insufficiently described (28, 29).
Aim, objectives and hypotheses
The aim of the study is to do an in depth exploration of differences in present psychopathology
(psychiatric symptoms) in young adults with SD and ASD. This will elaborate and refine our
understanding of SD and ASD specifically, and both spectrum disorders in general.
The objectives are to;
1. Explore differences in psychopathology between young adults with SD and ASD and
2. Contribute to both the general and the specific (in SD and ASD respectively) description of
the autism concept.
The hypotheses are that;
1. The total level of altered experiences (EASE total score (16)) is higher in SD than in ASD and
2. The pattern of most occurring altered experiences (individual EASE items) is different in
ASD, compared to SD.
Design, participants and methods
The study is observational and comparative in design. 100 participants will be included; 50
diagnosed with SD and 50 with ASD.
Inclusion criteria:
- ICD-10 diagnosis of Asperger syndrome (F84.5) or infantile autism (F84.0) with normal IQ
and no language impairments (1) or schizotypal disorder (F21) (1)
- Age 18-30 (both inclusive)
Exclusion criteria:
- Known non-verbal IQ < 80 (verbal IQ < 70) or an educational level corresponding to <9
years of primary education
- Diagnosed with both Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Psychotic symptoms (< 1 day of duration, lifetime)
- Severe physical illness (life-limiting, or limiting interview capacity)
- Organic brain disorder (corresponding to ICD-10 chapter F00-09 (1))
- Active heavy alcohol or substance abuse (corresponding to ICD-10 definitions (1))
- Not fluent in the Danish language
- Legal patients
Selection and expert panel
Essential to the study, is recruitment of participants with typical symptoms, to reduce
confounding of the results by diagnostic uncertainty. Thus we have chosen to recruit
participants, from specialized units, who are already diagnosed. Participants with SD will be
recruited from OPUS-teams (a specialized treatment program for patients with first episode of
schizophrenia spectrum disorder), within the Mental Health Services in the Capitol Region of
Denmark, and participants with ASD from The Danish Autism Centre (a non-profit organization
for people with ASD) (30).
Possible subjects will be identified by diagnosis through patient registers, and informed
consent will be obtained. The subjects’ medical records will then be revised, to further isolate
subjects eligible for inclusion. From the medical records, described social and psychiatric
history and observed psychiatric symptoms will be summarized for each eligible subject. The
summary will be presented to an expert panel, which divides the participants into four groups:
‘participant with symptoms typical of AS’, ‘participant with symptoms typical of SD’,
‘participant with inconclusive/non typical symptoms’ and ‘non eligible participant to ensure the
identification of subjects with typical symptoms, according to clinical consensus (based on the
information available).
The use of an expert panel is imperative; to further ensure isolation of subjects with typical
symptoms only. The panel consists of two senior psychiatric consultants (Peter Handest,
Mental Health Center North Zealand, Denmark and Lena Nylander, Adult Psychiatry Lund,
Sweden). The international representation significantly strengthens the generalizability of the
project.
Psychopathological examination
All included participants are asked for a detailed social and developmental history, and
interviewed with three semi-structured interviews:
1. Schedules for Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) (31); An assessment of
psychopathology and behaviour associated with the major psychiatric disorders in adult life.
2. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), module 4 (32); An assessment of
communication, social interaction and play (or imaginative use of materials) for adults who are
verbally fluent, to identify symptoms within the autism spectrum.
3. Examination of anomalous self-experience (EASE) (16); A checklist for exploration of
experiential anomalies, covering five domains: cognition and stream of consciousness, selfawareness and presence, bodily experiences, demarcation/transitivism and existential
reorientation.
The Ph.D.-student will obtain social and developmental history, and carry out the SCAN and
EASE interviews. The ADOS will be carried out by a consultant psychologist at The Danish
Autism Centre.
All psychopathological interviews will be videotaped. A subset of the taped SCAN and EASE
interviews will be co-rated by clinical supervisor Peter Handest. Co-ratings will also routinely
be performed amongst psychologists at The Danish Autism Centre, who conducts the ADOS
interviews.
Self-administered scales
The participants will be asked to fill out the following self-administered scales, concerning
psychiatric symptoms and psychological well-being:
1. The Autism Quotient (AQ). AQ is a 50 question scale, for the assessment of autistic
traits, assessing the areas; social skill, attention switching, attention to detail,
communication, and imagination. (ref)
2. The Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ). SPQ is a 74 item scale, for the
assessment of schizotypal personality, assessing the areas; ideas of reference,
excessive social anxiety, odd beliefs or magical thinking, unusual perceptual
experiences, odd or eccentric behavior, no close friends, odd speech, constricted affect,
suspiciousness. (ref)
3. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5). WHO-5 is a 5 item scale, for the assessment of
subjective psychological well-being.
Other interviewer ratings
1. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). GAF is a numeric scale (1 through 100) for
assessing social, occupational, and psychological functioning.
2. The Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI-Severity). The CGI-Severity is an
assessment of the clinician's global view of the patient's severity of psychopathology on
a 7 point scale.
Statistical analyses
The results will be analyzed quantitatively. To investigate between group differences, group
wise comparisons between SCAN algorithms (relevant for the two diagnoses), ADOS
algorithms and EASE outcomes will be applied. Further, secondary correlations across
psychopathological domains will be explored, and explorative cross-diagnostic factor analysis
will be performed (with the knowledge of possible limitations due to sample size).
Ethical considerations
Prior to inclusion a differentiated informed consent will be obtained from all participants;
1. An informed consent to participate in the study,
2. An informed consent to obtain relevant medical records, and the research groups revision of
the medical records,
3A. An informed consent to the recording of the interviews on videotape, including an informed
consent to the storage of taped material.
3B. An informed consent for the research group to use the taped material for educational
purposes.
4. An informed consent to be contacted after termination of the study if necessary, and to a
possible 5 and 10 year follow up.
Only the consent to participate in the study, and the research group’s revision of medical
records is mandatory for inclusion (1 and 2).
The study is approved by the Danish National Board of Health (Danish Patient Safety
Authority) (Sagsnr. 3-3013-1564/1/). All data handling will be performed according to
approval from The Data Protection Agency (j.nr.: 2012-58-0004). As the study is interviewand observation based, an approval from The National Committee on Health Research Ethics is
not required.
Feasibility of the study
The Danish Autism Centre is in contact with 50-100 users per year, and has a database with
about 1000 former users, all with an ASD diagnosis. The centre has wide experience with
participant recruitment from several former research collaborations. According to The Danish
Psychiatric Central Research Registry, 938 patients with SD were in contact with the Danish
Mental Health Services in 2012 (33). To achieve a least meaningful difference (LMD) of a total
EASE-score of 10, a total of 16 participants in each diagnostic group is required (based on
means and SD’s in Raballo et al (34)).
A total estimate of 100 included patients is considered the maximum feasible capacity,
considering above described patient flow and the estimated duration of the inclusion period.
The office facilities and office material required for the study are made available at Merntal
Helath Centre Ballerup, where the study is anchored. The social difficulties often present in the
concerned patient groups, will require acquisition of portable video and sound equipment, so
that interviews can be carried out wherever the participant is most comfortable.
References
1.
WHO. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva: World Health
Organization, 1993.
2.
Handest P, Parnas J. Clinical characteristics of first-admitted patients with ICD-10 schizotypal disorder.
The British journal of psychiatry Supplement. 2005;48:s49-54. Epub 2005/08/02.
3.
Pulay AJ, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Huang B, et al. Prevalence, correlates,
disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV schizotypal personality disorder: results from the wave 2 national epidemiologic
survey on alcohol and related conditions. Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2009;11(2):5367. Epub 2009/07/21.
4.
Brugha TS, McManus S, Bankart J, Scott F, Purdon S, Smith J, et al. Epidemiology of autism spectrum
disorders in adults in the community in England. Archives of general psychiatry. 2011;68(5):459-65. Epub 2011/05/04.
5.
Nylander L, Thernlund G. [Risk för överdiagnostik av autismspektrumstörning] [Läkartidningen].
2014(16-17/2014 ).
6.
Nylander L, Lugnegård T, Hallerbäck MU. Autism Spectrum Disorders and Schizophrenia Spectrum
Disorders in Adults - is there a connection? Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 2008;5(1):43-54.
7.
Bastiaansen JA, Meffert H, Hein S, Huizinga P, Ketelaars C, Pijnenborg M, et al. Diagnosing autism
spectrum disorders in adults: the use of Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) module 4. Journal of autism
and developmental disorders. 2011;41(9):1256-66. Epub 2010/12/15.
8.
King BH, Lord C. Is schizophrenia on the autism spectrum? Brain research. 2011;1380 34-41.
9.
Chang HL, Juang YY, Wang WT, Huang CI, Chen CY, Hwang YS. Screening for autism spectrum disorder
in adult psychiatric outpatients in a clinic in Taiwan. General hospital psychiatry. 2003;25(4):284-8. Epub 2003/07/10.
10.
Nylander L, Gillberg C. Screening for autism spectrum disorders in adult psychiatric out-patients: a
preliminary report. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2001;103(6):428-34. Epub 2001/06/13.
11.
Hurst RM, Nelson-Gray RO, Mitchell JT, Kwapil TR. The relationship of Asperger's characteristics and
schizotypal personality traits in a non-clinical adult sample. Journal of autism and developmental disorders.
2007;37(9):1711-20. Epub 2006/12/07.
12.
Hommer RE, Swedo SE. Schizophrenia and autism-related disorders. Schizophrenia bulletin.
2015;41(2):313-4. Epub 2015/01/31.
13.
Assosiation AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5®):
American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. 991 p.
14.
Uhlhaas PJ, Mishara AL. Perceptual anomalies in schizophrenia: integrating phenomenology and
cognitive neuroscience. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2007;33(1):142-56. Epub 2006/11/23.
15.
Fuchs T. The challenge of neuroscience: Psychiatry and phenomenology today. Psychopathology.
2002(35):319-26.
16.
Parnas J, Moller P, Kircher T, Thalbitzer J, Jansson L, Handest P, et al. EASE: Examination of Anomalous
Self-Experience. Psychopathology. 2005;38(5):236-58. Epub 2005/09/24.
17.
Parnas J, Handest P. Phenomenology of anomalous self-experience in early schizophrenia.
Comprehensive psychiatry. 2003;44(2):121-34. Epub 2003/03/27.
18.
Moller P, Haug E, Raballo A, Parnas J, Melle I. Examination of anomalous self-experience in firstepisode psychosis: interrater reliability. Psychopathology. 2011;44(6):386-90. Epub 2011/08/19.
19.
Parnas J, Bovet P, Zahavi D. Schizophrenic autism: clinical phenomenology and pathogenetic
implications. World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association. 2002;1(3):131-6. Epub
2006/09/02.
20.
1991/01/01.
Parnas J, Bovet P. Autism in schizophrenia revisited. Comprehensive psychiatry. 1991;32(1):7-21. Epub
21.
Stanghellini G. Vulnerability to schizophrenia and lack of common sense. Schizophrenia bulletin.
2000;26(4):775-87. Epub 2000/11/22.
22.
Urfer A. Phenomenology and psychopathology of Schizophrenia: The views of Eugene Minkowski.
Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology. 2001;8(4):279-89.
23.
Wing L. The autistic spectrum. Lancet. 1997;350(9093):1761-6. Epub 1997/12/31.
24.
Levy SE, Mandell DS, Schultz RT. Autism. Lancet. 2009;374(9701):1627-38. Epub 2009/10/13.
25.
Frith U. Why we need cognitive explanations of autism. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
2012;65(11):2073-92. Epub 2012/08/22.
26.
Bryant L, Coffey A, Povinelli DJ, Pruett JR, Jr. Theory of Mind experience sampling in typical adults.
Consciousness and cognition. 2013;22(3):697-707. Epub 2013/05/21.
27.
Apperly IA. What is "theory of mind"? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences.
Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. 2012;65(5):825-39. Epub 2012/04/27.
28.
Robledo J, Donnellan AM, Strandt-Conroy K. An exploration of sensory and movement differences
from the perspective of individuals with autism. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience. 2012;6:107. Epub 2012/11/20.
29.
Plaisted Grant K, Davis G. Perception and apperception in autism: rejecting the inverse assumption.
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences. 2009;364(1522):1393-8. Epub
2009/06/17.
30.
Center for Autisme. Available from: http://www.centerforautisme.dk/om-os/.
31.
Wing JK, Sartorius N, Üstün TB. Diagnosis and Clinical Measurement in Psychiatry: A Reference Manual
for SCAN (Updated Edition): Cambridge University Press; 2007.
32.
Lord C, Risi S, Lambrecht L, Cook EH, Jr., Leventhal BL, DiLavore PC, et al. The autism diagnostic
observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum
of autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 2000;30(3):205-23. Epub 2000/10/31.
33.
The Danish Psychiatric Central Research Registry [Det psykiatriske centralregister] [database on the
Internet]. Translational Nauropsychiatry Unit, University of Aarhus
2012 [cited 24.08.2014]. Available from: http://tnu.dk/fileadmin/CPG/CentReg/Aarstabeller/t1221.pdf (website in
Danish).
34.
Raballo A, Parnas J. Examination of anomalous self-experience: initial study of the structure of selfdisorders in schizophrenia spectrum. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 2012;200(7):577-83. Epub
2012/07/05.