Download Week 6 Lecture 1 PR and Propaganda

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

International broadcasting wikipedia, lookup

Jacques Ellul wikipedia, lookup

German Corpse Factory wikipedia, lookup

Propaganda in the Mexican Drug War wikipedia, lookup

RT (TV network) wikipedia, lookup

Eastern Bloc media and propaganda wikipedia, lookup

Propaganda of Fascist Italy wikipedia, lookup

Role of music in World War II wikipedia, lookup

Propaganda in Japan during the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II wikipedia, lookup

Cartographic propaganda wikipedia, lookup

Political warfare wikipedia, lookup

Airborne leaflet propaganda wikipedia, lookup

Architectural propaganda wikipedia, lookup

Radio propaganda wikipedia, lookup

Psychological warfare wikipedia, lookup

Propaganda in Nazi Germany wikipedia, lookup

Randal Marlin wikipedia, lookup

Propaganda in the Soviet Union wikipedia, lookup

Propaganda of the deed wikipedia, lookup

Transcript
What is Propaganda?
Politics and Aesthetics
Week 6 Lecture 1
• Understand the classic and evolving
definitions of propaganda
• Decipher fallacies in arguments, looking at
how some questions can bear very confusing
and irrelevant answers
• Understand techniques of political
communication in national and international
politics
To Propagate
• To make many plants from one original plant,
the gardener snips off a plants shoots and
puts them in the ground nearby. They grow
into new plants. This is propagation.
• Hence, to propagate ideas, we use
propaganda.
• Propaganda is often used as a pejorative term:
at is simplest level, though, it means to spread
ideas.
How Do We Define Propaganda?
Part I
• Wait, isn’t rhetoric about propagating ideas?
• Isn’t everything potentially about propagating ideas?
(And thus, all media?)
• How do we define propaganda as different?
• A partial rhetoric (Bryant, 1953)
• An unethical rhetoric.
• Rhetoric is about reason and argument – hence all the
rhetorical fallacies we noted in the last lecture fall
outside rhetoric.
• Propaganda is something more than just persuasion,
but something less than coercion or force.
Bryant’s “Spectrum of Influence”
Rhetoric
Propaganda
Coercion
Force
Adapted from Bennett and O’Rourke, a “Prolegomenon to the Future study of Rhetoric and Propaganda” in Jowett and O’Donnel, Eds, “Readings in Propaganda and Persuasion.” Sage,
London. 2006.
Rhetoric
Propaganda
Who is the audience?
A person worthy of equal
respect
A target or recipient of
information
What kind of choice is being
argued for?
A significant, informed choice
A Limited Choice because
audience will not be fully
informed
What is the desired response?
Thinking, reasoning
Reactionary, taking action
quickly.
What are the appropriate
means?
Reason is primary: supported
with logical and emotional
appeals
Emotional appeal is primary
How does the communicator
see himself/herself?
A co-participant, part of a
dialogue
More important and above
others.
Definitions of Propaganda – Jacques
Ellul
• “The aim of modern propaganda is no longer
to modify ideas but to provoke action. It is no
longer to change adherence to a doctrine, but
to make the individual cling irrationally to a
process of action…it is no longer to transform
an opinion, but to arouse an active and
mythical belief.” (Jacques Ellul)
Jacques Ellul
• “The propagandist does not normally address
the individual’s intelligence, for the process of
intellectual persuasion is long and
uncertain…” (16)
• Rather, the propagandist appeals to…emotion.
Jacques Ellul
• Ellul distinguishes between political propaganda
and sociological propaganda.
• Political Propaganda is what we will talk about
today: much of it is quite obvious. Campaign ads.
War propaganda, etc. But in coming weeks, and a
little bit today, we will talk about
• Sociological Propaganda: “the means by which
any society seeks to integrate…individuals and
unify its members.” eg: religion, advertising itself,
some would include ‘news’, public service
announcements..
Is this propaganda?
• Social Propaganda? Educational film from
1958 in the United States about Popularity
from Coronet Films, would be shown in
school:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eqpe7Y_6
rmQ
Propaganda in Politics - Methods
• White Propaganda: From a known source. The
audience is aware of the political “angle” of
the media.
• Black Propaganda: From an unidentified or
mis-identified source. Could be one side
posing as another. The audience is deliberately
confused as to the political “angle”.
Examples of Propaganda in
International Politics
• Black Propaganda (source is meant to be unclear):
– Soviet government paid an academic to write a paper
suggesting HIV/AIDS had been developed in a secret plot
by the American government.
• Grey Propaganda: (agenda is somewhat transparent)
– A news service that appears independent but is
government run and partially political in content.
• White propaganda: (source is clear as is message)
hosting the Olympics
– [Opening Ceremony Beijing 2008:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUy9OgRRXnw ]
Transparent, people know where its coming from.
Techniques
• Focusing on some things and not
others.
– Ex. During first war in Iraq, the US
wanted Iraqis to believe that they
would invade through Kuwait.
– “Public affairs officers carefully
drew the media’s attention to
Marine exercises in the area.”
– Forces actually came in from the
West across the desert as had
been planned.
– Pentagon official: “We told no
lies…The reporters wanted to
believe what they saw and simply
did not ask the right questions.
More fool them.”
Macdonald, 11.
• Staging a photograph or a
film.
– Civil War photographs
– 1898 – Battle of Manila Bay
shown in movie theater
news reels  filmed in a
bathtub.
– Pancho Villa, Mexican
revolutionary, “sold film
rights to his
battles…scheduled
executions for the
camera…restaged battles
after the fighting had
ended…”
• Staging a Film or Photograph
• 1944 – “The Fuehrer Gives the Jews a City”
created for neutral states to show that
relocated Jews were living happily (which was
obviously not the case).
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sD90XrG
e6E&feature=related
Source:
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/0
7/10/in-an-iranian-image-a-missile-toomany/
• Altering a photograph or film.
– Iranian Missiles (2008)
• Altering a photograph or film:
– 2004, Bush Campaign Ad
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/photo_database/chr
• Altering a photograph or film:
– Gorbacev’s birthmark
On the left, the leader’s natural birthmark. Didn’t
always appear on his official portraits, right.
• Photomontage
John Kerry, alone at a podium
John Kerry supposedly next to anti-War activist
Jane Fonda at a rally.
• Photomontage
– University alters photo to make it more “diverse”
• Photomontage – journalist alters photo for a better shot
– -jour
 This
photograph was
published in the
LA Times. The
photographer
was ultimately
fired.
Propaganda in War
• In a war incited in the media, should people fight
back with the media?
• Case Study: Rwanda in 1994
• Rwandan genocide incited over the radio.
• Extremist seized an FM radio station, the RTLM
(Free Radio-Television of the Thousand Hills)
– Incited violence against Tutsis, and also urged Hutus
to flee their homes.
– This meant thousands of people panicked, living in
refugee camps.
• Radio was key in spreading the word – why didn’t
anyone “counterattack” with radio?
– UNAMIR’s head in the region, Canadian Major General
R.A. Dallaire, wrote:
• “These broadcasts were …responsible for spreading
panic…and should have been jammed. The United Nations
should have aired counter broadcasts to give the
population a clear account of what was actually
happening…yet…no country came forward to offer
jamming or broadcasting assets.
• It later turned out the broadcasts were coming from one
Radio transmitter in the back of someone’s Toyota – it
could’ve easily been destroyed, but wasn’t.
Propaganda and Aesthetics
How Do We Define Propaganda, Part II
• How do we account for propaganda that is
also art?
• Sharon Tuttle Ross’ “Epistemic Merit Model”
• She defines propaganda as
– “an epistemically defective message used with
the intention to persuade a socially significant
group of people on behalf of a political
institution, organization, or cause” (Tuttle 2003,
10)
1. An Epistemically Defective Message
ARGUMENT is illogical, commits a
rhetorical error of some kind.
2. Used with the intention to persuade
INTENT is to convince someone of
something
3. A socially significant group of people
AUDIENCE is an important group of some
kind. (I can’t create propaganda for an
audience of just my Mother.)
4. On behalf of a political institution,
organization, or cause.
PRODUCER is politically oriented.
Adapted from Sharon Tuttle Ross.
• Tuttle: “Messages presented through works of
art…are not in the form of an argument but
rather made through the use of icons,
symbols, and metaphors.” (Tuttle 12)
• It’s critical to realize that art can be a source of
knowledge and a source of misinformation at
the same time.
Art and Propaganda Have a Long
History Together
The Line Between Propaganda and
Art?
A US Newsreel, some Soviet Caroons,
and The Triumph of the Will
US Propaganda Newsreels
• Political Propaganda US Propaganda Newsreel
(1962) The Berlin Wall
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9mWgqY
BZos
Soviet Propaganda Cartoons
• Black and White (1934)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7qiVMgo
m8g&p=37B751CC04FB3666
• Ave Maria (1960s)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lMhOtp6
2xc&p=37B751CC04FB3666
• Mister Twister
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4gUI9V
Ui4k )
• Which is your favorite and why?
Triumph of the Will
• Film by Leni Riefenstahl
• Chronicles the 1934 Nazi
Party Congress in Nuremberg
• Released in 1935
• Film won many awards at the
time.
• Director Riefenstahl later said in an interview:
– “My first reaction was to say that I did not know anything
about the way such a thing worked or the organization of
the Party, so that I would obviously photograph all the
wrong things and please nobody - even supposing that I
could make a documentary, which I had never yet done.
Hitler said that this was exactly why he wanted me to do it:
because anyone who knew all about the relative
importance of the various people and groups and so on
might make a film that would be pedantically accurate, but
this was not what he wanted. He wanted a film showing
the Congress through a non-expert eye, selecting just what
was most artistically satisfying - in terms of spectacle, I
suppose you might say. He wanted a film which would
move, appeal to, impress an audience which was not
necessarily interested in politics.”
• Film focuses on Hitler as leader.
• People of Germany are an “undifferentiated
mass enthusiastically supporting the state.”
• Through various symbols in the film Hitler
becomes Germany.
• Uniting the people.
• Film never addresses Hitler’s attitude toward
Jews nor the lebensraum push for territory in
the East.
• Opening sequence
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcFuHGH
fYwE )to around minute 10.
– Shots of the city: what do you notice about it?
– What kind of people are shown
• 14:30- Morning in Tent City (about 5 Minutes)
• 65:00 Tribute to War Dead
• 1:30:01 – END Final Squence
• Do You Believe Ms. Reifenstahl?
– "If you see this film again today you ascertain that it
doesn't contain a single reconstructed scene. Everything in
it is true. And it contains no tendentious commentary at
all. It is history. A pure historical film... it is film-vérité. It
reflects the truth that was then in 1934, history. It is
therefore a documentary. Not a propaganda film. Oh! I
know very well what propaganda is. That consists of
recreating events in order to illustrate a thesis, or, in the
face of certain events, to let one thing go in order to
accentuate another. I found myself, me, at the heart of an
event which was the reality of a certain time and a certain
place. My film is composed of what stemmed from that.”