Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Summer 2013 Ty Werdel Chadron State College Wildlife Management Prairie Dogs (Cynomys) are considered ecosystem engineers and a keystone species Impact abiotic and biotic features • Influence environmental heterogeneity, plant succession, hydrology, nutrient cycling, landscape architecture, and biodiversity Historical Range (1800) Historically occupied millions of hectares of land • Populations have declined by 90%-98% • Range disappearing due to encroachment on habitat and eradication Implications of Losing an Ecosystem Engineer • Many vertebrate species have been shown to depend on prairie dogs for habitat and survival. • Result in loss of species diversity in grasslands • Endangered or Species of Concern: Prairie Dog’s Impact on Small Mammals • Utilize prairie dog burrows for dens, shelter, and predator avoidance • Species richness, diversity, and abundance has been shown to increase in areas with prairie dogs • Certain species are adapted to live in areas with short grass and bare ground. What is the effect of C. gunnisoni on small mammal species diversity and abundance on Sevilleta NWR? Refuge Purpose for Reintroduction • Native, Eradicated, Reintroduced • Establish habitat for the prairie dog and for the many life forms that depend on its system Reintroduction History • Reintroduction within Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge in 2010 4-16 ha Vegetation Plots • Plot A- Control • Plot B- Prairie Dog Reintroduction • Plot C-Control • Plot D- Prairie Dog Reintroduction • Traps Placed in 9 ha Grid • 169 Traps • Arranged 25 M apart 1 Plot/Week 4 Weeks • Control Plots A- June 3-7 C- June 10-14 • Treatment Plots B- June 17-21 D- June 24-28 PROCEDURE: Trapped/Baited 5 Consecutive Days Per Week • Monday-Friday PROCESSING: Data Was Collected Regarding: Species, Sex, Age, Weight, and Measurements • Individuals marked Heteromyidae • Kangaroo Rats Dipodomys merriami Dipodomys ordii Dipodomys Spectabilis • Pocket Mice Perognathus flavus Sciuridae • Ground Squirrels Spermophilus spilosoma Merriam’s Kangaroo Rat Silky Pocket Mouse Cricetidae • Woodrats Neotoma micropus • Grasshopper Mice Onychomys leucogaster Onychomys arenicola • Mice Peromyscus boylii Peromyscus maniculatus Brush Mouse 9 8 8 Total Species 7 7 7 6 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 A B C Plot D 120 Total Individuals 100 80 60 96 90 70 68 40 20 0 A B C Plot D Average Total Individuals 100 80 93 60 40 69 20 0 Control Treatment P-Value: 0.3168 Not Significant 70 63 61 Total Individuals 60 50 Plot 41 42 A 40 B C 30 D 20 20 12 8 10 3 5 9 8 6 6 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 7 4 3 1 4 5 2 3 0 DIME DIOR DISP NEMI ONAR ONLE PEBO PEMA PGFV Species SPSP 70 63 61 Total Individuals 60 50 Plot 41 42 A 40 B C 30 D 20 20 12 8 10 3 5 9 8 6 6 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 7 4 3 1 4 5 2 3 0 DIME DIOR DISP NEMI ONAR ONLE PEBO PEMA PGFV Species SPSP 70 63 61 Total Individuals 60 50 Plot 41 42 A 40 B C 30 D 20 20 12 8 10 3 5 9 8 6 6 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 7 4 3 1 4 5 2 3 0 DIME DIOR DISP NEMI ONAR ONLE PEBO PEMA PGFV Species SPSP 70 63 61 Total Individuals 60 50 Plot 41 42 A 40 B C 30 D 20 20 12 8 10 3 5 9 8 6 6 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 7 4 3 1 4 5 2 3 0 DIME DIOR DISP NEMI ONAR ONLE PEBO PEMA PGFV Species SPSP Small Mammal Species Richness • Doesn’t seem to be a correlation between species richness and control or treatment sites Small Mammal Abundance • No significant difference • Seems to be a trend favoring abundance on treatment plots versus control plots Previous Research • Short term studies may not show significant data • Prairie dogs may have a different effect on different grassland types • Black-tailed vs. Gunnison’s Abundance of Small Mammals Low: • Only 1 Trapping Period Per Site • Season of Trapping • Drought vs. Monsoon • Low mammal activity Data Not Significant: • Low abundance over all plots • Less variation between plots Baseline Data • 1st year being researched • Build upon this data Methods • Extend trapping periods • Increase amount of traps • Trap during different seasons Concentrate on Specific Species • Perognathus flavus • Dipodomys merriami • Peromyscus GIS/Spatial Mapping • Vegetation • Prairie Dog Burrows • Trap Data Special Thank You to: • Jon Erz • Stephanie Baker • Amaris Swann • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Interns • REU Students