* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download generations.
Plant nutrition wikipedia , lookup
Plant secondary metabolism wikipedia , lookup
Ecology of Banksia wikipedia , lookup
Plant defense against herbivory wikipedia , lookup
History of herbalism wikipedia , lookup
Plant use of endophytic fungi in defense wikipedia , lookup
History of botany wikipedia , lookup
Plant breeding wikipedia , lookup
Plant physiology wikipedia , lookup
Plant morphology wikipedia , lookup
Ornamental bulbous plant wikipedia , lookup
Plant ecology wikipedia , lookup
Evolutionary history of plants wikipedia , lookup
Plant evolutionary developmental biology wikipedia , lookup
Perovskia atriplicifolia wikipedia , lookup
Pollination wikipedia , lookup
Flowering plant wikipedia , lookup
1 Summer Bio153 Lab 3: Sexual Reproduction in Plants and the Coevolution of Plants and Pollinators week of July 19 In order to understand the evolutionary progression in terrestrial plants, it is necessary to familiarize yourself with the different types of life cycles in plants. Life cycles in animals are relatively simple: usually, a diploid (2n) individual produces haploid (n) gametes, which fuse to produce a diploid zygote, which develops into the adult animal. In any organism with sexual reproduction, a generation of haploid cells alternates with a diploid generation. In most animals, there is no question which generation is more conspicuous or persistent – the diploid individual is what is evident, and the gametes are just specialized cells. In plants, however, the situation is not so simple. In single-celled algae the usual state is haploid, but 2 haploid cells may fuse to produce a diploid zygote, which promptly undergoes meiosis to produce haploid daughter cells. In higher plants, the diploid zygote does not immediately revert to haploidy, but grows into a diploid organism called a sporophyte. The sporophyte produces haploid spores by meiosis. Haploid spores develop into the gametophyte, which mitotically produces haploid gametes. Gamete union produces a diploid embryo, which is depends on the gametophyte for nourishment and protection. The embryo develops into the sporophyte, and the cycle starts again. Thus, plants are characterized by the alternation of haploid and diploid generations. In all land plants, the gametophyte and sporophyte generations look very different, and which generation is predominant (i.e. is the most conspicuous or persistent) varies among groups. For example, in primitive terrestrial plants such as liverworts and mosses, the gametophyte generation dominates. Thus, the mosses that you see growing on trees or rocks are haploid; periodically they produce short-lived structures shaped like little lamp-posts. These are the diploid, spore-producing sporophytes. In vascular plants, the sporophyte predominates. The frond of a fern is the sporophyte; the gametophyte is usually a small, inconspicuous structure clinging to the ground. In seed plants, the gametophyte is further reduced – it simply becomes part of the seed. In angiosperms (the most evolutionarily advanced plants), the female gametophyte is only 7 cells (one of them an egg cell), and the male gametophyte is only 3 cells (2 of them sperm). Thus, the major evolutionary trend in reproduction of terrestrial plants is the reduction of the gametophyte generation, such that the gametophytes of terrestrial plants have become smaller and simpler. A second evolutionary trend in the terrestrial plants is the transition from homospory to heterospory. In homosporous plants, the sporophyte produces a single type of spore that gives rise to one type of gametophyte. This structure bears both the female 2 (archegonia) and male (antheridia) sex organs, which produce female (egg) and male (sperm) gametes. In heterosporous plants, 2 types of sporangia (spore-bearing structures) give rise to 2 types of spore - microspores that make male gametophytes, and megaspores, that make female gametophytes. In Lab 2, you examined reproduction in the non-vascular land plants (the bryophytes). Today, we will look at reproduction in seedless vascular plants and the seed plants. 3 Seedless vascular plants 1. Primitive vascular plants: In these primitive vascular plants we begin to see the shift from the dominance of the gametophyte generation to that of the sporophyte generation. Rather than being a temporary structure permanently dependent on the gametophyte, the sporophyte eventually emerges as a separate, independent entity. However, the early vascular plants are still dependent on water to complete their life cycle – sperm must swim through water to reach the egg and produce the diploid embryo. A life cycle typical of the primitive vascular plants is observed in the club mosses (Lycopoda). Lycopodium is homosporous, meaning that meiosis in the sporangium forms spores that give rise to bisexual gametophytes bearing both archegonia and antheridia. The bi-flagellated sperm swim to the egg, and early development of the embryo occurs in the archegonium. Unlike in the bryophytes, where the sporophyte is completely dependent on the gametophyte, the sporophyte in clubmosses grows a root and becomes a separate entity. 2. Selaginella Sellaginella is the only genus in this group, but includes 700 known species. Most live in moist places, but a few are desert plants that lie dormant during the driest parts of the year (such as the “resurrection plant”). Unlike the other seedless vascular plants seen in this lab, Selaginella is heterosporous; its megaspores and microspores germinate to form separate male and female gametophytes. Again, Selaginella needs water for reproduction, as its sperm must swim to the egg in the archegonium. The young embryo is nourished by the megagametophyte, but eventually emerges from the gametophyte and becomes independent. Although Selaginella is not included with the true vascular plants (i.e. the Tracheophyta), heterosporous reproduction in Selaginella represents an evolutionary step forward. The sporangium is able to produce micro- or megaspores depending on its nutritional status. The slides of Selaginella cones that you will examine will show the random distribution of micro- and megaspores within a cone. • Examine a longitudinal section of a Selaginella cone (known as a strobilus). Note the presence of microspores and megaspores, the micro- and megasporangia, and the sporophylls (the modified leaves that bear the sporangia). 3. Pterophyta: the ferns Most ferns are homosporous, bearing spores in sporangia that are often clustered in sori on the edges or undersides of leaves. The gametophyte resembles a liverwort, while the sporophyte is usually structurally complex and large. In ferns, the sporophyte depends upon the gametophyte during the early phases of its development, and in some species the gametophyte is capable of 4 supporting several young sporophytes. Reproduction again requires water, because the motile sperm must swim to the egg. • Examine a fern and note the sori, which contain the sporangia and the spores. Make sure that you see gametophytes. You may see young sporophytes growing on them. The final step in plants’ conquest of land came with the evolution of the seed. Just as the cleidoic egg allowed reptiles to break free of reproduction in water required by their amphibian ancestors, the seed protected the plant embryo (the young sporophyte) from desiccation. All seed-bearing plants are heterosporous: they have microsporangia that produce male microspores and female megasporangia that produce female megaspores. But in seed plants, the megaspore gives rise to a megagametophyte that is highly reduced – and is retained in the megaspore. The megaspore, in turn, is retained in the megasporangium; the whole structure is called the ovule. The ovule is enclosed by sporophyte tissue called the integument. Thus, the whole, vulnerable gametophyte generation that produces the female gamete is packaged and protected within the tissues of the sporophyte. The first known seed-like structure appeared in the late Devonian, around 370 million years ago. The microspore is chaperoned by parent cells in a package called pollen, which is delivered to the ovule by wind or a pollinator. This process is analogous to copulation in land animals. The gametes do not need water to produce a zygote. 5 Seed plants The seed plants include the cycads, ginkgo, gymnosperms, gnetophytes and the angiosperms. Today, we will focus on the angiosperms. The Angiosperms – the flowering plants The flowering plants are the most diverse, specialized and complex of the plants. They appear relatively late in the fossil record – while early terrestrial plant fossils date from about 470 million years ago, the oldest evidence of angiosperms appear in the late Jurassic (around 140 million years ago). However, after their appearance, they radiated rapidly and now represent more than 230,000 species – more than 90% of all plant species. Much of their success is due to their complex associations with pollinators. Flowers vary greatly in morphology, but are made up of a consistent pattern of structures. In general, there are two groups of structures (fertile and sterile). The sterile structures include the sepals (collectively the calyx) and the petals (collectively the corolla). The sepals are usually green and support the corolla; the petals are often brightly coloured to attract pollinators. Collectively, the calyx and the corolla are called the perianth. The function of the perianth is to attract pollinators. The fertile structures are the sexual organs (the genitalia of the plant). The male components are collectively called the androecium (“house of the male”); the female, the gynoecium (“house of the female”). The androecium is made up of a variable number of stamens. Each stamen is made up of a filament bearing the anther, which produces and releases the pollen. The gynoecium is made up of one or several carpels. The carpel is a modified leaf that contains the ovule. Each carpel has an ovary at its base, a tube called the style, and a specialized structure at the top of the style called the stigma, which is designed to receive the pollen. Flowers that contain both male and female organs are called perfect; those that contain only the androecium or gynoecium are called imperfect. Flowers may be single or grouped together in an inflorescence. 6 The life cycle of angiosperms is heterosporous. Microsporangia produce microgametophytes; megasporangia produce megagametophytes. The gametophytes are now truly parasites on the sporophyte generation; the male gametophyte is reduced to just 3 haploid cells: 2 sperm cells plus a cell that forms the pollen tube. The female gametophyte is just 7 haploid cells, one of which is the egg cell. The remaining 6 cells contribute to the formation of the seed. The term angiosperm (“enclosed seed”) reflects a unique character of this group – the enclosed ovule. The ovule of an angiosperm is the organ that contains the female gametophyte, and within it, the egg cell. Thus, the egg cell is completely enclosed in layers of tissue. It is thought that the enclosed ovule evolved as a mechanism to prevent herbivory. Fertilization occurs via the pollen tube which grows out of the pollen (somewhat like the hypha of a fungus) and burrows through the style to deliver the sperm nuclei. • Look at the cross-section of the Lilium ovule on display. Following fertilization, the ovule develops into a seed and the ovary wall forms a fruit. Thus, a fruit is a fertilized, mature ovary. Fruits have evolved as specialized structures for seed dispersal. Because plants are not motile, there success depends on being able to exploit other means to move offspring away from the parent plant to prevent direct competition between parent and offspring for the same resources. Some fruits are fleshy; seeds are dispersed after the fruit is eaten and the seeds pass unharmed through the digestive tract of the frugivore (fruit-eating animal). Dry fruits are inedible and are dispersed by wind, by clinging to the exterior of animals, by floating, etc. • Examine the types of seeds and fruits. What are the probable modes of dispersal in each? Pollination Early angiosperms were probably wind pollinated, which has several disadvantages. First, vast quantities must be produced to increase the chances of pollen reaching a conspecific. (If you visit a lake in the boreal forest during spring, the shores will be thickly coated with huge amounts of bright yellow pine pollen.) Second, the chance of inbreeding is high, because most pollen falls close to the parent plant, possibly landing on a closely-related individual. Wind pollination also doesn’t work well in moist environments, because moisture weighs down the pollen grain. Regardless, the gymnosperms and several modern angiosperms continue to be wind pollinated. To increase the probability of trapping pollen grains, the ovule exudes sap. In the transition from wind pollination to insect pollination, insects were attracted to this sap as a food source. By visiting many plants, they transferred pollen from one to the other. 7 This created selection for the plant to develop mechanisms to attract insects, and eventually led to the evolution of nectaries (nectar-producing bodies) and conspicuous flowers. By the Cenozoic, other types of pollinators, including vertebrates (bats and birds) arrived on the scene, contributing to the diversity of flowering plants. Coevolution occurs when 2 species exert selective pressures on each other, resulting in evolutionary changes in both species. Certain flower morphs have evolved independently several times in response to the characteristics of the pollinators that visit them. These morphological types are often referred to as “pollinator syndromes”. Pollinator Bees - don’t see red - see in UV spectrum - diurnal - land to feed Flower Type - usually blue or yellow (bees don’t see red) - often have UV guides (markings visible in the UV spectrum) - sweet scent - landing platform - narrow floral tube to accommodate the proboscis - open in daytime - often red, odorless - long, narrow floral tube - landing platform Butterflies - good vision - poor sense of smell - diurnal - long proboscis Moths - often white (visible at night) - nocturnal - strong smell (esp. at night) - good sense of smell - plants flat or bent backwards - hover feeders Bats - white - nocturnal - musty smelling - good sense of smell; good vision! - sturdy flowers (accommodate bat’s head) - large head Birds - bright, often red - esp. hummingbirds - little smell - see red better than blue - long tube - poor sense of smell - no landing platform Flies - poor vision - attracted to carrion, feces • - brownish red, often inconspicuous - smell like rotting meat, feces. Look at the flowers on display. What are the probable pollinators in each case? 8 The relationship between plants and pollinators is mutualistic, in that both receive a benefit from the interaction. At the simplest level, the benefit to the plant is directed transfer of pollen, and the benefit to the pollinator is a nutritive reward – nectar and/or pollen. (There are other rewards that we will discuss in lecture.) The plant provides the reward to ensure that the pollinator will be motivated to visit another plant of the same type. However, there are costs to both parties in participating in this relationship. For the plant, the production of nectar (and extra pollen, if the pollinator is a bee) is energetically costly. For the pollinator, visiting flowers and handling them (especially while it is learning how to handle the flower) is also energetically costly. Both parties are trying to maximize their returns and minimize their energetic expenditure, which can create conflict: the plant “wants” the pollinator to visit many plants of the same type; the pollinator would “like” to visit only a few plants that provide substantial rewards. Thus, the plant must balance the benefits of producing a substantial reward with the costs (not only is it expensive to produce, but a large reward may produce satiation, discouraging the pollinator from visiting another flower and depositing pollen!). This cost/benefit asymmetry can have interesting implications for the coevolutionary paths of plants and pollinators. Another consideration is that of specialist and generalist pollinators. A plant benefits from having a specialist pollinator – if the pollinator only visits plants of a particular species, pollen is always being delivered to the appropriate type of plant. Sometimes it is also beneficial to a pollinator to specialize on one type of plant – it may lessen competition with other pollinators. It has been hypothesized that some plants have evolved extremely complex morphologies with hard-to-access nectaries specifically for this purpose: by being difficult to handle, they ensure that only one species of pollinator (or even a small subset of a species that learn the “trick”) will visit the flower. In these cases, the reward may be high, to motivate these pollinators to specialize exclusively on this type of flower. Yet again, however, there may be conflict: it may be advantageous for the pollinator to be more generalist, so it can feed on many types of flowers without having to travel long distances to find food. Coevolution experiment You will work in groups of four to design and conduct an experiment exploring some of the trade-offs involved in the coevolution of plants and pollinators. The purpose of the exercise is to understand how certain variables affect the costs and benefits involved in this mutualistic relationship. Materials: - Eppendorf tubes: 2 types (flip-top and screw-cap) - 3 Plexiglas holders for tubes 9 - 2 coloured tubes (2 different colours) 2 beakers of water (one clear, one coloured) suction tubes coloured cardboard timers You will work in groups of four in this exercise. During any “run” of the experiment, one pair of students will be researchers, and one pair will be bees. The researchers will use the materials above to create an array of “flowers”, and test the bees’ ability to gather the maximum amount of nectar reward in a set amount of time. By altering characteristics of the “flowers” and the array, the researchers can demonstrate some of the important variables affecting the plantpollinator interaction. How to set up (Read through before starting): It is important that the bees don’t know what the researchers are doing, so no peeking! Researchers’ Job: Design the experimental array The Eppendorf tubes represent the nectaries of your “flowers”. Some of these “flowers” are easy to handle (the pop-top tubes); some are harder (the screw top tubes). You will supply each flower with some nectar. The clear water represents low-sucrose nectar, and the coloured water represents high-sucrose nectar (twice the concentration of the clear nectar). Step 1: Design two types of flowers. Variables that can be altered: 1. difficulty (hard or easy) 2. nectar quality (high or low sucrose) 3. nectar quantity (lots or little nectar) Assign each of these types of flowers a petal colour (which will be indicated by coloured paper that you will glue onto the top of the tubes). Step 2: Decide how many of each type of flower you want, for a total of 18 flowers. (You can have roughly equal numbers of each types of flower, or many more of one type than the other). Fill the nectaries according to your flower design. Cut small squares of coloured paper and glue the appropriate colour on to the top of the tube (it takes a couple of minutes for the glue to dry). Step 3: While the flowers are drying, decide how you would like to distribute the 18 flowers among the 3 holders. In the holder on the right-hand, lower side, place 2 empty coloured Eppendorf tubes. These represent the hive, 10 where the bees will deliver their nectar rewards (one for the high-sucrose nectar; one for the low-sucrose nectar). hive Fig. 1. Arrangement of Plexiglas holders for floral array. Once the researchers have decided on the set up of the array, they will test the first bee. The second bee should not observe the first bee. Bees’ Job: Think like a bee! This experiment will yield meaningful results only if the “bees” make foraging decisions that are consistent with the constraints faced by real bees foraging on real flowers. Like all animals, bees should forage optimally (maximize their energy gain per unit effort; that is, get the most sucrose for the least amount of flying). Flight is enormously expensive in terms of energy use, so flying madly all over the array is not a realistic simulation of bee behaviour – this strategy would quickly lead to death. Also, bees in real life learn what types of rewards are associated with different types of flowers – bees may learn to avoid a flower type with a consistently small reward of poor quality (or one whose nectaries are consistently empty). How to forage: a test bee will have a suction tube, and will be let loose to forage on the array for 1 minute (Tip: the secret is not to go as fast as possible, but as “smart” as possible). When visiting a flower, the bee opens the tube, sucks once in the nectary, and closes the tube before moving on. Try to suck up nectar in such a way that the bee can visit either 2 flowers, or suck twice on the same flower before flying back to the hive. Once the bee flies back to the 11 hive, it deposits the high-sucrose nectar in one tube and the low-sucrose nectar in the other. Recording Foraging Data: • One researcher will keep track of amount of each type of nectar collected (emptying the collection tubes as necessary) and the sequence of flower types visited (e.g. A-B-A-A-B-B-B-A). • One researcher will keep track of the number and the length of flights around the array. Flights within a holder are considered short; flights on the diagonal are considered long, and all others are considered “medium”: medium long medium short Fig. 2. Types of foraging flights. • The second bee should keep time for the first bee, but should not observe its flight pattern. After the first bee is finished, the second bee will forage on the same array, but, because flowers will not be replenished, will run the risk of finding depleted flowers. Record the same data for the second bee as for the first bee. 12 Assessing the results of the experiment: 1. How successful were the bees? The bees maximize their success by getting the most sucrose for the shortest distance flown. It is not necessary to be absolutely exact in estimating the amount of sucrose. Remember that the high sucrose has 2X the concentration of sugar as the lowsucrose nectar; so, for example, approximately 2 tubes of low sucrose plus approximately ½ tube of high sucrose = 2 + (½ x 2) = approximately 3 tubes of nectar. To estimate flight costs, short flights = 1, medium = 2 and long = 3; add up the total values to obtain a measure of total fight costs. Compare the success of the 2 bees. Did bee #2 do much worse than bee #1? (Don’t worry too much about exact values – you are trying to understand the factors affecting the coevolutionary relationship.) 2. How successful were the flowers? A flower type visited twice in succession represents successful pollen transfer. A visit that is not followed by a visit to the same flower type constitutes pollen loss and “nectar theft” (the plant gives up nectar while getting nothing in return). The score for each flower type is obtained by dividing the number of successive visits by the total number of visits. For example, suppose a bee visits flower types A & B in the pattern A-BA-A-B-B-B-A-A-B-B-A. The score for A is 2/6 = 0.33; the score for B is 3/6 = 0.5. The larger the score, the more successful the flower type. In real life, over time, the “balancing point” between the costs and benefits to the flowers and to the bees will set the parameters of the coevolutionary relationship. Run the experiment as many times as you like, manipulating one or all of the following variables: 1. 2. 3. 4. nectar quality ease of flower handling spacing and distribution of flowers relative abundance of flower types The purpose is not to quantify your results, but to gain some insight into the costs and benefits of different strategies that could be employed by plants and pollinators. Use these results to help you answer the assignment questions. (We encourage you to discuss these questions as a group, but each student must submit their own answers to the assignment questions.) 13 Lab 3 Assignment (5% of final grade) • At the end of your lab period, each group of students must submit a completed data submission form (available online) describing the set-up and results from one run of the coevolution experiment (worth 4 marks). The names of each student in the group must be on the data submission form in order to receive marks! • The assignment is due at your next lab. Please complete the assignment on the assignment form (available online). The assignment consists of: 1. A drawing of the Selaginella cone (2 marks) 2. Answers to the 3 assignment questions (2 marks each = 6 marks) The data submission form is worth 4 marks. Total marks = 12