Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
RICHARD WAGNER composer, conductor (1813, Leipzig — 1883, Venice) “PRELUDE AND LIEBESTOD” FROM TRISTAN UND ISOLDE COMPOSED: 1854-1859 PREMIERED: June 10, 1865 in Munich, conducted by Hans von Bülow DURATION: ca. 17 minutes SCORING: two flutes, two oboes, English horn, two clarinets, bass clarinet, three bassoons, four horns, three trumpets, three trombones, tuba, timpani, harp and strings Overview Not all revolutions are made with the gun — some of the most important have been inspired by the pen. A pair of such non-violent salvos were fired off in the year 1859 by two of the greatest intellectual giants of the 19th century — Charles Darwin and Richard Wagner. In that year, Darwin published his epochal The Origin of Species and Wagner finished his monumental music-drama Tristan und Isolde. Though a greater contrast in personalities could hardly be imagined than that between the gentle and retiring English naturalist and the wildly egocentric German composer, their works were related in their examination of the human condition beyond the bounds previously explored. Darwin set off a controversy about the essential nature of the physical constitution of man, and of man’s relationship to the world, which continues to generate heated debate to this day. His theory, however, is a triumph of scientific observation and empirical knowledge which has established the warp through which the weft of our modern biological understanding is threaded. Wagner, too, was exploring. His journey of the mind, however, took him not on a trip of innumerable miles in a British trading ship, but on one of passion, into the deepest recesses of the human soul. Though “Romanticism” in music had been the style for at least four decades before he launched out into the stormy world of Tristan, no musician had plumbed the depths of swirling emotion and white-hot eroticism that Wagner exposed in this opera. In the visual arts, some painters had pierced into this twilight domain of the inner mind at the beginning of the century, most notably in the midnight conjurings of Fuseli and the disquieting visions of Goya, but it was Wagner who took it upon himself to devise a tonal language that could open these same vistas to music. “Every theory was quite forgotten,” he wrote. “During the working-out, I myself became aware how far I had outsoared my system.” Wagner’s new musical speech allowed an unprecedented laying-open of an unfathomed emotional world. “Here,” he wrote, “I plunged into the inner depths of soul-events and from the innermost center of the world I fearlessly built up to its outer form.... Life and death, the whole meaning and existence of the outer world, here hang on nothing but the inner movements of the soul.” It is wholly appropriate that Sigmund Freud, whose most important work was based on this same belief in subconscious motivations, should have been born in 1856, the year Wagner wrote the first notes of Tristan. As the opera progressed, Wagner became aware of the power of his creation. To Mathilde Wesendonck, with whom he was having an extended affair while her husband and children grew suspicious in the house next door, he admitted, “This Tristan is turning into something terrifying! I’m afraid the opera will be forbidden — unless it is turned into a parody by bad performances. Only mediocre performances can save me!” Wagner provided a synopsis of the emotional progression of the action of Tristan whose voluptuous prose is a not only a sketch of the events of the story, but also a key to understanding the surging sea of passion on which the entire world of this opera floats: “A primitive old love poem, which, far from having become extinct, is constantly fashioning itself anew, and has been adopted by every European language of the Middle Ages, tells of Tristan and Isolde. Tristan, the faithful vassal, woos for his king her for whom he dares not avow his own love, Isolde. Isolde, powerless than to do otherwise than obey the wooer, follows him as bride to his lord. Jealous of this infringement of her rights, the Goddess of Love takes her revenge. As the result of a happy mistake, she allows the couple to taste of the love potion which, in accordance with the custom of the times, and by way of precaution, the mother had prepared for the husband who should marry her daughter from political motives, and which, by the burning desire which suddenly inflames them after tasting it, opens their eyes to the truth and leads to the avowal that for the future they belong only to each other. “Henceforth, there is no end to the longings, the demands, the joys and woes of love. The world, power, fame, splendor, honor, knighthood, fidelity, friendship — all are dissipated like an empty dream. One thing only remains: longing, longing, insatiable longing, forever springing up anew, pining and thirsting. Death, which means passing away, perishing, never awakening, their only deliverance.... Powerless, the heart sinks back to languish in longing, in longing without attaining; for each attainment only begets new longing, until in the last stage of weariness the foreboding of the highest joy of dying, of no longer existing, of the last escape into that wonderful kingdom from which we are furthest off when we are most strenuously striving to enter therein. Shall we call it death? Or is it the hidden wonder-world from out of which an ivy and vine, entwined with each other, grew up upon Tristan’s and Isolde’s grave, as the legend tells us?” Wagner’s description opens as many questions as it answers. Such ambiguity is one of the most important characteristics of the opera, which has inspired many learned treatises from historians, philosophers, psychologists and musicians over the years in attempts to explain its “meaning.” There will never be one single, “correct” explanation of Tristan because of the profoundly individual manner in which this music affects each listener. In the words of Richard Strauss, the inheritor of Wagner’s mantle as the pre-eminent composer of German opera, “In Wagner, music reached its greatest capacity for expression.” This capacity grows chiefly from the harmonic style of Tristan, its building of enormous climaxes through the continuing frustration of expected resolutions of chord progressions. The lack of fulfillment creates an overwhelming sense of longing until the moment when the pent-up yearning is finally released in a magnificent, cathartic outpouring, heightened by its long period of expectancy. What To Listen For The sense of longing is generated right at the beginning of the opera. Its Prelude is built, in the composer’s words, from “one long series of linked phrases,” each of which is left hanging, unresolved, in silence. Of the remainder of the Prelude and its progression to the Liebestod (“Love-Death”), Wagner wrote, it moves from “the first timidest lament of inappeasable longing, the tenderest shudder, to the most terrible outpouring of an avowal of hopeless love, traversing all phases of the vain struggle against the inner ardor until this, sinking back upon itself, seems to be extinguished in death.” The Prelude is constructed as a long arch of sound, beginning faintly and building to a huge climax near its center before dying away to silence. In Wagner’s concert version, the Liebestod follows without pause, and it, too, generates a magnificent tonal gratification at the point near the end of the opera where the lovers find their only possible satisfaction in welcome death. Of this sublime moment, Wagner wrote, “What Fate divided in life now springs into transfigured life in death: the gates of union are thrown open. Over Tristan’s body the dying Isolde receives the blessed fulfillment of ardent longing, eternal union in measureless space, without barriers, without fetters, inseparable.” When Wagner conceived the idea of Tristan und Isolde in 1854, at a time when his first marriage was increasingly burdensome to him, he wrote to his future father-in-law, Franz Liszt, “As never in my life have I tasted the true joy of love, I will erect a monument to this most beautiful dream of all wherein from beginning to end this love may once drink to its fill.” JOAQUÍN RODRIGO composer (1901, Sagunto, Valencia — 1999, Madrid) CONCIERTO DE ARANJUEZ FOR GUITAR AND ORCHESTRA COMPOSED: 1939 PREMIERED: November 9, 1940 in Barcelona, conducted by César Mendoza Lasalle with Regino Sainz de la Maza as soloist DURATION: ca. 22 minutes SCORING: woodwinds in pairs plus piccolo and English horn, two horns, two trumpets and strings Overview Though Joaquín Rodrigo, born on November 22, 1901 at Sagunto, Valencia, on Spain’s eastern coast, lost his sight when he was three from diphtheria, he early showed a pronounced aptitude for music. His parents enrolled him in a school for blind children in the nearby city of Valencia, and at age eight, he began formal lessons in harmony, piano and violin; his teachers in composition included Francisco Antich, Enrique Gomá and Eduardo López Chavarri. During the 1920s, Rodrigo established himself as a pianist with performances of challenging recent works by Ravel, Stravinsky and other contemporary composers, and he began composing seriously in 1923 with the Suite para Piano and the Dos Esbozos (“Two Sketches”) for Violin and Piano. His first work for orchestra, Juglares (written, like all of his scores, on a Braille music typewriter and then dictated to a copyist), was played in both Valencia and Madrid in 1924; his Cinco Piezas Infantiles, also for orchestra, won a National Prize the following year. In 1927, he followed the path of his compatriots Albéniz, Granados, Falla and Turina, and moved to Paris, where he enrolled at the Schola Cantorum as a pupil of Paul Dukas. Rodrigo immersed himself in the musical life of the city, befriending Honegger, Milhaud, Ravel and other Parisian luminaries, receiving encouragement from Falla, and enjoying success with a performance of his orchestral Prelude for a Poem to the Alhambra, whose subject matter and distinctly Spanish idiom established the style that consistently characterized his creations. In 1933, he married the Turkish pianist Victoria Kamhi. A Conde de Cartegena Grant the following year enabled him to remain in Paris to continue his studies at the Conservatoire and the Sorbonne. The outbreak of civil war in Spain in 1936 prevented Rodrigo from returning home, and he spent the next three years traveling in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, and living in the French capital. He returned to Madrid after the Spanish Civil War ended in 1939, and established his position among the country’s leading musicians with the premiere of the Concierto de Aranjuez for Guitar and Orchestra the following year. His prominence in Spanish musical life was recognized with many awards, honorary degrees and memberships, and, in 1947, the creation for him of the Manuel de Falla Chair at the University of Madrid. In addition to teaching at the University, Rodrigo also served as Head of Music Broadcasts for Spanish Radio, music critic for several newspapers, and Director of the Artistic Section of the Spanish National Organization for the Blind. Though best known for his series of concertos for one, two and four guitars (Concierto de Aranjuez, Fantasía para un Gentilhombre, Concierto para una Fiesta, Concierto Madrigal, Concierto Andaluz), flute (Concierto Pastoral), cello (Concierto como un Divertimento) and harp (Concierto Serenata), Rodrigo also composed a ballet, a zarzuela, an opera, numerous orchestral works, music for the cinema, many songs, and solo numbers for piano and guitar. He died in Madrid on July 6, 1999. The small town of Aranjuez, thirty miles south of Madrid on the River Tagus, is a green oasis in the barren plateau of central Spain. In the mid-18th century, a palace, set amid verdant forests and parks, was built at Aranjuez as a summer retreat for the Spanish court. Generations of Spanish kings thereafter settled into Aranjuez every spring, when the countless nightingales would serenade them from the cedars and laurels, the court ladies would promenade in the cooling shade, and the men would hone their equestrian skills with the famous cream-colored Andalusian horses bred nearby. When Rodrigo sought inspiration for a new concerto in the difficult, war-torn year of 1939, it was to the elegant symbol of by-gone Spain represented by Aranjuez that he turned. “Having conceived the idea of a guitar concerto,” he recalled, “it was necessary for me to place it in a certain epoch and, still more, in a definite location — an epoch at the end of which fandangos transform themselves into fandanguillos, and when the cante and the bulerias vibrate in the Spanish air.” He further stated that he had in mind the early decades of the 19th century when composing this Concierto de Aranjuez. Of the work’s mood and the character of its solo instrument, the composer wrote, “Throughout the veins of Spanish music, a profound rhythmic beat seems to be diffused by a strange phantasmagoric, colossal and multiform instrument — an instrument idealized in the fiery imagination of Albéniz, Granados, Falla and Turina. It is an imaginary instrument that might be said to possess the wings of the harp, the heart of the grand piano and the soul of the guitar.... It would be unjust to expect strong sonorities from this Concierto; they would falsify its essence and distort an instrument made for subtle ambiguities. Its strength is to be found in its very lightness and in the intensity of its contrasts. The Aranjuez Concierto is meant to sound like the hidden breeze that stirs the tree tops in the parks, and it should be only as strong as a butterfly, and as dainty as a veronica.” What To Listen For The Concierto de Aranjuez has enjoyed a great popularity since it was introduced in 1940, having been recorded many times, made into a ballet, and set in an array of popular, jazz and even commercial arrangements. With few precedents to guide him, Rodrigo created a work that not only embodies the essential qualities of his musical style and the spiritual ethos of Spain, but also solves the difficult technical problems inherent in combining an unamplified solo guitar with a full orchestra. Rodrigo adapted the three traditional movements of the concerto form to reflect different aspects of the soul of Spanish music — the outer movements are fast in tempo and dance-like, while the middle one is imbued with the bittersweet intensity of classic flamenco cante hondo (“deep song”). The soloist opens the Concierto with an evocative, typically Spanish rhythmic pattern of ambiguous meter that courses throughout the movement. The orchestra, in colorful fiesta garb, soon enters while the guitar’s brilliant, virtuoso display continues. The haunting Adagio, among the most beautiful and beloved pieces ever written for guitar, is based on a theme of Middle Eastern ancestry, given in the plangent tones of the English horn, around which the soloist weaves delicate arabesques of sound as the music unfolds. The finale’s lilting simplicity (one commentator noted its similarity to a Spanish children’s song) serves as a foil to the imposing technical demands placed on the soloist, who is required to negotiate almost the entire range of the instrument’s possibilities. Like all of Rodrigo’s best music, the Concierto de Aranjuez bears the unmistakable stamp of his craftsmanship and stylistic personality, of which the noted Spanish composer Tomás Marco wrote, “His aim has been to create a Spanish ambiance, full of color and agreeable tunes, where folklore is a picturesque element and references to art music of the past consist of distilled 17th and 18th-century mannerisms.” This masterful Concierto is glowing evidence of Rodrigo’s ability of capture the spirit of his native land in music that is both immediate in appeal and lasting in value. MANUEL DE FALLA composer (1876, Cádiz, Spain — 1946, Alta Gracia, Argentina) THE THREE-CORNERED HAT, BALLET IN TWO PARTS COMPOSED: 1917 and 1919 PREMIERED: July 22, 1919 in London by the Ballet Russe, conducted by Ernest Ansermet DURATION: ca. 40 minutes SCORING: piccolo, two flutes, two oboes, English horn, two clarinets, two bassoons, four horns, three trumpets, three trombones, tuba, timpani, percussion, harp, celesta, piano and strings Overview The dazzling Parisian success of Sergei Diaghilev’s Ballet Russe that began in 1909 came to a jarring halt when the Guns of August tore across Belgium and France to begin World War I in 1914. Diaghilev, Leonide Massine and some of the company took refuge in Switzerland and Spain, while Nijinsky and others fled to America. Diaghilev arranged a season in Spain for 1917, and, always on the prowl for new talent, took the opportunity to look up a musician Stravinsky had met in Paris in 1910. Stravinsky described his Spanish colleague as “even smaller than myself, and as modest and withdrawn as an oyster... unpityingly religious, and the shyest man I have ever met.” His name was Manuel de Falla. Falla, a meticulous worker who composed slowly, had completed only a small number of works by 1917 — most notably Nights in the Gardens of Spain, the opera La Vida Breve and the ballet El Amor Brujo — and was little known outside of his homeland. When Diaghilev and Massine presented themselves to him in Barcelona, he took them to see a one-act farce set in the early 19th century about the attempted seduction of a miller’s wife by the local governor for which he had provided the music, El corregidor y la molinera (“The Corregidor and the Miller’s Wife”). The script for this “pantomime” was by Gregorio Martinez Sierra, who based it on a short novel by Pedro de Alarcon published in 1874 as El sombrero de tres picos. Alarcon was said to have heard the story in turn from an old goatherd who hired himself out as an entertainer for local weddings and feasts. Of Falla’s score, Massine wrote that it “seemed to us very exciting, and its blend of violence and passion was similar to much of the music of the local folk-dances. Both Diaghilev and I felt that the story and the music offered us the potentials of a full-length ballet.” Falla accepted Diaghilev’s proposal to revise and extend his score for production when the war was over, but gave the provision that he be allowed enough time to study Spanish folk music and dance styles to assure the correct atmosphere for the finished work. Diaghilev thought this a capital idea, and he, Massine, Falla and Felix Fernandez Garcia, a locally celebrated dancer who was enlisted to instruct the company in Spanish dance styles, set off for a leisurely tour of the country. The four pilgrims visited Saragossa, Salamanca, Toledo, Seville, Cordova, Granada and many small villages, eyes and ears constantly open for material for the new ballet. Falla and Massine both collected a wealth of ideas, and snippets from several of the melodies that the composer discovered ended up in the score, including one he heard by chance from a blind man walking the streets near the Alhambra chanting tunes to the accompaniment of his battered guitar. Falla took up the ballet score again after his grand Iberian tour, added to it two dance numbers and expanded the instrumentation from the original seventeen-piece chamber scoring to full orchestra. It was not until World War I ended that the production of The Three-Cornered Hat could be staged as part of the 1919 London season of the Ballet Russe. Diaghilev commissioned Pablo Picasso to design the decor; it was the great painter’s first ballet assignment. Massine choreographed the work with the help of the Spanish dancer Felix, who was brought to London to train the company for the premiere. (Sadly, the pressures of artistic life in a big city were more than the man could bear, and he lost his reason soon after he arrived, dying in a British asylum in 1941.) The first performance, on July 22, 1919 at London’s Alhambra Theater conducted by Ernest Ansermet, was a great success (Spanish dance schools sprang up all around London within weeks), and The Three-Cornered Hat was an important milestone in establishing Falla’s international reputation. What To Listen For The racy story of the ballet has its roots in the folk traditions of Spain. The curtain rises on the sunny esplanade beside a mill. The miller and his pretty wife are busy about their chores. A stately procession enters carrying the elderly Corregidor (the local magistrate) and his wife. The Corregidor is attracted to the miller’s wife, and slips back after his retinue has left to make his advances. The wife tells her husband to hide and watch her spurn the old man’s attempts at love. She dances a brilliant fandango and further tantalizes him with a bunch of grapes. He chases her, trips, and becomes aware of the teasing intrigue between husband and wife. The Corregidor departs, and the miller and his wife cheerfully resume the fandango. Part II of the ballet takes place that evening, St. John’s Night. The miller and his wife are joined in celebration by their neighbors, and together dance the popular seguidillas. The miller performs a virile farruca. The festivities are interrupted by the local constabulary, who have come to arrest the miller on a charge trumped up by the Corregidor to get him out of the way. The Corregidor appears as soon as the miller is led away, but falls into the millstream as he is pursuing the girl. She runs off in search of her husband, while the Corregidor removes his sodden clothes, including his three-cornered hat — the symbol of his office — hangs them on a chair outside the mill, and jumps into the absent girl’s bed to ward off a chill. Meanwhile, the miller has escaped from his captors to return home, sees the Corregidor’s discarded clothes and believes himself betrayed by his wife. Vowing to get even, he exchanges his garments for those of the official, scribbles on the wall “The wife of the Corregidor is also very pretty,” and runs off in search of his conquest. The Corregidor emerges from the bedroom to find only the miller’s clothes. He puts them on just in time for the police, hunting their escaped prisoner, to arrest him by mistake. The miller’s wife returns, followed by the miller, and the two are happily reconciled in the joyous final dance while the villagers toss a straw effigy of the Corregidor in a blanket. Falla’s masterful score captures both the dramatic action of the story and the colorful milieu of its setting. Gilbert Chase said of The Three-Cornered Hat that, like the best of Falla’s music, it is “an unceasing quest for the musical soul of Spain.” There are bits of many traditional Spanish melodies threaded through the score, but it is far more than a mere quodlibet of traditional tunes. Falla penetrated to the heart of the music of his homeland — the fiery gypsy cante jondo, the vibrant melodies and rhythms of Andalusia, the flamenco — and distilled them into a style that marks him as “a poet of Spanish emotion,” according to Georges Jean-Aubrey: The Neighbor’s Dance is a seguidillas, The Grapes is a fandango, The Miller’s Dance a farruca, and The Final Dance a jota. Enrique Franco’s summary of Falla’s style applies with special relevance to The Three-Cornered Hat. “Falla was no revolutionary,” Franco wrote, “but what he created was entirely new. His powerful originality depended not on matters of technique — even if in this he made startling innovations — but on substance.... It is as if Falla developed and exhausted all the possibilities of Spanish nationalism.” MAURICE RAVEL composer, pianist (1875, Ciboure, France — 1937, Paris) LA VALSE, POÈME CHORÉOGRAPHIQUE COMPOSED: 1919-1920 REMIERED P : December 12, 1920 in Paris, conducted by Camille Chevillard. DURATION: ca. 12 minutes SCORING: piccolo, three flutes, two oboes, English horn, two clarinets, bass clarinet, two bassoons, contrabassoon, four horns, three trumpets, three trombones, tuba, timpani, percussion, two harps and strings Overview Ravel first considered composing a musical homage to Johann Strauss as early as 1906. The idea forced itself upon him again a decade later, but during the years of the First World War, he could not bring himself to work on a score which he had tentatively titled “Wien” (“Vienna”). Since the war had sapped a great deal of his energy, causing his health to be precarious for the rest of his life, it took a proposal from the great ballet impresario Sergei Diaghilev in 1918 to convince Ravel to bring the project to fruition. (Diaghilev hoped to pair Ravel’s new work with Stravinsky’s Pulcinella, but upon its completion, the impresario was dissatisfied with La Valse — “a masterpiece, but it’s not a ballet,” he said — which then had to wait until 1929 for its stage premiere under Ida Rubinstein.) By January 1919, when Ravel was immersed in the composition of his tribute to Vienna, he said that he felt he was “waltzing frantically.” He saw La Valse both as “a kind of apotheosis of the Viennese waltz” and as a “fantastic and fatefully inescapable whirlpool.” The “inescapable whirlpool” was the First World War toward which Vienna marched in three-quarter time, salving its social and political conscience with the luscious strains of Johann Strauss. There is more than a touch of the surreal in La Valse. Familiar and real things are placed against a background strange and a little threatening in its disorienting effect. This artifice paralleled the situation that Ravel saw as characteristic of late 19th-century Vienna in particular and Europe in general. What To Listen For A surrealistic haze shrouds the opening of La Valse, a vague introduction from which fragments of themes gradually emerge. In the composer’s words, “At first the scene is dimmed by a kind of swirling mist, through which one discerns, vaguely and intermittently, the waltzing couples. Little by little the vapors disappear, the illumination grows brighter, revealing an immense ballroom filled with dancers; the blaze of the chandeliers comes to full splendor. An Imperial court ball about 1855.” In the form typical of the Viennese waltz, several continuous sections follow, each based on a different melody. At the half-way point of the score, however, the murmurs of the introduction return, and the melodies heard previously in clear and complete versions are now fragmented, played against each other, unable to regain the rhythmic flow of their initial appearances. Persistent rustlings in the low strings and woodwinds, flutter-tongue wails from the flutes, snarling muted brass, abrupt and violent crescendos challenge the old waltz melodies. The musical panacea of 1855 cannot smother the reality of 1915, however, and the music becomes consumed by the harsh thrust of the roaring triple meter transformed from a seductive dance into a demonic juggernaut. The dissonances grind, the rhythms become brutal, the orchestral colors blaze as the world of order is sucked toward the awaiting cataclysm in what Ravel called “a fantastic and fatal sort of dervish’s dance.” At the almost unbearable peak of tension, the dance is torn apart by a five-note figure spread through the entire orchestra, a figure so alien to the triple meter that it destroys the waltz and brings this brilliant, forceful and disturbing work to a shattering close. ©2016 Dr. Richard E. Rodda