* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download BER Scans at Low Optical Power
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Automation bias wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS SCT LINKS RX Performance ATLAS Project Document No: Institute Document No. ATL-IS-ER-0049 Created: 22/05/03 Page: 1 of 12 Modified: 30/04/17 21:21 Rev. No: 2 SCT Links RX PCB Performance This document describes the performance of the prototype RX PCBs. Results are given for the analogue measurements of the PIN arrays in terms of responsivity and rise and fall times. The RX PCBs which contain the DRX-12 ASIC and the PIN array were used to perform BER scans. These BER scans were made as a function of both receiver threshold and timing in order to fully characterise the system performance. Prepared by: Checked by: T. Weidberg Distribution List ATLAS SCT/Pixel Opto Links group Approved by: ATLAS Project Document No: ATL-IS-ER-0049 History of Changes Rev. No. Date 1 23/5/03 2 10/6/03 Pages Description of changes First Draft 11-12 12 Results for BER scans with attenuator added. Recommended PIN bias voltage changed. Page: 2 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 ATLAS Project Document No: ATL-IS-ER-0049 Page: 3 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...........................................................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................3 Analogue Measurements ..............................................................................................................................................................3 BER Scans .....................................................................................................................................................................................4 2D Scans .....................................................................................................................................................................................7 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................................................11 Introduction The RX PCBs are used to receive the optical data from the SCT and Pixel modules. The RX PCB contains the DRX-12 ASIC1 and an MT coupled 12 way PIN array. This note gives results of the measurements of the PIN responsivity and rise and fall times. The RX PCBs were used to perform BER scans using the VCSELs on a prototype SCT barrel harness as the data sources. 2D BER scans were performed as function of both RX threshold and timing. Analogue Measurements The rise and fall times of the PIN diodes were measured as a function of bias voltage on a prototype array and the results are shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1 Rise and Fall times (20%-80%) as a function of PIN bias voltage. Fast rise and fall times can be obtained provided that the PIN bias voltage is at least 5V. The distribution of PIN responsivities for a sample of seven prototype arrays is shown in Figure 2 below. All channels show responsivities well above the minimum specification of 0.4 A/W. ATLAS Project Document No: ATL-IS-ER-0049 Page: 4 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 PIN Responsivity 30 Frequency 25 20 15 10 5 0 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.62 0.64 0.66 More Responsivity (A/W) Figure 2 Distribution of PIN responsivity for all channels of 7 prototype PIN arrays. BER Scans In order to measure the performance of the combined PIN diode/DRX-12 system a series of Bit Error Rate (BER) measurements were performed using a prototype barrel SCT opto-harness as the 12 data sources. The opto-harness consisted of opto-flex cables connected to 6 low mass aluminium power tapes. An opto-package containing two VCSELs and one PIN diode[2,3] as well as the DORIC4A and VDC ASICs were mounted on the opto-flex cable[4]. Scans of BER versus RX DAC (this set the threshold) value were made at different PIN bias voltages. Scans of the number of errors as a function of the timing were also done. The results of the BER scans versus RX DAC value for PIN bias voltages in the range 0 to 4V are shown in Figure 3 to Figure 5 below. The results of scans with higher PIN bias voltages looked very similar to the results obtained at 4V. ATLAS Project Document No: ATL-IS-ER-0049 BER Scan PIN Bias 0V 6.00E-01 5.00E-01 Series1 Series2 4.00E-01 Series3 Series4 BER Series5 Series6 3.00E-01 Series7 Series8 Series9 2.00E-01 Series10 Series11 Series12 1.00E-01 0.00E+00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 RX DAC Figure 3 BER versus RX DAC value for PIN Bias of 0V. BER Scan PIN Bias 2V 6.00E-01 5.00E-01 Series1 4.00E-01 Series2 BER Series3 Series4 3.00E-01 Series5 Series6 Series7 Series8 2.00E-01 Series9 1.00E-01 0.00E+00 0 50 100 150 200 RX DAC Figure 4 BER versus RX DAC value for PIN Bias of 2V. 250 300 Page: 5 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 ATLAS Project Document No: Page: 6 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 ATL-IS-ER-0049 BER Scan PIN Bias 4V 8.00E-01 7.00E-01 6.00E-01 Series1 Series2 5.00E-01 Series3 BER Series4 4.00E-01 Series5 Series6 Series7 3.00E-01 Series8 Series9 2.00E-01 1.00E-01 0.00E+00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 RX DAC Figure 5 BER versus RX DAC value for PIN Bias of 4V. Not surprisingly, there is a clear improvement in going from a PIN bias of 0V to 2V. There is a slight improvement in going from 2V to 4V but after that there is no clear evidence of any further improvement. In order to summarise the data in one figure the results of the BER scans versus RX DAC value for one channel are shown in Figure 6 below. BER Scans vs PIN Bias 0.6 0.5 0V 2V 4V 6V 8V 10V 12V 14V BER 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 RX DAC Figure 6 BER scans versus RX DAC value for channel 0, at different PIN bias voltages. From the timing scans, the width of the region with no bit errors was determined and this width is plotted as a function of PIN bias voltage in Figure 7 below. ATLAS Project Document No: ATL-IS-ER-0049 Page: 7 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 Width of 0 Errors vs PIN Bias Voltage 25 Width (ns) 20 15 DAC=255 DAC=104 10 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 PIN Bias (V) Figure 7 Width of the region of 0 bit errors as a function of PIN bias voltage for two different settings of the RX DAC value. 2D Scans In order to further understand the system performance the BER scans were made as a function of RX DAC value and the relative delay between the reconstructed and reference data. These 2D scans can then be used to create the digital equivalent of an “eye” diagram. The results of a 2D scan of BER versus RX DAC value and timing setting is shown in Figure 8 below. PIN Bias 2V 0 250 1.000 4500 6750 200 9000 1.125E4 RX DAC Value 1.35E4 1.575E4 150 1.8E4 100 50 5 10 15 20 25 30 Timing (ns) Figure 8 Number of bit errors versus RX DAC value and timing setting for array C000 channel 0 at a PIN bias of 2V. This shows that the width of the timing scan with 0 errors, is greatly reduced at low DAC value, compared to higher DAC values. This corresponds to the slow tail in the analogue signal at low PIN bias voltage. The equivalent plot for a PIN bias of 4V is shown in Figure 9 below and shows a much better ATLAS Project Document No: ATL-IS-ER-0049 Page: 8 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 performance. There was no clear improvement in the plot as the PIN bias voltage was increased above 4V. PIN Bias 4V 0 250 1.000 4500 6750 200 9000 1.125E4 RX DAC Value 1.35E4 1.575E4 150 1.8E4 100 50 5 10 15 20 25 30 Timing (ns) Figure 9 Number of bit errors versus RX DAC value and timing setting for array C000 channel 0 at a PIN bias of 4V. In order to compare the performance more quantitatively, the range of the timing scan in which there were no bit errors was calculated as a function of RX DAC value. The results for one channel are shown for different PIN bias voltages in Figure 10 to Figure 13 below. C004 channel 0 2V 25 Range of 0 Errors (ns) 20 15 Range 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 RX DAC Figure 10 Range of timing scan with no bit errors as a function of RX DAC value for array C004, channel 0 at a PIN bias voltage of 2V. ATLAS Project Document No: Page: 9 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 ATL-IS-ER-0049 C004 channel 0 4V 25 Range of 0 Errors (ns) 20 15 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 RX DAC Figure 11 Range of timing scan with no bit errors as a function of RX DAC value for array C004, channel 0 at a PIN bias voltage of 4V. C004 channel 0 6V 25 Range of 0 Errors (ns) 20 15 Range 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 RX DAC Figure 12 Range of timing scan with no bit errors as a function of RX DAC value for array C004, channel 0 at a PIN bias voltage of 6V. ATLAS Project Document No: ATL-IS-ER-0049 Page: 10 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 C004 channel 0 8V 25 Range of 0 Errors (ns) 20 15 Range 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 RX DAC Figure 13 Range of timing scan with no bit errors as a function of RX DAC value for array C004, channel 0 at a PIN bias voltage of 8V. These results show a clear improvement in performance when increasing the PIN bias voltage from 2V to 4V but there is no evidence for any further improvement at higher PIN bias voltages. In order to summarise the performance for a given array at a particular PIN bias voltage, the number of bins in the 2D scan with no bit errors was counted. The results are shown for the sample of 10 PIN arrays used in Figure 14 below. Number Zero Error Bins 4500 4000 C001-c0 C001-c6 C002-c0 C003-c0 C004-c0 C005-c0 C006-c0 C007-c0 C008-c0 B000-c0 B001-c0 Number bins 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 PIN Bias (V) Figure 14 Number of bins in the 2D scan of BER versus RX DAC and timing setting with no bit errors as a function of PIN bias voltage, for the 10 PIN arrays used. For all the PIN arrays the performance improves with PIN bias voltage but no further improvement is observed for a PIN bias above 6V. ATLAS Project Document No: ATL-IS-ER-0049 Page: 11 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 BER Scans at Low Optical Power The results shown so far demonstrate that the data links with the PIN array and DRX-12 work well at the expected high optical power. In order to understand the safety margin in the system, BER scans were performed for one channel with a variable air gap optical attenuator inserted. The input optical power was measured by removing the fibre with the MT connector from the array and connecting it to a LAPD. The quoted optical power are corrected for the 50% duty cycle and therefore refer to the peak current not the DC average. The results of BER scans versus RX DAC threshold value for this channel are shown for different input optical power in Figure 15 below. BER Scans With Attenuation 0.6 0.5 BER 0.4 P=600 uW P=140 uW P=70 uW P=49 uW P=35 uW 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RX DAC Value Figure 15 BER scans versus RX DAC value for different input optical power (see legend). For the lowest value of the optical power used of 35 W, the RX DAC value was set to a value of 11 counts and the system was run for one hour with no bit errors. The resulting 90% c.l. upper limit on the BER is 1.6 10-11, which is well below the system specification of less than 10-9. The worst case optical power expected for ATLAS operation is 330 W5, so that there is a safety factor of about 10 dB in the system. Conclusions The analogue performance of the prototype PIN arrays satisfy the specifications for responsivity and speed. The BER scans with a prototype barrel harness show that good system performance can be achieved. A PIN bias voltage of greater than about 5V is required for optimal performance and the value that will be used in ATLAS operation will be 6 V to provide some safety margin. 1 DRX-12, EDMS note ATL-IS-ES-0045. A.R. Weidberg, SCT Optical Links, Radiation Hard Optical Links for the ATLAS SCT and Pixel Detectors, Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiments, Cracow, Poland, 11-15 September 2000, CERN 2000-010. 2 ATLAS Project Document No: ATL-IS-ER-0049 3 4 5 Page: 12 of 12 Rev. No.: 2 SCT Barrel opto-package, EDMS note ATL-IS-AT-0009. J. Matheson, Status Report on SCT links, Proceedings of the LECC 2002, Colmar, France, LHCC/xxx. A.R. Weidberg, Optical Power Safety Margins, http://www-pnp.physics.ox.ac.uk/~weidberg/Optical_Power_Safety_Margins.doc