Download Socio-Economic Caste Census 2011

Socio-Economic Caste Census
2011
Ministry of Rural Development
Government of India
CONTENTS
 Poverty Gaps and Methodology
 Status of SECC in States
 No . Of EB’s as per RGI
 Initiatives of MoRD
 Funding
 Key Issues
 Observations in the field
Ministry of Rural Development
2
SECC 2011
Methodology for Identification of BPL
households
 Based on recommendations of Expert Group, results of Pilot Survey and
detailed discussion with all stakeholders a methodology was proposed.
 Methodology included automatic exclusion and inclusion criteria and
deprivation indicators.
 After feedback / discussions with states, experts, NGOs following
decision taken.
 Joint Statement by Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission and hon’ble
Minister of RD issued on 3rd October 2011, a major policy level shift from
proposed methodology announced
Ministry of Rural Development
3
SECC 2011
Joint Statement issued on 3.10.2011
 Specific entitlements that rural households will receive under various
central government programmes and schemes decided after the SECC, 2011
survey results are available and analysed.
 The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission
methodology will NOT be used to impose any ceilings.
 Consultation with states, experts and civil society organizations to arrive at
a consensus on the methodology by the time the SECC, 2011 is completed.
 An Expert Committee will be appointed to ensure that this methodology is
consistent with the provisions of the Food Security Bill as it finally emerges.
Ministry of Rural Development
4
SECC 2011
Guidelines for Utilization of Funds for SECC
2011
 Funds sanction to States/UTs are for entire operations of SECC 2011including Urban
and Caste Census segment; Funds released to the agency designated by the
States/UTs.
 States/UTs to decide mechanism for further release of funds to other Departments.
 Detailed Guidelines issued for payment of honorarium and TA/DA at different levels.
 Sanctioned amount includes Provision for miscellaneous activities.
 The States/UTs to decide expenditure to be borne on various activities for the
successful completion of the SECC 2011. Total expenditure should not exceed
sanctioned amount.
 Additional allocation of funds for increase in EBS is as per information given by
Office of RGI
 The States/UTs not to create such liabilities which will involve any financial
implication on the MoRD beyond the activities of current SECC Census.
 State/UTs shall submit monthly progress and expenditure report by 10th of every
month.
Ministry of Rural Development
5
SECC 2011
Status of States (1/2)
Name of
State/UT
Status(as on 12.11.2011)
% Coverage
Tripura
• Started on 29/06/11 (First State to begin SECC 2011)
• Enumeration is completed in 5750 EBs out of 7239.
79%
• Started on 18/07/11
• Enumeration process completed on 1st October.
• Supervisory enumeration to start.
88%
• Started on 18/07/11 in both rural and urban areas.
•Supervisory enumeration has started in Diu Urban
areas.
90%
D&NH
Daman & Diu
Puducherry
• Started on 15/07/11
• Enumeration process completed on 4th October
Chandigarh
• Started on 18/07/11 in both rural and urban areas.
• Data Entry for 2067 EBs completed.
• Field enumeration completed on 31st October.
89%
• Planning to complete enumeration in 2 Phases.
• First phase started from 26/09/11 and currently
going on in 8 districts i.e. 20256 EBs.
• Enumeration completed in 14518 EBs.
74%
Chhattisgarh
Ministry of Rural Development
6
100%
SECC 2011
Status of States (2/2)
Name of
State/UT
Maharashtra
Himachal
Pradesh
Andhra
Pradesh
Punjab
Status(as on 12.11.2011)
% Coverage
• State commenced enumeration in Nashik, Ahmad
Nagar, Beed, Thane district on 3/11/2011.
•Enumeration is completed in 23 EBs out of 47505
Ebs.
1%
• Started in three snow bound districts(Kinnaur ,
Lahul and Spiti, Chamba)
• Enumeration is in completed in 499 out of 1615
EBs.
41%
• Started from 18/10/2011.
• Enumeration has been completed for 10027EBs
out of 112591 EBs.
• Enumerated data could not be uploaded to the NIC
server due to a problem of state code
• Supervisory enumeration to start.
15%
• Started on 01/10/2011.
• Enumeration is going on in 22 districts or 51313
EBs.
• Enumeration completed for 20131 EBs.
58%
Ministry of Rural Development
7
SECC 2011
No. of EB’s as per RGI
Name of State/UT
Revised no. of EBs
A&N Islands
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chandigarh
Chhattisgarh
Name of State/UT
1,229
Goa
Gujarat
113,412
7,290
Haryana
49,347
Himachal Pradesh
25,061
J&K
26,315
2,096
Jharkhand
68,649
49,390
Karnataka
126,612
64,286
205,832
689
Kerala
Daman & Diu
475
Lakshadweep
Ministry of Rural Development
3,210
188,676
D&NH
Delhi
Revised no. of EBs
33,325
Madhya Pradesh
8
68,351
117
156,745
SECC 2011
No. of EB’s as per RGI
Name of State/UT Revised no. of EBs Name of State/UT Revised no. of EBs
Maharashtra
224,531
Rajasthan
Manipur
6,225
Sikkim
Meghalaya
9,244
Tamil Nadu
Mizoram
2,160
Tripura
Nagaland
4,254
Uttar Pradesh
Orissa
Puducherry
Punjab
Ministry of Rural Development
137,733
1,612
136,106
6,814
395,268
96,882
Uttarakhand
27,909
2,307
West Bengal
178,706
52,410
9
SECC 2011
Initiatives by MoRD
 Coordinating supply of Tablet PC’s with Dept. of Defense
production
 Continuous Software updating due to emerging requirements
and requests from States ( State Specific ID numbers)
 5 Trainings have been completed at NIRD with 350
participants across the country ( Urban, Rural and Census)
 Trainers Alliances engaged to provide support, to be deputed
to states
 Instructed BEL to provide manpower at the district and
charge center to deal with software/hardware issues
Ministry of Rural Development
10
SECC 2011
Initiatives by MoRD
 Continuous coordination with various stakeholders like RGI,
HUPA,CPSU, BEL , NIC, States, etc.
 Instructed NIC to provide access to view data at the Charge
center /District level
Initiatives in the Pipeline
 Third Party Monitoring
 Integrated Media Campaign to be commenced shortly
 Helpline / call centers
 Sourcing additional vendors to help BEL complete HHD delivery
on schedule
Ministry of Rural Development
11
SECC 2011
Key Issues - States
Pre enumeration status to be shared with MoRD





Account Details for Transfer of Funds
NPR Images from DCO – RGI
Charge Center Readiness
Training to Enumerators
Accurate Consignee details by District ( Telephone, Mobile,
Fax, email, Name of the individual, District etc.)
 No. of HHD’s and Solar Chargers district wise
 Storage Space for stocking HHD’s
 Coordination with CPSU to ensure vendors engage DEO’s
 Very Slow uploading of data to NIC server
Ministry of Rural Development
12
SECC 2011
Key Issues – States to Note
Enumeration Process
 Information on Faulty HHD’s to be conveyed to CPSU’s
 To Ensure Current S/w version uploaded on to HHD’s
 To Ensure quality of Data
 Coordination with CPSU to upload data on to NIC server
 Timely uploading of EB’s enumerated
 To Ensure The HHD’s are picked up from the Transport Hubs
 Whenever DEO’s not in place, State to take proactive steps to
engage DEO’s – Payment by6 Vendor
Post Enumeration
 Ensure Supervisor Modules are uploaded on HHD’s
 Claims and Objections guidelines formats being finalized
Ministry of Rural Development
13
SECC 2011
Some Observation from Field
 Enumerator do not use I Card, Appointment Letter, Lay Out
Map, update AHL, carry blank schedule and Stickers are not
available
 Entry in the household is abrupt with no proper introduction
 DEO’s Asks questions and enter Data and Enumerators are
Bystanders
 Enumerators not noting observations
 Many times respondents stand and the team sits comfortably
 Locating household properly if two same name appear in AHL
11
Ministry of Rural Development
14
SECC 2011
Some Observation from Field
 Sometimes Sex of the person has been wrong in earlier data
 Some information like mother’s name, father’s name is incorrect
sometimes – but that can’t be corrected – so enumerators
should note it separately
 Questions related to disability, caste, religion are asked in ‘bulk’
and not about individual members as is expected.
 Separation/Divorce – local words not used properly
 PTG – understanding of the term
 Manual Scavenger = Open Defecation? Legally Released Bonded
Labor = Contractual annual labor?
Ministry of Rural Development
15
SECC 2011