Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Socio-Economic Caste Census 2011 Ministry of Rural Development Government of India CONTENTS Poverty Gaps and Methodology Status of SECC in States No . Of EB’s as per RGI Initiatives of MoRD Funding Key Issues Observations in the field Ministry of Rural Development 2 SECC 2011 Methodology for Identification of BPL households Based on recommendations of Expert Group, results of Pilot Survey and detailed discussion with all stakeholders a methodology was proposed. Methodology included automatic exclusion and inclusion criteria and deprivation indicators. After feedback / discussions with states, experts, NGOs following decision taken. Joint Statement by Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission and hon’ble Minister of RD issued on 3rd October 2011, a major policy level shift from proposed methodology announced Ministry of Rural Development 3 SECC 2011 Joint Statement issued on 3.10.2011 Specific entitlements that rural households will receive under various central government programmes and schemes decided after the SECC, 2011 survey results are available and analysed. The present state-wise poverty estimates using the Planning Commission methodology will NOT be used to impose any ceilings. Consultation with states, experts and civil society organizations to arrive at a consensus on the methodology by the time the SECC, 2011 is completed. An Expert Committee will be appointed to ensure that this methodology is consistent with the provisions of the Food Security Bill as it finally emerges. Ministry of Rural Development 4 SECC 2011 Guidelines for Utilization of Funds for SECC 2011 Funds sanction to States/UTs are for entire operations of SECC 2011including Urban and Caste Census segment; Funds released to the agency designated by the States/UTs. States/UTs to decide mechanism for further release of funds to other Departments. Detailed Guidelines issued for payment of honorarium and TA/DA at different levels. Sanctioned amount includes Provision for miscellaneous activities. The States/UTs to decide expenditure to be borne on various activities for the successful completion of the SECC 2011. Total expenditure should not exceed sanctioned amount. Additional allocation of funds for increase in EBS is as per information given by Office of RGI The States/UTs not to create such liabilities which will involve any financial implication on the MoRD beyond the activities of current SECC Census. State/UTs shall submit monthly progress and expenditure report by 10th of every month. Ministry of Rural Development 5 SECC 2011 Status of States (1/2) Name of State/UT Status(as on 12.11.2011) % Coverage Tripura • Started on 29/06/11 (First State to begin SECC 2011) • Enumeration is completed in 5750 EBs out of 7239. 79% • Started on 18/07/11 • Enumeration process completed on 1st October. • Supervisory enumeration to start. 88% • Started on 18/07/11 in both rural and urban areas. •Supervisory enumeration has started in Diu Urban areas. 90% D&NH Daman & Diu Puducherry • Started on 15/07/11 • Enumeration process completed on 4th October Chandigarh • Started on 18/07/11 in both rural and urban areas. • Data Entry for 2067 EBs completed. • Field enumeration completed on 31st October. 89% • Planning to complete enumeration in 2 Phases. • First phase started from 26/09/11 and currently going on in 8 districts i.e. 20256 EBs. • Enumeration completed in 14518 EBs. 74% Chhattisgarh Ministry of Rural Development 6 100% SECC 2011 Status of States (2/2) Name of State/UT Maharashtra Himachal Pradesh Andhra Pradesh Punjab Status(as on 12.11.2011) % Coverage • State commenced enumeration in Nashik, Ahmad Nagar, Beed, Thane district on 3/11/2011. •Enumeration is completed in 23 EBs out of 47505 Ebs. 1% • Started in three snow bound districts(Kinnaur , Lahul and Spiti, Chamba) • Enumeration is in completed in 499 out of 1615 EBs. 41% • Started from 18/10/2011. • Enumeration has been completed for 10027EBs out of 112591 EBs. • Enumerated data could not be uploaded to the NIC server due to a problem of state code • Supervisory enumeration to start. 15% • Started on 01/10/2011. • Enumeration is going on in 22 districts or 51313 EBs. • Enumeration completed for 20131 EBs. 58% Ministry of Rural Development 7 SECC 2011 No. of EB’s as per RGI Name of State/UT Revised no. of EBs A&N Islands Andhra Pradesh Arunachal Pradesh Assam Bihar Chandigarh Chhattisgarh Name of State/UT 1,229 Goa Gujarat 113,412 7,290 Haryana 49,347 Himachal Pradesh 25,061 J&K 26,315 2,096 Jharkhand 68,649 49,390 Karnataka 126,612 64,286 205,832 689 Kerala Daman & Diu 475 Lakshadweep Ministry of Rural Development 3,210 188,676 D&NH Delhi Revised no. of EBs 33,325 Madhya Pradesh 8 68,351 117 156,745 SECC 2011 No. of EB’s as per RGI Name of State/UT Revised no. of EBs Name of State/UT Revised no. of EBs Maharashtra 224,531 Rajasthan Manipur 6,225 Sikkim Meghalaya 9,244 Tamil Nadu Mizoram 2,160 Tripura Nagaland 4,254 Uttar Pradesh Orissa Puducherry Punjab Ministry of Rural Development 137,733 1,612 136,106 6,814 395,268 96,882 Uttarakhand 27,909 2,307 West Bengal 178,706 52,410 9 SECC 2011 Initiatives by MoRD Coordinating supply of Tablet PC’s with Dept. of Defense production Continuous Software updating due to emerging requirements and requests from States ( State Specific ID numbers) 5 Trainings have been completed at NIRD with 350 participants across the country ( Urban, Rural and Census) Trainers Alliances engaged to provide support, to be deputed to states Instructed BEL to provide manpower at the district and charge center to deal with software/hardware issues Ministry of Rural Development 10 SECC 2011 Initiatives by MoRD Continuous coordination with various stakeholders like RGI, HUPA,CPSU, BEL , NIC, States, etc. Instructed NIC to provide access to view data at the Charge center /District level Initiatives in the Pipeline Third Party Monitoring Integrated Media Campaign to be commenced shortly Helpline / call centers Sourcing additional vendors to help BEL complete HHD delivery on schedule Ministry of Rural Development 11 SECC 2011 Key Issues - States Pre enumeration status to be shared with MoRD Account Details for Transfer of Funds NPR Images from DCO – RGI Charge Center Readiness Training to Enumerators Accurate Consignee details by District ( Telephone, Mobile, Fax, email, Name of the individual, District etc.) No. of HHD’s and Solar Chargers district wise Storage Space for stocking HHD’s Coordination with CPSU to ensure vendors engage DEO’s Very Slow uploading of data to NIC server Ministry of Rural Development 12 SECC 2011 Key Issues – States to Note Enumeration Process Information on Faulty HHD’s to be conveyed to CPSU’s To Ensure Current S/w version uploaded on to HHD’s To Ensure quality of Data Coordination with CPSU to upload data on to NIC server Timely uploading of EB’s enumerated To Ensure The HHD’s are picked up from the Transport Hubs Whenever DEO’s not in place, State to take proactive steps to engage DEO’s – Payment by6 Vendor Post Enumeration Ensure Supervisor Modules are uploaded on HHD’s Claims and Objections guidelines formats being finalized Ministry of Rural Development 13 SECC 2011 Some Observation from Field Enumerator do not use I Card, Appointment Letter, Lay Out Map, update AHL, carry blank schedule and Stickers are not available Entry in the household is abrupt with no proper introduction DEO’s Asks questions and enter Data and Enumerators are Bystanders Enumerators not noting observations Many times respondents stand and the team sits comfortably Locating household properly if two same name appear in AHL 11 Ministry of Rural Development 14 SECC 2011 Some Observation from Field Sometimes Sex of the person has been wrong in earlier data Some information like mother’s name, father’s name is incorrect sometimes – but that can’t be corrected – so enumerators should note it separately Questions related to disability, caste, religion are asked in ‘bulk’ and not about individual members as is expected. Separation/Divorce – local words not used properly PTG – understanding of the term Manual Scavenger = Open Defecation? Legally Released Bonded Labor = Contractual annual labor? Ministry of Rural Development 15 SECC 2011