* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Sinyatkin
Survey
Document related concepts
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Bremsstrahlung wikipedia , lookup
ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup
Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
SR power loss in the FCC-ee quadrupoles (preliminary) A. Bogomyagkov, E. Levichev, K. Oide, P. Piminov, S. Sinyatkin FCC-ee Optics Meeting, CERN 01/04/2016 Important at high energy. Quad radiation effects: •Increase energy loss at high amplitude. A particle goes out of the momentum acceptance. •Exchange of damping partition numbers. A particle experiences atni-damping. •Increase emittance for large amplitude of particles (larger tails, detector background, less beam lifetime). Energy loss I Energy loss per turn E U P dt C 2 E4I2 Dipoles: I 2 d 6 10 4 m-1 Ed U d 7.96 GeV C 8.85 105 m / GeV 3 E 4.5% E d Quadrupoles horizontal motion, AB lattice, AB formula: 4 FF doublets The rest FODO lattice At 10 x , n 10 and for Lq 1.5 m E 0.35% 0.8% 1.15% E q Energy loss II KO formula AB lattice 2 Half of AB formula cos 1 / 2 ? E 0.5 1.15% 0.58% E q Uq C 2 E 4 K 2 1 2 ( s) x ds I 6 x K12 ( s ) x ( s )ds At 10 x x x 2 2 xx 2 Uq (Jowett definition) C 4 E x K ( s) x ( s)ds 4 I 6 x 352 m-1 9 and with x 1.4 10 m E C 3 2 E n x I 6 x 0.2% E q 4 2 1 C 4 E 4 x I 6 x Energy loss III The FCC-ee lattice has been represented by a transfer line multiplied 10 times to average the betatron phase. Then a particle is launched with nx amplitude and at this trajectory calculated the radiation integrals. Zero amplitude particle obviously produced pure dipole integrals which correspond exactly to those obtained from the closed lattice. At 10x a quadrupoles correction to the second radiation integral, averaged over 10 turns, gives I 2 q ds 2 2 5 1 K ( s ) x ds 2 . 5 10 m 1 2 ( s) E 0.2% E q ???? Summary Main contribution comes from the FODO quadrupoles, the QD0 gradient can be doubled (as it seems) still without harmful effect. Additional study is necessary. Change of Lstar and excitation of vertical emittance S. Sinyatkin Task • To insert device of detector the distance between defocusing lenses of final focus must be increased from 2*2 m to 2*3 m. • Vertical beta function at IP for high energy may be increased to 2 mm. • At low energy vertical beta function must be remained 1 mm or may be reduced to 0.5 mm. • Due to changing of FF lenses placement the maximal vertical beta function in QD0 is increased and vertical emittance is rise. • To optimize FF lenses with according to new parameters of lenses the rematching of twiss functions is carried out. 8 Original Final Focus layout Final quads Main detector solenoid 2 1 4 3 1 – Half of main solenoid length ( 1 m) 2 – Length of compensating solenoid (0.7 m) 3 – Overlap of compensating and screening solenoids (5 cm) 4 – Length of screening solenoid ( 3.95 m) Quad screening solenoid Compensati ng solenoid Transverse half size: - compensating solenoid - R = 0.1 m - screening solenoid - R = 0.15 m 9 Final focus layout E = 175 GeV Quads: GQD0 = - 200 T/m LQD0 = 1.68 m GQF1 = 192 T/m LQD0 = 1.17 m Main solenoid: Bs = 2 T Leff_geom=2*1.56 m Compensating solenoid: Bs_max_eff = - 3.2 T Rin = 0.16 m Lgeom= 1 m Rout = 0.26 m 10 Twiss function of FF bx,m by*103, m •Original lattice GQD0 = - 93 T/m GQF1 = 87 T/m Lstar = 2m Natural chromaticity: Cx = -17 by*103, m bx,m Cy = -1160 •Modified lattice GQD0 = - 200 T/m GQF1 = 192 T/m Lstar = 3m Natural chromaticity: Cx = -14 Cy = -1290 11 Update of solenoid geometry 4 0.4 L_comp_sol L_screen_sol 3 0.3 2 0.2 1 0.1 0 0 QD0 -1 Bs 10*Bx Solenoids Opening angle 0.1 rad QD0 -3 -4 0 0.5 1 Bs = 2 T -0.1 Leff_geom=2*1.56 m -0.2 Compensating solenoid: -0.3 L_free_space -0.4 1.5 2 s, m 2.5 3 3E-13 3.5 4 dI5y/ds Em_y 2.5E-13 dI5y/ds, m^-2 Main solenoid: |B|s_max_eff = 3.2 T 6E-13 Lgeom= 1 m 5E-13 ey = 0.5 pm*rad 2E-13 4E-13 1.5E-13 3E-13 1E-13 2E-13 5E-14 1E-13 0 Em_y, m*rad1 -2 E = 45 GeV X, m Bs, 10*Bx,T L_main_sol / 2 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 s, m 2.5 3 3.5 4 12 Vertical emittance vs. effective length of main solenoid 25 bety_IP= 0.5 mm bety_IP= 1 mm bety_IP= 2 mm Em_y, pm*rad 20 15 10 5 1.06 0.52 0.19 0 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 L_main_sol/2, m 1.8 1.9 2 E = 45 GeV L_star = 3 m L_main_sol = 1.56 m bx_IP= 0.5 m Em_y = 0.5 pm*rad by_IP = 1 mm 13 βy_IP vs. main solenoid length (free space) 2.5 Em_y =const= 0.5 pm*rad by_IP, mm 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 L_main_sol/2, m E = 45 GeV y _ new y y _ IP y _ IP _ new L_star = 3 m Em_y = 0.5 pm*rad 14 Ver. Emittance & Change of free space for detector Parameters Original* Geometry Update E, GeV Cross angle (tot), rad 45 0.03 0.026 Compensating solenoid R_in, m 0.100 0.100 0.145 0.157 0.164 0.170 0.186 R_end, m 0.100 0.171 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.256 0.7 0.7 1.1 0.989 0.915 0.856142 0.7 0.001 0.094 0.134 0.155 0.176 0.184 0.221 0.171 0.180 0.269 0.271 0.274 0.274 0.278 B, T 2.01 2.01 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 L_main/2, m 1.00 1.00 1.450 1.561 1.635 1.694 1.850 bx_IP, m 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 by_IP, m 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 I2_sol, m^-1 1.94E-06 1.19E-06 1.56E-06 2.11E-06 2.63E-06 3.09E-06 4.97E-06 I5y_sol, m^-1 3.42E-14 8.38E-15 3.82E-14 1.05E-13 2.15E-13 3.70E-13 1.68E-12 Emy_sol, m*rad 1.69E-13 4.14E-14 1.88E-13 5.21E-13 1.06E-12 1.83E-12 8.29E-12 Emy_sol/Emx 1.82E-03 4.48E-04 2.04E-03 5.64E-03 1.15E-02 1.98E-02 8.98E-02 111.8 69.0 89.9 121.7 151.8 178.6 15 287.0 L, m L_free_space, m Screening solenoid R_sc_sol,m Main solenoid Optics Uo_sol, keV Vertical emittance (E=175 Ge) Parameters E, GeV Cross angle (tot), rad Original* Geometry Update 175 175 0.03 0.026 Compensating solenoid R_in, m 0.100 0.157 R_end, m 0.100 0.256 0.7 0.989 0.000 0.155 0.171 0.271 B, T 2.01 2.00 L_main/2, m 1.00 1.561 bx_IP, m 0.5 0.5 by_IP, m 0.001 0.001 I2_sol, m^-1 1.28E-07 1.39E-07 I5y_sol, m^-1 3.84E-17 1.19E-16 Emy_sol, m*rad 2.87E-15 8.85E-15 Emx, m*rad 1.40E-09 1.40E-09 Emy_sol/Emx 2.05E-06 6.34E-06 16 1840.0 L, m L_free_space, m Screening solenoid R_sc_sol,m Main solenoid Optics Uo_sol, keV 1690.7 Summary • The increase of Lstar results in growth of vertical emittance. • To keep vertical emittance the length of compensating solenoid must be increased. • Distance between compensating solenoid and screening solenoid is used to optimize fringe magnetic field of solenoids at QD0. • New parameters of FF lenses allow to avoid the strong growth of the natural chromaticity with increasing Lstar. 17