Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Decreased Retinal Ganglion Cell Number and Misdirected Axon Growth Associated With Fissure Defects in Bst/ + Mutant Mice Dennis S. Rice,* Qing Tang,* Robert W. Williams,* Belinda S. Harris,^ Muriel T. Davisson,\ and Dan Goldowitz* Purpose. The autosomal semidominant mutation Bst (belly spot and tail) is often associated with small and atrophic optic nerves in adult mice and shares several important attributes with heritable optic nerve atrophy in humans. In this article, the authors present adult and developmental studies on the retinal phenotype in Bst/+ mice. Methods. Retinal ganglion cells in adult Bst/ + mice were labeled retrogradely with horseradish peroxidase injected into the right optic tract. Labeled ganglion cells were mapped in wholemounted retinas ipsilateral and contralateral to the injection site. The number of axons in optic nerves of these and other cases were quantified using an electron microscopic method. Eyes of neonatal, embryonic day 15 (E15), and embryonic day 12 (E12) Bst/+ mutants were examined histologically to understand the etiology of the retinal phenotype. Results. Approximately 60% of adult Bst/ + mice have deficient direct pupillary light responses. This neurologic phenotype is associated with a reduction in the number of retinal ganglion cells from the wild-type average of 67,000 to less than 20,000 in Bst/+ mutants. Ganglion cells with crossed projections are more severely affected than those with uncrossed projections. Histologic analysis of eyes from E12 mice reveals a delayed closure of the optic fissure. Despite this abnormality, other ocular structures appear relatively normal. However, some E15 mutants exhibit marked disorganization of the retinal neuroepithelium, and ganglion cell axons are found between pigmented and neural retina. At birth, optic nerves of affected mice are smaller than those of wild-type mice, ectopic axons are found within the eyes, and the ganglion cell layer contains many dying cells. Conclusions. The expression of the retinal phenotype in Bst/+ mutants is highly variable— ranging from a complete absence of ganglion cells to numbers comparable to that in wildtype mice. The reduction in ganglion cell number in affected adult Bst/+ mice is attributable to the failure of ganglion cell axons to reach the optic nerve head early in development. Delayed fusion of the fissure is consistently associated with the Bst/+ genotype and probably contributes to the failure of ganglion cell axons to grow out of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:2112-2124. Xvetinal ganglion cells are among the first cells to be generated in the vertebrate retina.1"4 Their axons extend into the thalamus and midbrain and provide the sole route by which visual information is relayed to the brain.5"8 A reduction in the number of these From the * Department, of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, and f The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine. Supported by National Institutes of Health grant NS EY095S6 (DC, RWW), neuroscience training grant NS073233 (DSR), and giant RRO1183 (MTD, BSH). Submitted for publication November 6, 1996; revised April 11, 1997; accepted May I, 1997. Proprietary interest categoty: N. Reprint requests: Dan Goldowitz, Department of Anatomy and Newobiology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee, 855 Monroe Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163. 2112 Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 cells is often associated with a decrease in visual acuity and visual field loss.9 Recently, we identified a striking but variable reduction in the size of the optic nerves in mice heterozygous for the autosomal, semidominant mutation, belly spot and tail (Bst). Despite the often severe reduction in the size of the optic nerve, mice that carry this mutation have relatively normal appearing eyes. The Bst gene is located on mouse Chromosome 16 in a region that is conserved on human Chromosome 3.10"12 The most common type of heritable optic nerve atrophy in humans, dominant optic atrophy or OPA1 (OMIM No. 165,550), maps to a 2- to 8-centi- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, September 1997, Vol. 38, No. 10 Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Retinal Ganglion Cell Abnormalities in Bst/+ Mice Morgan (cM) interval on chromosome 3.13 15 OPA1 occurs with a frequency of 1:50,000 and like Bst, OPA1 shows a dominant pattern of inheritance. There are variable and often asymmetric effects on visual acuity and the ganglion cell population1617, and as with most Bst/+ cases, eyes of humans with OPA1 are of normal size and appearance.18'19 Although neither Bst nor OPA1 has yet been cloned, there is sufficient similarity in their chromosomal positions and their phenotypes to raise the possibility that they are mutations in the same gene. In this article we provide the first description of the Bst retinal phenotype and consider developmental mechanisms that may account for the severe but variable reduction in retinal ganglion cell number in this mutant mouse. METHODS Animals Mutant mice used in this study were generated by mating C57BLKS-£^/ + males or females to C57BLKS+ / + mice. Wild-type mice were either littermates of C57BLKS-Bst/+ or C57BLKS-+/+ mice from the production colony at The Jackson Laboratory. The direct pupillary light response was examined by shining a pen light into the eye of dark-adapted unanesthetized mice. An abnormal pupillary response was defined as one that did not constrict to a diameter comparable to that in wild-type mice (approximately 1 mm). Embryonic mice were obtained by timed pregnancies with the plug date recorded as embryonic day 0. All mice were treated in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. Histology of Adult, Postnatal Day 0, and Embryonic Material Adult and postnatal day 0 (P0) mice were anesthetized with tribromoethanol (Avertin; 0.2 sec/10 g body weight) and perfused with 0.9% saline followed by 2.0% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB; pH = 7.2). Eyes and nerves were dissected, rinsed in 0.1 M PB with 6% sucrose, and transferred to cold 2% osmium tetroxide in a 6% sucrose solution for 2 hours. The tissue was then washed in 0.1 M PB-saline overnight, stained for 1 hour in 0.5% uranyl acetate, dehydrated, and embedded in Spurr's resin. Tissue was cut in semithin (1 fj,m) and thin (75 nm) transverse sections and mounted on glass slides and formvar-coated grids, respectively. Thin sections were stained with lead citrate. Embryonic material was obtained from females killed by cervical dislocation on days 12 and 15 of pregnancy. Mutants were distinguished from wild-type embryos because they were smaller and their tails were Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 2113 short and kinked. Embryos were immersion fixed in 3:1 95% ethanol:acetic acid overnight. Embryos were then transferred to 70% ethanol, embedded in paraffin blocks, cut into 6-//m thick coronal or horizontal sections, mounted on slides, deparaffinized, stained with cresyl violet, and covered with a coverslip. Wholemount Analysis and Quantification of Horseradish Peroxidase-Labeled Ganglion Cells Adult mice were anesthetized with tribromoethanol and positioned in a stereotaxic frame. A craniotomy was performed over the dorsal right hemisphere. Next, three unilateral injections (0.1 fi\ each) of a 40% solution of horseradish peroxidase (HRP IV; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in 5% dimethylsulfoxide were directed into the right optic tract and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus for 30 minutes. After 24 hours, mice were deeply anesthetized with tribromoethanol and perfused transcardially with 3.5% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PB (pH = 7.2). Optic nerves were processed for ultrastructural analysis as described above and each eye was dissected to obtain retinal wholemounts. Wholemounts were used to study the surface area of the retina and the topography of peroxidase-labeled ganglion cells as previously described.20 In most animals, a cut was made in the dorsal eye before dissection to mark orientation. In other cases, retinal vasculature was used to determine orientation. Retinas were dissected free from the pigment epithelium and HRP was visualized using a modified Hanker-Yates reaction.21 Coverslips were placed on wholemounts in a polyvinyl alcohol and glycerol solution and camera lucida drawings of the wholemounted retinas were made. The surface area of the retina was determined directly from these drawings using a graphics tablet. Retrogradely labeled ganglion cells in wild-type mice (n = 4) and Bst/+ mice {n = 8) were analyzed. In every ipsilateral retina, and in two contralateral retinas from Bst/ + mice with an associated small optic nerve, all HRP-labeled ganglion cells were plotted with the aid of a drawing tube attached to a microscope equipped with DIC optics using a 40X objective. In contralateral retinas with a normal optic nerve, ganglion cell density was estimated in 8 to 15 samples (7500 fim2) taken at evenly spaced intervals across the surface of the retina. The number of HRP-labeled ganglion cells in each retina was determined by multiplying cell density by the area of the retina.20 Detennining the Number of Axons in the Optic Nerve The nerve area was determined by directly measuring a low-magnification (200 to 300X) montage of the nerve with a graphics tablet. Mean axon density was estimated from a set of approximately 25 high-magni- 2114 Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, September 1997, Vol. 38, No. 10 FIGURE l. Ventral view of adult Bst/+ brains illustrating the variability found in the optic nerve phenotype. (A) The optic nerves (arrows) can be normal, (B) small on one side, (C) missing on one side, or (D) completely absent. fixation (12,000 to 15,000X) micrographs taken at evenly spaced intervals across the nerve cross-section. The number of axons in each nerve was determined by multiplying axon density by nerve area. Magnifications were calibrated with a carbon replica grid (2160 lines/ mm).22 The total number of HRP-labeled ganglion cells (ipsilateral and contralateral) in each retina was compared to the number of axons in the optic nerve Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 from the same case to determine die success of the retrograde labeling of ganglion cells.20 RESULTS Bst/+ mice have a kinky tail, a ventral white spot, lack of pigmentation on the back feet, and occasional polydactyly. In addition, they have either normal ap- Retinal Ganglion Cell Abnormalities in Bst/+ Mice 2115 I'. •- 9 0 -• 80 •• 70 •• 5 60 •• = g 50 •• I - 40 •• 30 • •:•• • • •' 20 •• 10 •• 0 •• • • 1 2 3 FIGURE 2. Adult optic nerves of wild-type mice (A) are larger when compared to Bst/+ mice with abnormal pupillary light responses (B). (C,D) Ultrastructure of two different sites from the small optic nerve shown in B. (C) Most axons are comparable to wild-type mice; however, there are several necrotic axons (arrowheads). (D) Only a few fibers are present (anvtus) and some of these are necrotic (anvwheads). Glial cell processes are abundant in sites containing few fibers. (E) The number of ganglion cell axons is shown for diree different groups of mice: 1, wild-type; 2, Bst/ + mice with normal pupillary light responses; and 3, Bst,/+ mice wdi deficient pupillary light responses. Each diamond represents the number of fibers in one nerve. The asterisk in group 3 indicates 23 eyes from Bst/+ mice with no optic nerve. Note that in some Bst/+ mice with nomial pupil responses the number of axons in die optic nerve is less than die lowest wild-type number. Scale bar = 100 /xm in A,B; = 1 (im in C,D. pearing optic nerves, one normal and one small nerve, only one nerve, or no nerves at all (Fig. 1). The Bst mutation has a dominant pattern of inheritance. However, the percentage of mutant progeny produced in crosses between Bst/+ and + / + mice is only 33% (179 mutants in 545 progeny; 104 litters). This percentage is significantly lower than the expected 50% (X2 = 64.16, P < 0.001). The deficit of mutants is most likely a result of death caused by severe developmental abnormalities. Exencephaly is observed in approximately 30% of Bst/+ mice (data not shown). Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 Axon Number in Adult Bst/ + Mice By simple inspection, most eyes of Bst/+ mutants are indistinguishable from those of wild-type mice. However, the pupillary light response in many Bst/+ mice is abnormal. The direct pupillary light response is weak or absent in approximately 60% (93/158) of the mutants examined. Of these 93 affected Bst,/+ mice, about two thirds (60/93) have a unilateral deficit, the remaining one third have a bilateral deficit in the pupil response. The abnormal direct pupillary reflex is detectable as soon as the eyelids open in the second postnatal week. 2116 Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, September 1997, Vol. 38, No. 10 3. The appearance of adult retinas from normal and severely affected Bst/+ mice is shown in this panel of 1-^m thick, toluidine blue-stained plastic sections. (A) The normal retina is organized into three obvious nuclear layers: outer (ONL), inner (INL), and ganglion cell layer (GCL). Ganglion cells are large cells in the GCL (arrowheads). (B,C) Sections through the central retina, near the presumed optic disc area. Note the obvious rosette (thin arroio) in the ONL in (B). The neural retina is buckled in (C). In both of these cases there is an ectopia within the sclera of the eye (thick airoius in B,Q. (D) In the periphery, the organization of the Bst/+ retina appears more normal. Note the severe depletion of cells in the GCL in Bst/+ cases B to D. (E,F). Comparison of layers in each retina from a single Bst/-\- mouse with a normal (E) and a unilaterally small optic nerve (F) indicates the variability in the phenotype observed in Bst/+ mutants. Scale bar = 100 /xm in A to D; = 50 fxm in E,F. FIGURE Optic nerves of Bst/+ mice with an abnormal pupillary light response are smaller (Fig. 2B), contain degenerating fibers (Figs. 2C, 2D), and have a reduction in the total number of ganglion cell axons (Fig. 2E). In 28 Bst/+ cases with an abnormal pupillary light response, 23 had no optic nerve. The average number of axons in the five remaining optic nerves from eyes with an abnormal pupillary response is 10,200 ± 2,800 axons (±SEM). In C57BLKS-+/ + mice the average is 67,100 ± 2,600 (n = 15). The axon population in Bst/+ mice with normal pupillary light responses is also reduced. Although these optic nerves appear normal, the average number of axons is only 51,300 ± 5,300 (Fig. 2E, n = 12). This is an approximately 24% reduction in the axon population compared with wild-type mice. Furthermore, there is more variability in ganglion cell number in Bst/ + Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 mice with normal pupillary light responses compared with wild-type mice. The coefficients of variation are 36% and 14%, respectively. Features of Retinas From Adult Bst/+ Mice The expression of the retinal phenotype in adult Bst/+ mice is highly variable. Some Bst/+ mice have retinas comparable to those in wild-type mice, whereas, others have a highly abnormal retinal appearance (Fig. 3). In severely affected Bst/+ mice, the organization of the neural retina is often distorted, particularly around the optic disc area (Figs. 3B, 3C). The outer and inner nuclear layers are thrown into folds, rosettes, or colobomas."^2'1 There are a few remaining cells in the ganglion cell layer, but based on morphologic criteria these cells do not appear to be ganglion cells. Consistent with a reduction in retinal Retinal Ganglion Cell Abnormalities in Bst/+ Mice 2117 TABLE l. Ganglion Cell Number (Ipsilateral and Contralateral) and Axon Number in + / + (Cases 1-4) and Bst/+ Mice (Cases 5-12) Ipsilateral Contralateral Cells Case 01-04 (+/+ mice; n = 4) 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Normal Ectopic Total Axons Cells Axons* 1482 ± 55 41 ± 4 (n=3) 262 214 117 105 ND 66 19 — 1513 ± 46 71,700 ± 3900 48,800 ± 3200 2900 ± 12,300 ± 13,100 ± 18,900 ± 30,000 ± 63,300 ± 66,600 ± — 45,200 ± 5100 49,700 ± 4200 52,200 ± 5300 30,100 ± 2800 34,800 ± 4000 1570 41,400 ± 4700 454 68,100 ± 2800 (n = 3) 66,000 ± 4500 59,100 ± 3700 52,800 ± 4300 61,400 ± 4400 69,200 ± 2900 1900 ± 600 64,600 ± 4000 197 566 577 206 804 1465 1145 -t 459 780 694 311 804 1531 1164 — 300 1200 1700 1200 1500 3400 4200 NDJ ND = not determined. Values are mean ± SEM. * The success of the injection can be determined by comparing the ipsilaterally and contralaterally projecting ganglion cell populations with the total number of axons in the optic nerve. f Because of spillage of horseradish peroxidase, this case was excluded from the analysis of the ipsilateral population. X This optic nerve was extremely small and was lost during embedding. ganglion cells, the inner plexiform layer is also reduced in thickness. In more severely affected eyes, the thickness of the inner nuclear layer is also reduced compared with normal retinas (Figs. 3E, 3F). Photoreceptors in the outer nuclear layer are the cell type least affected in retinas from Bst/+ mice. Inner and outer segments appear normal except where the retina is detached from the pigment epithelium or thrown into folds. The average surface area of the retina in wild-type mice is 16.7 ± 0.23 mm2 (16 retinas from 8 cases). In comparison, retinas taken from Bst/+ mice with abnormal pupillary light responses are approximately 10% smaller—14.8 mm2 ± 0.41 (protected t = 3.5; P < 0.01; n = 25, including 11 retinas from unilaterally affected mice and 14 retinas from 7 bilaterally affected cases). Retinas taken from Bst/+ mice that had normal light responses have an average area of 16.1 ± 0.32 mm2 (n = 29). This area is slightly lower than those of wild-type mice. This observation is consistent with the 24% reduction in retinal ganglion cell number in Bst/+ mice with normal pupillary light responses. Retinofugal Pathway in Bst/+ Mice The ipsilaterally projecting population of ganglion cells represents 2.1% of the total population of ganglion cells in the C57BLKS-+/+ retina (Table 1). These cells are located in the ventrotemporal part of the retina (Fig. 4A). As expected, retinas from Bst/+ mice with a small optic nerve ipsilateral to the injection have fewer ganglion cells than those from wild-type mice (Table 1, cases 05 to 09; Figs. 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E) or Bst/+ mice with normal, ipsilateral optic nerves (Table 1, cases 10 and 11; Fig. 4F). However in four of five Bst/+ cases with a small ipsilateral Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 optic nerve, the uncrossed population of ganglion cells represents a larger proportion of the total ganglion cell population compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 5). For example, in one of these cases (case 05 in Table 1; Fig. 4B) there are approximately 3000 axons remaining— merely 5% of the wild-type average. However, in this case there are 459 ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells—approximately 30% of the wild-type average. Despite an overall reduction of ganglion cells, the ipsilateral population is overrepresented in retinas from affected Bst/+ mice. In retinas from Bst/+ mice with an associated small optic nerve, there is an increase in ectopic, ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells compared with wildtype and normal Bst/+ mice (cases 05 to 08 in Table 1; Figs. 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E). These cells are located outside of the ventrotemporal part of the retina. In wild-type mice, there are no more than 60 of these ectopic, ipsilateral cells—less than 5% of the ipsilateral population. In a Bst/+ mouse with a normal ipsilateral but no contralateral optic nerve, the number of ectopic ipsilaterally projecting cells is relatively small (about 66 cells—see case 10 in Table 1; Fig. 4F). In Bst/ + cases with a reduction in the total number of ganglion cells in the ipsilateral retina, there is a twofold to fivefold increase in the absolute number of ectopic ipsilaterally projecting cells when compared with the wildtype population of cells (Table 1). In one case (06), these cells represent approximately 27% (214/780) of the total remaining population of ipsilateral ganglion cells (Fig. 4C). The morphology of these ectopic, ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells is similar to ipsilateral cells in the ventrotemporal part of the retina. Approximately 98% of the ganglion cell popula- 2118 Investigative Ophthalmology 8c Visual Science, September 1997, Vol. 38, No. 10 Features of Postnatal Day 0 Optic Nerves and Retinas in Bst/+ Mice Optic nerves of P0 Bst/+ mice have been examined in cross-section to determine whether the reduction in ganglion cells seen in adult mutants is related to their postnatal degeneration or to an embryonic abnormality. At P0 the wild-type nerve is divided into fascicles of unmyelinated ganglion cell axons by glial or neuroepithelial cell processes (Fig. 7A). In contrast, optic nerves of affected P0 Bsl/+ mice are smaller and contain fewer axons (Fig. 7B). Similar to the variability observed in the adult Bst/+ retinal phenotype, at P0 the size of the nerve and axon population are variable. The overall appearance of eyes from affected P0 Bst/+ mice is comparable to that in wild-type mice. However, the morphology of the neural retina is abnormal. In some cases, the neural retina is buckled, resulting in its detachment from die pigment epithelium (Figs. 7D, 7E, 7F). At higher magnification (Fig. 8), the ganglion cell layer is thinner in affected retinas compared with normal, and diere is a marked increase in the number of dying cells (Figs. 8B, 8C). Bundles of fibers, presumably those of ganglion cell axons, are seen within the neuroepithelium and between neural and pigmented retina (asterisks in Figs. 7F, 8D). At the ultrastructural level, these fibers have a size and appearance that are similar to ganglion cell axons located within the retinal neuroepithelial endfeet (Figs. 8E, 8F). FIGURE 4. The topography of ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells is shown in camera lucida plots for six retinas. Each dot represents a single, HRP-labeled cell. Case numbers are indicated to the right of each retina. (A) An example of the ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cell population in wild-type retinas is shown. Approximately 97% of these cells are located in the ventral (v) and temporal (t) retina. (B to E) The ipsilaterally projecting population in four different Bst/+ retinas with a small optic nerve is shown. Ganglion cell number in these four cases is reduced by 70% or greater. All four cases have fewer ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells compared with wild-type mice. Many of these cells are located outside of the ventral and temporal retina in ectopic positions. (F) The ipsiiateral population in a Bst/+ retina with a normal optic nerve is shown. Scale bar = 1 mm. tion projects contralaterally at the optic chiasm in C57BLKS-+/+ mice. These cells are distributed across the entire surface of the retina and the density of contralaterally projecting ganglion cells is higher in central versus peripheral retina (data not shown). In retinas of Bst/+ mice with an associated small optic nerve contralateral to the injection, the number of ganglion cells is severely reduced compared with normal (Table 1, cases 10 and 12). The surviving contralaterally projecting ganglion cells are located mostly in the dorsal hemiretina (Fig. 6). Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 Features of Eyes From Embryonic Days 15 and 12 Bst/+ Mice The normal retina at E15 has three prominent layers—a nerve fiber layer, a ganglion cell layer, and a thick neuroblast layer (Fig. 9A). In eyes from affected Bst/+ mice these layers are present but are often disrupted. For example, bundles of axons can be seen to penetrate the retina and collect between the retina and pigment epithelium (Fig. 9B). Disruption of retinal morphology is variable and severe cases have marked disorganization, particularly in the ventral retina (Fig. 9C). The overall size of the eye, however, is comparable to that in wild-type mice. At E12, the overall appearance of the mutant eye is similar to that of wild-type mice. Both genotypes have well-formed lenses and the hyaloid vasculature appears normal (Figs. 9D, 9E, 9F). In wild-type mice the optic fissure is closed and the neuroepithelium is continuous around the cup (Fig. 9D). In contrast, in the 10 Bst/+ cases that we examined the development of the optic fissure is delayed. For example, in the eye from a Bst/+ mouse shown in Fig. 9E, the margins of the ventral retina are in contact, but fusion of the margins has not yet occurred. The delay appears more severe in the eye from a Bsl/+ mouse shown in Fig. 9F. In this case, the margins of the ventral retina are not yet in contact with each other. Retinal Ganglion Cell Abnormalities in Bst/+ Mice 16 T • 14 .. 12 •• 10 •• 2119 to the optic disc. Lastly, it is possible that this variation may simply be the result of developmental noise,22 which consists of small random differences in levels of gene expression, patterns of cell genesis and migration, or cell death. Stochastic variations in these events may influence Bst expression and may account for the often dramatic differences between right and left sides of the same individual, or affected individuals within the same litter. percent ipsilateral „ 6 •• 4 • 2 •• 10 20 30 60 axon number (x1,000) 70 80 Retinofugal Pathway in Bst/+ Mice With Small Optic Nerves Bst/+ mice with abnormally small optic nerves have fewer retinal ganglion cells compared with wild-type FIGURE 5. Plot comparing the percentage of ganglion cells with ipsilateral projections versus the total number of ganglion cells. Each diamond {list/' + ) or circle (wild-type) represents a single animal. In wild-type mice, the average percentage of cells projecting ipsilaterally is 2.1% ± 0.05% (SEM, n = 4). In contrast, in four of five Bst/+ mice with a reduced number of ganglion cells, the proportion of ipsilateral cells is higher, 6.4% ± 2.5%, compared with wildtype mice. The lone exception to the trend may be caused by an incomplete labeling of all ganglion cells. DISCUSSION Ganglion Cell Number in Bst/+ Mice Many adult Bsl/+ mice have a marked reduction in retinal ganglion cell number. In these mice, the direct pupillary light response is weak or absent and one or both optic nerves are much smaller than normal. In Bst/+ mice with normal pupillary light responses, the average number of ganglion cells is also less than that in wild-type mice. Furthermore, variation in ganglion cell number in Bst/+ mice is much greater than that in coisogenic nonmutants or in 16 other inbred strains of mice.22 Thus, ganglion cell number in Bst/+ mice is highly variable, ranging from a severe reduction in this population of cells to a more subtle quantitative decrease. The marked phenotypic variability among Bst/ -V mutants suggests that additional factors influence the severity of the mutation. One possible factor that we can rule out is the segregation of modifier genes. Bst is maintained on the genetically standardized strain C57BLKS, therefore, all mutants have an identical genetic background. In addition, all mice are reared in a relatively uniform laboratory colony, thereby minimizing environmental factors. A more likely explanation for the observed variation in the Bst phenotype is that it is a product of inherently variable morphogenetic events, such as the temporal sequence of optic fissure closure along the central-peripheral axis in the mouse.25 The opportunity for ganglion cell axons to exit the eye and survive can be differentially affected by where abnormal fissure fusion occurs in relation Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 6. The topography and number of contralaterally projecting ganglion cells are shown in camera lucida plots for two Bst/ + mice with a small optic nerve contralateral to the peroxidase injection. Each dot represents a single, HRPlabeled contralaterally projecting cell. Case numbers are indicated to the right of each retina. In both cases, the total number of ganglion cells is severely reduced (Table 1, cases 10 and 12). There is a clear decrease in the number of contralaterally projecting cells, particularly in the ventral (v) and temporal (t) parts of the retina. Scale bar = 1 mm. FIGURE 2120 Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, September 1997, Vol. 38, No. 10 FIGURE 7. Light microscopic appearance of optic nerves and eyes from postnatal day 0 (PO) wild-type and Bst/+ mice in l-/xm thick sections stained with toluidine blue. The optic nerve {arrow, B) in the Bsl/+ mouse has far fewer ganglion cell axons than the wild-type optic nerve (A). The other fascicle in B {arrowhead, does not originate at the optic disc. In the eyes from PO Bst/+ mice (D to F) there is a well-formed neuroepithelium comparable to that in the normal eye (C) and an obvious ganglion cell layer {arrowheads, D to F; compare with arrowheads in C). However, the neural retina in the mutant is detached from the pigment epithelium {curved arrows, D,E). Note that the pigment epithelium {straight arrows, C) is not involved in the involution in the mutant eye {straight airows, E,F). The ganglion cell layer appears thicker in E {arrowhead), but this is an artifact resulting from the level of the section. Scale bar for A,B = 50 jum; C to E = 350 //m; and F - 75 yum. mice. There are two interesting features of the retinofugal pathway in these mice. First, there is an increase in the percentage of ganglion cells with ipsilateral projections at the optic chiasm relative to wild-type mice or Bst/ + mice with normal optic nerves. This increase is caused, in part, by a substantial population of ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells located outside of the ventrotemporal crescent. In wild-type mice the number of these ectopic, ipsilaterally projecting cells does not exceed 60, but in affected Bst/+ mice there are often several hundred of these cells. The reason for the presence of these ipsilaterally projecting cells is unknown, but there are several possibilities. These ectopic ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells may be cells that should have projected contralaterally but that projected incorrectly into the ipsilateral optic Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 tract. It is also possible that these cells have bilateral projections at the chiasm. Another explanation is that these ectopic cells may be remnants of a normally transient population of ipsilaterally projecting cells that originates from central retina during development.8 The second interesting feature of the retinofugal pathway in Bst/ + mice with small optic nerves is the topography of contralaterally projecting ganglion cells. The majority of these cells are located in dorsal retina. At present we do not yet know why some ganglion cells survive the Bst mutation. It is possible that the time at which ganglion cells are generated influences the likelihood of survival. This idea is supported by the fact that during development of the mouse eye, the ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells and ganglion cells located in dorsal retina are among the first to Retinal Ganglion Cell Abnormalities in Bst/+ Mice 2121 FIGURE 8. Cross-sections through the eye of PO wild-type (A) and three different Bst/+ mice (B to D) are shown in toluidine blue-stained, l-/xm thick plastic sections. (A) In wild-type retinas, the GCL is populated by large oval ganglion cells (arrowheads). Fascicles of ganglion cell axons among the endfeet of neuroepithelial cells can be seen at this magnification {open arrow). (B) In the eye from this Bst/+ neonate, the neuroepithelium is thinner compared with wild-type and the GCL is not as obvious. Cells that appear to be ganglion cells are present (arroiuheads), but many cells in this layer appear to be dead or dying (arrows). (C) The GCL in the Bst/+ mutant shows a high incidence of dying cells (arrows). (D) The neuroepithelium in this Bst/+ eye is highly disorganized. Axons (arrowheads) are found in the middle of the section and pinned between neuroepithelium and pigment epitlielium (PE; asterisk). The ultrastructural appearance of the axons near the PE (E) is similar to those among the endfeet (F). Pigment granules are black, dense structures located within the pigment epithelial cells (asterisk, E). The basal lamina of the retinal epithelium is prominent at the top of the micrograph F (arrows). Scale bar = 50 /xm in A,B>D; 100 //m in C; and 1 //m in E,F. be generated.1'3 However, conclusive results can only come from birth-dating studies. Developmental Basis of Reduced Ganglion Cell Numbers in Bst/+ Mice The normal external appearance of the eye in adult Bst/+ mutants indicates that early inductive processes, Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 those responsible for the formation of the optic vesicle and lens,26'27 are intact in Bst heterozygotes. Furthermore, the overall appearance of the eye from El2 Bst/+ mice is relatively normal except for the delay in closure of the optic fissure. The extent of delay is variable and the fissure is either completely open or the margins of the optic cup lining the fissure are in 2122 Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, September 1997, Vol. 38, No. 10 FIGURE 9. Paraffin-embedded, cresyl violet-stained sections through eyes of embryonic day 15 (El5; A to C) and embryonic day 12 (E12; D to F) wild-type (A,D) and Bst/+ mice (B,C,£, and F). (A) Three layers in the neural retina can be seen at E15 in the wild-type retina—the nerve fiber layer (arroiohead), the GCL layer (asterisk), and the neuroepithelium. Dividing cells are opposite the pigment epithelium in the neuroepithelium (arrows, A). (B) Two collections of fibers that originate in the nerve fiber layer are seen between pigmented and neural retina (arrowheads) in this Bst/+ mutant with a small optic nerve. (C) In this Bst/+ eye, the neuroepithelium is divided by the optic fissure. Mitotic cells line the fissure (arrows). Fibers (arrowheads) are located at the crest of the fissure, but they do not exit the eye. (D) The optic fissure is closed and appears fused (arrowhead) in this E12 wild-type eye. In contrast, the optic fissure (arrowheads, E,F) is not fused in the Bst/ + eye in E and remains open in F. Scale bar = approximately 50 /iin. contact but not yet fused. It should be stressed that although delayed, fusion of the fissure margins in Bsl/+ mutants does eventually occur.28 During normal development, the first axons to grow out of the eye do so in a series of channels formed by the processes of neuroepithelial cells oriented in the direction of the fissure.3 These channels are rapidly filled by additional axons, resulting in the formation of the nerve fiber layer. The cues used by axons to navigate toward the fissure are located within the embryonic nerve fiber layer.29"33 A delay in the closure of the optic fissure may disrupt the temporal presentation of these cues and result in aberrant growth of ganglion cell axons in the eye. Alternatively, the delayed closure of the optic fissure may be secondary to an abnormal interaction between ganglion cells and their retinal environment. Distinguishing between these possibilities requires the identification of the cellular target of the Bst gene.28 Despite this caveat, it is clear that in affected E15 and neonatal Bst/ + mice, many ganglion cell axons are found outside of the nerve fiber layer. Thus, the decrease in the size of the optic nerve and the number of axons in adult mutants is largely because of the failure of axons to Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 enter the nerve during development and consequently fail to reach their target in the brain. This observation may well explain the high incidence of cell death observed in the ganglion cell layer of these mutants. Alternatively, the program of ganglion cell development may be directly perturbed by the Bst mutation. The molecules involved in retinal development are rapidly being identified and characterized.34 Several genes—ChxlO, GH3, Mitf, and Pax6—were first described as the ocular retardation, extra-toes, microphthalmia, and small eye mutations, respectively.30"'11 Thus, the study of spontaneously occurring mutants has contributed to the identification of essential genes involved in retinal development. Many of these genes are putative transcription factors, but their molecular targets have not yet been identified. Comparison of retinal phenotypes in other mutant mice may help to identify potential molecular targets of these genes. In this respect, the retinal phenotype observed in Bst/+ mutant mice closely resembles that in several strains of mice with mutations in the Pax2 gene.42"44 In these mice, the optic fissure closes abnormally and retinal ganglion cells are die principal cell 2123 Retinal Ganglion Cell Abnormalities in Bst/+ Mice type affected. In addition to Pax2, two other genes, ChxlO and Mitf, also affect closure of the optic fissure. Mutations in these genes, however, are associated with small and grossly malformed eyes.35'45 7. Bst Mutation Is a Good Model for Heritable Ganglion Cell Loss in Humans 8. Mutations in similar genes are often associated with similar defects in different species.'16 For example, mutation of the human PAX2gene results in optic nerve coloboma and kidney defects comparable to that observed in mice with mutations in the Pax2gene.42'4347 The retinal phenotype in Bst/+ mice is similar to that in autosomal dominant optic atrophy (0PA1) and optic nerve hypoplasia in humans—both of which are characterized by an early and variable reduction in retinal ganglion cells in an otherwise normal appearing eye.17'48 Furthermore, the Bst gene is located on mouse Chromosome 16 in a region that is conserved in human Chromosome 3—where 0PA1 is located.10"15 The phenotypic similarities combined with the mapping data raise the possibility that Bst and 0PA1 are mutations in the same gene. Hoyt and Good49 discuss the underlying developmental events that may lead to human optic nerve atrophy and hypoplasia; however, the basis of ganglion cell loss remains obscure. In this study we provide evidence indicating that the reduction of ganglion cells in Bst/+ retinas is related to a developmental abnormality. The analysis of ganglion cell development in Bst/+ mutant retinas may provide insights into the variability and asymmetry of ganglion cell loss in humans with heritable optic neuropathies. 9. Key Words 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. genetic disease, mouse, optic nerve, pupil, retina development Acknowledgments The authors thank Kathy Troughton and Richard dishing for expert technical help. 19. 20. References 1. Siclman R. Hislogenesis of the Mouse Retina Studied With Tritiated Thymidine. In Smelser GK, ed. The Structure of the Eye. New York: Academic Press; 1961:487-505. 2. Walsh C, Polley EH. The topography of ganglion cell production in the cat's retina, f Neurosci. 1985;5:741750. 3. Drager UC. Birth dates of retinal ganglion cells giving rise to the uncrossed and crossed optic projections in the mouse. Proc R Soc Lond. 1985;224:57-77. 4. LaVail MM, Rapaport DH, Rakic P. Cytogenesis in monkey retina. / Cornp Neurol. 1991;309:86-114. 5. Silver J, Sidman RL. A mechanism for the guidance and topographic patterning of retinal ganglion cell axons. J Comp Neurol. 1980; 189:101 -111. 6. Shatz CJ, Sretavan DW. Interactions between retinal Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. ganglion cells during the development of the mammalian visual system. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1986;9:l7l-207. Guillery RW, Mason CA, Taylor JSH. Developmental determinants at the mammalian optic chiasm./Mrurosci. 1995; 15:4727-4737. Marcus RC, Mason CA. The first retinal axon growth in the mouse optic chiasm: Axon patterning and the cellular environment./JVeimwci. 1995; 15:6389-6402. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in humans with glaucoma. Am f Ophthalmol. 1989; 107:453-464. Epstein R, Davisson M, Lehmann K, Akeson EC, Colin M. Position of Igl-I, md, and Bst loci on chromosome 16 of the mouse. Immunogenetics. 1986;23:78-83. Rice DS, Williams RW, Ward-Bailey P, et al. Mapping the Bst mutation on mouse chromosome 16: A model for human optic atrophy. Mamm Genome. 1995; 6:546548. Reeves RH, Citron MP. Mouse chromosome 16. Mamm Genome, (supplement). 1994;5:S229-S237. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man: 1996; URL:http//www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov Eiberg H, Kjer P, Rosenberg T. Dominant optic atrophy (OPA1) mapped to chromosome 3q region. I. Linkage analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3:977-980. Lunkes A, Hartung U, Magarino C, et al. Refinement of the OPA1 gene locus on chromosome 3q28-29 to a region of 2-8 cM, in one Cuban pedigree with autosomal dominant optic auophy type Kjer. Am J Ham Genet. 1995;57:968-970. Eliott D, Traboulsi El, Maumenee IH. Visual prognosis in autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Amj Ophthalmol. 1993; 115:360-367. Hoyt CS. Autosomal dominant optic atrophy. A spectrum of disabilities. Ophthalmology. 1980;87:245-250. Johnston PB, Gaster RN, Smith VC, Tripathi, RC. A clinicopathologic study of autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979; 88:868-875. Kjer P, Jensen OA, Klinken L. Histopathology of eye, optic nerve and brain in a case of dominant optic atrophy. Ada Ophthalmol. 1983;61:300-312. Rice DS, Williams RW, Goldowitz D. Genetic control of retinal projections in inbred strains of albino mice. / Comp Neurol. 1995;354:459-469. Perry VH, Linden R. Evidence for dendritic competition in the developing retina. Nature. 1982; 297:683685. Williams RW, Strom RC, Rice DS, Goldowitz D. Genetic and environmental control of variation in retinal ganglion cell number in mice. / Neurosci. 1996; 16:7193-7205. Silver J, Puck SM, Albert DM. Development and aging of the eye in mice with inherited optic nerve aplasia: Histopathological studies. Exp Eye Res. 1984; 38:257266. Apple DJ, Rabb MF. Ocular Pathology: Clinical Applications and Self Assessment. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991:8-19. Hero I. Optic fissure closure in the normal cinnamon 2124 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, September 1997, Vol. 38, No. 10 mouse. An ultrastructure study. Invest Ophthalvwl Vis Sci. 1990;31:197-216. Pei YF, Rhodin JAG. The prenatal development of the mouse eye. Anat Rec. 1970; 168:105-126. Mann I. Development of the Human Eye. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1964. Tang Q, Rice DS, Williams RW, Goldowtiz D. Retinal development in the Bst mouse. Soc Neurosci Abs. 1996;22:1977. Goldberg S. Unidirectional, bidirectional and random growth of embryonic optic axons. Exp Eye Res. 1977; 25:399-404. Halfter W, Deiss S, Schwarz U. The formation of the axonal pattern in the embryonic avian retina. J Comp Neurol. 1985; 232:466-480. Brittis PA, Lemmon V, Rutishauser U, Silver J. Unique changes of ganglion cell growth cone behavior following cell adhesion molecule perturbations: A timelapse study of the living retina. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1995; 6:433-449. Halfter W. Intraretinal grafting reveals growth requirements and guidance cues for optic axons in the developing avian retina. Dev Biol. 1996; 177:160-177. Brittis PA, SilverJ. Multiple factors govern intraretinal axon guidance: A time-lapse study. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1995;6:413-432. Graw J. Genetic aspects of embryonic eye development in vertebrates. Dev Genet. 1996; 18:181-197. SilverJ, Robb RM. Studies on the development of the eye cup and optic nerve in normal mice and in mutants with congenital optic nerve aplasia. Dev Biol. 1979;68:175-190. Burmeister M, Novak J, Liang M-Y, et al. Ocular retardation mouse caused by ChxlO homeobox null allele: Impaired retinal progenitor proliferation and bipolar cell differentiation. Nat Genet. 1996; 12:376-384. Franz T, Besecke A. The development of the eye in homozygotes of the mouse mutant Extra-toes. Anat Embryol. 1991; 184:355-361. Vortkamp A, Franz T, Gessler M, Grzeschik K-H. Deletion of GLJ3 supports the homology of the human Greig cephalopolysyndactyly syndrome (GCPS) and Downloaded From: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/ on 04/28/2017 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. the mouse mutant extra toes {Xt). Mavivi Genome. 1992; 3:461-463. Hodgkinson CA, Moore KJ, Nakayama A, et al. Mutations at the mouse microphthalmia locus are associated with defects in a gene encoding a novel basic helix-loop-helix-zipper protein. Cell. 1993; 74:395404. Hogan BLM, Horsburgh G, Cohen J, et al. Small eyes (Sey): A homozygous lethal mutation on chromosome 2 which affects differentiation of both lens and nasal placodes in the mouse. / Embryol Exp Morph. 1986;97:95-110. Hill RE, Favor J, Hogan BL, et al. Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containinggene. Nature. 1991;354:522-525. Keller SA, Jones JM, Boyle A, et al. Kidney and retinal defects (Krd), a transgene-induced mutation with a deletion of mouse chromosome 19 that includes the Pax2 locus. Genomics. 1994;23:309-320. Favor J, Sandulache R, Neuhauser-Klaus A, et al. The mouse Pax2iNe" mutation is identical to a human PAX2 mutation in a family with renal-coloboma syndrome and results in developmental defects of the brain, ear, eye, and kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996; 93:13870-13875. Torres M, Gomez-Pardo E, Gruss P. Pax2 contributes to inner ear patterning and optic nerve trajectory. Development. 1996; 122:3381-3391. Hero I. The optic fissure in the normal and microphthalmic mouse. Exp Eye Res. 1989; 49:229-239. Glaser T, Walton DS, Maas RL. Genomic structure, evolutionary conservation and aniridia mutations in the human Pax6gene. Nat Genet. 1992;2:232-238. Sanyanusin P, Schimmenti LA, McNoe LA, et al. Mutation of the PAX2 gene in a family with optic nerve colobomas, renal anomalies and vesicoureteral reflux. Nat Genet. 1995;9:358-364. Frisen L, Holmegaard L. Spectrum of optic nerve hypoplasia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978;62:7-15. Hoyt CS, Good WV. Do we really understand the difference between optic nerve hypoplasia and atrophy. Eye. 1992:6:201-204.