* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Is some segment of the HIV-infected population
Cryptosporidiosis wikipedia , lookup
West Nile fever wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Henipavirus wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis C wikipedia , lookup
Herpes simplex virus wikipedia , lookup
Sexually transmitted infection wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Diagnosis of HIV/AIDS wikipedia , lookup
Epidemiology of HIV/AIDS wikipedia , lookup
Antiviral drug wikipedia , lookup
Microbicides for sexually transmitted diseases wikipedia , lookup
HIV? CHOLHUA , March 2015 Jean-Marc Fix, FSA, MAAA, VP, R&D Why not? The End 2 Is a segment of the HIV-infected population insurable? CHOLHUA , March 2015 Jean-Marc Fix, FSA, MAAA, VP, R&D Agenda • • • • • • • What is HIV infection? Evolution of HIV infection mortality Evolution of HIV infection treatment Segmentation of HIV-infected population Mortality of the better segments Underwriting skills Unknowns and risk mitigation strategies 4 Face of a killer 5 Face of a killer 6 Face of a killer 7 Face of a killer 8 Face of a killer 9 A Close-up 10 Video- Infection • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO8 MP3wMvqg • 4’08” 11 Infectious pathway • • • • • Men having sex with men Heterosexual Intravenous drug user Blood product (transfusion, hemophilia) Occupational 12 Infectious pathway -Men Other and not reported 19% Blood transfusion 0% High risk sex 7% Hemophilia 0% MSM+IDU 5% IDU 8% Male to male(MSM) 61% Source: HIV AIDS Surveillance vol 19 CDC 13 Infectious pathway Women IDU 14% Other and not reported 39% Blood transfusion 0% Source: HIV AIDS Surveillance vol 19 CDC Hemophilia 0% High risk sex 47% 14 What kills? • • • • • • • • Depletion of CD4+ T helper cells Loss of immune protection AIDS defining diseases ~50% (1) Liver disease (hepatitis co-infection) Infection (non AIDS defining) Cancer (non AIDS defining) Cardiovascular Drug overdose, accident, suicide Source: Gill et al, Clin Infect Dis 2010 15 What we remember AIDS Is Top Cause of Death for Young Adults in U.S. Disturbing report by federal agency San Francisco Chronicle 2/1/95 1985 Together in Life and Death 2001 San Ramon pair die of AIDS 2 days apart… Ray, 58, and Peggy, 54, of San Ramon, died earlier this month after battling the disease for five years. They were buried Monday in the same grave. SFC 2/1/95 Hunting for the Hidden Killers: AIDS Time Magazine 7/4/83 1992 16 Número estimado de adultos y niños que vivían con el VIH en 2008 América del Norte Europa oriental y Europa occidental Asia central y central 1,5 millones 850 000 [1,4 – 1,7 millones] 1,4 millones [710 000 – 970 000] [1,2 – 1,6 millones] África del Norte y Oriente Medio Caribe 240 000 [220 000 – 260 000] América Latina 2,0 millones [1,8 – 2,2 millones] 310 000 [250 000 – 380 000] África subsahariana 22,4 millones [20,8 – 24,1 millones] Asia oriental 850 000 [700 000 – 1,0 millones] Asia meridional y sudoriental 3,8 millones [3,4 – 4,3 millones] Oceanía 59 000 [51 000 – 68 000] Total: 33,4 millones (31,1 – 35,8 millones) HIV mortality 18 HIV deaths 19 What we should be hearing Managing HIV as a Chronic Disease South Afr j of HIV Med 2004 HIV: Now a Manageable Chronic Disease Pharmacy Times 2007 When AIDS became a chronic disease West J Med 2000 Comprehensive Clinical Care: Managing HIV as a Chronic Illness AIDS Clinical Care Journalwatch retrieved July 2010 20 HIV mortality 21 Trends in Annual Age-Adjusted* Rate of Death Due to HIV Infection, United States, 1987−2010 Note: For comparison with data for 1999 and later years, data for 1987−1998 were modified to account for ICD-10 rules instead of ICD-9 rules. *Standard: age distribution of 2000 US population Advances in treatment Source: Pallella et al, J Acq Immune Def Syndr 2006 23 HAART • Highly Active Antiretroviral Treatment • Latest is triple cocktail, for ART naïve patients: – NNRTI + 2 NRTI: Atripla and Complera – Ritonavir boosted PI + 2 NRTI – INSTI + 2 NRTI NRTI = nuclesos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse trans. inhib. PI = protease inhib. INSTI = integrase strand transfer inhib. Source: Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1 infected adults and adolescents DHHS as of 3/15 24 Video-Treatment • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RO8 MP3wMvqg • 4’09” 25 Advances in treatment 26 Action path of treatment 27 Action path of treatment 28 HIV reservoirs • CD4+ memory T-cell • Can stay inactive and virus dormant for many years • Under current therapy: 60+ years to clear the virus (1) (1): Marsden and Zack J Antimicrob Chemo 2009 29 Variables for mortality • • • • • • • • • • Age Gender Smoking Income CD4+ cell count Viral load Time since infection Response to treatment Quality of follow-up Infection source 30 Mortality by therapy • When: 1994-1997 • Where: 8 cities in US • Who:12% IDU, 12% Females, MSM decreasing to 65% • Severity: All had CD4+ cell counts below 100/mm3 • Significant treatment change in 1996 Source: Pallella et al NEJM 1998 31 Mortality by therapy • RR death or morbidity None vs. Monotherapy 1.5 None vs. combo 2.9 None vs. combo with protease inhibitor 4.5 Source: Pallella et al NEJM 1998 32 Mortality evolution • When: 1981-2006 • Where: 23 cohorts in Europe, Australia, Canada • Who:18% IDU, 22% Females, MSM 57% • Severity: Since seroconversion • Follow-up: median 6.3 (range 1 day to 23.8 years) Source: Bashkaran et al, JAMA 2008 33 Mortality evolution Deaths Pre 1996 199697 199899 200001 200203 200406 Expected 56 28 33 39 41 37 481 231 212 188 127 17 7.0 5.5 4.6 3.4 Observed 1332 Obs/Exp 24 Source: Bashkaran et al, JAMA 2008 34 Mortality evolution Source: Bashkaran et al, JAMA 2008 35 Mortality evolution Source: Bashkaran et al, JAMA 2008 36 Mortality by age Ratio observed to expected mortality by age, 15 year after seroconversion Age at seroconversion 1996-1997 2004-2006 15-24 3720% 736% 25-34 2225% 375% 35-44 3728% 150% 45+ na 192% Source: adapted from Table 4, Bashkaran et al, JAMA 2008 37 Mortality by segment • 7 year post cART France, first treated with PI 1997-99 • Overall: SMR 7.0 – Men 4.8 – Women 13.0 • HCV status – Positive: 13.9 – Negative: 4.4 • HIV transmission – IV drugs 16.3 – Other 5.5 Source: Lewden et al, J Acq Immune Def Syndr 2007 38 Mortality by segment CD4+ count cells/mm3 SMR 500+ 2.5 350-499 3.5 200-349 5.6 <200 30.3 Source: Lewden et al, J Acq Immune Def Syndr 2007 39 Mortality by segment Source: Lewden et al, J Acq Immune Def Syndr 2007 40 Mortality by age, CD4+ count and viral load • Monte Carlo simulation model • Includes HIV resistance evolution with treatment • Calibrated from a US cohort (CHORUS, less IDU, less non-white) • Validated against VA study (more IDU, more non-white) Source: Braithwaite et al, Am J of Med 2005 41 Modeling flowchart Source: Braithwaite et al, Am J of Med 2005 42 Mortality Age 30 Age CD4+ (cells/mm^3) 30 800 500 200 Viral load /ml Median survival Mort Mult (men) 10,000 31.30 400% 100,000 23.70 x 1,000,000 17.20 x 10,000 26.80 x 100,000 21.20 x 1,000,000 14.60 x 10,000 21.90 x 100,000 18.10 x 1,000,000 12.20 x Source: from Braithwaite et al, Am J of Med 2005 43 Mortality Age 40 Age CD4+ (cells/mm^3) 40 800 500 200 Viral load /ml Median survival Mort Mult (men) 10,000 28.00 250% 100,000 22.60 425% 1,000,000 15.20 x 10,000 24.40 350% 100,000 18.90 x 1,000,000 14.00 x 10,000 19.70 x 100,000 15.50 x 1,000,000 10.90 x Source: from Braithwaite et al, Am J of Med 2005 44 Mortality Age 50 Age CD4+ (cells/mm^3) 50 800 500 200 Viral load /ml Median survival Mort Mult (men) 10,000 22.30 200% 100,000 20.30 250% 1,000,000 14.30 x 10,000 21.10 225% 100,000 17.70 325% 1,000,000 12.90 x 10,000 16.50 375% 100,000 14.60 500% 1,000,000 10.20 x Source: from Braithwaite et al, Am J of Med 2005 45 HAART treatment consequences • • • • Dyslipidemia Insulin resistance/diabetes Endothelial dysfunction Altered fat distribution • More AMI in HIV + Source: Triant et al, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007 46 HAART treatment consequences HIV + HIV - Ratio Heart Attack Rates per 1000 PY 18-34 4.65 0.88 528% 35-44 10.13 3.34 303% 45-54 18.74 7.56 248% 55-64 33.39 14.78 226% 65-74 77.68 24.47 317% 75-84 43.63 36.47 120% Source: Triant et al, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007 47 Data limitations- the bad news • Atherosclerotic cardiovascular conditions take a long time to manifest themselves 48 Underwriting skill-the good news • Cardiovascular risk: our best skill set and treating physician are now well aware of the risk • Hepatitis co-infection (Hep. B &C) • IDU • We CAN identify the best risks 49 Coronary heart disease risk in HIV % increase in risk HIV+ 1 HIV+ 2 HIV – (7) Age - per year Sex – M vs F Diabetes – Yes vs No Smoking – Yes vs No Hypertension –Yes vs No 9% N/A 260% 140% 30% 6% 6-9% 110% 110-160% 90% 140-252% 290% 70-290% 80% 80-90% Tot Chol - per 1mmol/L N/A 26% 25-33% HDL chol. - per 1mmol/L N/A -28% -52% Source: Schambelan et al, Circulation 2008 50 The best • • • • Age: older is better Behavior: no drugs, how HIV acquired Income: higher is better HIV characteristics: CD4+ cell count and viral load • Treatment: timing, quality, response, follow-up, adherence • Documentation: available and plentiful 51 Unknowns and risk mitigation strategies • Full underwriting • Shorter term or shorter term equivalent coverage? • Limit the face amount • Reinsure 52 Potential Treatment Venues • • • • • • • • Don’t get infected Kill the virus Prevent entry of the virus in the cell Prevent normal virus intracellular processes Prevent viability of cell produced virus Kill infected active cells Kill infected latent cells Prevent CD4+ cell depletion 53 Kill the Virus • Immune response boosters: – cytokines, – interferon, – monoclonal antibodies, – vaccine, – gene therapy 54 Prevent Virus Entry • Prevent entry of the virus – Block access on T cell • CD4 • CCR5 • CXCR4 – Block connectors from virus – Block fusion – Cleave connectors: abzyme 55 Prevent Normal Virus Process Viral decay accelerator Innate antiretroviral factor 56 Prevent viability of cell produced virus • Maturation inhibitors – Env targeted cytotoxin (Berger 6/10) – Gag cleavage (Adamson, 8/09) – CA-CA interaction (ibid.) • Zinc finger inhibitors 57 Maybe one day • • • • • Kill infected active cells Kill infected latent cells Prevent CD4+ cell depletion Gene therapy Vaccine 58 Updates • Better understanding of CD4 cell death due to HIV infection of nearby cells and drug blocking that death and an existing drug blocking that effect (Doitsh, Nature 2013) • In monkeys, gene therapy ups the natural defenses against HIV (Gardner, Nature 2015) 59 Questions? 60