Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Inspire policy making by territorial evidence ESPON Seminar “Territories Acting for Economic Growth: Using territorial evidence to meet challenges towards 2020” Investment and integrated strategies supporting towns Raivis BREMSMITS Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia Regional development disparities • • Latvia has the 5th largest regional disparities in EU-28 (dispersion of regional GDP per inhabitant in NUTS 3 regions) Pronounced monocentric development tendencies – a need for many centres Number of companies per 1000 inhabitants, 2012 Personal income tax revenue in budgets of municipalities per capita. 2013 Unemployment level, 2014 Population decrease 2009-2014 ERDF priority “Polycentric development” 2007-2013 Activities • Growth of national and regional development centres • Sustainable development of Riga • Growth of amalgamated municipalities Total funding: 323 M EUR 12% 8% 25% 55% Transport infrastructure (incl. support for enterprises) Energy efficiency of public buildings Education infrastructure Culture infrastructure (incl. heritage& tourism) Daugavpils City Fortress infrastructure improvement of streets and engineering networks Total funding – 5,11 M EUR, incl. ERDF 4,68 M EUR Valmiera business and innovation center project Total funding – 1,53 M EUR, incl. ERDF 1,29 M EUR Lessons learned In order to tackle regional disparities more efficiently, there is a need for: 1. Concentration of funding thematically and territorially 2. Territorial programs have to be much more oriented towards investments in business infrastructure in order to promote entrepreneurial activity and increase the number of workplaces and thus address regional development challenges (less investments in leisure infrastructure) Sustainable urban development 2014-2020 Regulation on ERDF 2014-2020 Article 7 • • • The ERDF shall support, within operational programs, sustainable urban development through strategies that set out integrated actions to tackle the economic, environmental, climate, demographic and social challenges affecting urban areas, while taking into account the need to promote urbanrural linkages. At least 5 % of the ERDF resources allocated at national level under the Investment for growth and jobs goal shall be allocated to integrated actions for sustainable urban development Taking into account its specific territorial situation, each Member State shall establish in its Partnership Agreement the principles for the selection of urban areas where integrated actions for sustainable urban development are to be implemented and an indicative allocation for those actions at national level. Polycentric development: 9+21 Balanced network of centres • Latvia 2030 – Long term development strategy • Defines balanced network of centres: • 9 national level development centres (ITI) • 21 regional level development centres Urban development – ITI investments 2014-2020 ERDF including 9 cities 3.3.1. Attracting investments for regions 59 016 742 10 911 633 5.6.2. Revitalisation of deprived areas 236 524 372 92 138 673 8.1.2. Infrastructure for general education 138 389 313 30 000 000 8.1.3. Infrastructure for vocational education 89 068 648 66 801 486 Climate and environmental 4.2.2. Energy-efficiency of municipalities 31 393 658 15 696 829 5.6.2. Revitalisation of deprived areas 236 524 372 92 138 673 Social 9.3.1. Social services 41 241 194 15 300 000 Urban challenge Economical and demographical Specific Objective 9,6% Integrated approach 2014-2020 • Integrated or complementary projects – a set of projects from several specific objectives, where investments and results are interrelated – Business projects - municipalities and entrepreneurs – Service projects – municipalities and state • For these projects it is necessary to ensure synchronized project implementation: – Synchronized decision project proposals (evaluation of projects is taking into account interrelatedness of investments ) – Synchronizes decision making time on project proposals • Central element – Local development program EXAMPLE Trainings for empoyees Building or reconstruction of premises Equipment, technologies Private investments Public investments Power supply, gas supply Water supply and sewerage, rainwater drainage system, heating system Access roads Local Development Program . Revitalization of territories, development of deprived areas (Ministry of Regional Development) Energy-efficiency of municipal buildings (Ministry of Regional Development) Infrastructure of social services Integrated investments (Ministry of Welfare) Other investments Needs analysis Entrepreneurship (Ministry of Economy) Implementation of Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) Cabinet of Ministers Regional Development Coordination Council Municipality Development Program Investment Plan Priority project ideas: 1. Project idea 2. Project idea 3. Project idea Alternative project ideas: 1. Project idea 2. Project idea Approves: •Indicators and funding (in total for each municipality regarding each SSO) • Time frame of SSO implementation Municipal commission Performs selection of project proposals: •According to SSO terms •According to funding amount approved by Cabinet of Ministers Approves or rejects project proposal (after verification) Municipality Drafts project proposal for SSO VERIFICATION • According to Article 7 it is verified if project selection has been performed in compliance with regulations and criteria of SSO Thank you! www.varam.gov.lv 14