Download Chapter 14 Public Relations Goes International

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Chapter 14
Public Relations Goes International
Globalization
Terrorism
Public Diplomacy
Manheim’s Grid
World is Getting Smaller
•
•
•
•
McLuhan’s global village.
Short time for travel and communication.
Businesses are global.
Globalization: world has shrunk as technology
increases ease of international business.
Technology and Globalization
Growth
• Internet allows fast and inexpensive global
communication.
• Supply chains can be global.
• Multiple transportation options globally.
Globalization always good?
• Assumption is globalization is good for
business.
– People like inexpensive goods.
• Same assumption is made for public relations.
• What are the unintended consequences?
Liberalization of Trade and
Globalization
• Reduced trade barriers and cost of doing
business internationally.
– Products at a local Wal-mart are less expensive to
make in China than in the U.S.
• Free market capitalism spreads.
• Multinationals dominate economies because
they can produce for a lower cost.
• World Trade Organization (WTO) looks to
facilitate trade liberalization.
Risk of Global Business
• Conflicts or disasters can disrupt supply
chains.
• Embarrassment from supplier with unethical
practices such as child labor.
• Unreliable safety of products.
• Often ignore cultural differences.
• Concern over protection of human rights.
Globalization and
Public Relations Challenges
• Organizations must deal with more diverse
constituents.
– Often know little about these new constituents
• McDonald’s and vegetarian options
• Meaning of product names
• Differing nature of media relations.
– Some journalist expect bribes.
• Challenge of managing reputation across
cultures.
Globalization and
Public Relations Challenges
• Organization target for attack because of its
home country.
• Close scrutiny of supply chains and practices
because of exploitation fears.
– Locating in countries with weak environmental or
labor safety regulations
Battle for Seattle
• WTO meeting was focus of activists in 1999.
• Concerns about the negative effects of
globalization on society.
• Activists from around the world such as
Ruckus Society.
Battle for Seattle
• Internet facilitating activist organizing.
• Media coverage highlighted “violence” in
protests and message was obscured.
• Corporations portrayed themselves as victims.
• Ultimately did raise awareness of the cause.
Transnational Advocacy Network
• “includes those relevant actors working
internationally on an issue, who are bound
together by shared values, a common
discourse, and dense exchanges of
information and services” (Keck & Sikkink,
1998, p. 2).
• Frame issues for news media and politicians.
• Focus on issues with global dimension.
Reflection Points
• What are the challenges presented by
globalization?
• How does public relations fit into promoting
globalization?
• How does public relations fit into opposing
globalization?
Terrorism
• Has unfortunate connection to public
relations.
• Should never be equated with public relations.
Definition
• Is a political term shaped by ideology.
– Can be debated who is a terrorist
• U.S. government defines terrorism as “the
unlawful use of force and violence against
persons or property to intimidate or coerce a
government, the civilian population, or any
segment thereof, in furtherance of political or
social objectives” (28 CFR Section 0.85).
Legal Aspects of Terrorism
• States can legally commit violence against
people.
⁻ State-sponsored terrorism
• Can be non-violent resistance through civil
disobedience.
• Civil disobedience is necessary to change laws.
⁻ Purposeful violation of unfair laws.
Conceptualizing Terrorism
• Violence is a defining aspect of terrorism.
• Terrorists do seek change.
• Fine line between activist and terrorist when
violence is involved.
Case of Ecoterrorism
• FBI defines ecoterrorism as “the use or
threatened use of violence of a criminal
nature against innocent victims or property by
an environmentally-oriented, subnational
group for environmental-political reasons, or
aimed at an audience beyond the target, often
of a symbolic nature” (Jarboe, 2002).
Case of Ecoterrorism
• Are groups like the Animal Liberation Front
and Earth First! terrorists or activists pursuing
a legitimate cause?
Terrorism and Media:
The Unfortunate Link
• Terrorist seek to convey demands or ideas to
other people.
• Desire for media to cover their actions to
convey these messages.
• Attacks create fear and pressure to change.
– Madrid train bombings
– London underground and bus bombings
Terrorism and Media:
The Unfortunate Link
• Media reports help to create the fear
terrorists desire.
• Violence becomes publicity tactic.
• News outlets around the world wrestle with
how to cover terrorism.
– Russia has the strongest limitations
Reflection Points
• Why is it problematic to say terrorism is a
form of public relations?
• How does public relations play a role in
terrorism?
• Is the use of violence ever justified to support
a cause or issue?
Public Diplomacy
• Original international public relations.
• Defined as government-to-people.
• Traditional diplomacy is viewed as
government-to-government.
• Government communicates directly to people
in another country.
• Part of the “soft power.”
Common Goals
•
•
•
•
Increasing awareness.
Managing reputations.
Changing legislation.
Altering attitudes.
Connection to Public Relations
• Public diplomacy lacks understanding of how
to communicate to achieve the objectives.
• Public relations offers insights into how
communication can be used effectively in
public diplomacy.
Legal Constraints
• In U.S., public diplomacy/international public
relations is monitored.
• Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) requires
all public relations personnel that work for
foreign countries to register with the Justice
Department.
• Must report fees, provide copies of messages,
and list actions they take for clients.
Four Common Objectives
of Public Diplomacy
• Foreign investment.
• Drawing tourists.
• Maintaining favorable trading policies.
• Receiving foreign aid.
All show connections to public relations.
Foreign Investment
• Attract foreign investors.
• Similar to investor relations of corporations.
• Potential investors must appreciate
investment potential in a country.
Tourism
• Great source of revenue.
• Potential tourists must know the reasons to
visit.
Trade Policies
• Issues management can be used to influence
government policies.
• This includes trade policies.
Foreign Aid
• Constituents must know there is a need.
• Politicians must “like” the country.
Media and Country Reputations
• Constituents experience countries primarily
indirectly through the media.
• Therefore media coverage is powerful in
shaping country reputations.
• Research proves changing media coverage
changes country reputations even when no
substantive changes occurred.
Manheim’s Grid
• Two dimensions:
– Visibility, amount of coverage
– Valence, is coverage positive or negative
• Four quadrants.
• Each quadrant has special concerns for
practitioners.
Quadrants and Public Relations
• Quadrant 1: a high amount of negative
coverage so try to reduce the amount of
coverage.
• Quadrant 2: low amount of negative coverage
so try to transition from negative to positive
media coverage.
Quadrants and Public Relations
• Quadrant 3: low amount of positive coverage,
so try to increase visibility because the
coverage is positive.
• Quadrant 4: high amount of positive coverage
so try to reinforce the existing positive, high
visibility.
Convergence of Public Relations
and Public Diplomacy
• Public diplomacy should move beyond
manipulating reputations to understanding
constituents.
• Public diplomacy should move to more twoway communication.
• Governments need to consider how
corporations and NGOs affect public
diplomacy efforts.
Reflection Points
• What are the dangers associated with
manipulating country reputations through
public diplomacy?
• Should all countries be allowed to utilize
public diplomacy?
• What is the role of transparency in public
diplomacy?