* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download decision - New Zealand Advertising Standards Authority
Survey
Document related concepts
Age disparity in sexual relationships wikipedia , lookup
Sexual reproduction wikipedia , lookup
Rochdale child sex abuse ring wikipedia , lookup
History of homosexuality wikipedia , lookup
Slut-shaming wikipedia , lookup
Sexual selection wikipedia , lookup
Human female sexuality wikipedia , lookup
Sexual attraction wikipedia , lookup
Female promiscuity wikipedia , lookup
Body odour and sexual attraction wikipedia , lookup
History of cross-dressing wikipedia , lookup
Human male sexuality wikipedia , lookup
Sex and sexuality in speculative fiction wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
ADVERTISING STANDARDS COMPLAINTS BOARD PO Box 10-675 Wellington Telephone (04) 472-7852 Facsimile (04) 471-1785 Email [email protected] Website www.asa.co.nz 06/385 DECISION Chairman’s Ruling 18 November 2006 Complaint 06/385 Complainant: A. Machin Advertisement: Domino’s Pizza Complaint: A television advertisement for Domino’s Pizza featured a male and two females eating roast beef pizza. As the blonde female chews the pizza she starts to take on the characteristics of a male. She looks at the brunette female and moves over to sit next to her. “The brunette asks “Are you ok?” The blonde replies “I’m fine.” Then putting her arm around the brunette and sitting in a relaxed male pose, she says “Not as fine as you though!” Images of pizzas are shown while a voice over says: “Unleash the bloke within, try Domino’s new roast beef specials.” Complainant, A. Machin, was of the view that it was completely inappropriate to use sexual innuendo in the context of food advertising. The Complainant also said it implied that lesbian sex only exists to amuse men and that the stereotype of a “bloke” is negative as the advertisement portrays young men as being obsessed with sex and unaware of social decorum. The relevant provisions were: Code for People in Advertising, Basic Principles 4, 5 and 6. The Chairman noted the issues raised by the Complainant in relation to the advertisement before him when viewing the advertisement. The Chairman noted that the advertisement was promoting a new type of pizza with roast beef that was more likely to appeal to a male audience. While the advertisement made use of stereotypes to highlight the ‘blokey’ appeal of the product, the Chairman ruled that the level of humour and exaggerated behaviour in the advertisement meant that the threshold to cause serious or widespread offence had not been reached. There were therefore no grounds for the complaint to proceed. Chairman’s Ruling: Complaint No Grounds to Proceed