Download More Doom for Descartes Reports that some scientists believe that

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Brain damage wikipedia , lookup

René Descartes wikipedia , lookup

Craniometry wikipedia , lookup

History of neuroimaging wikipedia , lookup

Dysprosody wikipedia , lookup

Phineas Gage wikipedia , lookup

History of anthropometry wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
More Doom for Descartes
Reports that some scientists believe that emotion and reason may be inextricably linked within our brains so that
decision making, particularly in social situations, might be impossible without a dollop of feelings. Evidence in
the Phineas Gage case; Findings of the case; Conclusions of the scientist.
-Psychology Today, By PT Staff, published November 1, 1994-last revised on June 19, 2012
FEELING AND REASON
Many of history's enlightened sages, from Descartes to our mothers, have dispensed the
following wisdom to those of us trying to resolve an exasperating dilemma: "Calm down."
The suggestion stems, of course, from the idea that emotion interferes with rational thinking. But some
scientists now think that emotion and reason may be inextricably linked within our brains, so that
logical decision making, particularly in social situations, might be impossible without a dollop of feelings.
An intriguing bit of evidence: the case of Phineas Gage.
Two remarkable things happened to Phineas in fall, 1848. The first was that a tamping iron, 43 inches
long, one inch in diameter, pierced his brain in a construction explosion. The tapered metal rod tore
through his left cheek, exited via the top of his skull, and landed more than a hundred feet away.
The other remarkable thing? Phineas survived.
Although his wound healed, our hero was a changed man. According to one acquaintance, Phineas
had been a "shrewd, smart businessman, very energetic and persistent." The new Phineas, however,
couldn't keep a decent job and reneged on commitments. His formidable intelligence remained intact,
yet he now seemed oblivious to social conventions, swearing so vigorously women were advised to
avoid his company.
More than a century later, a team of scientists think they understand Phineas’ transformation. Armed
with X rays of Phineas’ skull and a battery of computers, the neurodetectives recreated on-line the
tamping iron's gruesome journey through Phineas’ brain.
Their conclusion: The rod wreaked havoc on Phineas’ prefrontal cortex. According to University of Iowa
neurologist Antonio Damasio, M.D., injury to this region of his brain "compromised Phineas’ ability to
conduct himself according to the social rules he previously had learned, to decide on the course of
action that ultimately would be most advantageous to his survival, and to plan for the future."
Damasio, in Descartes' Error (Grosset/Putnam), says Phineas’ behavior after the accident mirrors that
of patients who suffer prefrontal damage from tumors. Their intellect, memory, and language skills are
unchanged, but their ability to make social decisions is impaired and their emotion-processing
machinery malfunctions or shuts down. The implication, says Damasio, is that reason and emotion are
strange but inseparable bedfellows.
Questions:
1. Can one make decisions without involving their feelings? Explain.
2. What evidence do scientist suggest prove that emotion and human thinking are linked together?
3. Do the scientists have sufficient evidence to justify the link between human thinking, reasoning
and emotion? Explain.