* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Notes – Simple and Non-simple Sentences
Transformational grammar wikipedia , lookup
Antisymmetry wikipedia , lookup
Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup
Navajo grammar wikipedia , lookup
American Sign Language grammar wikipedia , lookup
Double negative wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Japanese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup
French grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
Icelandic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Chinese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Russian grammar wikipedia , lookup
English passive voice wikipedia , lookup
English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Simple and non-simple sentence in English: An Introduction (Basic simple sentence patterns) The basic simple sentence patterns are made up of parts that are arranged in a definite order and are realized or represented by particular kinds of words or word groups (nouns, noun phrases, adjective, adjective phrases, etc.) English Sentences Simple Basic Non-simple Non-basic Compound Complex Compound-complex Basic Simple sentences 1. Subject + predicator, eg: My sister smiled. S S (NP) Det My N P V sister smiled 2. Subject + predicator + Direct Object, eg: My father drove the car. S S Det My P N father O V Det N drove the car 3. Subject + Predicator + Indirect Object + Direct Object, eg: I gave my friend some money. S S P Pronoun V I gave Oi Det Od N Det N my friend some money 4. Subject + Predicator + Subject Complement [Nominal], eg: My father is a lawyer. S S P S Compl.[Nom] Det N V Det N My father is a lawyer 5. Subject + Predicator + Subject Complement [Adjectival], eg: Her roommate is noisy. S S Det Her P S Compl.[Adj] N V Adj room mate is noisy 6. Subject + Predicator + Adverbial, eg: Daisy is in the library. S N P A N V PP P Diasy is NP in Det N the library 7. Subject + Predicator + Direct Object + Object Complement [Nominal], eg: We consider him a nuisance. S N P DO O.Compl.[Nom] N V P Det We consider him a N nuisance 8. Subject + Predicator + Object Complement [Adjectival], eg: I find your advice useful. S S P DO N V I find your Det O. Compl[Adj] N Adj advice useful 9. Subject + Predicator + Direct Object + Adverbial, eg: I dropped the key in the locker. S S P N V DO Det A N PP P I dropped the key in NP the locker NON-BASIC SIMPLE SENTENCES Non-basic simple sentences are formed by altering the basic ones in various ways. The formation of non-basic from basic simple sentences involves one or more of the following ways, which we will refer to as transformations: Re-ordering Movement Deletion Insertion Examples of Non-basic Simple Sentences (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Passive sentences Negative sentences Questions Commands Exclamations The movement of the predicator from its position to one before the subject can be used to change a basic simple sentence (statement) to a non-basic simple sentence (question). Margaret is your friend. Is Margaret your friend? The insertion of another element can also alter a basic simple sentence and make it a non-basic one. My keys are on the table. My keys are not on the table. This is called Negation. We shall be looking at three major non-basic simple sentence types, namely Passivisation Negation Interrogation Passivisation Passivisation can be formed by making some changes to the corresponding active sentence. Such changes involve a rearrangement of the parts and the insertion of new items. It is essential that a sentence has at least an object. This means that the verb is transitive Active: Passive: My sister took the phone. The phone was taken by my sister The transformations that take place in the process of forming a passive sentence from an active sentence are as follow: (a) The active object becomes the passive subject (the phone (active object) becomes the subject (b) The active subject becomes in the passive an optional agentive adjunct in the form of a prepositional phrase with by (by my sister) (c) The verb or verb phrase in the active predicator becomes a passive verb phrase, one containing an appropriate form of the auxiliary BE followed by the –en form of the verb. (was taken) ACTIVE SUBJECT My sister PASSIIVE SUBJECT The phone ACTIVE PREDICATOR (active verb/verb phrase) took PASSIVE PREDICATOR Passive verb phrase was taken ACTIVE OBJECT the phone (AGENTIVE ADJUNCT) by my sister Passive sentences can be formed from active sentences with considerably expanded verbal parts, eg: My sister has taken the phone My sister will take the phone My sister will be taking the phone My sister has taken the phone The phone has been taken by my sister. The phone will have been taken by my sister. The phone will be being taken by my sister. The phone has been being taken by my sister. Note: that there are certain transitive verbs which do not express any action, so even when such verbs occur in an active sentence, there are no corresponding passive forms. He resembles someone I know. *Someone I know is resembled by him. The meat weighs two kilogrammes. *Two kilogrammes is weighed by the meat. The car costs him a fortune. *He was cost a fortune by the car. *A fortune was cost hum by the car. Uses of Passive Sentences (a) Passive sentences are preferred when the speaker does not know or cannot easily specify the active subject (agent), eg, My purse was stolen during the rush. Radio was invented last century. (b) When it is felt unnecessary to specify the agent of the action, especially when it is expected to be clear from the context . The car was stolen last night. She was born in 1995. (c) The passive is preferred when it is necessary to bring the person who undergoes the action into special prominence in the initial position, which is normally occupied by the active subject. My father was criticized for his leadership style. The boys were roped into the crime. Negative Sentences Afixal and Non-affixal Sentence Negation Non-affixal Negation Negation with “not” or “n’t” (the reduced form) This is the simplest form of negation. It is done by inserting the negator/negative particle “not” or its reduced form “n’t” between the operator (the first or the only auxiliary in the verbal group) and the lexical verb in the verbal group/phrase when there is only one. However, if there are more than one auxiliary then the negator is placed after the first auxiliary. I will see you at noon → I will not see you at noon You should have done it → You should not have done it They could have been attending to the victims → They could not have been attending to the victims The auxiliary is so important in the positive/affirmative/assertive form that if it is not available, one has to be inserted, eg, We visit our grandmother everyday → We do not visit our grandmother everyday This means if a positive sentence is to be negated by the insertion of “not” and it does not contain an auxiliary, one is required. The auxiliary “do” inserted here is not like any other auxiliary (eg, lexical “do” and pro-form “do”. It is merely a utility auxiliary. It is not normally found occurring with another auxiliary. The auxiliary also carries the tense in the verbal group and is marked for concord with the subject. Kunle did his work well →Kunle did not do his work well Negative Sentences with “n’t” The negator in a negative sentence can take the reduced form “n’t” especially in informal conversation or writing. will not → won’t; have not → haven’t; are not → aren’t; should not → shouldn’t; could not → couldn’t, etc. Note (i) The modal “must” when it is equal to logical reference is normally replaced by “cannot/can’t” They must be in Lagos by now → They cannot be in Lagos by now Still on Sentential Negation Sentential Negation can apply to either the main clause or to the complement clause, eg I said he took the book I did not say [that he took the book] – I said nothing (main clause negation) I said he [that he did not take the book] – I said something – what? - that he did not take the book (complement clause negation) Sentences with semi-negative adverbs Semi-negative adverbs are also used for negation, eg, hardly, never, scarcely, seldom, rarely No Negation I have had breakfast I have not had breakfast I have had no breakfast Parallel positive and negative sentences Indefinites – any (anything, anywhere, anybody) some (something, somewhere, somebody) → (nothing, nowhere, nobody) Inherent Negative forms Words such as doubt, forbid, deny can have their positive forms such as believe, allow, accept I believe your testimony → I doubt your testimony Cigarette smoking allowed here → Cigarette smoking is forbidden here. He accepted being a culprit → He denied being a culprit Affixal Negation Negative affixes can be used to negate an English sentence. inimirildisunless- inaudible, inexperienced impossible irrelevant, irregular illegal, illogical disbelieve, disappear unimportant, unacceptable useless, careless Interrogation/Questions Scholars on interrogative syntax have identified some types of interrogatives in English. The broad types identified from the typologies presented by these various scholars are the following: (a) Yes-no Questions, otherwise known as Polar Questions, Closed Questions Or Nexus Questions, Confirmation-denial Questions (b) Wh-Questions, otherwise known as Information-seeking Questions (c) Alternative Questions (d) Tag Questions (e) Rhetorical Questions Yes-no Questions can be described as questions that allow for an affirmative (yes) or negative (no) reply. According to Aremo (1997:342), in a typical Yes-no question, the operator (the only auxiliary or the first of the two or more auxiliaries in a verb phrase) is moved before the subject and is pronounced with a rising intonation. Eggins (1993: 173) puts this in another way – “the structure of the polar question involves the positioning of the finite before the subject”, for example, Are they coming tonight? In 4 above, the operator or the finite verb are, is fronted, while the subject they is placed next to it. The rising intonation is indicated by the question mark. In cases where the related declarative contains a fused finite/predicator (ie, simple past and simple present forms of verb) there is need to introduce a finite element to be placed before the subject. This finite element is typically the “do” auxiliary, eg: Declarative: Tunde copied the work from his book Interrogative: Did Tunde copy the work from his book? The second sentence is a non-basic sentence formed from the first one, a basic sentence by inserting the finite element “do”. In a Yes-no question clear constraints are on the interpretation of the utterance which follows. Hearers therefore will try and interpret whatever follows the question as meaning either “yes” or “no”. According to Stubbs, 1983: 105), this is not to say that only the forms “yes “ and “no” can occur; but that whatever does occur is already pre-classified as meaning either “yes” or “no”. For instance, an answer such as “I don’t think so” can be interpreted as negative. Wh- Ouestions are questions formed with one of the closed class of interrogative pronouns (who, what, where, when, why and how). According to Quirk, et al (1985: 806), wh- questions typically expect a reply from an open range of replies. It may appear that wh- questions are syntactically constrained in the sense that a where- interrogative is normally followed by a place adverbial and a when- interrogative, by a time adverbial, Q: Where is my book? A: On the table. / *At five o’clock. Q: When is daddy coming? A: At five o’clock. / *On the table. It is easy to identify counter examples where there are no such constraints, eg: Q: Where is John? A: He’s not well today. The answer in the question above can still be interpreted as “At home”, but using the latter “might be conversationally inappropriate on its own, since some reasons might be required” (Stubbs, 1983: 108). Alternative Questions are a special kind of Yes-no question in the sense that the structure is like that of a yes-no question (the subject follows the operator or the finite verb). They differ only in the fact that they possess two or more alternative answers. In alternative questions, there is a presupposition of the truth value of only one of the propositions, eg: Will you have tea or coffee? Tag Questions are a type of question in which the interrogative structure is left to the end of the sentence where the operator is “tagged on” to the pronoun subject and the question expects a “yes” or “no” answer. The central purpose of a tag question is to seek confirmation, eg: He came late, didn’t he? Kersti and Burridge (2001) identified other functions of tag questions: (i) Regulating conversational interaction and politeness, for instance, a parent may say to a child who misbehaves in the presence of visitors You don’t do that, do you? (ii) Indicating interest in participation in an ongoing discourse, eg: I guess I can come in now, can’t? (iii) Seeking empathy form listener (s), eg: I am not as bad as he portrayed me, am I? For further discussion on the functions of tag questions, see Kersti and Burridge (2001: 122 ff). Rhetorical Question is common in formal speeches of persuasion made by public speakers, politicians and poets. It resembles questions in structure, but is really used for making emphatic statements. Quirk et al (1985: 1478) assert that “in communicative effect, it [rhetorical question] is similar to tag question since it seeks confirmation of what the speaker has explicitly assumed (by preceding declarative) to be agreed as truth.” In a rhetorical question, the speaker does not expect an answer, for example, Is there anybody here ready to die? Sometimes, rhetorical questions reflect how the speaker thinks, ie, his internal reflection and at the same time, it directs the hearer’s mind to the points being made, eg: How shall I put it now? But, where was I? Some rhetorical questions have the functions of a directive (with abusive component), eg: Why don’t you go and jump in to the lagoon?