* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download s27R
Transformer wikipedia , lookup
Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
Power factor wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Electric power system wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Transmission tower wikipedia , lookup
Overhead power line wikipedia , lookup
Electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Lecture 27 – ECE504PS – Spring 2007 Goals of this lecture are to: 1. increase our familiarity with PSAT, 2. explore the π model of an AC line at different loadings, including SIL and Pmax, 3. look at the relationship between voltage angle and magnitude versus real and reactive power flow, 4. investigate properties of parallel circuits, and 5. introduce TSAT. Further exploration of SIL (Surge Impedance Loading) In Lecture 25 we discussed a five bus-system. Two parallel lines were modeled. One line was modeled using a single section and the other was modeled with two sections. For this lecture, the second line will be divided into 6 sections using five buses. We will compare these two models as we explore surge impedance loading. The data for one line is: Series Impedance: 0.013+j0.1 pu Admittances: 0+j0.2 pu {Is this B or B/w???} Rating 1 of 300 MVA When we divide the line into six sections, the data for each section becomes: Series Impedance: 0.00216666666666667+ 0.0166666666666667 pu Admittances: 0+j 0.0333333333333333 pu {Is this B or B/2???} Rating 1 of 300 MVA 1.0000 0.00 -3.35 0.00 -6.69 -0.0104 1.0014 -0.0166 -0.00 3.35 500.00 0.00 -0.00 6.69 0.00 -10.02 500.00 -20.02 Swing230 -0.00 0.00 1.0022 -0.0187 1.0025 0.00 -0.00 Mid5 -0.00 -3.35 Mid4 3.35 -0.0166 1.0022 0.00 Mid3 -0.00 -6.69 Mid2 Mid1 -0.0104 -10.00 0.00 0.00 -10.02 6.69 Gen230 0.0000 0.00 -0.00 -10.00 1.0014 -20.02 0.00 Unloaded lines -0.0001 1.0000 Eliminate the two 13.8 buses and add a generator to the Gen230 Bus (Remember to change Gen230 from a load bus to a Gen bus –What happens if you leave it as a load bus?) Set Gen230 and Swing230 to control their own voltages to 1.0 pu. Set the MW Output of the generator at Gen230 to zero. Add a 500 MW constant power load to Swing230. Solve the powerflow and you should get something that looks like: Unloaded lines: The two line models yield almost identical results. The voltage rises as we approach the middle of an unloaded line; thus, the segmented line produces slightly more reactive power because it models this rise. Both ends of the lines are producing Page 1 of 8 Lecture 27 – ECE504PS – Spring 2007 10 MVARS (0.1 pu); thus, the entire line is producing 0.2 pu reactive power – This tells us that the susceptance in the model is the total “B” for the line. Note that real power flows from higher angles to lower angles and that Vars flow from higher to lower voltages. -6.47 600.00 1.0000 Heavy loaded lines -287.85 299.51 -3.30 38.37 292.68 -290.74 -50.05 61.67 2.8663 0.9950 5.7599 0.9920 294.63 -292.68 -38.37 50.05 500.00 0.00 290.74 -288.81 -76.66 -61.67 73.19 146.24 Swing230 -294.62 8.6694 0.9910 296.58 -26.64 Mid5 26.64 11.5831 0.9920 -296.58 Mid4 298.53 -14.90 Mid3 14.90 Mid2 -298.53 14.4892 0.9950 73.06 Mid1 Gen230 300.49 -3.17 0.0000 17.3761 1.0000 Next increase the generation at Gen230 up to 600 MW and solve the powerflow to see Heavy loaded lines: Again the two line models yield almost identical results. Both lines consume about 12 MW of real power and 70 MW of reactive power while transferring about 300 MW. The voltage drops as we approach the middle of an unloaded line; thus, the segmented line consumes slightly more reactive power because it models this drop. Note that real power flows from higher angles to lower angles and that Vars flow from higher to lower voltages. 18.28 139.91 -139.48 -18.27 18.25 1.3526 1.0000 2.7095 1.0000 140.34 -139.91 -18.28 18.27 500.00 0.00 139.48 -139.05 -18.25 18.20 222.36 36.39 Swing230 -140.34 4.0705 1.0000 140.77 -18.26 Mid5 18.26 5.4356 1.0000 -140.77 Mid4 141.21 -18.23 Mid3 18.23 Mid2 -141.21 6.8049 18.19 Mid1 Gen230 1.0000 -138.59 141.19 -18.18 141.65 -18.17 0.0000 Lines at SIL 1.0000 -36.35 282.84 8.1783 1.0000 In lecture 26 we noted that SIL occurs when I = √(B/X). In this instance I would equal 1.4142 pu. At 1.0 pu voltage this would correspond to 1.4142 pu power in each line, so the generator will need to produce 282.84 MW, to load the lines to SIL as shown below: Lines at SIL: Again the two line models yield almost identical results. The lines produce no net reactive power (a second verification that the susceptance in the model is the total “B” for the line). The voltage profile of the segmented line is flat. This very slight difference comes from the 2.6 MW of losses in each line due to the line resistance. Note that real power flows from higher angles to lower angles. Page 2 of 8 Lecture 27 – ECE504PS – Spring 2007 500.00 0.00 11.3280 1003.24 -1003.24 1003.24 331.10 -331.10 661.45 -661.46 -1003.24 -1503.24 990.35 1977.10 Swing230 0.8512 26.5574 -1003.24 Mid5 1003.24 -0.00 -0.00 0.7478 44.9175 -1003.24 Mid4 1003.24 -331.10 331.10 0.7099 63.2777 0.7478 -1003.24 Mid3 1003.24 -661.46 661.45 Mid2 -1003.24 78.5071 987.12 Mid1 Gen230 1.0000 -1000.00 1000.00 987.12 1003.24 990.34 0.0000 Pure X lines (R=0) 0.8512 1977.10 2003.24 89.8351 1.0000 Pmax: In earlier lectures we looked at the swing equation. We talked about the maximum power transfer in the swing equation as Pmax = | V1|∙|V2|/X. For our lines Pmax = 10 pu as X = 1 u and V1 = V2 = 1. What will the voltage in the middle of the line become? At Pmax, V1 & V2 are 90º apart. The middle of the line should is a voltage divider, (or average of V1 & V2). The voltage at the middle of the line will approach 1/sqrt(2) or 0.707 pu. {Add figure below:} Further exploration of π model: Consider the pi model of a transmission line with the sending side voltage, V1, and load side voltage, V2. Assume the angle on V2 is zero and the angle for V1 is . That is |V2| = |V2|0º and V1 = |V1|∙cos + j∙|V1|∙sin. Let the current into the sending side be I1 and the current to the load be I2. {Draw figure below:} Page 3 of 8 Lecture 27 – ECE504PS – Spring 2007 The sending side voltage equals the load side voltage plus the current times the series reactance: V1 = V2 + (R+jX)∙I2 Solving for I2 yields: I2 = {V1 - V2}/(R+jX) Multiply top and bottom by R-jX and doing a little algebra yields: I2 = {(R-jX)∙V1 - [R–jX]∙V2}/(R2+X2) Substitute [|V1|∙cos + j∙|V1|∙sin] for V1 and separate real and imaginary terms I2 = {(R-jX)∙ [|V1|∙cos + j∙|V1|∙sin] -[R –jX]∙|V2|}/(R2+X2) {Remember that |V2| = |V2|0º} I2 = {(R∙|V1|∙cos+X∙|V1|∙sin-jX∙|V1|∙cos+jR∙|V1|∙sin] -R∙|V2|+jX∙|V2|}/(R2+X2) Remember that the complex power, S, equals the voltage time the complex conjugate of the current. The complex power to the load is therefore: S2 = V2∙I2* S2 = |V2|∙I2* {Remember that |V2| = |V2|0º} We can substitute the above equation for I2 into our complex power equation: S2 = |V2|∙{R∙|V1|∙cos+X∙|V1|∙sin-jX∙|V1|∙cos+jR∙|V1|∙sin] -R∙|V2|+jX∙|V2|}/(R2+X2)* S2 = |V2|∙{R∙|V1|∙cos+X∙|V1|∙sin+jX∙|V1|∙cos-jR∙|V1|∙sin] -R∙|V2|-jX∙|V2|}/(R2+X2) S2 = {R∙|V1|∙|V2|∙cos+X∙|V1|∙|V2|∙sin+jX∙|V1|∙|V2|∙cos-jR∙|V1|∙|V2|∙sin] -R∙|V2|∙|V2|-jX∙|V2|∙|V2|}/(R2+X2) S2 = {R∙|V1|∙|V2|∙cos+X∙|V1|∙|V2|∙sin-R∙|V2|∙|V2|}/(R2+X2)+ +j{X∙|V1|∙|V2|∙cos-R∙|V1|∙|V2|∙sin-X∙|V2|∙|V2|}/(R2+X2) S2 = {R∙(|V1|∙cos- |V2|)∙|V2|+X∙|V1|∙|V2|∙sin}/(R2+X2)+ +j{X∙(|V1|∙cos-|V2|)∙|V2|-R∙|V1|∙|V2|∙sin}/(R2+X2) The real part of the complex power is: P = R∙(|V1|∙cos-|V2|)∙|V2|+X∙|V1|∙|V2|∙sin}/(R2+X2) Which simplifies to a familiar form when R<<X: P = |V1|∙|V2|∙sin/X Provided X>>R, power flows from higher angles to lower angles as we saw in the earlier examples. The imaginary part of the complex power is: Q = j{X∙(|V1|∙cos-|V2|)∙|V2|-R∙|V1|∙|V2|∙sin}/(R2+X2) When R<<X this simplifies to: Q = j{(|V1|∙cos-|V2|)∙|V2|}/X If is relatively small cos ≈ 1 and the imaginary part becomes: Q = j{(|V1|-|V2|)∙|V2|}/X Provided X>>R and cos ≈ 1, reactive power flows from higher voltages to lower voltages as we saw in the earlier examples. Page 4 of 8 Lecture 27 – ECE504PS – Spring 2007 Let us explore the situations where these are not true: 1. If R is significant the term, R∙(|V1|∙cos-|V2|)∙|V2| becomes significant. In this instance real power tend to flow from higher to lower voltages in addition to from higher to lower angles. 2. If R is significant the term, -R∙|V1|∙|V2|∙sin term becomes significant. In this instance, in addition to flowing from higher to lower voltages, Vars tend to flow from lower to higher angles! -27.89 -136.11 X and R values reversed for this line (Z = 0.1+j0.01) Power flows from higher to lower voltages Vars flow from lower to higher angle 0.0000 1.0500 7.2948 1.0000 To evaluate the above thoughts, imagine that we enter data for two parallel lines with a series impedance of Z = 0.01 + j0.1 pu, but accidentally reverse R and X for the first line: The solved powerflow will look like: 47.19 138.04 -190.40 100.00 100.00 0.00 X and R entered properly for this line (Z = 0.01+J0.01) -125.96 73.60 21.23 211.64 LoadBus Power flows from higher to lower angles Vars flow from higher to lower voltage GenBus 127.89 -54.29 This figure clearly shows that real power can flow from a lower angle to a higher angle in the theoretical case of R>>X. To make clear that the Vars can flow from a lower to a higher voltage, the same case is rerun with the load voltage reduced to 0.95 pu. The results of this powerflow are shown at the top of the next page. Now you can see that the Vars can flow from a lower to a higher voltage in the theoretical case of R>>X. I have observed Vars flow from lower to higher voltages on heavy load 7#8 copper 115 kV transmission lines. To get an idea of how big this conductor is imagine that #8 wires in a house are used for 40 Amp circuits, (#14 for 15 Amp circuits, #12 for 20 Amp circuits … you get the idea). Page 5 of 8 54.43 -35.50 X and R values reversed for this line (Z = 0.1+j0.01) Power flows from higher to lower voltages Vars flow from lower to higher angle 0.0000 0.9500 2.4699 1.0000 Lecture 27 – ECE504PS – Spring 2007 -50.21 35.92 10.83 100.00 100.00 0.00 X and R entered properly for this line (Z = 0.01+J0.01) -45.15 Power flows from higher to lower angles Vars flow from higher to lower voltage -42.10 4.64 -6.18 GenBus LoadBus 45.57 46.33 50.00 103.75 0.0000 "From" and "To" accidentally refersed for tap ratio of 1.05 Wrong ratio causes Vars to flow to increase low side voltage 1.0000 2.8660 1.0500 Another interesting situation occurs when parallel transformers are set at different tap ratios. Imagine that the transmission is set to run at 1.05 and the load buses at 1.0. While entering data for parallel transformers, imagine you reverse the “from” and “to” buses and keep the same tap ratio. See the example below. -50.00 -91.72 1.05000 105.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 50.00 1.25 -50.00 1.25 0.00 -90.47 Highside LoadBus 1.05000 50.00 50.80 0.0000 "From" and "To" accidentally refersed for tap ratio of 1.05 Wrong ratio causes Vars to flow to increase low side voltage 1.0200 2.8922 1.0200 It is likely in such a situation that the high-side voltage is reduced and the low side is increased yielding a situation more like: -50.00 -45.92 1.05000 4.88 100.00 100.00 0.00 Note that VArs are "circulating" 50.00 -45.92 -50.00 50.80 0.01 4.88 Highside LoadBus 1.05000 Page 6 of 8 Lecture 27 – ECE504PS – Spring 2007 When two control areas are parallel to one another, the operators can get in this situation with tap changes transformers if the voltage schedules of the two systems are not coordinated. Housekeeping: Project files have the extension .psp. Single Line Diagram files have the extension .pfd Powerflow data files have the extension .pfb (Powerflow data can be exported to a number of formats including GE, PTI, and BPA) Enough powerflow stuff, on to transient stability TSAT Start TSAT. Click “Help” and select “Online Manual”. A one page .pdf file will open. In the middle of the page will be blue block with two grey buttons in it, “User Manual” and “Model Manual”. Open bookmarks. If you browse through the model manual, you should see some things that are familiar; for example: At the top of page 17 is the quadratic saturation model Many of the parameters in the model DG0S4 on page 24 should look familiar Governor Type 20 on page 171 Tables 2-1 to 2-9 on pages 76-78 are a good place to start looking at the models Now open the user manual. Open bookmarks. We will briefly look at chapters 3, 6, 7, and 8. Look at Figure 1-1 adobe page 10 (manual page 4). We are now at the center of the stability world! The TSAT tool is set up to allow us analyze a system in the following order: 1. Open 2area.tsa 2. Start with a base case and screen the contingencies of possible interest. The intent is to find the most severe contingencies. In TSAT, click “Options” and select “computations” There are five choices a. Transient stability – Estimate rotor angle stability (higher is more likely to be stable; default threshold is a 0%) b. Damping – Estimates the damping of the oscillations (higher index is better; default threshold is 3%) c. Transient Voltage – Look at Figure 3-2 adobe page 18 (manual page 12). This is the voltage dip criterion we looked at in L26. (Anything over zero is bad; default is 0 sec duration below 0.8 pu). Note that the default is to NOT use threshold as a percentage of pre-fault voltage. d. Transient Frequency – Like voltage dip this is the time a frequency dip is below a threshold (higher is less stable; default is 1 second duration below 59 Hz). e. Relay Margin – The relay margin indices measure the distance between the apparent impedance trajectories of a transmission line Page 7 of 8 Lecture 27 – ECE504PS – Spring 2007 and the impedance circles of user-defined distance relay characteristics (higher is better; default thresholds are zero). 3. Run base case analysis by clicking “Run” and selecting “Basecase analysis” a. Look at rotor angles and bus voltages with “spinner” b. Look at Results summary, double one contingency c. View results 4. Run Transaction analysis Page 8 of 8