Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Financialization wikipedia , lookup
History of the Federal Reserve System wikipedia , lookup
Purchasing power parity wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative easing wikipedia , lookup
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Money supply wikipedia , lookup
Inflation targeting wikipedia , lookup
International monetary systems wikipedia , lookup
Slovakia (Prepared by Roland Straub and Klara Simon) 1. Legislation of the National Bank of Slovakia The National Bank of Slovakia (NBS) has been established in January 1993 before the split of the former Czecho-Slovak currency in February 1993. After more than a decade of its existence the NBS performs practically the same basic functions as it did upon its creation. However, several constitutional arrangement changed the legal status of the NBS in the recent years. Until July 2001, the Slovak constitution did not contain any explicit statement on the legal position of the central bank, but only a general note of an issuing bank being established. In July 2001, in the amended Article 56 of the Constitution it was stipulated that the NBS is an independent central bank and that, within the scope of its authority, it may issue generally binding legislation. The authority to issue such legislation is currently documented in the Act on the National Bank of Slovakia, the Foreign Exchange Act, the Banking Act and the Act on Payments. Without this amendment Slovakia would not be able to comply with requirements made by the European Union in respect of the status of national central banks. 2. Brief Overview of Economic Developments from 1993 to 2003 Over the period 1993-2003, macroeconomic development in Slovakia was marked by disproportions in the achievement of macroeconomic objectives. On the one hand, Slovakia reached a relatively high rate of economic growth at a lower rate of inflation in comparison with under transition economies, while on the other hand the external disequilibrium and increased unemployment persisted. Slovakia’s relatively good inflation performance during transition reflected moderate wage pressures, facilitated by high unemployment and tripartite consensus between business, employees and government. Postponement of administered price increases further moderated price pressures. After inflation of 25 percent in 1993 (the first year of independence) on the heels of the introduction of the VAT and a 10 percent devaluation, inflation fell gradually to some 7 percent at end 1995 and remained at about this level until mid 1999, despite considerable turmoil in the foreign exchange market. The absence of structural reforms, economic growth became increasingly unsustainable. Poor governance in the public and private sectors led to rising levels of inefficient investments and macroeconomic balances worsened after 1996. With three years of current account deficits at 10 percent of GDP during 1996-98, partly reflecting a lax fiscal stance, capital flows variability led to a stepwise widening of the fluctuation bands for the peg to DEM/USD basket. Persistent pressures on the foreign exchange market led to the floating of the koruna in 1998, despite very tight monetary stance. The tight monetary policy that can be considered as a response to the loose fiscal stance caused debt servicing problems for the enterprise sector and a deterioration in the loan portfolios of banks. In 1999-2000, administered prices were raised in the context of tightening fiscal stance, temporarily boosting headline inflation, but with the weak domestic economy, core inflation remained subdued at 5-6 percent, subsequently falling below 4 percent in 2001. Current account pressures resurfaced during 2001. In 2002, real GDP grew by 4.4 percent. Core inflation reached a historical minimum of 2 percent . Fiscal and external balances remain high but 1 both are starting to improve as a result of better export performance, as well as the implementation of a fiscal moderation package. Large capital inflows contributed to a significant appreciation of the national currency. There has been a good progress on the structural reorganization in recent years. The main banks and utilities have been privatized, fiscal transparency and control have improved. In 2003, the Slovak government approved an extensive tax reform to be implemented from 2004 to 2006. This contains a uniform corporate, personal and valued added tax rate of 19%. Regarding the tax base, the new law rules out any kind of exemptions, exceptions or special agreements. Growth of 4.2 percent in 2003 was driven by good performance of the export sector, which offset a significant decline in domestic demand. Fiscal tightening (especially indirect tax and administered price increases) and the associated fall in real wages dampened private sector consumption; and fixed investment, which had grown strongly in the past, declined modestly. The outlook remains for strong macroeconomic performance in 2004, with the composition of growth shifting gradually to domestic sources. 3. Monetary Policy of the NBS The main objective of the monetary policy during this period was to maintain the stability of the exchange rate. Exchange rate stability was defined towards a synthetic currency basket that composed 5 currencies (USD, DEM, Austrian Schilling, Swiss Franc and French Franc). The policy was conducted by controlling the growth of the M2 monetary aggregate. In 1993, in the first year of independence of the Slovak Republic, the monetary policy was accompanied by a number of one-o. factors like the breaking up of the federation, the currency split, tax reform, and outflow of foreign exchange reserves triggered by devaluation fears. The monetary policy makers were faced with the task of restoring balance to the foreign exchange economy, eventually achieved by introducing administrative measures as cross-border payments and a 10% devaluation of the Slovak crown in July 1993. Under the improving conditions in 1994 some of the foreign exchange controls have been relaxed and the number of components in the currency basket have been cut from five to two (USD and DEM). Also, a new foreign exchange rate law removed remaining obstacles to current account operations in the balance of payment. In 1996, the NBS focused its monetary policy on creating sterilization opportunities, by encouraging withdrawal excess liquidity from commercial banks through issues of NBS bills. Doubts about the effects of this policy on the lending activities of the commercial banks, caused by soaring imports and high growth rate of the relevant monetary aggregates, induced a change in policy. The NBS decided to lift the ratio of required minimum reserves, to introduce foreign exchange positions that commercial banks were obliged to observe (in order to exert some control over foreign currency loans that banks were selling to residents), to increase the Lombard rate to 15% and to expand the fluctuation spread for the Koruna to ±5%. In 1998, the fluctuation band has been even widened to ±7%. All these measures were designed to rein the excess liquidity and to control the lending activities of the commercial banks. Quantitative control over liquidity in the banking sector helped the NBS to meets its money supply and net domestic assets targets in 1997, in keeping with its main objective the stability of the exchange rate. In 1998, due to the contagion effects of the financial crisis in Russia, there was a pressure on the exchange rate of the Slovak Koruna. The NBS intervene indirectly in favour of the koruna, by setting the exchange rate above the market value. Commercial banks had the opportunity to replenish their foreign exchange rate reserves by purchasing funds fixed at the announced rate, which generated a fall of the NBS foreign exchange rate reserves by almost US$ 1 billion. Finally, the ongoing pressure on the exchange rate and the fall in foreign exchange rate reserves led to a change in the stance of the monetary policy. In October 1998, the NBS decided to let the 2 exchange rate float. The exchange rate depreciated significantly during the year without a negative effect on inflation. In 1999, in connection with the price deregulations conducted, the NBS began to monitor net inflation. The ultimate goal was to stabilise public expectations and to counteract possible second round effect of price liberalizations. Measurements like the previously required foreign exchange position for domestic banks and branches of foreign banks has been abandoned. In the same year, the euro became the reference currency of the koruna. In 1999, despite the fact that the inflation rate remain stable, the exchange rate depreciated steadily. This prompted the central bank to intervene in the foreign exchange rate market. The turnaround came finally after the government adopted an austerity package that improved public finances and curb domestic demand. The favourable trend in economic development in 2000 made possible transition from a quantitative to qualitative monetary control. On 1 February 2000, the NBS commenced setting overnight rates for sterilisation and refinancing purposes, followed by a limit rate for two-week repo tenders in May. The introduction of official NBS rates contributed significantly to the stabilization of the interbank rates. Since 1 January 2000, the NBS has begun to monitor core inflation, in addition to consumer price index. In comparison with net inflation, core inflation includes the effect of food prices, while the direct effects of changes in excise duties, VAT rates and subsidies for consumer prices are fully eliminated from the value of core inflation. As discussed in the last section, in 2001 the legal framework for the implementation of monetary policy has been modified. The NBS became a fully independent central bank and any kind of financing of public debt was prohibited. In November 2002, there was a remarkable pressure for appreciation on the exchange rate, mainly reflected by the improvement of the country’s rating, which was also connected with an inflow of foreign capital. The situation required relatively intensive central bank intervention in the foreign exchange rate market, backed by a 1.5 percentage point cut in the key NBS interest rate. In line with the harmonization of the Bank’s monetary policy instruments with EMU and ECB standards, the ratio of required reserves for commercial banks was reduced from 5 to 4 percent with e.ect from 1 January 2002. At the same time, the Lombard loan, the Lombard rate, and bills of exchange transactions were cancelled. The method of calculating the discount rate was also modified (with effect of 1 January 2002). Its value corresponds to the limit rate for standard twoweek NBS repo tenders. In the course of 2003, the Slovak Koruna on the average nominally appreciated against the EURO by 2.8%, which can be seen in the context of the favourable trade balance development. The Real Effective Exchange Rate) appreciated by 10% on the CPI basis in the course of eleven months of the previous year. On the PPI manufacturing basis, the REER appreciated by 4%, which may be considered as adequate in order to have some pressures in the economy towards restructuring of less effective productions, however without having a negative impact on the competitiveness of other production. As reaction to these developments, the NBS decided to cut interest rates in September (by 0.25%) and December (by 0.25%). Due to the continuing appreciation of the exchange rate of the koruna vis-à-vis the euro, the Bank Board of the NBS decided on lowering further the key interest rates in the period of January-June 2004 (One-day sterilization rate from 4.50% to 3.00%, the one-day refinancing rate from 7.50% to 6.% and the two week reverse REPO rate from 6% to 4.50%). The lowered interest rates should support recovery in domestic demand, which should fuel the economic growth in 2004 along with expected lower contribution of net exports. The Bank Board also stated that the cut in interest rates would further help the NBS in its efforts to ease pressures on the exchange rate appreciation. 3 4. Research Activities of the NBS Demand for research at the NBS arises from the need to highly support policy decision making of the bank board. Topics of research cover several issues, as follows: optimum currency area issues, transition mechanism of the monetary policy, lags and efficiency of monetary policy in small open economies, equilibrium exchange rate estimation, modelling and forecasting of inflation, capital flows and unemployment etc. Research at the NBS is carried out by two independent departments: Monetary Division focuses on more practical issues, regular forecasts, projections and publication of regular reports —performs applied and needs based type of research, which is heavily used in the monetary decision process. The Institute of Monetary and Financial Studies performs rather theoretical and long-term research, currently concentrating on the euro adoption strategies and consequences. The main function of the Institute is to promulgate objective information on economic development both inside of the country and abroad, to establish a theoretical background, and create conditions for the executive bodies of the NBS to make objective decisions. The Institute is to be engaged predominantly in the area of monetary and fiscal policy to stabilize the development of the economy and currency stability. Sources of research at the NBS are fairly limited in both quantity and quality; therefore the bank relies on international and domestic organisation’s ideas and methods as well. Mostly used sources are working papers, reports and official publications coming from the ECB, IMF, EC, CEPR, WB, OECD, Academy of Science, several commercial banks and partner central banks. However the Bank most often relies on its own research. Regular publications are available for the public, both in Slovak and English, and downloadable from the bank’s website, these are: Monetary survey, Monetary Programme of the NBS, BIATEC — monthly banking journal, Annual reports, Some information brochures and legislation documents. The Institute of Monetary and Financial Studies publish occasional research publications. However, most of the research that supports policy decisions stays within the bank and is not published. 4