Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Muted group theory wikipedia , lookup
Second-wave feminism wikipedia , lookup
First-wave feminism wikipedia , lookup
Exploitation of women in mass media wikipedia , lookup
Women in ancient Egypt wikipedia , lookup
Feminist movement wikipedia , lookup
Raunch aesthetics wikipedia , lookup
New feminism wikipedia , lookup
Feminism in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Anarcha-feminism wikipedia , lookup
When Gossips Meet: Women, Family and Neighbourhood in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Bernard Capp. Press, 2003. vi + 398pp. ISBN 0199255989 In this lively and meticulously researched monograph, Bernard Capp explores how, and with what success, women negotiated the patriarchal restrictions of early modern England. His conclusion is an optimistic one: despite social, cultural, and material constraints, the realities of many women’s lives failed in numerous ways to conform to dominant patriarchal codes. The eponymous meetings of gossips refers to the female networks from which so many women drew support in a range of contexts. But while the book’s title foregrounds the meeting of ‘gossips’ or female friends, Capp offers us far more: he explores manifold aspects of women’s lives and relationships, including, but not exclusively, those between women. While women’s speech was a matter for ridicule and anxiety on the part of many male commentators, in practice the social order itself depended on women’s networking and friendships. Households headed by women – not only widows and spinsters but also married women whose husbands were absent – necessarily found themselves participating in a predominantly female ‘economy of mutual favours’. But such networks extended support to women trapped in unhappy or violent marriages, too. Such women, having failed to resolve marital problems privately, frequently turned to other women for assistance. Female friendships also helped maidservants to bear with lives of drudgery and dependence, and, if they were unlucky, the cruelty of their master or mistress. Of course, women’s experiences with other women were not always positive, but even this could take the form of a resource. Verbal insults, uttered publicly, and even physical assaults, which Capp argues convincingly were minor rather than rare, were used to undermine or confer credit on the parties involved. Matters were somewhat different when women quarrelled with men. Although the issues were similar to those of all-female altercations, the patriarchal capital accorded to men placed female adversaries at a serious disadvantage. Women tried to counter this in various ways. For instance, the insults that women flung at men, such as ‘rogue’, ‘knave’, and ‘jack’, were not actionable in the ecclesiastical courts and were discouraged in the civil courts. Women therefore used such insults against male opponents with impunity, but if a man responded with an equivalent insult, especially the typical retort ‘whore’, his adversary might sue him for defamation. Women were theoretically excluded from most aspects of public life. Capp demonstrates, however, that many women played a larger role than many historians have acknowledged. This was not confined to acting as juries of matrons or medical experts as midwives in legal cases such as rape, infanticide, and fornication, where evidence was imprinted on the female body. They also exerted collective pressure on parish officers through informal networks and gossip. Moreover, women collectively petitioned the authorities with demands about a number of issues, not only during the civil wars but both before and after, and rioted together in protest over a number of issues that affected their lives. Women’s traditional concern for the welfare of their families led many to act overtly to protect collectively the social and material interests of their households and neighbourhoods. The very concerns that patriarchal ideology dictated were connected to women’s household duties were thus the very same that provoked women to become involved in politicised actions. Capp does not stop there with women’s activities outside the home: he discusses women’s recreational activities, too, in the context of both religion and secular female culture. While some female recreational activities took place in the context of marital, household, and neighbourhood alliances in which women and men participated together, Capp shows that women did enjoy a great deal of same-sex company. Importantly, he warns against sentimentalising or idealising a female ‘sub-culture’; we must acknowledge that women’s relationships could be characterised by competition and conflict as well as by cooperation and support. Capp has mined primary manuscript and printed sources to produce a book packed to the brim with rich detail. He expertly reads his numerous sources ‘against the grain’ to discover the diversity of female experience. The overall impression one gains is that for every passive and docile woman, many more were feisty and assertive, usually within the boundaries set by dominant gender codes but sometimes transgressing them. This is both the book’s strength and its weakness. For such emphasis on female agency allows the reader to celebrate early modern women and perhaps forget the extent to which they were undoubtedly oppressed by patriarchal structures. That quibble notwithstanding, Bernard Capp’s When Gossips Meet is essential reading for all students and scholars of early modern women. Dr Garthine Walker, Cardiff University