• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
CouvertureIthaque - Armstrong
CouvertureIthaque - Armstrong

... The thesis I defend in this paper is that one should not (or at least one does not have to) concentrate on either of the minimalist accounts of HRs presented here. Moreover, I shall argue for a more expansive account of HRs defending a more critical and political use of the concept. I should also no ...
Consent, Risk and Modern Warfare - the Arthur D. Simons Center for
Consent, Risk and Modern Warfare - the Arthur D. Simons Center for

... double effect from which we draw the concept of “acceptable collateral damage.” The doctrine of double effect comes from a “principle of moral Once war begins, those responsible for conducting the war must seek moral justification...It is their job to achieve military objectives, and in doing so, th ...
Dewey`s Aesthetics and Today`s Moral Education - Purdue e-Pubs
Dewey`s Aesthetics and Today`s Moral Education - Purdue e-Pubs

... century, we need to rethink the fundamental meaning of morality and moral education. As a few recent researchers claim,1 obeying a society’s rules, laws, and regulations or possessing certain virtues such as knowledge does not necessarily make us moral; it may just rather cause us to benumb the virt ...
Journal Article Critique Example
Journal Article Critique Example

... This  is  good  concept  for  how  the  problem  of  multiple  value  systems  and  accountability   should  be  handled.  However,  there  doesn’t  appear  to  be  any  concrete  guidelines  for  carrying   this  out.  In  other  words ...
As a Matter of Fact: Empirical Perspectives on Ethics
As a Matter of Fact: Empirical Perspectives on Ethics

... spirit, ‘surrender of the ethical burden to psychology’. And so far as we know, neither is anyone else. Ethics must not—indeed cannot—be psychology, but it does not follow that ethics should ignore psychology. The most obvious, and most compelling, motivation for our perspective is simply this: It i ...
CSCI102 - University of Wollongong
CSCI102 - University of Wollongong

... Arguments are used to justify things, to convince people of things etc. ...
8.1 What are ethics
8.1 What are ethics

... use unethical tactics? How can negotiators deal with the other party’s use of deception? ...
Is Immoralism Coherent
Is Immoralism Coherent

... The British Journal of Aesthetics 48.1 (January 2008): 45-64 What do we mean by a perspective in this context? Jacobson and Kieran use the term ‘perspective’ to emphasize the distinction between propositional knowledge and ‘knowing what it is like’. Narrative artworks excel at providing the latter, ...
Thesis edit2 - University of Tilburg
Thesis edit2 - University of Tilburg

... generally, nor be independent of authority, but do appeal to morality (Haidt & Joseph, 2004). Moreover, Japanese morality may be (and is) very different from American morality. Because the moral frameworks are different, some situations can occur morally distressing according to one party while rend ...
Exodos (or Epilogue and Exodus)
Exodos (or Epilogue and Exodus)

... Is Creon a tragic figure? Do you feel sympathy for him at the end as someone who initially tried to do good yet was overwhelmed by circumstance, or do you believe that he is a bullying, misogynistic control-freak who gets what he deserves? Why does Antigone commit suicide? The German philosopher Heg ...
Virtue Ethics - Religious Studies
Virtue Ethics - Religious Studies

... system which can work in the modern age. MacIntyre observes that ancient societies developed a series of virtues agreed by their inhabitants. The high point of this, claims MacIntyre, was the Athenian Virtues of Aristotle. However, since the Enlightenment, rational philosophers have sought to give a ...
Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics

... system which can work in the modern age. MacIntyre observes that ancient societies developed a series of virtues agreed by their inhabitants. The high point of this, claims MacIntyre, was the Athenian Virtues of Aristotle. However, since the Enlightenment, rational philosophers have sought to give a ...
Reasons, rational requirements, and the putative pseudo
Reasons, rational requirements, and the putative pseudo

... (2) remain in conflict, (5) does not imply or suggest that nonmoral reasons are suitable for answering “Why be moral?” Second, and more important, it is a mistake to think that “Why be moral?” seriously arises for a person only when, for her, the weight of nonmoral reasons tilts against being moral— ...
Slide 1 - Faculty Personal Homepage
Slide 1 - Faculty Personal Homepage

... that ethical beliefs and standards are merely a matter of subjective personnel opinion or biased feelings, so that there really are not any justifiable, reliable ethical standards. ...
Ethical Fading - Ethics Unwrapped
Ethical Fading - Ethics Unwrapped

... Part  of  the  explanation  is  what  professors  Ann  Tenbrunsel  and  David  Messick   call  ethical  fading.    Imagine  that  you  work  for  a  company  in  internal  audit  and  your  boss   asks  you  to  inappropriately  massa ...
Good Will, Duty, and the Categorical Imperative
Good Will, Duty, and the Categorical Imperative

... • Human beings are also free agents, that is, we have free will, or can freely choose between options, including moral options. That is, we can freely choose to do right or wrong. • Because of our rationality, we can understand the difference between right and wrong. And, because of our rationality, ...
DEFINING PLURALISM - Second Baptist Church
DEFINING PLURALISM - Second Baptist Church

... process, one must identify the source or basis of authority in asserting propositional claims regarding the pluralistic view. What this brief exercise will seek to demonstrate is that unless one presupposes a Christian theistic worldview as the starting point for defending ethical notions, which plu ...
Intuitive Methods of Moral Decision Making, A
Intuitive Methods of Moral Decision Making, A

... source of moral objectivity and reasons for what we ought to do. I will address this concern later in the paper. The error with the first point is the confusion between a pedagogical approach to applied ethics and actual moral decision making.13 In order to be applied, general moral principles need ...
Ethics and Business
Ethics and Business

... • Although Kant showed that some rules would become inconsistent when universalized, this does not tell us which rules are morally valid • Kant never showed us how to resolve conflicts between equally absolute rules • Kant did not distinguish between making an exception to a rule and qualifying a ru ...
Click to edit Master title style
Click to edit Master title style

... Officials in International Business Transactions adopted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), obliges member states to make the bribery of foreign public officials a criminal offense ...
Ethical Theory - Watford Grammar School For Boys
Ethical Theory - Watford Grammar School For Boys

... about something being good, bad, right or wrong can be based on the extent to which, in any given situation, agape is best served whether Fletcher’s understanding of agape is really religious or whether it means nothing more than wanting the best for the person involved in a given situation ...
Center for ETHICS - University of Idaho
Center for ETHICS - University of Idaho

...  A Moral and Nonmoral Value is involved.  The Agent MUST have a CHOICE, without coercion.  A Moral Principle is in conflict.  The Agent is faced with Moral Obligation. ...
Ethics and Accountability
Ethics and Accountability

...  Ethics is concerned about WHAT IS RIGHT, just, fair, or good, about what we ought to do  Ethics is the DISCOVERY AND APPLICATION OF MORAL STANDARDS to the conduct of officials  The normative standards of conduct derived from the PHILOSOPHICAL AND RELIGIOUS TRADITIONS of society ...
Mgmt 308 Chap007 - Cal State LA
Mgmt 308 Chap007 - Cal State LA

... honesty, protection of life, respect for rights, fairness, and obedience to law.  Eliminating unethical behavior may be difficult, but knowing the rightness or wrongness of actions is usually easy.  Some ethical decisions are troublesome because although basic ethical standards apply, conflicts be ...
Reasons, Rational Requirements, and the Putative Pseudo
Reasons, Rational Requirements, and the Putative Pseudo

... just any sort of reasons to be moral we could meet her demand with nonmoral reasons of that kind. But we cannot do that. In the first place, “Why be moral?” seriously arises for a person only when, nonmorally speaking, she should not be moral—or more precisely, should not do what she takes “being mo ...
< 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 55 >

Moral relativism

Moral relativism may be any of several philosophical positions concerned with the differences in moral judgments across different people and cultures. Descriptive moral relativism holds only that some people do in fact disagree about what is moral; meta-ethical moral relativism holds that in such disagreements, nobody is objectively right or wrong; and normative moral relativism holds that because nobody is right or wrong, we ought to tolerate the behavior of others even when we disagree about the morality of it. Not all descriptive relativists adopt meta-ethical relativism, and moreover, not all meta-ethical relativists adopt normative relativism. Richard Rorty, for example, argued that relativist philosophers believe ""that the grounds for choosing between such opinions is less algorithmic than had been thought"", but not that any belief is equally as valid as any other.Moral relativism has been espoused, criticized, and debated for thousands of years, from ancient Greece and India to the present day, in diverse fields including philosophy, science, and religion.
  • studyres.com © 2026
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report