
Writing Tips
... • A corollary is a result that follows from a theorem. It could be a special case of the theorem or a particularly important consequence of it. So theorems stand on their own, a lemma always comes before a theorem, and corollaries always come after a theorem. The order in which these appear, then, i ...
... • A corollary is a result that follows from a theorem. It could be a special case of the theorem or a particularly important consequence of it. So theorems stand on their own, a lemma always comes before a theorem, and corollaries always come after a theorem. The order in which these appear, then, i ...
Geometry Lesson 31
... A flowchart proof should be read from left to right or from top to bottom. Each part of the proof appears in a _____, while the justification for each step is written __________ the box. The arrows show the progression of the proof’s steps. Example 1 Interpreting a Flowchart Proof Use the given flow ...
... A flowchart proof should be read from left to right or from top to bottom. Each part of the proof appears in a _____, while the justification for each step is written __________ the box. The arrows show the progression of the proof’s steps. Example 1 Interpreting a Flowchart Proof Use the given flow ...
Fiedler`s Theorems on Nodal Domains 7.1 About these notes 7.2
... In Lecture 3, we proved the Perron-Frobenius Theorem for non-negative matrices. I wish to quickly observe that this theory may also be applied to Laplacian matrices, to principal sub-matrices of Laplacian matrices, and to any matrix with non-positive off-diagonal entries. The difference is that it t ...
... In Lecture 3, we proved the Perron-Frobenius Theorem for non-negative matrices. I wish to quickly observe that this theory may also be applied to Laplacian matrices, to principal sub-matrices of Laplacian matrices, and to any matrix with non-positive off-diagonal entries. The difference is that it t ...
Solution for Fermat`s Last Theorem
... Fermat in 1667, proved the case n = 4, using the method of infinite descent; it is likely that him had deceived to believe that he had a proof for the general case. It can be even that will have noticed his error further: their marginal notes were for personal use, and therefore Fermat would have no ...
... Fermat in 1667, proved the case n = 4, using the method of infinite descent; it is likely that him had deceived to believe that he had a proof for the general case. It can be even that will have noticed his error further: their marginal notes were for personal use, and therefore Fermat would have no ...
Brouwer fixed-point theorem

Brouwer's fixed-point theorem is a fixed-point theorem in topology, named after Luitzen Brouwer. It states that for any continuous function f mapping a compact convex set into itself there is a point x0 such that f(x0) = x0. The simplest forms of Brouwer's theorem are for continuous functions f from a closed interval I in the real numbers to itself or from a closed disk D to itself. A more general form than the latter is for continuous functions from a convex compact subset K of Euclidean space to itself.Among hundreds of fixed-point theorems, Brouwer's is particularly well known, due in part to its use across numerous fields of mathematics.In its original field, this result is one of the key theorems characterizing the topology of Euclidean spaces, along with the Jordan curve theorem, the hairy ball theorem and the Borsuk–Ulam theorem.This gives it a place among the fundamental theorems of topology. The theorem is also used for proving deep results about differential equations and is covered in most introductory courses on differential geometry.It appears in unlikely fields such as game theory. In economics, Brouwer's fixed-point theorem and its extension, the Kakutani fixed-point theorem, play a central role in the proof of existence of general equilibrium in market economies as developed in the 1950s by economics Nobel prize winners Kenneth Arrow and Gérard Debreu.The theorem was first studied in view of work on differential equations by the French mathematicians around Poincaré and Picard.Proving results such as the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem requires the use of topological methods.This work at the end of the 19th century opened into several successive versions of the theorem. The general case was first proved in 1910 by Jacques Hadamard and by Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer.