
1+1 + ll + fl.lfcl + M
... resulting set through an angle of arg a. By the notation J D [ # 5 ] is meant the point set intersection of all sets aS as a assumes all values in a given set A. The following lemma is an extension of a result due to Scott and Wall [4]. LEMMA 2.1. Let Dh D^, Vi, Vi be any jour sets of points in the ...
... resulting set through an angle of arg a. By the notation J D [ # 5 ] is meant the point set intersection of all sets aS as a assumes all values in a given set A. The following lemma is an extension of a result due to Scott and Wall [4]. LEMMA 2.1. Let Dh D^, Vi, Vi be any jour sets of points in the ...
Midterm 2 Review Answers
... should be grouped together by yet another pair of parentheses due to the ∩ between them. This ∩ operation separates these two sets from the adjacent set C C , around which an improper use of ∪ associativity occurs in line 3. The error in line 3 is a direct result of the laziness with the parentheses ...
... should be grouped together by yet another pair of parentheses due to the ∩ between them. This ∩ operation separates these two sets from the adjacent set C C , around which an improper use of ∪ associativity occurs in line 3. The error in line 3 is a direct result of the laziness with the parentheses ...
The Number of t-Cores of Size n
... where p(n) is the partition function, and cn (n) = p(n) − n. However, one can restrict the range of t to get the following conjecture. Conjecture 1.1 (Monotonicity Conjecture) Suppose that n and t are natural numbers, and that 4 6 t < n − 1. Then ct+1 (n) > ct (n). One of the results in this article ...
... where p(n) is the partition function, and cn (n) = p(n) − n. However, one can restrict the range of t to get the following conjecture. Conjecture 1.1 (Monotonicity Conjecture) Suppose that n and t are natural numbers, and that 4 6 t < n − 1. Then ct+1 (n) > ct (n). One of the results in this article ...
arXiv:1510.00735v3 [math.NT] 14 Oct 2015
... Abstract. We revisit the mathematics that Ramanujan developed in connection with the famous “taxi-cab” number 1729. A study of his writings reveals that he had been studying Euler’s diophantine equation a3 + b3 = c3 + d3 . It turns out that Ramanujan’s work anticipated deep structures and phenomena ...
... Abstract. We revisit the mathematics that Ramanujan developed in connection with the famous “taxi-cab” number 1729. A study of his writings reveals that he had been studying Euler’s diophantine equation a3 + b3 = c3 + d3 . It turns out that Ramanujan’s work anticipated deep structures and phenomena ...
Brouwer fixed-point theorem

Brouwer's fixed-point theorem is a fixed-point theorem in topology, named after Luitzen Brouwer. It states that for any continuous function f mapping a compact convex set into itself there is a point x0 such that f(x0) = x0. The simplest forms of Brouwer's theorem are for continuous functions f from a closed interval I in the real numbers to itself or from a closed disk D to itself. A more general form than the latter is for continuous functions from a convex compact subset K of Euclidean space to itself.Among hundreds of fixed-point theorems, Brouwer's is particularly well known, due in part to its use across numerous fields of mathematics.In its original field, this result is one of the key theorems characterizing the topology of Euclidean spaces, along with the Jordan curve theorem, the hairy ball theorem and the Borsuk–Ulam theorem.This gives it a place among the fundamental theorems of topology. The theorem is also used for proving deep results about differential equations and is covered in most introductory courses on differential geometry.It appears in unlikely fields such as game theory. In economics, Brouwer's fixed-point theorem and its extension, the Kakutani fixed-point theorem, play a central role in the proof of existence of general equilibrium in market economies as developed in the 1950s by economics Nobel prize winners Kenneth Arrow and Gérard Debreu.The theorem was first studied in view of work on differential equations by the French mathematicians around Poincaré and Picard.Proving results such as the Poincaré–Bendixson theorem requires the use of topological methods.This work at the end of the 19th century opened into several successive versions of the theorem. The general case was first proved in 1910 by Jacques Hadamard and by Luitzen Egbertus Jan Brouwer.