• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
CLASSICAL FOUNDATIONALISM
CLASSICAL FOUNDATIONALISM

... there is not one but an infinite number of infinite regresses that seem to threaten our ability to justifiably believe anything, on the supposition that all justification is inferential. Peter Klein has recently argued in an unpublished paper for a view he calls infinitism. He accepts the first clau ...
Study Guide: René Descartes
Study Guide: René Descartes

...  Deduction: Beginning only with facts one knows with complete certainty, reasoning to reach further facts that are known with certainty. o Any belief of which one is not completely certain cannot qualify as knowledge. Descartes’s Meditations on First Philosophy are intended to show that we can be a ...
The Essentials of Pragmatism
The Essentials of Pragmatism

... capable of determinate scientific investigation; 2) it conforms to our common sense understanding of things; 3) it offers an alternative to traditional metaphysics, extracting whatever was worthwhile in the old doctrines. -through an imaginary dialogue, P further elaborates this doctrine... ...
Peirce What Pragmatism Is [DOC]
Peirce What Pragmatism Is [DOC]

... 10. The reader does not doubt that he can exert self-control over his future actions, that selfpreparation will impart to action one character i.e. absence of self-reproach. a. As action is repeated it tends toward the perfection of that fixed character. b. Where no self-control is possible there wi ...
Why Should We Believe Moral Claims?
Why Should We Believe Moral Claims?

... the idea that we can start from certain moral principles, without having to justify them by argument, implies that those moral principles must be infallible, incorrigible, etc. But I have never been able to get anyone to tell me why this would be so.12 Why may we not hold our starting points open to ...
1 Empiricism, Rationalism, and Plato`s Innatism Intro to Philosophy
1 Empiricism, Rationalism, and Plato`s Innatism Intro to Philosophy

... be known a posteriori as well—as when a young child learns by counting that two apples bunched together with two other apples equals four apples—and how this affects the status of one’s apparent knowledge of such truths. For rationalists, statements which can be known both a posteriori and a priori ...
1 “A Counter-Example to Contextualism about Justificatory
1 “A Counter-Example to Contextualism about Justificatory

... evidence at t1, they would know that p, the plane will stop in Chicago, based on his evidence? Clearly, since he knows in this reversed scenario about Mary and John’s skeptical doubts, and not having gotten the calls from his airline and travel agents yet at this point, he wouldn’t. What about at t2 ...
Knowledge
Knowledge

... Questioning Is it possible that we have any knowledge at the level of certitude? one of the most difficult subject in epistemology ...
Plato, knowledge and virtue
Plato, knowledge and virtue

... both beautiful and not beautiful. • Therefore, we can have knowledge of the Forms, though not through our senses. • The highest knowledge is knowledge of the Form of the Good: it is from the good that ‘things that are just and so on derive their usefulness and value… Is there any point in having the ...
Philosophy 165: Epistemology
Philosophy 165: Epistemology

... because you saw them get married. But unknown to you, they actually got married before the stage wedding and therefore you have a false belief that they were married in front of you when they were not. So you still know that they are married but it is based on a false believe. And it proved to be to ...
Some basic terminology
Some basic terminology

... some point, we may want to gives reasons, justifications, for these beliefs. Empiricists say that justification of a belief must always end in some kind of appeal to sense experience. (For example, “I know that P is true because I saw Q.”) Rationalists deny this, and say that, at least sometimes (ma ...
1 “Our cabaret is a gesture. Every word that is spoken and sung here
1 “Our cabaret is a gesture. Every word that is spoken and sung here

... the anthropologist’s macrocosm is this: co-presence. At least the presence of persons is not, thankfully, reducible to the anthropologist’s relationships with them. In this realization, anthropology might find a purpose for the displacement of knowledge.” And: “I like to think that anthropologists c ...
THE PROBLEM OF KNOWLEDGE
THE PROBLEM OF KNOWLEDGE

... laws. But such backing is not always strong enough for knowledge. Whether it is so or not depends upon the circumstances of the particular case. If I were asked how I knew that a physical object of a certain sort was in such and such a place, it would, in general, be a sufficient answer for me to sa ...
Can We Believe Without Sufficient Evidence? The James/Clifford
Can We Believe Without Sufficient Evidence? The James/Clifford

... belief is properly basic? Plantinga alleges that the condition of foundationalism for a properly basic belief is the following: (F) A proposition p is properly basic for a person S if and only if p is selfevident, incorrigible, or ‘evident to the senses’ for S. This is classical foundationalism, bas ...
Rationalism
Rationalism

... experienced “disillusionment” because of the turbulent times in which he lived (Protestant Revolution, Church beliefs cast into doubt, Copernicus & Galileo challenged religious/scientific truths ...
here - News @ Wesleyan
here - News @ Wesleyan

... find this reasoning to be fully convincing on its own terms, yet I have also come to realize that “belief ” is not a central analytic category to the philosophical and theological texts with which I tend to work. In fact, many of these texts explicitly reject belief as inimical to thinking itself. So ...
Document
Document

... Figure of common argument on these 3 ...
Correspondence, Coherence, and Pragmatic Theories of Truth
Correspondence, Coherence, and Pragmatic Theories of Truth

... theory of truth. That theory holds that judgements we make about the world are true or false depending on whether they correspond to facts. ANY theory of truth must satisfy three requisites by displying the following features: Features of the Theory: Theory of truth must contain an account of fal ...
Notes to Introduce Epistemology
Notes to Introduce Epistemology

...  He would build his knowledge upon this one undoubtable thing.  The one undoubtable thing: He was a thinking substance.  “I doubt; therefore I think.”  “I think; therefore I am.” ...
Plato
Plato

... There is also intelligent ignorance, as when someone does not know X and acknowledges forthrightly that he does not know it, etc. More thought is needed on this matter….  However, Plato’s view of ignorance as having non-being (nothingness) as its object does not seem correct (or at least not ...
Plato
Plato

... There is also intelligent ignorance, as when someone does not know X and acknowledges forthrightly that he does not know it, etc. More thought is needed on this matter…. However, Plato's view of ignorance as having non-being (nothingness) as its object does not seem correct (or at least not ...
Rationalism - George Belic Philosophy
Rationalism - George Belic Philosophy

... had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true, and that consequently what I afterward based on such principles was highly doubtful; and from that time I was convinced of the necessity of undertaking once in my life to rid myself of all the opinions I had adopted, and of commencing a ...
Philosophy Years 5 - The da Vinci Decathlon
Philosophy Years 5 - The da Vinci Decathlon

... Strawman – Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack Middle ground - Claiming that a compromise or middle point between two arguments is the truth False Cause -Presuming that a real or perceived relationship between things means that one is the cause of the other. Appeal to natu ...
This dissertation is a critique of three strands of recent
This dissertation is a critique of three strands of recent

... problem is with the naturalists’ use of the concept of “belief.” I argue that naturalistic philosophy of mind, while perhaps acceptable for other purposes, does not deliver a concept of “belief” consistent with the constraints and needs of naturalized epistemology. I achieve this by offering a taxon ...
HERE - A Universal Basic Income
HERE - A Universal Basic Income

... whether deductive or inductive, are usually less obvious than many of their instances. Towards the end of our inquiry I shall return to the definition of “knowledge,” and shall then attempt to give more precision and articulation to the above suggestions. Meanwhile let us remember that the question ...
< 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 >

Gettier problem

The Gettier problem is a philosophical question about whether a piece of information that happens to be true but that someone believes for invalid reasons, such as a faulty premise, counts as knowledge. It is named after American philosopher Edmund Gettier, who wrote about the problem in a three-page paper published in 1963, called ""Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?"". The paper refers to the concept of knowledge as justified true belief (JTB), credited to Plato, though Plato argued against this very account of knowledge in the Theaetetus (210a). In the paper, Gettier proposed two scenarios where the three criteria (justification, truth, and belief) seemed to be met, but where the majority of readers would not have felt that the result was knowledge due to the element of luck involved.The term is sometimes used to cover any one of a category of thought experiments in contemporary epistemology that seem to repudiate a definition of knowledge as justified true belief.The responses to Gettier's paper have been numerous. While some rejected Gettier's examples, many sought to adjust the JTB account of knowledge to lessen the impact of both Gettier's own problems and other problems (collectively titled ""Gettier problems"") created in their mould. Since 1963, experiments have also been conducted to determine whether the instinctive reactions of those presented with a Gettier problem are uniform or display language or genetic biases.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report