Download Objectives – Translation Part I

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Ancestral sequence reconstruction wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Ligand binding assay wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

Clinical neurochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression wikipedia , lookup

EXPOSE wikipedia , lookup

Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup

Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup

Epitranscriptome wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup

Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup

Genetic code wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Objectives – Translation Part II
1. Describe the entire process of translation in prokaryotes. Be sure to include all
necessary components, including the specific roles of IF’s, EF’s and RF’s.
2. How does the initiator tRNA differ from all other tRNA’s in translation?
3. What is the total energy expenditure required to make a given protein (lets say the
protein is 100 amino acids in length)?
4. How does translation differ between prokaryotes and eukaryotes?
5. Where is the enzyme peptidyl transferase located?
6. Describe the “fragment assay” of Monro et al. What were the conclusions of these
experiments? Understand this assay and be able to interpret alternative results.
7. How did the “reconstitution” studies of the early 1980’s differ from Monro’s fragment
assay? What were the results of these experiments?
8. Describe the “deprotienation” experiments of Noller et al. What were the results of this
line of experiments? Understand this assay and be able to interpret alternative results.
9. Define codon.
10. What is the meaning of a degenerate code?
11. Why is the code considered nearly universal?
12. Why is the code considered non-overlapping?
13. Describe the cell free protein synthesis reaction.
14. How did Nirenberg and Matthaei utilize this assay in determining what certain codons
coded for?
15. Explain the work of Lengyel and Speyer (random co-polymers in a cell free protein
synthesis reaction). How did their work help in determining the genetic code? Be sure
you understand and are able to interpret the results of this type of experiment.
16. In the early 1960’s Khorana was able to improve RNA synthesis. Describe his
experiments and how they contributed to cracking the genetic code.
17. Describe the triplet binding assay of Nirenberg and Leder. Understand these
experiments and be able to interpret results.