* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Islamic Conquests
Islamofascism wikipedia , lookup
Islam and Sikhism wikipedia , lookup
Islam and violence wikipedia , lookup
Succession to Muhammad wikipedia , lookup
Islamic socialism wikipedia , lookup
Islam and secularism wikipedia , lookup
Islam and modernity wikipedia , lookup
Islam in Somalia wikipedia , lookup
Islam in Indonesia wikipedia , lookup
Islamic democracy wikipedia , lookup
Medieval Muslim Algeria wikipedia , lookup
Islam in Afghanistan wikipedia , lookup
Islam in Iran wikipedia , lookup
Islamic culture wikipedia , lookup
Usul Fiqh in Ja'fari school wikipedia , lookup
Islam in Bangladesh wikipedia , lookup
History of Islam wikipedia , lookup
Imamah (Shia) wikipedia , lookup
Islam and other religions wikipedia , lookup
Political aspects of Islam wikipedia , lookup
Islamic schools and branches wikipedia , lookup
Criticism of Twelver Shia Islam wikipedia , lookup
Islamic Conquests And civil war: the Sunni/Shiite division Conquest paradox "Early Islamic conquests were not accompanied by some fanatical desire to convert the world. The Muslim conquests have to be understood in terms of religious motivation but not in terms of a determination to wipe out Judaism and Christianity." – Paul Freedman Rapid Islamic expansion not accompanied by mandatory conversions. Motivation to conquer not equitable to desire to spread religion. 650-750, more on the paradox Internal division manifest Nature of religion not decided Conquest not equal to conversion Successor to Mohammed? Seal of the prophets Military, religious, civil Abu Bakr elected Caliph Ali, husband of Fatima, disputes Ridea/apostasy – rejection of Abu Bakr ◦ Will become Shiite Systematic conquest of apostasy turns to conquest of outsiders Military energy turns from internal to external Factors for quick conquest Romans and Persians worn out Razzi turn into territorial gains Vikings of the desert? Minority religions: Monophysites and Zoroastrians Jihad, struggle, against other religions or internecine. Religious motivation but not justification. Conquests Conquest of Persia, Syria, Palestine, Egypt under Omar Fall of Damascus, 634 Invasion of Spain, 711 Administration of Arab Conquests No rule on how this works ◦ Alexandria surrenders, people allowed to keep things as they were ◦ Plunder readily available from the state and church, so populations left alone ◦ Taxes assessed double to non-Muslims ◦ Land tax ◦ Imperial bureaucracies maintained, official languages ◦ Daily life maintains basically the same Tolerance No interest in conversion to Islam, keep higher tax bracket Respect for people of the book Confidence in Islam itself Until 750, no mass conversions to Islam in conquered territories Umayyad Dynasty, Shiite Division 644, Murder of Omar Ali defeated again in election, by Uthman Meccan establishment returns to power to the great chagrin of Ali Uthman continues conquests Battle of the Masts, islands fall Armenia Dislike for Uthman, monarch rather than caliph Murder of Uthman, 656 Ali proclaimed Caliph By the assassins of Uthman Umayyads oppose Ali First civil war started by the Umayyad Mu'awiya the governor of Damascus Gives rise to third party against both groups. Messy civil war Capital from Medina to Damascus Mu'awiya Moves capital to Damascus Cosmopolitan move away from Arabia Transforms caliphate into monarchy Ummayad Shiites emerge Minority emerge against Sunni and Umayyads Permanent dissidents ◦ Reject caliph, because of dynastic question also because he is monarchical, shiites call it tyranny ◦ Egalitarian yet violent opposition emerges ◦ Shiites call for imam, a spiritual savior who is inspired. ◦ 11 imams are all there 12th imam Period of occultation Idea he will come and set things right Shia tends towards Arabian values, purity, apocalypse, etc discontents Sunnis towards established authority, more cosmopolitian Mawali (mawal singular) are non-Arab Muslims and not the Shia preference