* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Role of Histamine H1 , H2 and H3 Receptors on Enteric
Neural engineering wikipedia , lookup
Long-term depression wikipedia , lookup
Nervous system network models wikipedia , lookup
Development of the nervous system wikipedia , lookup
Caridoid escape reaction wikipedia , lookup
Premovement neuronal activity wikipedia , lookup
Feature detection (nervous system) wikipedia , lookup
Nonsynaptic plasticity wikipedia , lookup
Optogenetics wikipedia , lookup
Microneurography wikipedia , lookup
NMDA receptor wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Central pattern generator wikipedia , lookup
Activity-dependent plasticity wikipedia , lookup
Pre-Bötzinger complex wikipedia , lookup
End-plate potential wikipedia , lookup
Synaptogenesis wikipedia , lookup
Synaptic gating wikipedia , lookup
Endocannabinoid system wikipedia , lookup
Chemical synapse wikipedia , lookup
Neurotransmitter wikipedia , lookup
Neuromuscular junction wikipedia , lookup
Stimulus (physiology) wikipedia , lookup
Molecular neuroscience wikipedia , lookup
0022-3565/98/2873-0952$03.00/0 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics JPET 287:952–957, 1998 Vol. 287, No. 3 Printed in U.S.A. The Role of Histamine H1, H2 and H3 Receptors on Enteric Ascending Synaptic Transmission in the Guinea Pig Ileum1 ANGELO A. IZZO, MARCELLO COSTA, NICOLA MASCOLO and FRANCESCO CAPASSO Department of Experimental Pharmacology (A.A.I., N.M., F.C.), University of Naples “Federico II” via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy and Department of Human Physiology and Centre for Neuroscience (M.C.), School of Medicine, The Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, SA, Australia Accepted for publication June 24, 1998 This paper is available online at http://www.jpet.org Histamine is widely distributed within mammalian tissues in both neural and nonneural compartments and there is evidence that in the central nervous system, it has a role as primary transmitter or neuromodulator (Schwartz et al., 1991). However, histamine is contained in mast cells and basophils in the wall of the intestine (Burks, 1994) and there is evidence that when it is released during hypersensitivity reactions to allergens, it may mediate neural events (Wood, 1992). Three classes of histamine receptors, H1, H2 and H3 have been identified in vertebrates (Hill, 1990) and all three are present in the guinea pig small intestine (Leurs et al., 1991; Bertaccini and Coruzzi, 1995). Histamine contracts the longitudinal muscle in the guinea pig small intestine. These contractions are mediated by the H1 receptor subtype, because they can be antagonized by mepyramine (Zavecz and Yellin, 1982; Trzeciakowski, 1987) and are likely to be due to a direct action on the smooth muscle. There is ample evidence that histamine stimulates the Received for publication March 12, 1998. 1 This work was supported by CNR (Rome, Italy). mine (1 mM) and tetrodotoxin (0.6 mM). The H2 agonists dimaprit (30 and 100 mM) and amphamine (0.1–300 mM) produced small contractions of the circular muscle in the oral compartment. These contractile responses were abolished by tetrodotoxin (0.6 mM) and cimetidine (10 mM). The H3 agonist R-amethylhistamine (0.001–1 mM) inhibited (2–58%, P ,.05) the nerve-mediated contractions. This inhibitory effect was antagonized by the H3 antagonist thioperamide. These results indicate that 1) histamine, acting at H1 receptors, at lower concentrations depresses synaptic transmission, although at higher concentrations activates the enteric excitatory ascending pathway; 2) activation of H2 receptors by H2 agonists stimulates the enteric excitatory ascending pathways and 3) activation of H3 receptors inhibits synaptic transmission. enteric neurons. A tetrodotoxin-sensitive release of acetylcholine via H2 receptors and of tachykinins has been demonstrated (Barker and Ebersole, 1982; Rubinstein and Cohen, 1985). In addition H2 agonists have been shown to increase the amplitude of electrically evoked contractions of the longitudinal muscle (Zavecz and Yellin, 1982). Thus it is likely that histamine activates the longitudinal muscle excitatory motor neurons. Histamine also produces a tetrodotoxin sensitive contraction of the circular muscle in the guinea pig small intestine indicating that it stimulates excitatory motorneurons to the circular muscle (Harry, 1963). Histamine, acting via H1- and H2-receptors produces slow depolarization of guinea pig myenteric neurons that is associated with increase in the input resistance, augmented excitability and repetitive spike discharge (Nemeth et al., 1984; Tamura and Wood, 1992). Histamine also produces inhibitory effects in the guinea pig small intestine inhibiting atropine-resistant contractions of the longitudinal muscle elicited by electrical stimulation, in the presence of H1 and H2 receptor antagonists (Ambache and Aboo Zar, 1970). Thus receptors other than H1 and H2 appear to be involved in this inhibitory effect. As histamine ABBREVIATIONS: NO, nitric oxide; L-NMMA, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide. 952 Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org at ASPET Journals on May 11, 2017 ABSTRACT The role of histamine H1-, H2- and H3-receptors was studied on neural transmission in ascending excitatory pathways of the guinea pig ileum. A two-compartment (oral and anal compartments) bath was used: ascending neural pathways were activated by electrical stimulation in the anal compartment and the resulting contraction of the circular muscle in the oral compartment was recorded. Drugs were applied in the anal compartment and each agonist was evaluated in the presence of the antagonists of the other two receptors. In the presence of cimetidine (10 mM) and thioperamide (1 mM), histamine (0.03–3 mM) depressed the nerve-mediated contractions (5–70% inhibition, P ,.05–.01). The inhibitory effect of histamine was antagonized by mepyramine. At the higher concentrations (10 and 30 mM), histamine elicited contractions of the circular muscle in the oral compartment, and these were abolished by mepyra- 1998 Histamine and Enteric Ascending Synaptic Transmission Materials and Methods Male guinea pigs weighing between 250 and 350 g were used. The animals were killed by being stunned and bled via the carotid arteries. Segments (4 – 6 cm) of ileum were removed and the content of intestine flushed. The segments were placed horizontally in a bath filled with warm (37°C) oxygenated Krebs’ solution (composition in mM: NaCl 119, KCl 4.7, KH2PO4 1.2, NaHCO3 25, MgSO4 1.5, CaCl2 2.5 and glucose 11) and set up as described previously (Izzo et al., 1997b). The mechanical activity of the circular muscle at the oral end was recorded isotonically (load 0.5 g) with a transducer connected to a “Gemini” recording apparatus (Ugo Basile, Comerio VA, Italy). The enteric nerve pathways were activated by electrical field stimulation (10 Hz for 2 sec, 45 mA, 0.5-msec pulse duration) via a pair of platinum electrodes placed around the intestine in the anal compartment, 30 mm from the partition. The distance between the stimulating electrodes and the recording of the circular muscle was 35 mm. To study neural transmission, drugs were applied in the anal compartment. Stable and reproducible contractions were obtained with stimulation every 2.5 min and expressed as percentage of lumen occlusive contraction produced by 10 mM carbachol applied to the recording site. Previous studies have shown that responses evoked by electrical stimulation are abolished by either tetrodotoxin or hexamethonium (Izzo et al., 1997b), added in the anal compartment. The effect of H1, H2 and H3 histamine agonists (histamine for H1 receptors, dimaprit and amthamine for H2 receptors and R-a-methylhistamine for H3 receptors) on neural transmission was evaluated by adding the drugs to the anal compartment. Cumulative concentration-effects curves (0.03–3 mM histamine, 0.1–300 mM dimaprit, 0.1–300 mM amthamine and 0.001–1 mM R-a-methylhistamine, contact time 5 min for each concentration) were constructed. To determinate antagonistic activity (pA2), histamine and R-a-methylhistamine were tested 20 min after mepyramine (3, 10, 30 and 100 nM) and thiopheramine (30, 100 and 300 nM) respectively. To ensure that histamine only acted on H1 receptors, the H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine (10 mM) and the H3 antagonist thioperamide (1 mM) were present in the anal bath; the effect of dimaprit and amthamine was observed in the presence of mepyramine (1 mM) and thioperamide (1 mM) and the effect of R-a-methylhistamine was observed in the presence of mepyramine (1 mM) and cimetidine (10 mM). The concentration of antagonists used were selected from previous work (Trzeciakwski, 1987; Hew et al., 1990; Poli et al., 1994). In some experiments the effect of histamine was observed 20 min after LNMMA (100 mM), naloxone (1 mM) or phentolamine (1 mM) although the contractile effect of histamine and dimaprit (or anthamine) was studied 20 min after hexamethonium (100 mM). These concentrations were shown effective in previous papers (Waterman et al., 1992; Yuan et al., 1995; Izzo et al., 1997b). In another set of experiments, to block all synaptic transmission without blocking the action potentials in neurons, the anal compartment was perfused with Krebs with no Ca11 which was replaced by 12 mM Mg11 (Tonini and Costa, 1990). Statistical analysis. Results are given as mean 6 S.E.M. Competitive antagonism was quantified as the ratio of equi-active molar concentrations. These values were estimated at the level of the half-maximal response. Antagonist activity (pA2 value) was estimated with the Schild analysis of these data (Aranlakshana and Schild, 1959). Statistical analysis was carried out with analysis of variance or Student’s t test for paired data. P ,.05 was considered significant. Drugs. Drugs used were: histamine hydrochloride, dimaprit hydrochloride, R-a-methylhistamine hydrochloride, mepyramine hydrochloride, cimetidine, thiopheramide hydrochloride, tetrodotoxin (all purchased from RBI, Milan, Italy), carbachol chloride, hexamethonium bromide, naloxone hydrochloride and L-NMMA acetate, phentolamine hydrochloride (Sigma, Milan, Italy) and amphamine dihydrobromide (Tocris Cookson, Bristol, UK). The drugs were dissolved in distilled water with the exception of cimetidine which was dissolved in DMSO. All drugs were added in volumes less than 0.1% of the bath volume. DMSO had no effect on the responses studied. Results Contractile effect of H1, H2 and H3 agonists. Histamine (10 and 30 mM, but not lower), applied to the anal compartment, with cimetidine and thioperamide in the bath, produced contractions of the circular smooth muscle in the oral compartment with a latency of 15 to 20 sec; the contractile effect of histamine consisted of a series of 5 to 10 phasic contractions superimposed to a small tonic component (fig. 1). The amplitude of the contraction produced by 30 mM histamine was greater than that of 10 mM (table 1). Mepyramine (1 mM) and tetrodotoxin (0.6 mM) or hexamethonium (100 mM) applied to the anal compartment, abolished the histamine-induced contractions (fig. 1; table 1). Replacing the Krebs’ solution in the anal compartment with a Ca11 free (12 mM Mg11 Krebs’ solution) almost abolished the contractile effect of histamine 30 mM (fig. 1). The H2 agonist dimaprit (30 mM), applied to the anal compartment, in the presence of mepyramine and thioperamide, evoked a small multiphasic contractile response (fig. 1). The initial phasic contraction reached maximum in 15 to 30 sec. The latter phasic contractions were variable and consisted of a series of three to six phasic contractions. A greater concentration of dimaprit (100 mM), produced smaller contractions and 300 mM dimaprit did not produce any contraction. Amphamine, another H2 agonist, also produced a contractile response but at lower concentrations Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org at ASPET Journals on May 11, 2017 in these conditions does not inhibit the contraction produced by exogenous bradykinin (Ambache and Aboo Zar, 1970) is unlikely to inhibit directly the muscle. Thus the inhibitory action is likely to be via enteric neurons. A third class of histamine receptors has been identified. Histamine H3 receptors were originally identified as inhibitory autoreceptors on histamine-containing nerve terminals in rat cerebral cortex (Arrang et al., 1983), but have since been shown to inhibit the release of a variety of neurotransmitters in both central (Schilicker et al., 1988) and peripheral tissues (Ishikawa and Sperelakis, 1987). Hew et al. (1990) have demonstrated the presence of binding sites for H3 ligands in the guinea pig small intestine. In this preparation the H3 receptor agonists act presynaptically or prejunctionally to inhibit cholinergic and non-cholinergic excitatory transmission (Trzeciakowski, 1987; Tamura et al., 1988; Taylor and Kilpatrick, 1992; Bertaccini and Coruzzi, 1995). In addition histamine has a presynaptic inhibitory action on nicotinic synaptic transmission in the myenteric plexus (Tamura et al., 1988). Thus there is ample evidence that histamine has multiple sites of action on enteric neurons. To establish the action of histamine on specific enteric neural pathways and the nature of the receptors involved, we have used a preparation of guinea pig small intestine in which ascending nerve pathways can be stimulated electrically to activate synaptically excitatory motor neurons to the circular muscle and the action of drugs on enteric nerve pathway can be studied without interfering with the recording of the smooth muscle contractions (Izzo et al., 1997b). A preliminary account of this work was presented at the XXVIII National Congress of the Italian Pharmacological Society (Izzo et al., 1997a). 953 954 Izzo et al. Vol. 287 Fig. 1. Representative tracings of the contractile responses to histamine 30 mM or dimaprit 30 mM added to the anal compartment. The effect of both histamine and dimaprit was also evaluated in the presence of tetrodotoxin (0.6 mM), mepyramine (1 mM) (or cimetidine, 10 mM) or in a Krebs solution without Ca11 (12 mM Mg11). Drugs (mM) Histamine Histamine Histamine Histamine Histamine Dimaprit Dimaprit Dimaprit Dimaprit 10 30 30 1 mepyramine 1 30 1 tetrodotoxin 0.6 30 1 hexamethonium 100 30 30 1 cimetidine 10 30 1 tetrodotoxin 0.6 30 1 hexamethonium 100 Amthamine Amthamine Amthamine Amthamine Amthamine Amthamine Amthamine 10 30 100 300 300 1 cimetidine 10 300 1 tetrodotoxin 0.6 300 1 hexamethonium 100 Contraction (%) na 13 6 4 17 6 3 0 0 263 12 11 6 4 4 562 0 0 0 16 6 4 4 564 563 864 863 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 4 4 The effect of histamine was evaluated in the presence of cimetidine (10 mM) and thioperamide (1 mM), while the effect of the H2 agonists dimaprit and amthamine was evaluated in the presence of mepyramine (1 mM) and thioperamide (1 mM). a Indicates the number of experiments. (starting from 10 mM) (table 1). The contractile effect of dimaprit (30 mM) or amthamine (300 mM) was abolished by cimetidine (10 mM), tetrodotoxin (0.6 mM) or hexamethonium applied to the anal compartment (fig. 1; table 1). Removal of Ca11 from the anal compartment (replacing it with 12 mM Mg11) also blocked the contractile effect of both dimaprit (fig. 1) and amphamine (data not shown). The H3 agonist R-a-methylhistamine, applied to the anal compartment, did not produce any contraction. Effect of H1, H2 and H3 agonists and antagonists on the ascending excitatory pathways activated by electrical stimulation. Electrical field stimulation in the anal compartment elicited a single phasic contraction of the circular smooth muscle in the oral compartment that lasted about 2 to 3 sec. These contractions were 28 6 4% of the contraction produced by 10 mM carbachol (n 5 92). Histamine (0.03–3 mM), in the presence of cimetidine and thioperamide, produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of the nerve mediated contraction when applied to the anal compartment (fig. 2). Significant inhibition was achieved with the 1 to 3 mM concentrations (P ,.05 at 1 mM and P ,.01 at 3 Fig. 2. Ascending excitatory response elicited by electrical stimulation: graph showing the effect of increasing concentration of histamine added to the anal compartment alone or in the presence of mepyramine (3–100 nM). The electrodes were placed on the intestine in the anal compartment about 30 mm from the partition. The experiments were performed in the presence of cimetidine (10 mM) and thioperamide (1 mM). Each point represents the mean 6 S.E.M. of five to seven experiments. mM). The effect of histamine was competivively prevented by mepyramine (fig. 2) with a pA2 of 9.14 6 0.10 (Schild slope: 0.60 6 0.03). The inhibitory effect of histamine was not modified by L-NMMA (100 mM), naloxone (1 mM) or phentolamine (1 mM) added in the anal compartment before histamine (fig. 3). LNMMA, naloxone or phentolamine did not modify the nervemediated contractions (% variation of control response: 112 6 10%, 17 6 10%, 15 6 4, n 5 6 for each drug tested, P ..2). The H2 agonist dimaprit (0.1–300 mM), in the presence of mepyramine and thioperamide, produced a significant (P ,.01) inhibition of the nerve mediated contraction only at higher concentration (300 mM, fig. 4). This effect was not modified by the H2 antagonist cimetidine (10 mM, fig. 4). By contrast, amthamine (0.1–300 mM), another H2 agonist, was without effect on the nerve mediated contractions (fig. 4). The potent H3 receptor agonist R-a-methylhistamine (0.001–1 mM) reduced, in a concentration-dependent manner, the nerve mediated contraction when applied to the anal Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org at ASPET Journals on May 11, 2017 TABLE 1 Contractile effect of histamine, dimaprit and amthamine added to the anal compartment 1998 Fig. 4. Ascending excitatory response elicited by electrical stimulation: graph showing the effect of increasing concentration of amthamine and dimaprit (alone or in presence of cimetidine 10 mM) added to the anal compartment. The electrodes were placed on the intestine in the anal compartment about 30 mm from the partition. The experiments were performed in the presence of mepyramine (1 mM) and thioperamide (1 mM). Each point represents the mean 6 S.E.M. of seven experiments. *P ,.05 vs. control. compartment (fig. 5). Significant inhibition (P ,.05) was achieved with the 0.1 to 1 mM concentrations. The inhibitory effect of R-a-methylhistamine was competitively inhibited by thioperamide, with a pA2 of 8.12 6 0.23 (Schild slope: 0.96 6 0.19). When the stimulating electrode was placed 2 mm just anal to the partition, thus bypassing synaptic transmission along the chain of ascending interneurons (Izzo et al., 1997b), histamine, dimaprit or R-a-methylhistamine had no significant effect, even at the highest concentrations used (fig. 6). Addition to the anal compartment of any of the receptor 955 Fig. 5. Ascending excitatory response elicited by electrical stimulation: graph showing the effect of increasing concentration of R-a-methylhistamine added to the anal compartment alone or in the presence of thioperamide (30 –300 nM). The electrodes were placed on the intestine in the anal compartment about 30 mm from the partition. The experiments were performed in the presence of mepyramine (1 mM) and cimetidine (10 mM). Each point represents the mean 6 S.E.M. of five to seven experiments. Fig. 6. Graph showing the lack of effect of histamine (0.1-3 mM), dimaprit (0.1-300 mM) and R-a-methylhistamine (0.001-1 mM), applied to the anal compartment, on the ascending excitatory response elicited by electrical stimulation just anal to the partition to bypass any synaptic transmission within the anal compartment. Each point represents the mean 6 S.E.M. of seven experiments. No statistical differences with control were observed. antagonists mepyramine (1 mM) cimetidine (10 mM) or thioperamide (1 mM), failed to modify the ascending nerve mediated contractions (% inhibition: mepyramine 0 6 7, cimetidine 9 6 8, thioperamide 1 6 7). Discussion Our study shows that activation of histamine receptors modifies transmission in the ascending excitatory pathways Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org at ASPET Journals on May 11, 2017 Fig. 3. Ascending excitatory response elicited by electrical stimulation: graph showing the effect of increasing concentration of histamine added to the anal compartment alone or in the presence of L-NMMA (100 mM), naloxone (1 mM) or phentolamine (1 mM). The electrodes were placed on the intestine in the anal compartment about 30 mm from the partition. The experiments were performed in the presence of cimetidine (10 mM) and thioperamide (1 mM). Each point represents the mean 6 S.E.M. of five to seven experiments. Histamine and Enteric Ascending Synaptic Transmission 956 Izzo et al. sis (Waterman et al., 1992). NO is synthetised in inhibitory motor neurons and descending interneurons in the guinea pig small intestine (Costa et al., 1992). NO inhibits synaptic transmission in myenteric ganglia in the guinea pig ileum (Yuan et al., 1995) and histamine has been shown to release NO in several tissues (Garrison, 1990). Noradrenaline, released from postganglionic sympatetic neurons, acts presynaptically to inhibit acetylcholine release (Wood, 1987). However it is unlikely that histamine inhibits synaptic transmission in the ascending excitatory pathways by releasing NO, opioids or noradrenaline as the NO synthase inhibitor L-NMMA, the opioid antagonist naloxone or the alphaadrenoceptor antagonist phentolamine failed to modify the inhibitory effect of histamine. The inhibitory action of dimaprit does not appear to be mediated by H2 receptors as it was not antagonized by cimetidine. Bertaccini and Zappia (1981) showed that dimapritinduced relaxation of guinea pig duodenum that was not counteracted by cimetidine and other H2 antagonists. In the same way, Leurs et al. (1991) also showed that the dimapritinduced relaxation of the guinea pig ileum, jejunum and colon was unaffected by a number of H2 antagonists, such as famotidine, mifentidine and tioxidine. The potent and selective H3 receptor agonist R-a-methylhistamine produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of the neural contraction when applied in the anal compartment. This effect was competitively antagonized by the H3 antagonist thioperamide, indicating that was mediated by H3 histamine receptors. The pA2 value for thioperamide is in keeping with previous studies on guinea pig intestine (Leurs et al., 1991; Taylor and Kilpatric, 1992). The most likely site and mechanism of action of H3 agonists is by presynaptic inhibition along the chain of ascending excitatory interneurons. Presynaptic inhibition mediated by H3-receptors is widespread in central and peripheral nervous system (Schwartz et al., 1991). There is ample evidence for H3 receptors on longitudinal muscle enteric motorneurons to mediate inhibition of transmitter release (Bertaccini and Coruzzi, 1995; Leurs et al., 1991; Taylor and Kilpatrick, 1992; Trzeciakowski, 1987). Poli et al. (1994) showed that histamine acts on these neurons in the duodenum by decreasing Ca11 entry via the N-type Ca11 channels in the nerve terminals. It is possible that the inhibitory effect of R-a-methylhistamine on synaptic transmission demonstrated in our work is due to a similar mechanism as N-type Ca11 channels are involved in the ascending excitatory pathways (Izzo et al., 1997b). The discrepancy with the findings of Poli and Pozzoli (1997) who have shown that R-a-methylhistamine did not modify either the ascending excitatory reflex elicited by caudal distention or peristaltic movements in the isolated guinea pig ileum remains to be explained. The failure of the histamine receptor antagonist, mepyramine, cimetidine and thioperamide, to affect transmission along the intestine indicates that endogenous histamine is not involved in neural transmission along the ascending excitatory pathways activated by electrical stimulation. There is no evidence for the presence of histamine in enteric neurons in the guinea pig intestine although histidine decarboxylase, the enzyme involved in the synthesis of histamine and its mRNA are present in enteric neurons (Ekblad et al., 1985). If histamine plays a functional role in intestinal mo- Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org at ASPET Journals on May 11, 2017 to the circular muscle in the guinea pig small intestine. These pathways involve at least three neurons (Izzo et al., 1997b). A final excitatory motor neuron to the circular muscle is located in myenteric ganglia in the oral compartment. The motor neurons receive excitatory nicotinic synaptic inputs from the only class of ascending interneurons that form an excitatory chain of neurons (Tonini and Costa, 1990; Brookes et al., 1991a, 1991b; Izzo et al., 1997b). These neurons and their projections have been identified by tracing experiments (Brookes et al., 1990, 1991b). The electrical stimulation in the anal compartment activates this chain of ascending interneurons thus involving at least two neural synapses in the pathway. Both stimulatory or inhibitory effects of histamine agonists were observed, depending of the concentrations used and the type of receptor involved. Activation of H1 and H2 receptors, by high concentrations of histamine, dimaprit or amthamine, added to the anal compartment, produced a contractile response of the circular muscle in the oral compartment. Blockade of nerve activity by tetrodotoxin abolished these contractile responses indicating that they are nerve mediated. Blockade of all synaptic transmission in the anal compartment, by replacing calcium with magnesium, significantly reduced the contractile responses to both agonists. Histamine has been shown to depolarize myenteric neurons via both H1 and H2 receptors (Nemeth et al., 1984; Tamura and Wood, 1992) with consequent release of acetylcholine (Rubinstein and Cohen, 1985) and to elicit synaptic potentials in myenteric neurons (Nemeth et al., 1984; Tamura and Wood, 1992). H2-receptor agonists have been shown to enhance the release of acetylcholine from the enteric nerves (Barker and Erbesole, 1982). We have shown that hexamethonium, a nicotinic receptor antagonist, strongly reduced the contractile effect of both H2 agonists, suggesting that these drugs may act mainly by releasing acetylcholine from the presynaptic nerve terminals of ascending interneurons in the chain. Histamine acting on H1 receptors, dimaprit and R-a-methylhistamine depressed, in a concentration-dependent manner, the ascending excitatory synaptic transmission. Histamine is unlikely to inhibit directly the myenteric neurons as no postsynaptic hyperpolarizing effects have been observed on myenteric neurons (Tamura et al., 1988). In addition in our experiments when the axons of ascending interneurons were stimulated just anal to the partition, thus bypassing synaptic transmission (Izzo et al., 1997b), histamine, dimaprit or R-a-methylhistamine had no effect on the contractile response. Thus, the inhibitory effects of histamine are most likely to be due to inhibition of synaptic transmission along the ascending chain of interneurons. The inhibitory action of histamine was competitively antagonized by mepyramine and thus is mediated by H1 receptors. The pA2 value for mepyramine correlates well with previous findings (Barker, 1985). There is no evidence in intestinal preparations for presynaptic inhibition mediated by H1 receptors. Thus it is more likely that activation of these receptors releases endogenous substances from presynaptic nerve endings within the myenteric ganglia, which in turn inhibit synaptic transmission. A number of endogenous substances released by histamine may be involved in this inhibition. Opioids are known to inhibit ascending synaptic transmission (Tonini et al., 1992), are contained in enteric neurons (Costa et al., 1996) and are released during peristal- Vol. 287 1998 tility is more likely to originate from nonneural cells in pathophysiological conditions (Wood, 1992). The presence of inhibitory and excitatory histamine receptors on different populations of enteric neurons acting at different sites suggests that caution must be exerted in the interpretation of the net effects of pharmacological studies on enteric motor functions, using histamine receptors agonists. Acknowledgments The authors thank Bao Nan Chen for her help in the references. This work was supported by CNR, Murst and Enrico and Enrica Sovena Foundation (Roma). References 957 Ishikawa S and Sperelakis N (1987) A novel class (H3) of histamine receptors on perivascular nerve terminals. Nature 327:158 –160. Izzo AA, Mascolo N, Costa M and Capasso F (1997a) Effect of histamine H1-, H2- and H3-receptor agonists on synaptic transmission in the guinea-pig ileum (Abstract). Pharm Res 35(Suppl):87. Izzo AA, Mascolo N, Costa M and Capasso F (1997b) Effect of papaverine on synaptic transmission in the guinea-pig ileum. Br J Pharmacol 121:768 –772. Leurs R, Brozius MM, Smit MJ, Bast A and Timmerman H (1991) Effects of histamine H1- H2- and H3-receptor selective drugs on the mechanical activity of guinea-pig small and large intestine. Br J Pharmacol 102:179 –185. Nemeth PR, Ort CA and Wood JD (1984) Intracellular study of effects of histamine on electrical behavior of myenteric neurons in guinea-pig small intestine. J Physiol 355:411– 425. Poli E and Pozzoli C (1997) Histamine H3 receptors do not modulate reflex-evoked motility in the isolated guinea-pig ileum. Eur J Pharmacol 327:49 –56. Poli E, Pozzoli C, Coruzzi G and Bertaccini G (1994) Signal transducing mechanisms coupled to histamine H3 receptors and alpha-2 adrenoceptors in the guinea pig duodenum: possible involvement of N-Type Ca11 channels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 270:788 –794. Rubinstein R and Cohen S (1985) Histamine-mediated acetylcholine release in the guinea-pig ileum. Eur J Pharmacol 111:245–250. Schilicker E, Betz R and Gothert M (1988) Histamine H3-receptor-mediated inhibition of serotonin release in the rat brain cortex. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 337:588 –590. Schwartz JC, Arrang JM, Garbarg M, Pollard H and Ruat M (1991) Histaminergic transmission in mammalian brain. Physiol Rev 71:1–51. Tamura K and Wood JD (1992) Effect of prolonged exposure to histamine. Dig Dis Sci 37:1084 –1088. Tamura K, Palmer JM and Wood JD (1988) Presynaptic inhibition produced by histamine at nicotinic synapses in enteric ganglia. Neuroscience 25:171–179. Taylor SJ and Kilpatrick GJ (1992) Characterization of histamine H3 receptors controlling non-adrenergic non-cholinergic contractions of the guinea pig isolated ileum. Br J Pharmacol 105:667– 674. Tonini M and Costa M (1990) A pharmacological analysis of the neuronal circuitry involved in distension-evoked enteric excitatory reflex. Neuroscience 38:787–795. Tonini M, Waterman SA, Candura SM, Coccini T and Costa M (1992) Sites of action of morphine on the ascending excitatory reflex in the guinea-pig small intestine. Neurosc Lett 144:195–198. Trzeciakowski JP (1987) Inhibition of guinea pig ileum contractions mediated by a class of histamine receptor resembling the H3 subtype. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 243:874 – 880. Waterman SA, Costa M and Tonini M (1992) Modulation of peristalsis in the guinea-pig isolated small intestine by exogenous and endogenous opioids. Br J Pharmacol 106:1004 –1010. Wood JD (1987) Physiology of the enteric nervous system, in Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (Johnson LR ed) pp 67–110, Raven Press, New York. Wood JD (1992) Histamine signals in enteric neuroimmune interactions. Ann NY Acad Sci 664:275–283. Xia Y, Fertel RH and Wood JD (1996) Stimulation of formation of adenosine 39-59phosphate by histamine in myenteric ganglia isolated from guinea-pig small intestine. Eur J Pharmacol 316:81– 85. Yuan SY, Bornstein JC and Furness J (1995) Pharmacological evidence that nitric oxide may be a retrograde messanger in the enteric nervous system. Br J Pharmacol 114:428 – 432. Zavecz JH and Yellin TO (1982) Histamine receptors in the myenteric plexuslongitudinal muscle of the guinea-pig ileum: H1- and H2-receptor-mediated potentiation of the contractile response to electrical stimulation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 223:177–182. Send reprint requests to: Dr. Angelo A. Izzo, Department of Experimental Pharmacology, University of Naples “Federico II,” via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy. Downloaded from jpet.aspetjournals.org at ASPET Journals on May 11, 2017 Ambache N and Aboo Zar M (1970) An inhibitory action of histamine on the guineapig ileum. Br J Pharmacol 38:229 –240. Arunlakshana AO and Schild HO (1959) Some quantitative uses of drug antagonist. Br J Pharmacol Chemiother 14:153–161. Arrang JM, Garbarb M and Schwartz JC (1983) Autoinhibition of brain histamine release by a novel class (H3) of histamine receptors. Nature 327:117–123. Barker LA (1985) Regional variation in the sensitivity of longitudinal smooth muscle to histamine at H1-receptors in guinea-pig ileum and colon. Br J Pharmacol 85:377–381. Barker LA and Ebersole BJ (1982) Histamine H2-receptors on guinea-pig ileum myenteric plexus neurons mediate the release of contractile agents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 221:69 –75. Bertaccini G and Coruzzi G (1995) An update on histamine H3 receptors and gastrointestinal functions. Dig Dis Sci 40:2052–2063. Bertaccini G and Zappia L (1991) Histamine receptors in the guinea-pig duodenum. J Pharm Pharmacol 33:590 –593. Brookes SJH and Costa M (1990) Identification of enteric motor neurons which innervate the circular muscle of the guinea-pig small intestine. Neurosci Lett 118:227–230. Brookes SJH, Steele A and Costa M (1991a) Calretinin immunoreactivity in cholinergic motor neurones, interneurones and vasomotor neurones in the guinea-pig small intestine. Cell Tissue Res 263:471– 481. Brookes SJH, Steele A and Costa M (1991b) Identification and immunohistochemistry of cholinergic and non-cholinergic circular muscle motor neurons in the guinea-pig small intestine. Neuroscience 42:863– 878. Burks TF (1994) Neurotransmission and neurotransmitters, in Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (Johnson LR ed) pp 211–242. Raven Press, New York. Costa M, Brookes SJH, Steele A, Gibbins IL, Burcher E and Kandiah CJ (1996) Neurochemical classification of myenteric neurons in the guinea-pig ileum. Neuroscience 75:949 –967. Costa M, Furness JB, Pompolo S, Brookes SJH, Bornstein JC, Bredt DS and Snyder SH (1992) Projections and chemical coding of neurones with immunoreactivity for nitric oxide synthase in the guinea pig small intestine. Neurosci Lett 148:121–125. Ekblad E, Wahlestedt C, Hakanson R, Sundler F, Watanabe T and Wada H (1985) Is histamine a neurotransmitter in the gut? Evidence from histidine decarboxylase immunocytochemistry. Acta Physiol Scand 123:225–227. Garrison JC (1990) Histamine, Bradykinin, 5-Hydroxytryptamine and their antagonists, in The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutic (Goodman Gilman A, Rall TW, Nies AS and Taylor P eds) pp 574 –599, Pergamon Press, New York. Harry J (1963) The action of drugs on the circular muscle strip from the guinea-pig isolated ileum. Br J Pharmacol 20:399 – 417. Hew RWS and Hodgkinson CR (1990) Characterization of histamine H3-receptors in guinea pig ileum with H3-selective ligands. Br J Pharmacol 101:621– 624. Hill SJ (1990) Distribution, properties and functional characteristics of three classes of histamine receptor. Pharm Rev 42:45– 84. Histamine and Enteric Ascending Synaptic Transmission