Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Self-categorization theory wikipedia , lookup
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Social loafing wikipedia , lookup
James M. Honeycutt wikipedia , lookup
Belongingness wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
Attitude change wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Memory conformity wikipedia , lookup
Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup
Compliance (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Social Thinking Social Psychologists study why the same person acts differently in different situations EXERCISE – Attribution Scale Distribute 2 copies of the handout to each student. Have students complete the scale twice. Once for a former teacher and once for themselves. After they have completed both forms, have them count the number of times they circled “depends on the situation” on each rating sheet. A show of hands will demonstrate a greater tendency to attribute the other person’s behavior to personal disposition, while attributing their own behavior to the environment. Ask students why this may be the case. Fundamental Attribution Error – underestimating the impact of the situation and overestimating the impact of personal disposition. Example Hurricane Katrina – why didn’t residents evacuate? Does what we think predict what we will do, or does what we do shape what we will think? Attitudes: feelings based on beliefs, that predispose us to respond in a particular way Attitudes can affect actions AND Actions can affect Attitudes Foot in the Door phenomenon Roles – a set of social norms, defining how one should behave in that role Cognitive Dissonance – when we become aware of when our actions and our attitudes don’t match – we experience tension or cognitive dissonance. We can reduce tension, by changing our attitudes. Example – current war…… pretense becomes reality…. Act as if you like someone, and you soon will. Changing our behavior can change how we think about others and feel about ourselves! Social Influence Social Psychology – how we think about, influence and relate to one another. Two major components: Conformity & Compliance (obedience) Group Influence What do experiments on conformity and compliance reveal about the power of social influence? Behavior is contagious Chameleon effect – we are natural mimics – (part of empathy) Suggestibility – a subtle type of conformity…… Group Pressure and Conformity Conformity – adjusting our behavior or thinking toward some group standard) Asch’s conformity experiments What are the conditions that strengthen conformity? One is made to feel incompetent The group has at least 3 people The group is unanimous One admires the group’s status One has made no prior commitment to any choice Others in the group observe one’s behavior One’s culture strongly encourages respect for social standards Why do we conform? Normative social influence – desire to gain approval or avoid disapproval Informational social influence – one’s willingness to accept others’ opinions about reality Obedience Stanley Milgram’s studies….. shock experiements What lessons have we learned from Conformity & Obedience studies? Strong social influences can make people conform to falsehoods or do cruel things – people succumb to evil. Second major component of Social Psychology is Group Influence How does the mere presence of others influence our actions? Does our behavior change when we act as part of a group? Social Facilitation – improved performance of simple or well-learned tasks in the presence of others. Social Loafing – tendency for people in a group to exert less effort when working together toward a goal, than when held individually accountable Why? Feel less accountable – therefore worry less. And/or Don’t feel their input adds anything new EXERICSE BEFORE DISCUSSING DEINDIVIDUATION….. Write down your response to this question: (DO NOT put your names on them!) “If you could do anything humanly possible with complete assurance that you would not be detected or held responsible, what would you do?” (As a teacher it will be difficult for you to not elaborate – but don’t. If they ask any questions, just restate the previous sentence.) A follow-up teaching point could be the ability to deal with ambiguity….. Right before you collect the responses, tell the class you will make a prediction of the most common answer…. And write your prediction down on paper. Do not tell them what it is. You will write down, “Rob a bank / Steal/take money” Collect the responses – and read responses to the class….. Once all the responses have been read, share your prediction with the class. I have NEVER had this fail once! The majority of the answers are just that…. Rob a bank. Now – transition into how you knew that – with a discussion on Deindividuation…… Deindividuation – loss of self awareness and self-restraint when in group situations that foster arousal and anonymity. Effects of Group Interaction….. What is group polarization? – If a group is like-minded, a discussion strengthens its prevailing opinion. – racial discussions and prejudice What is group think? – when the desire for harmony in a decision-making group overrides a realistic appraisal of alternatives. NOTE: Many students don’t grasp the concept that Group Think is a bad thing. Be sure to reiterate this. Examples? Challenger, Bay of Pigs (some of these they may not be able to relate to – but maybe you can think of more relevant ones) Group think is fed by over confidence, conformity, self-justification and group polarization. Can a minority sway a majority? - Twelve angry men…..