Download Effect of Diaphragm Discontinuity on Seismic Response

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Transcript
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 5, Issue 12, December 2015)
4. More the displacement flexible is the structure and
vice versa. Therefore model type 3 is more stiff as
compared to other models.
5. For G+7 building with diaphragm discontinuity modal
mass participation is almost same for all models.
Therefore diaphragm discontinuity does not have
much effect on modal mass participation
REFERENCES AND STANDARDS
[1]
[2]
Fig 16 Modal Mass Participation comparison for the six considered
G+7 storey models in Y direction
[3]
It is observed that when considering modal mass
participation in X direction, the participation is zero for all
types in 1st and 2nd mode and in 3rd mode it is less in Type 3
when compared with other Types. On the other hand the
modal mass participation is zero for all types in 2 nd and 3rd
mode and it is almost same for all types in 1 st mode.
Diaphragm discontinuity does not have much effect on
modal mass participation.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
V. CONCLUSION
From the linear static analysis of G+7 storey building
with plan irregularity following conclusions can be made
1. The behaviour of building is better when diaphragm
discontinuity is closer to the centre of the building.
2. Frequency is directly proportional to the stiffness of
building. Therefore model type 3 is more stiff than
other model considered.
3. More the base shear stiff the building since member
will attract more forces. Model type 3 is more stiff
than other models considered
[8]
[9]
135
Indian Standard code IS 18932-2002
Turgut O. (2011) : “ A study of the effect of slab gaps in
buildings on seismic response according to three different codes”
(Scientific research and essays vol 6)
Mohammed Y. and P.M Shimpale (2013) : “Dynamic analysis
of reinforced concrete building with plan irregularities”
(International journal of emerging technology and advanced
engineering)
Joheb A. and Syed A. (2014): “ seismic vulnerability of RC building
by considering plan irregularities using pushover analysis”
(International global journal for research analysis)
Terry R., PE, SE : “ Analysis of horizontally offset diaphragms”
(World conference on timber engineering)
Morteza M. and Behzad R. (2011) : “Investigation of floor
diaphragms flexibility in RC structures and code provisions” (Global
association of research)
Amin A. and Prof. P.S. Rao (2013) : “Influence of torsional
irregularities of RC buildings in High Seismic Zone” (Australian
journal of basic and applied sciences)
Ravikumar C.M and Sujith B V l (2012) : “Effect of irregular
configurations on seismic vulnerability of RC building”
(Architecture Reasearch)
R.G. Herrera and C.G. Soberon (2008) : “Influence of plan
irregularity of buildings” (14TH world conference of earthquake
engineering.
Document related concepts

Seismic retrofit wikipedia, lookup

1880 Luzon earthquakes wikipedia, lookup

Earthquake engineering wikipedia, lookup

1988 Armenian earthquake wikipedia, lookup