Download MCB100A/CHEM130A In-Section Quiz #2 (Aathavan Karunakaran)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup

Structural alignment wikipedia , lookup

Protein wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Rosetta@home wikipedia , lookup

Proteomics wikipedia , lookup

Implicit solvation wikipedia , lookup

Protein mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup

Protein design wikipedia , lookup

Homology modeling wikipedia , lookup

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

Cyclol wikipedia , lookup

Protein folding wikipedia , lookup

Protein purification wikipedia , lookup

Alpha helix wikipedia , lookup

Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup

Protein domain wikipedia , lookup

Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Disulfide wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Name: _________________________________________________
MCB100A/CHEM130A In-Section Quiz #2
(Aathavan K, 7th Oct 2005)
(Open Book, 15 minutes)
1. A. Rank the following in the order of increasing tolerance to mutations in a
protein: hydrophobic core, hydrophilic surface, catalytic site. Explain your
ordering briefly (atmost 2-3 sentences) (3)
Catalytic site (functionally important residues – often very very specific)
Hydrophobic core (tolerates most hydrobic residues, and polar uncharged
residues)
Hydrophilic Surface (tolerates almost all sorts of residues)
B Define Convergent Evolution (1)
When similar traits develop independently in two different species whose different
ancestors didn’t have that trait.
2. Consider Ribonuclease-A from Anfinsen’s original experiment. You have
mutated one of the cysteines into a serine (there are now only 7 cysteines), but the
mutant protein is just as active as the wild-type. You now repeat the Anfinsen
experiment on this mutant protein: i.e, unfolded the protein with urea, reduced all
the disulfide bonds, put the protein in oxidizing environment to reform disulfide
bonds, and then allowed to refold by removing the Urea). What percent of the
original activity would you expect to recover. (6).
Note: Consider in this experiment, like in the original one, only intra-molecular
disulfide bonds are formed but not inter-molecular bonds. Clearly show the logic
of your calculation.
You can form only 3 disulfide bonds. And the number of ways of doing this is
7.6.5.4.3.2.
------------ = 105
3! 23
So activity recovered = 100/105 = 0.95% which is the same as the case with 8
cystines