* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Corrigendum: Auditory and cognitive factors underlying
Survey
Document related concepts
Sex differences in intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Neurophilosophy wikipedia , lookup
Intelligence quotient wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive neuroscience of music wikipedia , lookup
G factor (psychometrics) wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive neuroscience wikipedia , lookup
Attribution (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive psychology wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive science wikipedia , lookup
Music psychology wikipedia , lookup
Sex differences in cognition wikipedia , lookup
Aging brain wikipedia , lookup
Impact of health on intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
CORRECTION published: 11 November 2016 doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00091 Corrigendum: Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults Larry E. Humes *, Gary R. Kidd and Jennifer J. Lentz Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA Keywords: presbycusis, speech recognition, amplification, psychoacoustics, aging A corrigendum on Edited and reviewed by: Jonathan B. Fritz, University of Maryland, College Park, USA *Correspondence: Larry E. Humes [email protected] Received: 06 October 2016 Accepted: 28 October 2016 Published: 11 November 2016 Citation: Humes LE, Kidd GR and Lentz JJ (2016) Corrigendum: Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 10:91. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00091 Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speechunderstanding among older adults by Humes, L. E., Kidd, G. R., and Lentz, J. J. (2013). Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:55. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00055 Reason for Corrigendum: There is an error in the reporting of the Text Recognition Threshold (TRT) data in the original article. The TRT results were reported as “percent unmasked” in Tables 1 and 2, but the data are actually percent masked values. Thus, higher scores mean better performance, and the older group actually performed slightly worse than the younger group on the TRT task (not better, as indicated in Table 2). The correlations with other measures, reported in Table 6, should be interpreted with the percent-masked scoring in mind. Thus, the significant positive correlations between TRT and the global measures of cognition and speech understanding reported in Table 6 indicate that better performance on the TRT is associated with higher (better) scores on those global measures. Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Copyright © 2016 Humes, Kidd and Lentz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.org 1 November 2016 | Volume 10 | Article 91