Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Exelon Corporation Case Study: Wind Power Marketing In 2001, Exelon Corporation signed four twenty-year power purchase agreements for the purchase of wind power in Pennsylvania making it the largest wind marketer east of the Mississippi River. The wind power will be marketed by Exelon Power Team, Exelon’s wholesale marketing operation. Collectively, the four agreements bring Exelon Power Team’s zero emission wind portfolio to 151.6 megawatts (MW). This capacity is projected to produce enough electrical output to power over 58,000 average homes annually or the equivalent of approximately 411,600 zero emission megawatt hours (MWhs) annually.1 Quantification of Emissions The new Pennsylvania wind farms will feed clean electricity into a multi-state region that includes Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Ohio, New York, and part of Virginia. The zero emission wind power from these four wind farms avoid greenhouse gases (GHG) and criteria air pollutants associated with generating electricity from the resources providing power to the regional Pennsylvania, New Jersey Maryland (PJM) Power Pool.2 In order to estimate the annual impacts of this quantity of zero emission power being sold into the PJM grid, the baseline emission rates as noted above are multiplied by the total annual estimated electric generation by the wind farms. Emission Reductions Based upon PJM Power Pool average emission rates, the approximately 411,600 MWhs generated collectively from the four wind farms avoids approximately 246,000 tons of CO2, 580 tons of NOx, 1,850 tons of SO2 and 14,000 pounds of mercury emissions annually. The main areas of uncertainty with the quantification of the emission reductions are the annual generation of the wind farms and the emission factors used. The average PJM Power Pool emission rates were used instead of the marginal emission rates due to data availability. For future project monitoring and reporting actual metered generation data will be retrospectively evaluated and a more precise PJM Power Pool emission factor most likely the marginal rate will be calculated based on actual dispatch. 1 An average home is assumed to use 600 kWh per month or approximately 7 MWhs annually. Electric generation projections are based on an average capacity factor of 31%. 2 For comparison, the current average mix of resources supplying the PJM includes: Coal (47%), Nuclear (37%), Oil (4%), Natural Gas (9%), Hydro-electric (1%), and Other (2%).