Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION Harrisburg, PA 17105-3265 Public Meeting held August 17, 2000 Commissioners Present: John M. Quain, Chairman Robert K. Bloom, Vice Chairman Nora Mead Brownell, Statement attached Aaron Wilson, Jr. Terrance J. Fitzpatrick Petition of Manufacturer’s Association of Northwest Pennsylvania for a Declaratory Order Docket No. P-00991785 ORDER BY THE COMMISSION: Before the Commission for disposition is a Petition for Declaratory Order filed on December 21, 1999, by the Manufacturer’s Association of Northwest Pennsylvania (MANP). By this Petition, the MANP requests the Commission to conclude that it is not required to be licensed as an electric generation supplier, as defined in Section 2803 of the Public Utility Code, 66 Pa. C.S. § 2803, and Section 54.31 of the Commission’s Regulations, 52 Pa. Code § 54.31. The MANP asserts that a declaratory order is necessary so as to remove the uncertainty regarding their “marketing” activities pursuant to an agreement with Exelon Energy. According to Section 331(f), 66 Pa. C.S. §331(f), the issuance of a declaratory order is a matter within the Commission’s discretion. Therefore, in order to remove the uncertainty associated with MANP’s provision of information regarding Exelon’s services to MANP’s members, we are entertaining this petition. No responses have been filed opposing this Petition. Background The MANP is a trade association that operates as a not-for-profit organization established under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The MANP’s members are located in 17 counties throughout the state. The MANP supports its members by providing information and services that will assist them in the pursuit of their business and community interests. The MANP entered into an Affinity Master Agreement (Agreement) with Horizon Energy Company d/b/a Exelon Energy (Exelon), an entity licensed as a electric generation supplier by the Commission at Docket No. A-110028. Pursuant to the Agreement, the MANP agreed to provide Exelon with a list of the MANP’s members and to send letters of introduction as well as information to its members regarding Exelon’s services. Consequently, if a member of the MANP were interested in entering into a contract with Exelon for the provision of electricity, all contacts would occur directly between Exelon and the member, with no involvement by the MANP to facilitate the sale. Under the terms of the Agreement, Exelon is solely responsible for providing the electricity generation; billing, collecting and/or meter reading; scheduling delivery of the electricity, and holding title to the electricity before it is transmitted to the MANP’s members. 2 MANP’s Petition By this petition, the MANP requests the Commission to declare that it is not an electric generation supplier, aggregator, broker, or marketer as defined by 66 Pa. C.S. § 2803 and 52 Pa. Code § 54.31. The MANP asserts that since its activities pertaining to the generation of electricity are limited only to introducing its members to Exelon’s services, it is not required to be licensed under the Public Utility Code and Commission’s Regulations. Discussion The issue raised by the Petition for Declaratory Order is whether the MANP is required to be licensed as an electric generation supplier, as defined in Section 2803 of the Code and Section 54.31 of the Commission’s Regulation, for providing its members with information regarding Exelon’s services. The Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act (the Act), as well as the Commission’s Regulation, provide that an electric generation supplier must obtain a license from the Commission in order to provide services in Pennsylvania. 66 Pa. C.S. § 2803, 52 Pa. Code 54.32. Additionally, both the Act and the Commission’s Regulations include the terms broker, marketers, and aggregators in the definition of electric generation supplier. Thus, if any of these terms are applicable to an entity wishing to provide service in Pennsylvania, the entity is an electric generation supplier and must obtain a license. An aggregator has been defined as “an entity, licensed by the commission, that purchases electric energy and takes title to electric energy as an intermediary for sale to retail customers.” 66 Pa. C.S. § 2803, 52 Pa. Code 54.31. From the activities described in 3 the Petition, it is apparent that MANP is not purchasing or taking title to energy for sale to its membership, thus, MANP is not an “aggregator” for licensing purposes. Nevertheless, it is also necessary to determine whether MANP’s actions come within the parameters of a “broker” or “marketer” as defined by the Act and the Commission’s Regulations. A broker or marketer has been defined as “an entity, licensed by the commission, that acts as an agent or intermediary in the sale and purchase of electric energy but that does not take title to electric energy.” 66 Pa. C.S. § 2803, 52 Pa. Code 54.31. (emphasis added). Furthermore, the definition of “electric generation supplier” includes entities that “arrange or market” electricity for sale to end-use customers. The question is, therefore, whether the activities set forth in the Agreement between MANP and Exelon make MANP “an agent or intermediary in the sale and purchase of electric energy...” requiring MANP to obtain a license from the Commission. The resolution of this issue depends upon the extent of the MANP participation in the sale and purchase of the electricity. From the description of the activities in the Agreement, it appears that MANP exclusively endorses Exelon’s services to its membership. MANP, however, is not involved in any communications between the member and Exelon or, for that matter, even arranging for the ultimate sale of electricity from Exelon to the member. If the member wishes to enter into a contractual relationship with Exelon for the “special” discounted rate, it must directly contact Exelon. Because the MANP is merely informing its members 4 about the services of Exelon Energy, it appears that its activities do not require it to obtain a license from the Commission. Moreover, the Commission takes into consideration its recent conclusion that nontraditional marketing groups seeking to participate in the retail gas service market will not be required to obtain a license so long as the non-traditional marketer meets the following criteria: 1. The non-traditional marketer must conduct their transactions through a licensed natural gas supplier. 2. The non-traditional marketer: a) may not collect revenues directly from retail customers due to the provision of natural gas services; b) may not require its members or constituents to obtain their natural gas service through the non-traditional marketer or the licensed natural gas supplier(s) with which the non-traditional marketer arranges retail service. c) is not responsible for the scheduling of natural gas supplies, the payment or remission of taxes due from the sales of natural gas services and are not responsible for the payment of the costs of the natural gas to its suppliers or producers. Proposed Rulemaking Order, In Re: Licensing Requirements for Natural Gas Suppliers, Docket No. L-00000150, entered April 13, 2000. The statutory definition of a “natural gas supplier” is similar and just as broad as the statutory definition of “electric generation supplier”. See 66 Pa. C.S. § 2202. Although the Commission has not formally acted to establish final regulations regarding the licensure of non-traditional marketers seeking to enter the electric generation market, we believe that 5 the above-mentioned criteria are relevant to the instant question of whether the MANP, a non-traditional marketer seeking to participate in the retail electric market, is required to be licensed. Therefore, we conclude that this additional consideration supports our conclusion that the MANP is not required to be licensed in order to provide service in Pennsylvania. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the MANP is not required to be licensed by the Commission; THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 1. That the Petition of the Manufacturer’s Association of Northwest Pennsylvania be granted consistent with the discussion contained in the body of this order. BY THE COMMISSION, James J. McNulty Secretary (SEAL) ORDER ADOPTED: August 17, 2000 ORDER ENTERED: August 18, 2000 6