* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Figure 1 Aggregate Supply and Demand
Survey
Document related concepts
Nominal rigidity wikipedia , lookup
Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup
Business cycle wikipedia , lookup
Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup
Fear of floating wikipedia , lookup
Real bills doctrine wikipedia , lookup
Exchange rate wikipedia , lookup
Okishio's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Money supply wikipedia , lookup
Full employment wikipedia , lookup
Inflation targeting wikipedia , lookup
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
Stagflation wikipedia , lookup
Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Macro2 Manual Purpose of Program This module is designed to allow you to get experience with the way the national economy fluctuates on its own, and the ways it responds to government decisions. You control all the major tools the government uses to control the economy. You face some of the difficulties the government has in figuring out what to do with those tools, and you, like a government, have to decide what you are trying to accomplish. Unlike the Macro1 module, this one allows you to control three policy tools at the same time, as real policy makers can. This makes it possible for you to confuse yourself more easily than in Macro1, since by changing all three tools at the same time you can make it very hard to figure out what any one of them does. Of course, unlike real policy makers, you can try out each tool individually without changing the others to avoid this confusion. Also unlike Macro1, in this module you control the real money supply, rather than the real rate of interest (real policy makers can choose which of these they prefer to work on). Finally, in this module you can stage a “running fight” (over eight years) against the evils of inflation and unemployment. In other words, each year you can institute new policies, but the results you get in one year depend on what happened the previous two years because the previous two years inflation affect the expected rate of inflation in the current year. This dependence of the current economy on past events adds another note of realism to the module. It may also add to your understanding of the problems that real policy makers face over a period of years, as they try to get the macroeconomy where they want it to be. The Nature of the Problem In this module, as in Macro1, you face the problems of inflation and unemployment. However, in Macro1 there was a fixed tradeoff between the inflation and unemployment rates, a “Phillips curve.” In this module the inflation rate you get does depend on the unemployment rate (or equivalently, on the level of real GDP) but it also depends on the past history of inflation in the economy. As a result, a particular unemployment rate may appear in a given year with virtually any inflation rate. A further consequence of this is that the initial (1st year) effect of a policy change on all of the macroeconomic variables is not the same as its impact in year 2, or year 3, and so on. This makes the problem of hitting a target (an inflation rate, an unemployment rate, or some combination of the two) is far harder—and even if you hit it in one year, that does not mean the same policies will let you hit that target again in the following year. The problem in this module is learning to control an economy that is far more dynamic than the one in Macro1, one in which behavior changes even when you have done nothing to change it. That should make it more interesting, more realistic, and more difficult to work with. 1 The Model The overall measure of the level of economic activity in the country is real GDP. Real GDP is the measure of total production and how much is received by all sectors of the economy combined. The sectors that get the product are: (1) Households -Consumption Spending, (2) Business -- Investment Spending (3) Government -Government Spending. Other measures of interest to people are: the unemployment rate, inflation rate, nominal interest rates, and real interest rates. Unemployment Rate This is the number of people unemployed (no jobs, looking for work) divided by the number of people in the labor force (the unemployed plus those working). Example: There are 100 people with no jobs, who are actively trying to get jobs, and 900 people working, so the unemployment rate is 100 / (100 + 900) = 0.10, or 10%. The unemployment rate indicates the amount of unused resources, and measures (crudely) the cost to society of having fewer goods and services than it could have had. Inflation Rate This is the rate of increase in the price level. Example: The price index at the beginning of the year is 120 (prices are higher than in the “base year” when the price index was 100). If the price level at the end of the year is 140, the change in the level is 140 - 120 = 20. The rate of inflation is the change in the price level (20) divided by the beginning price level (120), so the rate of inflation is .167, or almost 17%. The higher the inflation rate, the more adjustment costs society has, and the more redistribution of income there may be. (Whether income is redistributed depends partly on whether the inflation was expected.) Consumption This is the amount of (real) spending by households on goods and services. It increases as real GDP rises, but falls as the real rate of interest rises. (See below for an explanation of the real rate of interest.) In the real world other variables may affect consumption, for example: expected future income (and therefore “consumer confidence”), the current value of the nation’s marketable wealth (i.e. the stock market), and the distribution of income. Investment This is the (real) amount spent by businesses on goods and services that they do not resell to households, government, or foreign buyers by the end of the year. It includes buildings, machinery, etc. that firms will use for a long time. It also includes stockpiles of raw materials, semi-finished goods, and finished goods not sold by the end of the year, inventory. Investment goes down if the real rate of interest goes up. (In reality 2 investment may also go up as real GDP goes up.) Investment in this context does not include buying stocks, bonds, or other pieces of paper (i.e. financial assets). The value used in the module is Gross investment which means we are not subtracting off any depreciation (allowance for wear and tear on existing capital). That means that the value of investment cannot be negative in the module. Nominal Interest Rate A measure of the nominal interest rate is the amount of interest paid on an asset (i.e. a bond or a bank) account divided by the current value of that asset. Example: A bond is currently worth $1,000, and its owner gets $15 per year for owning it. The nominal rate of interest on this bond is 15%. [If an asset has no finite expiration date this is the general measure of the return on that asset. For assets with expiration dates, there are other return measures, such as the “return to maturity.] “The” nominal rate of interest is an overall measure, or index, of interest rates. In common usage, the nominal interest rate is usually just called the interest rate. Real Interest Rate The real interest rate measures the change in real ability to buy that a nominal interest rate is expected to offer. If the nominal rate is 15% per year, but George expects the price level to rise 20% per year, by the end of the year, George expects to wind up with about 5% less ability to buy if he lends money at that rate of interest. Example: Hannah asks George for a one year $1,000 loan at 15% (nominal) interest. If George makes the loan, expecting 20% inflation, he gives up $1,000 worth of goods and services at today’s prices. He will get $1,150 at the end of the year, but expects each dollar to be worth 20% less. If he makes the loan he expects at the end of the year to be able to buy goods and services worth about $950 in today’s prices. The expected loss in purchasing power for George is about $50, a real rate of about negative five percent. In symbolic form, if the real rate is R, the nominal rate is IN, and expected inflation is EDP: R = IN – EDP (This is an approximation useful if there is not too much inflation.) The tools available to control the economy are divided into fiscal policy and monetary policy. Fiscal policy is divided into two categories: government spending and taxes Government Spending If Congress and the President want to raise real GDP, they can raise real government spending. If everything else (taxes and the real rate of interest) is held constant, the increase in government buying raises total demand for goods and services. This raises production (real GDP) and income. The rise in income causes a rise in household demand for goods and services, and further increases in production and income. This (government) spending multiplier means the eventual rise in income can be larger than the initial rise in government spending. 3 Example: Suppose the government spends an extra $100, and the population spends an extra $0.90 for every extra dollar in income they get. There will be a chain of increases in income and spending whose first few terms will look like this: change in government spending = 100 change in consumer spending = 90 change in income = 90 change in consumer spending = 81 change in income = 81 change in consumer spending = 72.90 ….. The result of this chain can be calculated using the formula: change in income = change in spending * (1/(1-MPC)) where MPC is the marginal propensity to consume, 0.9. Taxes If the government wants to raise real GDP it can cut real taxes (holding real interest rates and government spending constant). If taxes are cut, people have more income available to spend, and they spend more. This increases consumer demand, which causes production (real GDP) to rise, and therefore further increases in spending. (Again, sectors other than households are being ignored.) The eventual rise in real GDP can be greater than the initial tax cut. The example under Government Spending can be used to show how this works, but to get the same increase in GDP you must assume that the initial cut in taxes was just enough to give households the right increase in “after tax” income, so they will spend another 100. (Using the same behavior as before, the required tax cut is 100/0.9 = 111.11….). In other words the initial increase in spending will the MPC times the initial cut in taxes, so the tax multiplier is MPC/(1-MPC). Monetary Policy If the government (the Federal Reserve Board) wants real GDP to rise it can cause an increase in the real money supply. It buys Treasury bonds from banks, so they have more “reserves” and can offer more loans. As the loan supply increases, the price of loans (the interest rate) falls. If the real interest rate falls, consumer and business spending rises. As this demand rises, production and income rise. (The Fed has other methods of affecting the money supply and interest rates (i.e. discount rate, reserve requirements), but one is sufficient here.) If government spending rises, with taxes constant and the money supply constant, interest rates will not remain constant. If income starts to increase, due to the rise in government spending, there is more demand for money by consumers and businesses, since they are making more transactions. This also causes the price of money (still the interest rate) to go up. As interest rates go up, this has a negative effect on investment and consumer spending. The same analysis applies to the effects of a cut in taxes. In the real world the Federal Reserve directly controls the nominal money supply -- the dollar value not corrected for changes in the price level. That means a surprise change in the price level could make the FED miss a target expressed in terms of the real money supply (nominal money supply divided by the price index). In this module your job is simplified because you directly control the real money supply. 4 Aggregate Supply and Aggregate Demand The aggregate supply curve describes the levels of production that firms will offer at given price levels for final goods and services, holding constant prices of resources used in production. The higher the prices of final goods and services are, relative to resource prices, the larger the level of output and visa versa. Aggregate demand is the combined demand for final goods and services from government, consumers, and business (investment). The determination of demand is discussed in terms of the three sectors of the economy: consumers, business, and government. In other words, if AD is aggregate demand, C is consumer demand, I is (business) investment demand, and G is government demand. AD = C + I + G In equilibrium aggregate demand is equal to real GDP, but that level of GDP may or may not be at full employment. The full employment real GDP (GDPFE) is the long run equilibrium level of output. It corresponds to a level of unemployment where there is zero cyclical unemployment, and workers are not being fooled about the purchasing power of their wages. In the module, the new price level is equal to the old price level plus the change in the price level from the previous year. Information concerning monetary and fiscal policy, and the behavior of investors and consumers is summarized in the Aggregate Demand (AD) curve in Figure 1. The behavior of firms, which determines the goods and services supplied, is summarized in the Aggregate Supply (AS) curve. Figure 1 Aggregate Supply and Demand P AS P1 P0 AD1 AD0 GDP0 GDP GDP1 GDPFE 5 In Figure 1 the aggregate demand line AD0 could represent an original level of demand in a recession, and AD1 the impact of expansionary monetary and/or fiscal policies. Performance Over Time This graph allows you to see how the unemployment (red in the module, dotted in the figure below) and inflation rates (blue in the module, dashed in the figure below) changed over your time in office, compared to the values they had at the end of your predecessor’s regime. Each (inflation and unemployment) is measured compared to the original value. In other words, if the inflation rate was 5% before, and is 5% now, the line for inflation will be at zero (5% - 5%). If Unemployment was 6% before and is 8% now, the unemployment line will be at 2% (8% - 6%). For example, if Figure 2 below, over the user’s first three years in office the unemployment rate (starting at a base figure of 3.81%) was 3%, 5%, and 7%, while the inflation rate, starting at 3.26%, varied from 6%, 5%, and 2% the results look like this: Figure 2 Performance Over Time % Unemployment Rate 6 3 Inflation Rate 1 2 3 Time (In the module the inflation rate is measured on the left vertical axis, as usual, but the unemployment rate is measured on a right side vertical axis. The two are measured on different scales.) Running the Program When you start running the program, you must choose whether to begin in a recession or in an inflationary situation. The first year you have to take the policy decisions made by the previous administration - and get the “initial conditions” results you’ve already seen. After that, by clicking on “New Year” you get a chance to enter policies of your own. If you keep running the economy and keep using the same values for your policies you will notice that your results keep changing. This is due to the fact that you do not control the 6 rate of inflation that people in this economy expect. The inflation rate they expect is a weighted average of the actual inflation experienced in the past two years (65% of the weight on the most recent year). If the actual inflation rate is changing they keep changing their expectations. If nominal interest rates stayed the same, the real interest rate would fall. A reduction in the real rate of interest would encourage more investment and consumption spending, and that means higher real GDP, lower unemployment, and more inflation. In spite of this, the first time you run the program it might be a good idea to run it for a while with the same policy numbers, just to see what happens. If you do, you may discovery that there are some patterns to the results. In any case, doing this will give you a basis for comparison - if you are trying to change your policies every year to get better results, how do you know they are better? If you could change your policies to get less inflation, or less unemployment, or best of all, less unemployment and inflation that you get if you just keep the same policy numbers, then you’re helping. Math Model One of the ways the model used in this module differs from many elementary textbook models is the direct incorporation of the expected rate of inflation. In this module the expected inflation rate for the current year (EDP) is a weighted average of the actual inflation rate in the previous year and the actual inflation rate of two years back. The more recent experience carries more weight. EDP = (0.65 * inflation last year) + (0.35 * inflation two years ago) The values for the inflation rates for the two years before you took over are built in to the two scenarios, but you can figure out the expected inflation rate from looking at the first year’s results—just subtract the real interest rate from the nominal interest rate. The structural equations for the sectors are: Consumption: C = a1 + a2 (GDP - T) + a3 R where C = real consumer spending, R = real rate of interest, GDP = real Gross Domestic Product, T = taxes, a1 through a3 are parameters. In this module the parameter values for the consumption function are: a1 = 10, a2 = 0.9, a3 = - 25 Investment: I = b1 + b2 R Where I is real investment spending, b1 and b2 are parameters. In this module the parameter values for investment spending are: b1 = 870, b2 = 0.70 7 Government spending is the value set by the user and real GDP is, as usual: GDP = C + I + G + NX NX stands for net exports, but this is a closed economy module so net exports are assumed to always be zero. The spending multiplier (SM) in the module is (IF real interest rates are kept constant): SM = 1 / (1 - a2) = 1 / (1-.9) = 10 The tax multiplier is (IF real interest rates are kept constant): TM = .9 / (1-.9) = 9 The monetary sector assumes real money supply (determined by the user) equals real money demand. (MD is real money demand, IN is the nominal rate of interest, d1 d2, and d3 are parameters) MD = d1 + d2 IN + d3 GDP In this module parameter values for the money demand equation are: d1 = 15, d2 = -0.95, d3 = 0.025 A complicating feature in solving the model is that, for sufficiently high values of the real interest rate investment spending becomes zero. For even higher values of the real rate investment spending would be negative if that were possible--which it isn't. When determining outcomes at such high real rates it is necessary to force investment spending to zero and determine all outcomes using the structural equations for only two sectors. The solution for real GDP is (M is the money supply--and demand): GDP = {(a1+b1)+(G- a2 T) + (a3+b2)(M-d1-d2 EDP) / d2) / (1-a2 + (d3 / d2)(a3 + b2)) Where M (money supply), G (government spending), and T (taxes) are all obtained from inputs provided by the user. And R = IN – EDP = (M – d1 – d3*GDP)/d2 - EDP However, in cases where the solution for R (using the parameter values shown along the way) produces a value greater than -b1 / b2, the result is a negative value for investment. When this happens real GDP and R are recalculated using zero values for b1 and b2 (guaranteeing an investment value of zero). 8 The unemployment rate is determined using a version of Okun's law: Unemployment = 0.5 - (0.000199 GDP) The inflation rate is also calculated using the real GDP and expected inflation rate already obtained. The equation below could be combined with the one for unemployment to produce a Phillips curve equation. The real Phillips curve is nonlinear. (Real world estimates are consistent with a non linear function) It is approximated for this module by a set of linear equations, one for each of several ranges of real GDP. If dp is the inflation rate then: If realGNP > 2400 dp = 0.003 * EDP + (0.1152 + (0.0142 * (realGNP - 2400))) If realGNP <= 2400 and realGNP > 2350 dp = 0.003 * EDP + (0.0748 + (0.00083 * (realGNP - 2350))) If realGNP <= 2350 and realGNP > 2300 dp = 0.003 * EDP + (0.05 + (0.0005 * (realGNP - 2300))) If realGNP <= 2300 and realGNP > 2211 dp = 0.003 * EDP + (0.01 + (0.000449 * (realGNP - 2211))) If realGNP <= 2211 and realGNP > 2200 dp = 0.003 * EDP + ((0.0009009 * (realGNP - 2200))) If realGNP <= 2200 dp = 0.003 * EDP - 0.0002 + (-0.000022 * (2200 - realGNP)) If dp < -0.02, then dp = -0.02. This last part represents the lower limit on price changes, due to some downward inflexibility of prices. Since the expected inflation rate is incorporated into the Phillips curve technically the above equations represent segments on an inflation-augmented Phillips curve. In the short run with constant inflationary expectations they represent a short run Phillips curve. When expectations vary they represent a longer run Phillips curve. Once all the previous results have been obtained, new values for consumption, investment, government spending, and the nominal interest rate are calculated. 9