* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Why did they fight article AP
Battle of New Bern wikipedia , lookup
United Kingdom and the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Baltimore riot of 1861 wikipedia , lookup
Conclusion of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Lost Cause of the Confederacy wikipedia , lookup
South Carolina in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Jubal Early wikipedia , lookup
Georgia in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Alabama in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Opposition to the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Issues of the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Battle of Fort Pillow wikipedia , lookup
Union (American Civil War) wikipedia , lookup
Mississippi in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
Racial segregation in the United States Armed Forces wikipedia , lookup
Military history of African Americans in the American Civil War wikipedia , lookup
by NJ Rebel Why Did They Fight? One of the biggest questions about the Civil War is why the men of both sides fought. The answer is not as simple as many might think. The simplistic view is that each side fought for the primary reasons the War started: those on the Southern side to preserve slavery and those on the Northern side to preserve the Union and then later, in a crusade to end slavery and free the black man. The very nature of why the soldiers of both sides fought was recently explored by Dr. James McPherson in a book titled "For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War". While I am not promoting his book here (although it did win the 1998 Lincoln Prize), his book does make some very interesting and intriguing points. First, it is surprising the amount of men from both sides in his statistical sampling who fought mirrored similar thoughts. Many fought for their country and considered it an honor to be called to lay their lives down on the altar "of their country". Many on both sides also had the strength of conviction of fighting for a holy cause; others fought simply because their neighbors and friends had joined and did not wish to be seen as being cowards or soft. Still others (in the North) fought to eradicate slavery, while those down South fought in the knowledge they would be supported back home (as did those up North) and at the same time taking "vengeance" on those who "would pollute and desecrate our Southern soil". (I kid you not; if you read some of the letters from Southern soldiers of the early war period, you realize they were in earnest about their convictions.) The cause of liberty, as defined by both sections, figured highly in the reasoning of many soldiers. Those of the North felt they were fighting to not only preserve the Union but to keep alive the spirit of the Declaration of Independence and of the Constitution. After the Emancipation Proclamation was issued on New Years' Day in 1862, many Union soldiers clearly saw an opportunity to eradicate slavery forever from the nation, thereby extending the full promise of liberty to the black man as envisioned by the framers of the Declaration but not the Constitution. It is ironic that many Southerners, while not slave holding, consented to fight to preserve or maintain what would be a slave-holding republic if successful in winning independence. (And the South claimed it was doing so in imitation of its Revolutionary War ancestors!) However, at the same time, many in the South fought "against" slavery. Not the slavery they were used to living with, but the slavery perceived as being readied to be imposed on them by the hated Yankee. The word "subjugation" was one also heavily used by Southerners in describing the result of the South returning to the Union or being defeated by the North. Both sides in the conflict revered George Washington; it was the Southern Confederacy that placed him on its Great Seal. Washington's home of Mt. Vernon, while clearly in Confederate Virginia, was neutral ground by both sides. After all, who would want to be responsible for destroying the house of the Father of the Country and the winner of the fight for Independence from the British Empire in the War of 1775-1783? Lastly, and perhaps more pronounced as the War dragged on, the soldiers of both sides fought for each other. Just like the recent book by World War II historian Stephen Ambrose about the members of the 509th Parachute Infantry Regiment (and later made into a mini-series for HBO), many soldiers in the Civil War truly became a band of brothers. Perhaps the fictional Chamberlain in "Killer angels" described it best when he tried to explain to the members of the Second Maine (whose enlistments had not expired and were being added to the Twentieth Maine rather forcibly) why they all fought: "Some of us volunteered to fight for Union. Some came in mainly because we were bored at home and this looked like it might be fun. Some came because we were ashamed not to. Many of us came . . . because it was the right thing to do…. But freedom . . . is not just a word. This is free ground. All the way from here to the Pacific Ocean. No man has to bow…. Here we judge you by what you do, not by what your father was. Here you can be something. Here's a place to build a home… It's the idea that we all have value, you and me, we're worth something more than the dirt…. What we're all fighting for, in the end, is each other." (The Killer Angels, © 1974, Michael Shaara.) The reasons why men fought in the Civil War are largely just as true today as they were then. As a Civil War living historian, I can personally say I have felt the power of those emotions: fighting for one's home, cause, beliefs and, in the end, one's pards. The common question: Why did women want to fight? Well the same question could be asked of men. Just as men of both the Confederate States and the Union had their various reasons for why they went to war, so did the women who managed to enlist. With the possibility of entering the ranks barred for any females, all they had to do was cut their hair, wear male attire and go under a male alias.With the lack of properly constructed physical examinations, and the requirements being, good health, reasonable height, at least a few teeth (to be able to tear open cartridges) and a trigger finger intact, it's understandable that so many women passed off as a man. What needs to be realised, is that any women present in the ranks, disguised as a man, was there as a volunteer ! No one expected women to sign up or did they ask them to. Why did so many want to fight ? To be with a loved one A number of women joined the ranks to be with a husband, brother, father etc. This was either because they didn't want to be left behind alone, or separated from the ones they loved. An account of two individual ladies in "They fought like demons" tells that the ladies life was their husband, and they would prefer death than to be without them. Both accounts tell that when the women were sent home, they attempted suicide. Some women really did love the excitement of going to war. Some simply loved the idea of becoming a soldier. The thought of being in battle was both scary, but an adventure to so many young enlisted men (and women). Sense of Duty For some women, they were already living under a male alias. With the opportunities for unmarried women being so few, often dressing and acting like a man secured them a lifestyle that would not have been available to them as a women. Money and male independence ! Of course in hand with this, then came the pressure to enlist to prove your manhood. The pressure for men of the period to fight, was exactly the same for the women dressed as a man ! Fighting for the cause Confederates: As with men of the confederacy, women too wanted to defend their homeland from the invading Union armies. Yankees: For the northern women, preserving the Union was what they fought for. The reasons women fought from either side, can be seen as exactly the same as those of a man. Some women enlisted with brothers or fathers. Not wanting to be seperated by war, they saw the only way to stay with them was to become a soldier. Running away from home Some women joined for the exact oposite reasons as the above section. They infact wanted to get away from unpleasent situations at home. It was seen as way of escaping a situation they didn't like. Running away as a girl, wouldn't ensure that they could get work or support themselves, but taking on a male guise, they would be able to get work, or indeed join the army. Attractive Bounty and Pay Certainly an important contributing factor to signing up for poor, working class women was bounty and pay. But this wasn't solely admitted as a reason to enlist. Work for women in this period of history was indeed not along the same lines as it was for men. Few domestic roles were available , and low paid. For a women to make a good living, it wasn't easy. So with the temptation of earning a "man's" wage, some women lost their skirts and lived under a male alias. Sarah Rosetta Wakeman did just this and in letters home told her parents how she had later enlisted and received $152 in money, then $13 a month there after. Freedom and Adventure Adventure certainly came into the reasons for enlistment for some women, just as it did for so many men. "Once let the black man get upon his person the brass letter, U.S., let him get an eagle on his button, and a musket on his shoulder and bullets in his pocket, there is no power on earth that can deny that he has earned the right to citizenship." Frederick Douglass The issues of emancipation and military service were intertwined from the onset of the Civil War. News from Fort Sumter set off a rush by free black men to enlist in U.S. military units. They were turned away, however, because a Federal law dating from 1792 barred Negroes from bearing arms for the U.S. army (although they had served in the American Revolution and in the War of 1812). In Boston disappointed would-be volunteers met and passed a resolution requesting that the Government modify its laws to permit their enlistment. The Lincoln administration wrestled with the idea of authorizing the recruitment of black troops, concerned that such a move would prompt the border states to secede. When Gen. John C. Frémont (photo citation: 111-B-3756) in Missouri and Gen. David Hunter (photo citation: 111-B-3580) in South Carolina issued proclamations that emancipated slaves in their military regions and permitted them to enlist, their superiors sternly revoked their orders. By mid-1862, however, the escalating number of former slaves (contrabands), the declining number of white volunteers, and the increasingly pressing personnel needs of the Union Army pushed the Government into reconsidering the ban. As a result, on July 17, 1862, Congress passed the Second Confiscation and Militia Act, freeing slaves who had masters in the Confederate Army. Two days later, slavery was abolished in the territories of the United States, and on July 22 President Lincoln (photo citation: 111-B-2323) presented the preliminary draft of the Emancipation Proclamation to his Cabinet. After the Union Army turned back Lee's first invasion of the North at Antietam, MD, and the Emancipation Proclamation was subsequently announced, black recruitment was pursued in earnest. Volunteers from South Carolina, Tennessee, and Massachusetts filled the first authorized black regiments. Recruitment was slow until black leaders such as Frederick Douglass (photo citation: 200-FL-22) encouraged black men to become soldiers to ensure eventual full citizenship. (Two of Douglass's own sons contributed to the war effort.) Volunteers began to respond, and in May 1863 the Government established the Bureau of Colored Troops to manage the burgeoning numbers of black soldiers. By the end of the Civil War, roughly 179,000 black men (10% of the Union Army) served as soldiers in the U.S. Army and another 19,000 served in the Navy. Nearly 40,000 black soldiers died over the course of the war—30,000 of infection or disease. Black soldiers served in artillery and infantry and performed all noncombat support functions that sustain an army, as well. Black carpenters, chaplains, cooks, guards, laborers, nurses, scouts, spies, steamboat pilots, surgeons, and teamsters also contributed to the war cause. There were nearly 80 black commissioned officers. Black women, who could not formally join the Army, nonetheless served as nurses, spies, and scouts, the most famous being Harriet Tubman (photo citation: 200-HN-PIO-1), who scouted for the 2d South Carolina Volunteers. Because of prejudice against them, black units were not used in combat as extensively as they might have been. Nevertheless, the soldiers served with distinction in a number of battles. Black infantrymen fought gallantly at Milliken's Bend, LA; Port Hudson, LA; Petersburg, VA; and Nashville, TN. The July 1863 assault on Fort Wagner, SC, in which the 54th Regiment of Massachusetts Volunteers lost two-thirds of their officers and half of their troops, was memorably dramatized in the film Glory. By war's end, 16 black soldiers had been awarded the Medal of Honor for their valor. In addition to the perils of war faced by all Civil War soldiers, black soldiers faced additional problems stemming from racial prejudice. Racial discrimination was prevalent even in the North, and discriminatory practices permeated the U.S. military. Segregated units were formed with black enlisted men and typically commanded by white officers and black noncommissioned officers. The 54th Massachusetts was commanded by Robert Shaw and the 1st South Carolina by Thomas Wentworth Higginson—both white. Black soldiers were initially paid $10 per month from which $3 was automatically deducted for clothing, resulting in a net pay of $7. In contrast, white soldiers received $13 per month from which no clothing allowance was drawn. In June 1864 Congress granted equal pay to the U.S. Colored Troops and made the action retroactive. Black soldiers received the same rations and supplies. In addition, they received comparable medical care. The black troops, however, faced greater peril than white troops when captured by the Confederate Army. In 1863 the Confederate Congress threatened to punish severely officers of black troops and to enslave black soldiers. As a result, President Lincoln issued General Order 233, threatening reprisal on Confederate prisoners of war (POWs) for any mistreatment of black troops. Although the threat generally restrained the Confederates, black captives were typically treated more harshly than white captives. In perhaps the most heinous known example of abuse, Confederate soldiers shot to death black Union soldiers captured at the Fort Pillow, TN, engagement of 1864. Confederate General Nathan B. Forrest witnessed the massacre and did nothing to stop it. The document featured with this article is a recruiting poster directed at black men during the Civil War. It refers to efforts by the Lincoln administration to provide equal pay for black soldiers and equal protection for black POWs. The original poster is located in the Records of the Adjutant General's Office, 1780's–1917, Record Group 94. Article Citation Freeman, Elsie, Wynell Burroughs Schamel, and Jean West. "The Fight for Equal Rights: A Recruiting Poster for Black Soldiers in the Civil War." Social Education 56, 2 (February 1992): 118-120. [Revised and updated in 1999 by Budge Weidman.]