Download The Science of the Extraterrestrials

The Science of Extraterrestrials
2007 the Year of Explanations*
By Eric Julien**
Available only at
WORLD RELEASE
10-10-06
The centenary of Einstein's special relativity theory gave us in 2005 the opportunity to
wonder about beliefs in the matter of UFOs. This is now the opportunity to present The
Science of Extraterrestrials. Well more than a book, it proposes a new paradigm:
Absolute Relativity!
Envisaging the existence of extraterrestrials in our environment is described as imaginary
and impracticable. Two limits have been maintained to convince us of it. The first is that of
the dream whose portrayal the film industry has as a goal. Thus, we unconsciously
associate a fiction with the total absence of reality. If it is part of cinema, it does not exist.
Thus the screen indeed acts as a screen. The second is that of the speed of the light.
Nothing can go faster than light. Thus it would be impossible to come from a star to visit
Earth. End of demonstration. It is time to move on.
Yet, admitting to the existence of extraterrestrial intelligences would not pose problems for
the scientific community! In fact, every astronomer knows perfectly well that interstellar
gases harbor molecules forming the materials of life. In the abundance of galaxies, among
the myriad stars, life itself thus is inevitably developed. Closer to us, Mars was an
immense reservoir of water, seat of probable life. The holders of the Darwinian thesis of
evolution, a conservative theory as controversial to say the least for its missing links as,
conversely, for its total absence of mutations, even are the first to admit that evolution
leads sooner or later to intelligence by adaptation to the environment. This does not fail to
make Ufologists smile. In fact, what comes after (read “beyond”) the stage of human
intelligence? Don’t ask some of the skeptics, they often have a problem of ego and believe
they know everything about universe from their seat. How will humanity need to adapt in
the centuries ahead? Are ETs, like us, limited by the speed of light?
The Science of the Extraterrestrials, available only at alliesbooks.com (world release
10-10-06), confirms this limit. But then what are UFOs? Illusions? A myth? Hoaxes?
Misunderstandings? Human technologies? True UFOs are extraterrestrial ships. But they
are not spatial! First because the universe itself is extraterrestrial! But also because it is
extratemporal! The hourglass image explains what the density of time means; it is the
foundation of the extratemporality of the extraterrestrials.
The second is an arbitrary convention on
which the equations are supported.
True UFOs are extraterrestrial ships. But they are not spatial!
In reality, the sand flows at different speeds.
The density of time is increased when space
diminishes.
The density of time is a major concept: to any given density of time there corresponds a
given quantity of simultaneous physical information. In a higher density the amount of
simultaneous information is greater. The greater the increase, the less "solid" the matter is,
as the changes in the state considered keep growing ... until it becomes physically invisible
to us, apparently being too rapid from our point of view as observers.
The work, greatly lightened by numerous illustrations, demonstrates this thesis and
explains point by point the extensive spectrum of the oddities reported by hundreds of
thousands of witnesses, by those who have dared to speak. Not one of these mysteries
will fail to find a solution in Absolute Relativity. We are alone and lost in space, as it is
not in space that it is necessary to seek the ET pilots of UFOs!
The speed of light thus remains a limit. But of what? Let us return to the year 1905.
Einstein used the work of numerous scientists, among them Lorentz and Poincaré, to
describe and compare the behavior of what are customarily called Galilean referentials,
that is to say, reference points of space and time. Notably, he reached the conclusion that
space and time are not dissociable, that the speed of light c is unsurpassable and constant
in the void. Time amounts then to a flow of instants going from the past toward the future.
In this view, an effect can not precede a cause. The limit of the speed of light thus
becomes that of the causality that can not be inverted.
The Science of Extraterrestrials is founded on an intimate knowledge of the nature of time.
This last is fundamentally cyclical and fractal (identically reproducing an object to a
different scale). Now, a cycle is a process by which a point of origin is also the point of
arrival. Causality is lacking there. All of human science, all our equations need causality to
explain the world. Explaining comes back to describing a relationship between two
situations. But can it be that a relationship may structurally escape us? Take the Big Bang.
The universe is in accelerated expansion, we are told. So be it. But if it really is
expanding, why do we study the microscopic universe? A painful question, in truth ...
In this universe, quantum mechanics does not apply the concept of causality in a strict
fashion! It uses probabilities. Not only is the structure of matter immaterial because
undulatory (one observes the materiality only on our spatial scale); in addition, the
scientists "explain" the universe with an absence of law: that is, chance! How is
chance causal? It is veritable nonsense. A mundane heresy. It is remarkable to note that
the same probabilities serve, on the one hand, the cause of the determinism of
equations (solid proofs) stemming from the statistical mechanics of the infinitely small, and
conversely the cause of chance (absence of proof), for example refuting the results of
parapsychological tests (telepathy, precognition, and so on). The same conceptual
instrument for two opposing logics? The scientific opportunism of the "rationalists" often
borders on intellectual dishonesty.
In the end, is "rationality" anything but persistent belief? Just a sectarian and irrational
prejudice? Just the opinion, the point of view of an observer? Before one speaks of proof,
it is important to evoke its definition. Now, the history of the sciences proves that it evolves
with time! Then, proof of chance or chance of proof? Is it not our point of view as
observer that needs to change, as it is on this last that the proof depends? Before judging,
one still has to be capable of it! Naturally many are persuaded of it ... as they judge! But
the clear-headed know that an opinion is but an opinion, though it may be rendered by one
of the "notables." This is why NOTHING can replace personal experience. As NOTHING
renders it absolute. The only universal way thus is the sharing of experience. This is
what renders the interaction of ETs with humans inevitable. The question of why being
resolved, it remains to know how.
The general principle of quantum mechanics is to vary physical sizes by small packets, as
though counting the grains of sand on the beach. A wave is first of all a deformation
traversing a medium, that is to say space flowing in time. Absolute Relativity suggests that
time is transported by the waves, and not that the waves, universal phenomenon if it is
one, propagate themselves "with" time. Hang on: though admitted by common sense,
today nothing explains the propagation of the waves! Now, Absolute Relativity
describes why and how phenomena exist only according to the space-time fractal to which
they belong or that they traverse.
Fractals are natural or mathematical objects
that reproduce themselves to different scales.
(image of Philippe of Courcy)
What is a fractal? Imagine a rocky coast like that of Bretagne. The general form
reproduces itself but to ever smaller scales. For us human beings, the coastline will
represent a certain distance. For the ant that will need to follow the meanders of the
merest pebble, the distance to travel will be much longer, an intangible length for us.
Like space, time reproduces itself, but the cycles are ever shorter down to an
imperceptible limit. Time will become stroboscopic (alternations of perceived time). Thus
there will exist phenomena that will be impossible for us to perceive. Now, reality seems
just the character of what appears to us to have a certain duration. This reality thus is quite
relative! Extraterrestrials seek not to reach the speed of light but to reduce it to the
maximum. This would have the relative effect of showing us lightning-fast accelerations.
Paradoxical, is it not?
Waves are spires of time. In zooming on a
quantum of time one notices another
series of chronons, and so it goes.
Nothing explains the quantum character of matter ...
apart from cyclical time!
The work overcomes some of this gratuitous evidence. You will certainly regain more of
these charming contradictions. Here you are, help yourself: nothing explains the
quantum character of matter ... apart from cyclical time! You know, this time that
defies causality. In fact, this is the only variable that can be logically finite, thus
quantified. Besides, ask a scientist what is between two quantum states. Most often, the
response will be a big silence. This silence is all the more surprising as cyclical time (spin)
is just what characterizes electrons and protons, principal constituents of matter!
But what is the relationship between travel by extraterrestrials in "space" and the infinitely
small?
Extraterrestrial ships have the ability to pass from macroscopic laws to microscopic
laws by causing variation in the flow of time, that is to say, the number of grains of
cyclical time. With every scale of space is literally associated a quantity of cyclical time.
Ships, blindly called spaceships, travel not in space but between superimposed spacetime entities of different scales. The universe is a layered cake of which global
comprehension would be impossible: each layer has its own sense of perception! The
physical world has its five senses. The psychological world has its own. And thus the
spiritual world has ... its blinds!
The fundamental law of Absolute Relativity replaces the secular special relativity. It can be
summarized in a sentence that any five-year-old child can remember: "The more time
there is, the less space there is, and conversely." Thus, the speed of light is the limit
between two space-time entities separated by their scale according to a specific number of
magnifications, as it happens seven according to J.P. Garnier-Malet, Doctor in Physics
(http://www.garnier-malet.com).
For
his
part,
Laurent
Nottale
(http://wwwusr.obspm.fr/~nottale/), another Doctor in Physics, has studied the relativity of
scale for twenty years. There are numerous scholars of time, such as Tifft, Letho,
Shikhobalov, and Venik. Does one need to insist on the experimental demonstration of
temporal density in a rotating mechanism carried out by Kozyrev in the 1950s? Does
one need to remind the neuropsychiatrists, enthusiasts of materialistic explanations, that
our physical body does not evolve at the same speed as that which ... constitutes it?
Read this question again, nice and calmly. If it is not enough, repeat the operation. Above
all, do not hesitate. Your life risks being profoundly changed by it, as ...
Can anyone say where and when consciousness is located? Does one need to repeat
that special relativity itself affirms these discrepancies of perception of space and time,
depending on speed? Then what is "the imagination," if it is not a particular state of
our consciousness to emit and receive information at a relativist speed? Can there
be reception, though it be described as imaginative through ignorance, elsewhere than in
space and time, supports of every perception? We are but at the beginnings, as the power
of necessary abstraction is so great that even the most experienced physicists could lose
their Latin in it. Yet a simple diagram permits representation of intervals of time of Absolute
Relativity, intervals at the heart of which smaller chronons (quanta of time) multiply.
Linear time is a series of chronons of
variable size. The larger ones conceal the
smaller ones. This is why linear time,
which flows, comes from the absence of
perceived cyclical time.
Imagine beings, ET or not, that live in intervals of temporal non-existence from our point of
view. Naturally they will be dematerialized as waves are! But then the universe will hold
them in a handkerchief.
A particular viewpoint permits a better visualization
of the superimposition of quantum time. The flow of
time comes from the intervals of temporal nonexistence (mauve lines) in the concentric spheres of
the universe.
It is enough for the extraterrestrials to diminish the flow of time in order to appear
perfectly material to us in our expanded world. They succeed in this thanks to the
conjugation of two forms of temporal pumping amply explained in the work, notably by
using rotors and turning electromagnetic fields. The great difficulty consists of grasping
what is produced at the interior of a system making the temporal flow vary. In fact, the
state of matter depends directly on it! We perceive only the differences of density of time in
the manifestations of nature, as we "see" it from the exterior, from a specific spatiotemporal scale.
The "space" agencies, unless they are unbaptized, are the least well placed to address
extratemporal phenomena. In fact, these Ufological "anomalies" are not aerospatial but
transmaterial. The state known as "matter" is a particular case of a vast whole. There is no
"rigid substance" outside our spatial--and temporal--scale. How can one claim to study
UAP (Unidentified Aerospatial Phenomena) while overlooking the essential, namely, this
psychological part of the manifestations of which the casuistic is extraordinarily richer and
yet neglected?
Every grain of time constitutes a data point, a state. Thus, time has a density. The more
important it is, the more information there is and the more troubling the intensity of the
phenomena will be.
The more time there is, the less space there is, and conversely.
High temporal densities are the seat of the psyche, of which the ETs have made
themselves masters. They incarnate themselves at will following a genetic mutation
synonymous with mastery of the information packets in the sense of universal entropy,
which then becomes neguentropic (information structured in the image of the structure of
the DNA molecule). Besides, this is what distinguishes us from the animals. This is also
what differentiates, generally speaking, the living from the inert. The same qualitative
discrepancy exists between the immaterial living and the material living. Extrasensory
perceptions, emotions or thoughts are issues of the highest densities of time, access to
which depends on the very complex structure of the neuronal network, a veritable spatiotemporal elevator. This is also the case with dreams, apparently brief, in which are
produced quantities of events that our memory can not retrieve in physical time, hence
their fleeting and incoherent character from our point of view on waking (weaker temporal
density). Thus, the discrepancy between material and spiritual is but the result of a
difference of flow of time. The question thus is not whether to believe it, or even to
understand it, but to be capable of "rising" or not! In the past, humanity was stricken by
geocentrism, believing itself the center of the world. Could it be that at this start of a
millennium humanity remains fixed in chronocentrism, asserting an arbitrary unit of time in
the equations?
Diversity and strangeness characterize UFO and paranormal phenomena. It renders them
apparently insoluble. But on the basis of a unique concept transmitted by ETs to the
author, which constitutes a decisive step in the matter of exopolitics (ET/human diplomatic
relations), The Science of Extraterrestrials presents numerous clear explanations such as
those which follow, abstracted from the work.
Besides, this new paradigm does not content itself with providing a solution to the
paranormal. It also explains the missing mass of the universe, the cosmological anomalies,
the structure of the atom, and other quantum paradoxes, backed up by equations. Once
the nature of time is assimilated, it is easy to understand the effects of one of its three
dimensions, density.
An ET vessel is surrounded by concentric strata of flattened temporal bubbles. These
bubbles are, of course, invisible in reality. They are comparable to waves of which we
perceive only the effects.
The discrepancy between material and spiritual is but the result of a
difference of flow of time.
The figure below displays different hourglasses that, for simplicity, we will not retain in
most of the illustrations. Many of them show cross sections that are intentionally simplistic
in order to capture the general principle.
A ship is surrounded by different layers of
temporal flows.
The frequency of the sound waves
diminishes as they move away from the
UFO, as a consequence of temporal
variation. Generally speaking, the possible
sound from an UFO is always at the limits of
the audible: low or high frequencies.
Let us linger over the means of observation and perception, whether they are natural or
technical. UFOs are silent as the sound wave emitted by the craft, bathed in conditions of
high density of time, is progressively slowed, thus expanded in moving away from the
emitter.
It becomes an infrasound once it has left the temporal bubbles. This explains their
"auditory" perception by the only animals endowed with specific organs. Then they
manifest nervousness or fear, not understanding where this "noise" comes from.
The supersonic bang is absent for ETs as the air is progressively slowed as far as the
fuselage. Time passes more slowly in successive temporal bubbles. The sound barrier
simply does not exist. Besides, an ET ship is not "flying" properly speaking. It does not
enter the frame of the aerodynamic laws of flight (force of sustenance). This is why an
UFO is an unidentified object ...
There is no boundary layer on which the
shock wave could be born.
In "visual" perception, the discrepancies are understandable as well. The temporal fields
around the UFO respect Absolute Relativity: "the more time there is, the less space there
is, and conversely." Thus, depending on the intensity and influence of these fields, the
perception of a single object will vary between witnesses. A ship will be more or less
luminous, more or less large, more or less material. Hence the divergent reports of
witnesses. If the abductees (the "taken") are surprised at the enormous interior
dimensions, it is no less readily explained: the size of UFOs is relative to the temporal
referential. They are small outside the field, large within.
The perception of distances, sizes, and
shapes depends on the situation of every one
of the witnesses and on the instantaneous
temporal density of the UFO.
The technical means of observation are of the same stripe. Photographs of UFOs are
more or less blurred. The temporal bubbles are equivalent to the capture of an object in
rapid motion even if the UFO is stationary.
As for speed, a space-time entity is a
connection between space and time. Thus a
photograph captures the immediate vibratory
state of the foreground.
High density of time is in tune with the psychological view of the witness, a view that
an ET can influence. Many past appearances corresponded to the technical level of the
epoch: chariots, airships, etc. These visions were produced by ETs with the consent of our
subconscious, seat of the form-thoughts long emitted, multiplied, and consolidated by our
beliefs, that is to say our "imagination" of the moment. In fact, imagination = creation of
information = reality. Let us note in fact that there is nothing but creation in the
universe. There is no reality without creation, as reality IS creation, whatever the origin
may be. Try to demonstrate the converse! I wish you luck. This is precisely the whole
problem of the perception that superimposes itself on our own psychological creativity,
which is at the same time legitimate, natural, and universal, thus logical. Thus every
perception is REAL but more or less shared! This is why Reality is Illusion and
conversely. Again, slowly read the preceding once more, as a lot of debates could thus be
calmed. The "real" forms of ET ships, in contemporary witnessings, coincide with the
massive diffusion of photographic devices, which can not be influenced by a psychological
signal, lacking access to the higher densities of time. ETs a priori no longer need adapt our
perception, and more and more they present themselves as they are from their own point
of view. Liberated from creative beliefs (a deformed description of the witnesses to the
course of history), all thus is, for humanity, nothing but a problem of perceptual
maturity, including the psychological and spiritual!
Extraterrestrials do nothing but respect the laws of nature.
Radar emits waves that material bodies reflect. A detection module receives in return a
weak portion of these waves, which it amplifies and translates in the form of a luminous
plot. But then the train of emitted waves encounters a temporal field that causes
variation in the frequency itself, and not the direction of the waves (the case of the
stealth technology of our airplanes). If this modification is too great, the new frequency will
be outside the radar spectrum. Material ships, although confirmed to be present by visual
witnesses, are not always detected by a station: the radar frequencies are lower than the
luminous frequencies.
The waves (spires of time) of a radar are
changed as they enter the temporal field of a
ship. Their detection is erratic.
Several secondary effects follow from the laws mastered by the ETs. Truncated beams of
light are among them. Their length is included in the temporal field of the ship.
Beyond the bubble, as with sound waves, the light disappears, descending into the
infrared.
The bubble around a ship is the natural limit of
a luminous beam emitted in a specific density
of time. Beyond, the frequency "reddens."
UFOs can conceal themselves in the clouds that they themselves form. The temporal
field creates a zone of cold by application of a Bose-Einstein condensate. Then
condensation of the water vapor (a very different principle) is produced around the nave,
as when you remove a bottle of fresh water from a refrigerator. Mist, fog, or even a dense
cloud may appear, depending on the external conditions.
The cold reigning around a ship engenders a
condensation of the water vapor invisible until
then and conceals it in an cloud depending on
the atmospheric conditions.
After the phenomena of perception, let us address the technology properly speaking. The
sustenance of the naves seems prodigious. But ETs do nothing but respect the laws of
nature. The force of gravitation, like every force needing a point of application
(contrary to those of quantum mechanics), is expressed as F = ma: mass times
acceleration. The latter is distance per unit of time squared. Thus the more time
increases, the more force diminishes! The antigravity of the ETs is degravitation in
reality. The entire difficulty is in knowing how to produce more time locally. The solution is
found in technology.
The potential gravitation (arrow) is annulled
(directionless tube above). The degravitation
grows with time squared.
An ET vessel consists of a double rotor with inverted rotation, a superconductor network, a
central oscillator, and a peripheral torus. There is not room here to record the detailed
description of these that the work provides.
Four technologies:
double rotor, superconductors, oscillator,
and torus.
ET ships are capable of materialization and dematerialization, in motion or in place.
Their behavior is due to variations in the intensity of the temporal field. It is crucial to
understand that such a “spacecraft” does not have ANY PROPULSION in the classic
sense of the term. The conjugate operation of the direction adopted and of this variation is
what provokes and permits motion and navigation. Once the orientation is stabilized and
the initial impulsion of motion is made, the increase in the intensity of the temporal field
reduces the size of the universe in which an ET travels. It is in fact the destination that
approaches the ship!
Space is, then, neither isotropic nor homogeneous. It is a matter of pure and simple
mastery of space and time. What is important is to grasp the mechanism of change in
direction. It is assured by the two rotors with inverted rotation. The plane of an UFO is
dictated by a temporary differential of speed of rotation of the rotors taken separately. This
being out of phase explains the dead-leaf behavior described by witnesses. Well-known
gyroscopic effects then produce changes in course in the three dimensions of space. No
aerodynamic consideration is useful for piloting an ET ship, not even MHD
(MagnetoHydroDynamics). Let us simply recall that lightning-fast accelerations are
illusions due to the change in density of time of the ship.
The materialization and acceleration of UFOs are
nothing but a simple problem of variation in the
intensity of temporal density. The acceleration
seems all the greater as the nave shrinks.
No aerodynamic consideration is useful for piloting an ET ship, not even
MHD.
The variation in the plane of an UFO is due to
a rotating differential between the two rotors
with inverted rotation.
Let us speak of the real crop circles, those circles in wheat that appear before the harvest.
They are well and truly a product of the creativity of ETs.
These agroglyphs are generated in conditions that are perfectly identifiable with a single
unique principle. A ship of the size of a fat firefly (sometimes invisible), its size adapted to
rapid execution of the work, creates a zone of cold above the field of wheat. This done, a
light condensation appears permitting the cereals to absorb this humidity in conjunction
with a "natural" emission of microwaves (the universal electromagnetic spectrum being the
domain of flight of ETs). This situation softens and ionizes the wheat, which is contracted
in the temporal field of the ship as the latter passes above ("the more time there is, the
less space there is"). The first knot is then mechanically stretched and cooked.
Here, the different phases of a stalk. The
representative witness (to the left) sees its
size reduced by the temporal field (the second
and following stalks toward the left--it is a
matter of the same stalk seen in stages).
The UFO describes a trajectory conforming to the shape to be produced. It sucks the
soft, ionized stalks into its magnetic field. Once the degravitational influence has passed,
they need do nothing but lie down. Certain stalks will become entangled in the zones of
intersection of the influence of the ship. In fact, the stalks already on the ground will rise
again, orienting themselves sideways at the time of the next passage of the ship-firefly and
mixing with the neighboring stalks.
The ions (central stalk in the cut) rise again
toward the top, inducing a mechanical falling
effect. The ionization of the wheat is weak,
but the magnetic field of the artist is
considerable.
These explanations, very fragmentary here in relation to the work, in the eyes of many
constitute a spectacular advance in the understanding of the UFO phenomenon, and even
beyond.
Will the war of the worlds happen? Might this be simply the expression of our fear of the
unknown, of our incomprehension of the innermost laws of the universe? In times past,
lightning in a thunderstorm represented the anger of the gods. Today, Ufological
manifestations produce in us reactions of survival and, beyond that, aggressiveness.
Hence our immunological rejection, and hence this mass exorcism in darkened rooms.
Who are the real invaders ? The Science of the Extraterrestrials proves how and why
humans are the space (time) invaders through the use of nuclear weapons! When the core
of an atom is broken, it expands time quanta which normally remain below the scale of the
quarks. At this scale, which is the one of the quantum vacuum, live many ETs, especially
when they use their ships. It’s not a matter of nuclear warhead range, it’s a matter of real
space-time nature, well beyond the old and wrong knowledge of Einstein.
The collapse of billions of billions of atoms is like an Earthquake in their time density. It
means that we represent a real threat for ETs, not only for their navigation system, but for
their life too. This is why UFOs sightings have been multiplied since the end of the World
War II. Many ET races were therefore warned, even if they came from deep space. All our
nuclear weapon tests, all our quantum physics experiments could be interpreted as being
aggressive, or at least unconscious from the ET point of view. Many nuclear facilities have
been visited and even neutralized by ETs. This is a clear sign of their fear. The biggest
error is to believe that they could easily neutralize all the nuclear warheads at will. It is
simply irresponsible to keep such a belief. No one staying within this old mental structure
would become a real exopolitics analyst, neither would be responsibly in touch with aliens.
To speak about peace with extraterrestrials one needs to know first in what it consists of.
In fact, an important question raises. Why so many nuclear weapons have been
manufactured in the past? We assume that part of the almost 16,000 nuclear bombs is not
dedicated to humanity since we are able to destroy Earth many times with such an
arsenal. Let us remember that only two bombs stopped the World War II. One should see
the abductions phenomena according to this human threat, particularly in the USA, first
country to test and launch nuclear bombs. Let us note that the Roswell crash occurred
close to the first historical nuclear testing place on Earth.
The nuclear question is more than a matter of humanity survival but a true paradigm for
the ET presence. From the galactic point of view, in a new potential global war context,
exopolitical implications will become the main issue within the next few years. Instead of
having bigger UFO sightings catalogue, we’d rather usefully think about our universal
maturity. Apocalypse could mean “end of times” or “disclosure”. What will be the UFO
community reaction once facing this tremendous input giving us only few time to spread it?
Deny, discuss or act through activism?
The radiant truth can frighten only those who do not cease to justify their beliefs. It can not
frighten a free, responsible, and enterprising democracy. The Science of Extraterrestrials
should slake our thirst to evolve toward the level of those that we fear through ignorance. If
knowledge protects, it is because it liberates, including from gossip.
Progress will recognize its own because some already write the History. It is a question of
time ...
__________
* Translated by Chuck Brandstater
**About the Author: Eric Julien (aka Jean Ederman) is a
former fighter pilot trainee, a military air traffic controller, a
twin-jet pilot in commercial aviation, station manager for an
international airline company and an airport manager in the
great Parisian airports. Holding a post-graduate degree in
Economic Science on new technologies, he also has an
Airport Senior Manager Certificate from the Ecole Nationale
de l'Aviation Civile (National School of Civil Aviation) in
France. He states having had contacts with extraterrestrials
and shares in this body of work his understanding of the
universe. He authored two other books in French and has participated in several national
radio and TV shows.
A major book on Ufology: The Science of Extraterrestrials, by
Eric
Julien,
published
on
october
2006
only
through
alliesbooks.com (400 pages) ISBN 1-60177-101-0, presents a
"theory of Everything" concretely explaining the scientific,
paranormal, and ufological mysteries in a language that is
accessible, direct, and abundantly illustrated (135 figures). Its
philosophical reach is incalculable and it provides answers to
paranormal questions that if correct, according to French
Physicist Dr Michel Carmassi, deserve the Nobel Prize in
Physics.
Available only at
WORLD RELEASE
10-10-06
Comments of some scientific readers
"If the hypothesis, fascinating I must admit, of Eric Julien is verified directly or indirectly, so yes,
that would explain all the paranormal, I indeed say all the SUPERNATURAL, more exactly all the
NATURAL NOT ALREADY EXPLAINED, and one must give to him the Nobel prize of physics".
Michel Carmassi (Phd) French Physicist
"The demonstration is convincing! ... I find the whole very well structured and interesting; as for
the innovative aspect, not to worry." Michel Actis, Doctor in Physics, France.
"I am happy to be useful to you. Your views on the phenomenon of time are very interesting to my
colleagues and myself." Alexander Levich, Physicist, President of the Institute of Time
Nature Exploration, Russia.
"My opinion of this book is that it is highly coherent. ... It is okay that it is coherent, but it is not
enough that the pieces all agree among themselves: do they agree with the reality of things? That is
where it becomes interesting. In fact, its field of investigation ranges from the microscopic (a study
of matter at the fundamental level, the internal structure of the wave of matter, the structure of the
electron and of light, the structure of space and of time, fundamental forces, energy, heat, and so on)
to the macroscopic (a study of the formation of the galaxies, of gravitation at the universal scale, of
missing mass, and so on); giving explanations that are plausible, coherent, and in accordance with
the observations that quantum physics and astrophysics have been able to provide but not to
explain. ... In this sense, it lays the foundations of a new physics with a vision that is unifying and
finally fundamentally simple (although abstract), meanwhile paying homage to the labors of those
whose ideas have served him in the effort to make explicit, in scientific language, what he had in
mind (Ari Letho, Jean-Pierre Garnier-Malet, and so on). ... It becomes clear that his theory goes
much further than what already exists, and that it is innovative. ... The coherence includes
paranormal effects (psychic abilities, telepathy, displacement in the spiritual body, memory of
dreams, and so on) and explanations relative to the effects of UFOs (displacement of the ships,
various visual effects, missing time, creation of crop circles, radiant impacts on nature, and so on).
There it become a theory of the super-all, but one that does not need all kinds of lumps to succeed in
unifying the various elements: all is based on one unique concept." Pascal di Scala, Professor of
Mathematics, France.
“Having had scientific training (Centrale School Engineer Paris), I found in the book of Eric Julien
a well argued development in favor of his absolute Relativity. This new approach, which upsets our
usual concepts, seems me to propose solid answers to currently unsolved scientific problems. And,
more important in my eyes still, absolute Relativity brings something essential for the
comprehension of the spiritual world. I thus can only highly recommend the reading of this book to
any person eager to understand who we are”. Philippe Pellaumail 44800 Saint-Herblain,
France.
"Eric Julien has worked much to assimilate the laws of physics in their latest development: limited
and generalized relativity, quantum mechanics, cosmology. He uses his knowledge of these domains
to draw up a theory that would explain the existence of extraterrestrials and how they would reach
us, even living so far from us on the universal scale. ... This book is very clever, and being
scientifically trained, I would have to study it closely to detect possible tricks. In any case this book
is a scientific mine. Competent physicists would need to give their opinions on the method and the
results. I am pleased to signal the enormous scientific work behind and the certain interest in this
book beyond the polemics that it may engender here and there. ... This book deserves to be read for
the scientific knowledge that it provides. ..." Alain Pelosato, Editor in Chief of ScienceFiction Magazine.
Comments of some professional readers
” It is huge, it’s like a Copernicus revolution just like the one in every millennium in sciences. This
may be the most important book ever published on UFOs. I am still suspicious of theories-thatexplain-it-all, but this book blew me away and I am bluffed”. Michel Picard, author of Les
OVNIs, laboratoire du futur (UFOs, Laboratory of Future)
“I am still so impressed by your monumental Work that words are missing to express to you the
state of plenitude in which it put me in since its discovery, as of its release. Following the good
advice of Mr Gurdjieff, I finished his third reading at a rate of a good hour, daily. (Former teacher;
to understand is one thing but it is still necessary to have the capacity to express it. What a book!)
(…) Be deeply thanked. 45 years of research and experimentations overall propose many outcomes.
You just delivered the Key. I remain startled. Not being of adulating nature, I confess to find
myself, this time, exceptionally fulfilled. May your Extra-Knowledge finally illuminate this
incipient millennium. Humbly” Michel Thomas, France.
"I have no doubt of the great success that your work will have. ... I need to admit to you that I
consider myself a skeptic, as much on the subject of religion as on the subject of extraterrestrials,
but your book has attracted my interest and my scientific curiosity. Although the subject of UFOs
did not especially appeal to me, which is to say that it was not a cause for concern in my life, your
book is so well written and so well founded that I would really be pleased to translate it." Carlos
Teixera, Translator, Brazil.
"All that I can do is to define your work by what it is not; it is not at all superficial! The tone of the
account is constructive and optimistic, the recourse to the first person plural engaging the reader in
a direct dialogue with the author. The utmost interest is constantly maintained by means of the
prescient questions scattered through the text." Sorina Sabau, Translator, Romania.
"Eric Julien provides explanations that are plausible, coherent, and in my humble opinion as
someone not expert in the domain of the sciences, also all new in the field of Ufology. One of the
greatest virtues of the work is its total coherence and cohesion, as all the subjects dealt with are
perfectly argued, developed, and justified with respect to the goal that it had set for itself. In
addition, it is written in simple and direct language, without academic jargon, in a style that makes
understanding it easy and makes reading it a truly pleasant pastime. ... I would like to offer you my
congratulations, as you have created, in my opinion, a document that is truly intelligent, solid, well
documented, and very pleasant to read." Cristina Rodriguez, Translator, Spain.
"Among the books, so numerous, that enlighten us about the civilizations of the Extraterrestrials,
and about paranormal phenomena such as UFOs, that of Eric Julien, The Science of the
Extraterrestrials, seems to me to be unique. First, in a referential context, in full mastery of a fluid
style of writing, by its logic of reasoning and the organization of its chapters, it provokes an internal
conversation in the reader. Then, in order to convince, it argues as objectively as possible, adopting
a didactic tone with a clear syntax, without ambiguity, without implications. It is a reading
understandable to all; this is very important for the diffusion of its paradigm. As for the content of
his work, it takes us to a Space-Time in comparison with which all that has been said and written is
nothing! ... To go beyond our civilizations almost exclusively devoted to materialism, the work of
Eric Julien permits me to be less pessimistic and to believe that the scientific community will look
into his theory, certainly a breathtaking prospect: a great revolution of thought may change the
course of our human evolution." Suzie Fontaine, University Professor, Italy.
"I have glanced through the work, and it seems to me to be interesting and to provide precise
answers. This is not the case with other Ufological books, reflecting more intellectual masturbation
than level-headed reflection, as is the case in this book. I like the third part, which provides certain
explanations about UFO appearances with diagrams to back them up, and responds to questioning
(about propulsion, and so on). Regardless of its origin, I find that the manuscript is well put
together, well written, readily understandable, and deserving of at least as much attention as the
works constantly cited in reference although they have provided nothing new in 30 or 40 years."
Bernard Thouanel, Editor in Chief of VSD Hors Serie specialised in UFOs, France.
"Today, even if science has helped us to explain the appearance of lightning, one retains a sense of
powerlessness before the UFO. The work is all the more daring as it sets out to broach the subject of
and to explain, with the scientific means available, this mysterious and controversial phenomenon. I
need to warn you that the point of view on the work is that of a translator, thus of just anyone who
does not possess the scientific information necessary to grasp in depth the explanations offered, and
thus to realize the dimensions of the discovery. ... If in the first part the reader is, little by little,
familiarized with the problems that the discussion of this subject implies, in the second part the
theory of Absolute Relativity will satisfy one's curiosity by offering responses to the questions that
arise as fast as the reading proceeds. The successive stages, marks of philosophical reflections,
provide fluidity to the writing, which becomes light, far from transforming itself into a strictly
technical text. ... The explanations offered by the author make us enter another zone, and they aim
at good sense and human capacity for understanding. The solution is simpler than expected: the
structuring of time in 3 dimensions, in combination with the space-time relationship. The reasoning
is well constructed and relevant, and it lets it be understood that the explanation happened to be in
our reach, that one needed to make only the slightest effort to make the great discovery oneself. At
the same time, it shows us the limits of our thought, and the risks it runs by following prefabricated
logic. There is no need to force oneself to use Amstrong's words ('one small step for a man, one
giant leap for mankind') concerning this work. The idea that an explanation for UFOs has been
found, this lightning in the sky of the primitives, makes us think that what remains to be discovered
is spectacular. One realizes that humanity has entered a new epoch, a new stage of development. In
conclusion, it is necessary to note the profoundly humanistic message at the end of the work, where
the author seeks to move us away from the false conviction that ETs represent a menace to our
existence by pointing out to us the real danger, humanity itself, from the errors it commits."
Violeta Birtan, Translator, Romania.
"The fundamental thing that Eric Julien requests of us is not to believe but to understand, to doubt
our knowledge, because only through doubt can we show our intelligence and nourish it. ...
'Intellectual strabismus never leads to the truth.' A sentence that makes us think, that leaves us
perplexed, because for the first time we are before a bifurcation: to doubt our knowledge and put in
question all we have learned up to now, or instead to open our horizons and finally understand who
we are in reality. But will we ever be in a position to brave such a journey?" Valentina
Sommella, Translator, Italy.
"Well, 'hats off,' and what a nice surprise, I just glanced through Eric Julien's book; it is a brick,
but well spaced out by numerous diagrams and drawings. Diagrams sometimes of great complexity,
sometimes of 'lovely simplicity' without 'vulgar' vulgarization. ... It has taken its time to explain
things well, point by point. All the same, the second part will remain reserved to the specialists,
math aficionados, and lovers of modern theories--and others passionate about quantum physics. The
neurons work, a little, or a lot to the point of insanity. ... The last part will please all, including the
'ground Ufologists' who will be able to compare their data with the theories of Eric Julien. I applaud
Eric Julien, who has an impartial book there. ... The tone is cheerful and optimistic, and the literary
style pleasant for such complex subjects." Didier Herbots, Ufologist, Belgium.
"In view of the very rich and very incisive content, we can thank your publisher, as it is
courageous. ... If people deign to contemplate your presentations of the nature of time, they will also
be able to pose the good questions to themselves. ... Goodness, it includes some beautiful things! ... It
is very well explained, a sheer marvel! ... And very impressive in its precision. The work that you
have done is so powerful. ... It is BEAUTIFUL, what you explain. ... A thousand thanks again!"
Bernard Goepp, France.
"I have read many manuscripts of this type, so ... well, my surprise was not just considerable but
overwhelming! ... The manuscript needs reading, reading at all costs! ... Truly an Adam-like man!
His scaffolding of ideas, even insolent given the current erudition of certain points of view, but for
all that not faulty, is not inclined to collapse; on the contrary, every page reveals to us arguments
that one can not easily contradict. Understanding is put to the test for superficial readers, who can
not realize that they are refuting a bedtime story! So much the worse for them!
To cultivate the paradox, as principle and criterion, in order to inculcate in or even impose on the
reader a reality that belongs to him and of which he is unaware, is quite redoubtable! But ... what an
accomplishment for the reader! ... Its style and its writing are very easy, skipping along; ironic
accents are not lacking, and there are assertions that awaken the interest and transport the reader to
worlds never known.
The text and the images find their appropriate place in the economy of the work. The importance of
the ideation of the author, the depth of his analyses, so unusual, this magical universe, overwhelm
and permit us at least to glimpse, if not to understand, what we really are, how our Universe
properly speaking is defined, and in what manner it is to be envisaged!
This author, writing at the start of the 21st Century (Einstein wrote at the start of the last century-coincidence?), makes us part of his very daring ideas, daring not only for the domain of
mathematics (or contemporary physics) but also for other domains that fascinate and of which the
abysses seem, apparently, uncontrollable by our weak intellectual capacity! But ... SURPRISE! The
author opens for us a hidden window, almost never known! I invite you to look at the landscape! It
is incredible and ... it is real!" Vasilica Rascanu, Senior Editor, Romania.
"As for my opinion of the book, I think that it is revolutionary, an invitation to everyone with
enough sensitivity and wisdom to understand that the material world is not the only truth, and that
we are part of the evolution that continues in other spheres, not yet visible to us. ... I am sure that
you are now so intrigued that you want to know more about it. I would like to invite you to open
(yet further) your spirit, and to come with me on a voyage of exploration. Be among the explorers of
the new world of your generation, and do not miss this chance!" Karin Lemmen, Translator,
Holland.
"The book is more than excellent in its ideas and its style. ... I have had a wonderful adventure.
Thank you." Nahed Ragai, Translator, Egypt.