Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Administrative Assistants’ Perceptions of IT Training Effectiveness Amran Rasli, Taman University, Malaysia Paper presented at Fourth International Conference 'Vocational Education and Training Research', University of Wolverhampton, 16-18 July 2001 INTRODUCTION The efficacy of training programmes in enhancing management competencies of individuals cannot be taken for granted any more as most organisations have allocated sizeable annual budgets on management development training programmes (Robinson & Robinson, 1996). According to Saari et al. (1988) and Sogunro (1997), many large organisations devote a substantial portion of their human resource effort to managerial training as compared to smaller organisations. Most of the reviews of management training stress that little is known about the effectiveness of the training conducted (Fielder, 1996; Sugunro, 1997). Saari et al. (1988) discovered that a major reason for the lack of knowledge is the scarcity of meaningful and rigorous research. The main evaluation in most management training too often consists of simply asking the trainees how they liked the programme and whether they thought they had learned something. There is tremendous support for the evaluation of staff development and training programmes (Fielder, 1996; Parry, 1997). Managers recognise that what is lacking is answer to the question, “Are we achieving results?” – specifically, the question of actual transfer of training towards professional development needs to be addressed. The current interest and engagement in the areas of professional development is increasing in the corporate, public and private organisational settings. This is due, in part, to changes in technology and in efforts to increase organisational efficiency and productivity. Creating substantive and meaningful professional development programmes is challenging when attempting to meet the training needs of employees within a changing work environment brought about by technological advancements as well as ensuring a productive return for training investments. Literature Review A review of literature in the field of human resource development (HRD) is important to the understanding of the professional development of employees, that is, processes that prepare an individual for the advancement in one's vocation and for increased of new responsibilities. The growth of HRD, as a discipline, has been attributed to technological advances, increased work force diversity and demands for productivity improvement. However, the research literature in the field of HRD has not paralleled this growth (Fortunato & Keiser, 1985). Several researchers believe that this is due to the fact that HRD is a young field with its literature dispersed among roots in behavioural science, adult education and personnel management (Fortunato & Keiser, 1985). Differentiating Education and Transfer of Training This study is directed towards understanding what moves adults to participate in education and learning pursuits, especially in the context of in-service training. The concepts of "education" and "transfer of training" were considered central in the present exercise. The interrelationships of these concepts has been the major focus of study by the proponents of "adult education" and "training" such as Darkenwald and Merriam (1982) and Caffarella (1991). This section briefly describes and links these major concepts together. Concept of Education The term 'education' has been defined in a variety of ways. Silong (1986) confirms this view in his illustration of the shift from a traditional and narrow concept of education to the presently more integrated and broader concept. The traditional concept views education as something that is deeply associated with children and school. It looks that education is only for children. This may sound awkward but Adler (1982) observes that "this error about education being completed at school is widespread…" The present concept of education takes note that education and schooling are not always synonymous. This is manifested in the many definitions of education presented by various scholars. For instance, Kachar and Teh (1980) in their attempt to integrate various definition of education, see education as a process of facilitating in which the learner is made aware of the various opportunities, options and alternatives that are available to him so that he can decide on his own what steps to take. Education, according to these authors, is concerned with the opening up of the world of the learner and helping him to decide his activities. Smith's (1982) concern for the 'occurrence of learning' is apparent from the following definition of education: "The organised, systematic effort to foster learning, to establish the conditions, and to provide the activities through which learning can occur." Darkenwald and Merriam (1982) view education as follows: "Education is broadly conceived as the deliberate, systematic and sustained effort to transmit, evoke, or acquire knowledge, attitudes, values, or skills, as well as any outcome of the efforts." Therefore, based on some definitions highlighted above, it can be concluded that education is a learning process that consists of elements of design and content. On the design side, education can occur either through deliberate, organised and systematic efforts, or under lesser or non-regulated environments which include normal life circumstances. The elements of content include the types of knowledge, skills, attitudes and values that need to be transmitted to specific categories of learners. Education is not synonymous with learning. The term "education" emphasises the educators or the agents of change who present stimuli and reinforcement for learning and who design activities to induce change. In contrast, the term "learning" emphasises the person in whom the change occurs. Learning is the act or the process by which behavioural change, knowledge, skills and attitudes are acquired (Boyd, et al., 1980; Knowles, Holton & Swanson, 1998). From the types of education highlighted above, it is clear that the term 'education' is very broad and is truly a lifelong process. The emergence of a new concept called 'lifelong education' or 'lifelong learning' is in line with this broader view of education. Many scholars such as Lengrand (1975) and Cropley (1980) as well as Darkenwald and Merriam (1982) have contributed to the development of this new concept of education. Although different scholars have highlighted different facets of the same idea, Dave, (1976) sees 'lifelong education' as a comprehensive concept which includes formal, non-formal and informal education, covering the lifespan of an individual. Concept of Transfer of Training Newstrom (1986) states “transfer of training is defined as the degree to which managers effectively applied to their jobs the knowledge and skills gained in the off-the-job developmental process”. It has been estimated that billions of dollars are spent annually on all types of training in the United States (Fielder, 1996). According to Georgenson (1982) and Caffarrella (1994) as little as 10% of the expenditure pays off in actual behaviour change on the job, resulting in a relapse rate of 90%. Newstrom (1986) reported the results of a survey of 84 training and development specialists that were asked the proportion of management development programme content that gets transferred to the job immediately. The average response was 40%. When the time period was changed to within a 6-month period, the response dropped to 25%. The residual effects of the training programmes after 1 year were estimated at a 15% transfer rate. Caffarrella (1994) emphasised that transfer of training is enhanced when the training is viewed as relevant and practical. Application exercises where the trainee can practice the new skills should be a major part of the instructional activities. The changes required by the learner should be realistic and able to be accomplished. Cascio (1998) offered several suggestions to maximise transfer of training. Similarities between the training situation and job situation should be maximised. Trainees should receive as much experience with the new skills as possible. Trainers should provide a strong link between training content and job content emphasising that what is learned in training is immediately applicable to the job. Wexley and Baldwin (1986) investigated the effectiveness of three post-training strategies for facilitating transfer of training. The authors picked time management as the training topic because of its relevance to students and future managers. The three approaches were assigned goal setting, participative goal setting, and a behavioural self-management approach based on the relapse prevention model. Byham, Adams, and Kiggins (1976) investigated the transfer of training of a behavioural modelling programme using nine supervisors and a matched control group. The authors stated that successful transfer of training skills from the classroom to the job required three things: an acquisition of new skills from training, confidence to use the new skills on the job, and positive reinforcement of skills when applied. Skill acquisition was obtained through use of the modelling programme. Confidence was built by providing a series of success experiences leading to more and more difficult interactions and by providing the opportunity for rehearsal. The factors leading to self-reinforcement included the use of defined steps to handle each interaction and the classroom experience of being an observer of the interactions, which should heighten participants’ selfevaluation skills. The trainees’ supervisors also received an orientation to the modelling programme to increase the probability of management reinforcement for the use of the new skills. Finally, while education and transfer of training are now easy to distinguish, the next question is what type of training can be considered as education? According to Nadler (1970) "employee's training" involves those activities designed to improve the performance on the job the employee is presently doing whereas, "employee's education" involves those human resource development (HRD) activities which are designed to improve the overall competence of the employee in a specified direction and beyond the job the employee is presently doing. Relevant Research Findings on Adult Learning Caffarella (1994) asserted that adults are not likely to willingly engage in learning activities unless the content is meaningful to them. Adults want to apply their learning to present situations and come to a learning activity with their personal goals and objectives. They prefer to be actively involved in the learning process rather than passive acceptors of knowledge. Adults also want to be able to support each other in the learning process. Abadzi (1990) contended that since adults are self-directed, they could only be given facilitation, not taught. In facilitating adult learning, it is important to establish a climate conducive to learning where two-way transmission of knowledge takes place rather than the one-way transmission of children’s classrooms. For learning to occur with adults, Abadzi (1990) believed there should be an atmosphere of mutual respect, supportiveness, collaboration, and openness rather than a competitive environment. The climate is important because unless they find the content and mode of presentation appealing, adults will either leave or not attend to the learning experience. Abadzi (1990) stated that the experiential learning model is a cyclical process that includes four basic modes for optimal learning. First, there needs to be a concrete experience where the person is able to become involved fully, openly, and without bias in the new experiences. An example of this would be the trainee observing a film demonstrating various managerial techniques. Next, a person must be able to reflect on and observe these experiences from many perspectives. This could occur through a discussion after the observations. The person then must be able to create concepts that integrate these observations into logically sound theories. This could be accomplished through lecture and required reading. Finally, a person must be able to use these theories to make decisions and practising and demonstrating the previously learned skills could accomplish this for the trainee. Tindall-Ford, Chandler, and Sweller (1997) found that learning materials that use dualmode presentation techniques result in superior learning to equivalent single-modality formats. An example of dual modality includes lecture and audio-visual presentations together, as opposed to one or the other alone. This supports the experiential learning model as well as behaviour modelling. Knox (1977) stated that, in most instances, adults purposefully engage in systematic and sustained learning for the purpose of modifying performance. Their reasons for engaging in learning activity and their anticipated uses of the new learning usually relate to a familiar area of performance. Actual transfer of the learned activity to a real situation that the learner engages in outside of the classroom identifies improved performance (Caffarella, 1994). Some adult workers with experience in specialised occupations become supervisors (Knox, 1977). Learning to supervise others effectively involves many types of learning activities, such as closely observing others, on-the-job training, supervisory skills coaching by one’s manager, supervisory training sessions, reading about supervision, and receiving feedback about the effectiveness of supervisory performance. Knox (1977) asserted that supervisory training or management development sessions often focus on helping the new supervisor to understand concepts about interpersonal relations and to apply the concepts to improve supervisory performance. The learning activities are successful to the extent that the new supervisor integrates relevant experience and recent changes in knowledge, skills, and attitudes to produce improved performance. Cascio (1998) contended that feedback about one’s performance is essential for learning to occur. Knowledge of results gives the learner information about how he or she is performing and what corrections should be made. Learners can acquire knowledge or results intrinsically, through rehearsal and practice or extrinsically, through feedback from the trainer and other participants. Knox (1977) pointed out that an adult’s motivation and co-operation in learning is more likely when the tasks are meaningful and of interest to the learner. Active interest and participation are more likely when the learner helps in selecting the learning tasks. Torrence (1993) suggested that having the trainees make some decisions about their training makes them feel personally involved. Varying the training activities to include didactic and experiential interaction is motivating to adult learners. Know continued that one way in which adult learners can gain encouragement is through the use of an example or model of what they should know or be able to do as a result of the training experience. This assists the adult learner with clarification about expectations for the learning experience. The Baldwin and Ford Model for Professional Development Based upon research in the behavioural sciences, adult education and personnel administration, Baldwin and Ford (1988) developed a model to illustrate the factors that influence the transfer of learning from the training site to the work environment. This model is important because it highlights the close relationship of the major characteristics of the trainee, the training programme and the work environment to the design and delivery of training programmes and, in turn, the effectiveness of the transfer of learning to the work environment. In addition, the model also provides insight into the factors that could be potential supports or barriers to individual knowledge and skill development programmes. The Baldwin and Ford model, describes the transfer process in terms of training inputs, training outputs or outcomes and conditions of transfer. The trainee input factor includes various characteristics of the (a) trainee, (b) training design of the instructional programme, and (c) the work environment. The conditions of transfer include (a) the ability of the trainee to and take generalise skills or behaviours learned in training to the job context and (b) the ability to maintain the learned skills or behaviours over a period of time on the job. According to the model, regardless of the initial training during the programme, both the characteristics of the trainee and factors within the work environment have a direct effect on professional development and on the trainee's ability to take generalised learning and to apply as well to maintain it within the job context. Therefore, it is important for HRD professionals to gain an understanding of the employee and their work environment. The model also illustrates that the design of the training programme has a direct effect on professional development. Factors such as the techniques of instruction and training content have an affect on professional development. In turn, professional development has a direct effect on the ability to take generalised learning and apply it to "real life" work situations and maintain the philosophy of learning organisation. A review of literature regarding characteristics of the trainee, training design and factors in the work environment to the success of the transfer of learning provides additional insight into professional development of employees. Trainee Characteristics A great deal of literature is available regarding the trainee's ability or skill, attitudes and motivation in relationship to the degree of success of training programmes. In terms of ability and skill, Flavell's (1977) research is sometimes referred to in adult education literature since it deals with the growth of adult cognition. According to Flavell (1977) for many adults, real problems are those situations that confront adults in their areas of expertise and the resolution of these problems is dependent upon the ways in which adults use their cognitive skills. More recent literature often refers to the types of ability or skills that the future work environment will require.. Howell and Cooke's (1989) research indicate that the computerised workplace has moved individuals from performing simple and procedural tasks to more complex tasks requiring them to be able to make inferences, diagnoses, judgements and be involved in decision making processes oftentimes under time pressures. Fleishman and Mumford report (1989) that it will be increasingly important to know how individuals build on previously learned material in order to understand how the transfer of learning affects performance of new and more complex tasks. Research regarding personality factors such as self-efficacy, career aspirations and attitudes towards learning and towards change often reflects the affect these factors have upon an individual's motivation to learn. In a study of improvement of computer skills in the workplace, Hill, Smith and Mann (1987) suggest that individuals who have a high self-efficacy level are more likely to seek opportunities to improve computer skills and are more likely to attempt more difficult and complex tasks on the job. Other researchers suggest that the relevance of training programmes to an individual's job and career aspirations can affect their motivation to learn (Knowles, 1980; Perry, 1990). Craig (1996) report that individuals who believe in the value of training that they received towards job skill improvement are more likely to try newly acquired skills on the job. An individual's attitude toward learning and change can also affect an individual's motivation to learn. According to Knowles (1980), the adult learner in today's changing work environment needs to view learning as a life long endeavour. The old belief that learning is primarily a function of youth and that the purpose of an education is to supply all the knowledge and skills required to live adequately for life is no longer valid. The rapidly accelerating pace of information processing change means that facts learned in youth have become insufficient and skills become outmoded by new technologies (Knowles, 1980). How an individual deals with these changes is a factor in human resource development. Some individuals are eager for change while others may view change as a threat to their current positions. Fuller (1969) and Hall et al., (1973) state that changes over time can produce various perceptions, feelings and frustrations within individuals thus affecting their learning processes. In addition to characteristics of the trainee, the design and delivery of training programmes also influences the success of the transfer of learning to the job context. Training Design Early research on training focussed on the incorporation of learning principles on the improvement of training programmes. This includes research in the areas of (a) identical stimulusresponse elements both in training and the work environment (Underwood, 1951), (b) principles underlying training content (McGee & Thayer, 1961), (c) stimulus variability, that is, presenting relevant training stimuli in multiple ways (Ellis, 1965), and (d) conditions of practice such as distributed sessions and various feedback mechanisms (McGee & Thayer, 1961; Naylor & Briggs, 1963; Wexley & Thornton, 1972). Later research explored the facilitation of training transfer through self-management and goal-setting (Wexley & Baldwin, 1986; Latham and Frayne, 1989). These approaches focus on how to maintain and generalise learning with the promotion of selfdirected behaviour on the part of the learner to facilitate the transfer of learning. Sterns and Doversphike (1989) studied these learning theories as well as Malcolm Knowles' andragogical paradigm for adult learning and identified common factors within the design and delivery of training that they believe to have a positive impact on the transfer of learning. First, training programmes should be relevant to the trainees' job. Second, ample feedback within learning sessions must be included to encourage self-confidence. Third, training should build on elements that are familiar to the trainees' past learning and job experiences. Fourth, instructional strategies should be developed to limit memory requirements. Sterns and Doversphike (1989) believe that these factors can be particularly important for older employees who have motivation to learn but lack self-confidence or fear failure due to competition of younger or more recently educated workers. Recent research has examined instructional strategies such as demonstrations, discussions, case studies and role play in the classroom (Bentley, 1994; Craig, 1996; Knowles, Holton & Swanson, 1998). These strategies attempt to generalise learning and provide opportunities to apply knowledge, skills and attitudes to various work situations and tasks. Current research interest is growing in examining the merits of non-classroom delivery techniques through the use of technology. Factors within the work environment can also influence the success of the transfer of learning. Work Environment The extent to which an organisational climate provides an environment that facilitates continuous learning is another factor that research indicates affects individual development and transfer of learning from a training programme to the work environment. According to Ford (1994), when trainees return to the work environment from a training activity a broad range of problems can occur as they interact with new learning, other people and their job environments. Factors such as time and distance from the educational experience, the risks perceived by trainees in adopting new behaviour and the lack of readily available resources within the work environment can hamper the transfer of learning process. Perry (1990) suggests that it is important for individuals to have ample opportunities to practice, experiment with and perform their newly acquired knowledge and skills in order to facilitate learning transfer in their work environments. In terms of learning environments, Diamond and Allcorn (1986) state that work environments designed to support inquiry fosters unlimited opportunities for individuals to acquire new meanings and insights into their jobs. They add that a supportive environment in which ample opportunities are given to share experiences and consolidate new learning promotes higher levels of intellectual thought. Their research indicates that the success of this type of environment depends upon the willingness of individuals to share their experiences and for management to support and interact with their staff regarding organisational goals and objectives. The research on characteristics of the trainee, training design and the work environment suggest that the transfer of learning process needs to be a concern to those who design, implement, assess and support professional development programmes. Although the ultimate decision to learn lies with the learner, involvement of the learner, educator and supervisor can facilitate the transfer of learning process. Furthermore, the Baldwin and Ford framework can be used before developing, expanding or changing professional development activities to identify jobrelevant training needs, supports, barriers and incentives that may affect employee participation and utilisation of programmes. Moreover, the model can be used after training to assess the extent to which the transfer of newly acquired knowledge and skills are being utilised on the job and maintained over time. The remaining part of this chapter will discuss what can be done to facilitate the transfer of learning before and after professional development activities. Kirkpatrick’s Training Evaluation Model and Professional Development Bramley (1986) defined training evaluation as “a process or set of activities comparing results against goals and established criteria. It is in a very real sense a scientific exercise designed to answer the basic questions in a rigorous, neutral, objective and unbiased manner.” Goldstein (1986), on the other hand, defines training evaluation as, “the systematic collection of descriptive and judgemental information necessary to make effective decisions related to selection, adoption, value and modification of various instructional activities.” A more recent definition of training programme evaluation is provided by Attia (1998) who like Goldstein (1986) defines training evaluation as “the systematic collection of information necessary to determine the effectiveness of training activities and their outcome.” Hawes, Hutchens and Crittenden (1982) classified the benefits of evaluating training programmes into primary and secondary goals. The primary goals are: 1) reduce learning time to educate staff, 2) increase staff morale, 3) reduce staff turnover rate and improve control, 4) monitor staff progress, and 5) improve interdepartmental communications. According to the same authors, the secondary goals of training evaluations are to: 1) develop operational measures to determine training programme effectiveness, 2) keep abreast with the dynamic and ever changing market environment, and 3) provide valid modification lists on training programme methods and content. Levels Involved in Training Evaluation Process Kirkpatrick’s (1959a, 1959b, 1960a, 1960b) four level model of evaluating training programmes has become the classic model and been used widely by trainers for over four decades. The model explains that the tasks of training programme evaluation must involve four distinct levels: reaction, learning, behaviour and results. According to Newstorm (1978), these four levels have been endorsed by many researchers and practitioners, such that they have been accepted as standard for training evaluation. Kirkpatrick’s (1959a, 1959b, 1960a, 1960b), Newstorm (1978) and Honeycutt and Stevenson (1989) mentioned that all four levels of evaluation categories can be ranked ordered from “reaction” being the simplest criteria, to “results” being the most difficult criteria to be accomplished. Thus the task of training evaluation becomes increasingly complex as training experts move their evaluation efforts on the continuum of “reaction-results levels” of the evaluation categories particularly related to professional development (refer Figure 1). Level of evaluation complexity high results Professional Development behaviour learning low reaction Figure 1: Kirkpatrick Evaluation Levels. Adapted from Reser, C. L. W. (1999). An Evaluation Schema for Management Training and Development Prorammes. Master of Education Thesis, Queen’s University, Ontario. DEVELOPMENT OF THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK In general, due to a lack of structure in exploratory studies, the use of a research framework as a guide is very important (Parasuraman, 1986). Based on Baldwin and Ford’s model, the researcher developed a revised conceptual framework. There are three apparent weaknesses in the Baldwin-Ford model. The first weakness is the non-consideration of evaluation as an important input towards professional development. Fortunately, based on the Kirkpatrick’s model, evaluation is considered as an important factor for professional development. The second weakness is the failure to consider socio-demographic influence on the model. The researcher feels that it would be appropriate to develop a framework on professional development whereby socio-demographic variables would be included as moderators. And finally, the complicative relationship between the independent variables and confusion related to professional development as an intervening variable. To off-set these weaknesses, the researcher will propose a simplified model as in Figure 2. Figure 2 shows that an employee’s professional development is influenced by four major factors directly: trainee characteristics, training design, work environment and evaluation method; and one major factor indirectly: socio-demographic factors. Each factor is capable of influencing an employee to participate in training activities either independently or through interactions with other factors as a group. The framework indicates the source of differences in professional development for employees are based on: 1) the extent to which trainee characteristics affects their professional development, 2) the extent to which training design affects their professional development, 3) the extent to which work environment affects their professional development, 4) the extent to which evaluation methodology affects their professional development, and 5) the extent to which sociodemographic factors influence their professional development. The dependent variable for this exercise is professional development of employees. As such, the dependent variable comprises of the combination of trainee characteristics, training design, work environment and evaluation method. The independent variables consisted of trainee characteristics, training design, work environment and evaluation method. Trainee characteristics comprised of their ability, personality and motivation. Training design consisted of principles of learning, sequencing and training content. Work environment was made of support at work and opportunity to use skills attained. Finally, evaluation method comprised of reaction, learning, behaviour and results. According to Sekaran (1992), a moderating variable is used to measure the influence of another variable on the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. Socio-demographic variables such as technological competency, gender, age and race are commonly used as moderators. Independent Variables Moderating Variables Dependent Variables Trainee Characteristics Ability Personality Motivation Training Design Principles of Learning Sequencing Training Content Professional Development Work Environment Support Opportunity to use Evaluation Method Reaction Learning Behaviour Results Socio-demographic Factors Figure 2: Proposed Conceptual Framework CONCLUSION The development of a new model should be tested rigorously for applicability. Many questions need to be answered. As an example, can the new model be applied for within different types of organisation? Therefore, further research must be conducted to ascertain the validity of the model. REFERENCES Abadzi, H. (1990). Cognitive psychology in the seminar room (EDI Catalog # 280/013). Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction & Development/The World Bank. Adler, M. (1982). Why only adults can be educated. IN Ronald Gross (Ed). Invitation to Lifelong Learning. Chicago: Follet Publishing. Attia, Ashraf M. (1998). Measuring and Evaluating Sales Force Training Effectiveness: A Proposed & Empirically Tested Model, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Old Dominion University. Bramley, P. (1986). Evaluation of Training: A Practicle Guide. BACIE. London: Gwynne Printers. Baldwin, T. T. & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Journal, 41, 63-105. Bentley, T. (1994). Facilitation: Providing opportunities for learning. London: McGraw-Hill. Boyd, R. D. Apps, J. W. & Associates (1980). Redefining the Discipline of Adult Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Byham, W. C., Adams, D. & Kiggins, A. (1976). Transfer of training to the job. Personnel Psychology, 29, 345-349. Caffarella, R. S. (1994). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide for educators, trainers and staff developers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Cascio, W. F. (1998). Applied psychology in human resource management (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Craig, R. L. (1996). Training and development handbook: A guide to human resource development. (4th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill. Cropley, A. J. (1980). Toward a System of Lifelong Education: Some Practical Considerations. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education. Darkwenwald, G. G. & Merriam, S. B. (1982). Why adults participate in education: some implications for programs development of research on motivational orientations. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. ED 135-992. Dave, R. H. (ed) (1976). Foundations of Lifelong Education. Oxford: Pergammon Press. Diamond, M. A. & Allcorn, S. (1986). Psychological dimensions of role use in bureaucratic organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 23-59. Ellis, H. C. (1965). The Transfer of Learning. New York: McMillan. Fielder, F. E. (1996). Research on leadership selection and training: one view of the future. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 241-249. Flavell, J. H. (1977). Cognitive changes in adulthood. In L. R. Goulet and P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Lifespan developmental psychology: Research and theory. New York: Academic Press. Fleishman, E. A. & Mumford, M. D. (1989). Individual attributes and training performance: Applications of ability taxanomies in instructional systems design. In I. L. Goldstein (Ed.), Training and development in work organizations: Frontiers of industrial and organizational psychology. (pp. 183-25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Ford, K. J. (1994). Defining transfer of learning: The meaning is in the answers. Adult Learning, 5, (4), 22-30. Fortunato, R. T. & Keiser, D. W. (1985). Human resource development in higher education institutions. Washington, D. C.: College and University Personnel Association. Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, (2), 207-226. Georgenson, D. L. (1982). The problem of transfer call for partnership. Training and Development Journal, 36, 75-78. Goldstein, Irwin (1986), Training in Organizations: Needs Assessment, Development and Evaluation. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C. & Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. Austin: Research and Development Centre for Teacher Education. Hawes, J. M., Stephen, P. H. & William, F. C. (1982). Evaluating corporate sales training programme. Training and Development Journal, 36, 44-48. Hill, T., Smith, N. D. & Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies. The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 307-313. Honeycutt, E. D. & Thomas, H. S. (1989). Evaluating sales training programs. Industrial Marketing Management, 22, 117-123. Kachar, Kamaruddin & Teh, Saidin (1980). Teaching methodology and organizational pattern of adult and continuing education. Proceeding of National ASAIHL Seminar on Lifelong Education. Serdang, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959a). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Reaction. American Society for Training and Development Journal, 13, 3-9. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959b). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Learning. American Society for Training and Development Journal, 13, 21-26. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1960a). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Behavior. American Society for Training and Development Journal, 14, 13-18. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1960b). Techniques for evaluating training programs: Knowledge. American Society for Training and Development Journal, 14, 28-32. Knowles, M., Holton, E. F. & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner: A neglected species. (5th ed.). Houston, Texas: Gulf Publishing. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Chicago: Associated Press. Knox, A. B. (1977). Adult development and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Latham, G. P. & Frayne, C. (1998). Self-management training for increasing job attendance: A follow-up and replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 411-416. McGee, W. & Thayer, P. W. (1961). Training in business and industry. New York: Wiley. Nadler, l. (1970). Developing Human Resources. Houston: Gulf Publishing. Naylor, J. C. & Briggs G. E. (1963). The effect of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 217-224. Newstrom, J. W. (1986). Leveraging management development through the management of transfer. Journal of Management Development, 5, 33-45. Parasuraman, A. (1986). Marketing Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Parry, S. B. (1997). Evaluating the impact of training. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development. Perry, S. (1990). Ideas for improving the transfer of learning. Adult Learning, 1 (7), 19-23. Reser, C. L. W. (1999). An Evaluation Schema for Management Training and Development Programmes. Unpublished Master of Education Thesis, Queen’s University, Ontario. Robinson, D. G., & Robinson, J. C. (1996). Performance Consulting: Moving Beyond Training. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Saari, L. T., Johnson, T. R., McLaughlin, S. D., & Zimmerly, D. M. (1988). A survey of management education practices in U. S. companies. Personnel Psychology, 41, 731-743. Silong, Abu Daud (1986). Professionalizing Characteristics of the Training Profession in West Malaysia. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maryland. Sogunro, O. A. (1997). Impact of training on leadership development. Evaluation Review, 21, 713– 737. Sterns, H. L. & Doverspike, D. (1989). Aging and the training and learning process in organizations. In I. L. Goldstein (Ed.), Training and development in work organizations: Frontiers of industrial and organizational psychology. (pp. 183-25). San Francisco: JosseyBass. Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257-287. Torrence, D. R. (1993). Motivating trainees to learn. Training and Development Journal, 47, 55-58. Wexley, K. N. & Baldwin, T. T. (1986). Post-training strategies for facilitating positive transfer: an empirical exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 502-520. Wexley, K. N. & Thornton, C. L. (1972). Effectiveness of positive reinforcement and goal setting as methods of management development. Journal of Educational Research, 66, 119-121.