* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download TUNED LNA FOR RFICs - Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell
Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Transmission line loudspeaker wikipedia , lookup
Control system wikipedia , lookup
Chirp spectrum wikipedia , lookup
Mechanical filter wikipedia , lookup
Electronic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Resonant inductive coupling wikipedia , lookup
Utility frequency wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup
Zobel network wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Wien bridge oscillator wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup
TUNED LNA FOR RFICs USING BOOT-STRAPPED INDUCTOR Fleana Albertoni, Luca Fanucci, Bruno Neri, Enrico Sentieri Università di Pisa, Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Pisa, I-56122, Italy C.S. Metodi e Dispositivi per Radiotrasmissioni, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pisa, Italy Index Terms – Tunable amplifiers, Inductors, Integrated circuit design, Bipolar analog integrated circuits, low-noise amplifier, radio frequency, wireless receiver Abstract — In this paper, the principle of operation of a new type of active inductor, based on an integrated transformer in connection with a current amplifier, is described. The application of this new scheme, named boot-strapped inductor, to the design of integrated tuned low noise amplifiers (LNAs) is demonstrated through actual measurement of a previously developed prototype chip fabricated in a 20 GHz cut-off frequency bipolar process. The measured center frequency of the amplifier is tunable between 0.96-1.026 GHz with a transducer power gain greater than 27 dB and a quality factor (Q) greater than 15. Based on the same boot-strapped inductor and on the same silicon technology, the design of an improved LNA optimized at 1.8 GHz is presented. According to post-layout simulation the circuit features a 60 MHz bandwidth, corresponding to a Q of 30, a matched noise figure of 1.8 dB with 25.5 dB transducer power gain and a power consumption of 20.7 mW from a 3 V power supply. I. INTRODUCTION The realization of high quality factor (Q) integrated inductors is one of the most intriguing problems in the design of RF front-ends for integrated transceivers. In a previous work [1] the results which can be obtained in terms of inductance (L) and Q values by using a novel circuit topology have been described. This solution allows to obtain very high value of the Q x L product. Other solutions, based on the utilization of active devices, have been proposed in the past to improve the Q-factor with respect to that of passive spiral inductors [2-3]. However, none of these solutions is capable to increase the effective L value which, in silicon integrated devices, is normally limited to a few nanoHenry at frequencies of about 2 GHz. The approach proposed in this paper allows to improve both the effective values of L and Q, almost up to a factor of 10, while keeping practically constant the occupied silicon area. This solution can be advantageously used to design tuned low noise amplifiers (LNA) capable, for instance, of attenuate the image frequency by 20 dB @ 200 MHz of intermediate frequency. This has been already demonstrated by the authors in [4], where the design and the simulation results of a preliminary tuned LNA based on the boot-strapped inductor are presented. The structure of this paper is as follows. Section II presents the principle of operation of the novel boot-strapped inductor. In Section III, after a brief review of recently proposed LNA circuits, the measurement of a previously designed tuned LNA prototype based on the boot-strapped inductor approach are discussed. An improved LNA design optimized at 1.8 GHz is then described in Section IV while the relevant simulated performance results are presented in Section V together with a comparison with previously proposed circuits. Finally, some conclusion are drawn in Section VI. II. BOOT-STRAPPED INDUCTOR In order to increase the Q-factor of integrated inductors (defined as the ratio between the imaginary part and the real part of its impedance) many techniques have been presented [5, 6]. Nevertheless it is not simple to obtain Q-factors greater than 8 for inductors of few nH. Indeed, achievable Q values decrease as the inductor value rises. An improvement of Q can be obtained by using active circuits to compensate for the losses of the integrated inductor [7]. This method, anyway, does not provide any increase of the inductance value and it may lead to instability. Moreover, the robustness versus the process parameter tolerances, and, consequently, their practical implementation, has not been demonstrated yet. Here, we propose a solution based on the circuit depicted in Fig 1. This circuit exploits the magnetic coupling between two spiral inductors (L1 and L2 in Fig. 1) to increase the inductance value seen at the input terminals 1-1'. The inductor L3, its parasitic series resistance R3 and the base-emitter capacitance of Q1 realize an LRC filter. If the value of L3 is chosen in such a way to resonate with the input capacitance of Q1, then the current through L1 is in phase with the base-to-emitter voltage of Q1. In this case, the currents I1 and I2 are in phase, provided that the equivalent transconductance g m* of the cascode stage is a real value. Because of the magnetic coupling, the voltage drop on L1 is increased by the factor Mg m* r I1 , where is the operating frequency, M is the mutual inductance between L1 and L2 and r is the base-to-emitter differential resistance of Q1. In this case the value of the equivalent inductance seen at the terminals 1-1' would be increased by a factor Mg m* r . More in general the input impedance seen at terminals 1-1’ (Z v ) is expressed by the following formula: ZV [ R1 r M g m* r sin ] j [ L1 M g m* r cos ] (1) where R1 is the parasitic series resistance of L1 and is the angle between I1 and I2. This way the equivalent inductance value is increased by a factor Mg m* r cos , whereas the real part is decreased by Mg m* r sin r . By changing , which depends on the intrinsic capacitances of Q1 and Q2, different values of the effective inductance can be obtained. This task can be accomplished by changing the bias current of Q1 and the base voltage of Q2 [1]. In Fig. 2 the performances of actual integrated inductors in Si-Ge technology [8], in terms of Q and L, are compared with the typical performance which has been obtained by using the new circuit block depicted in Fig. 1, which has been called “boot-strapped” inductor. III. TUNED LNA The LNA is the most critical stage as far as the overall noise figure (NF) of the receiver is concerned. NF values as low as 2 dB are sometimes required in modern wireless terminals. In supereterodyne architecture, which is, at present, the most widely adopted for this type of application, the LNA should perform also another task: it should introduce a sufficiently large attenuation of the image frequency. Indeed, presently realizable image rejection mixer are unable to obtain an image frequency rejection larger than 40 dB, whereas some applications, for instance GSM standard, require overall attenuation as high as 70 dB. To this end tuned amplifiers using high Q monolithic external filters (ceramic or surface acoustic wave types) are required. The drawback of this solution consists of the need of supplemental pins and external components which are more costly and introduce noise and attenuation also in the pass band. The realization of entirely integrated tuned amplifiers, in the GHz range, represents a very stimulating target for RF IC designers. Several solutions have been proposed in literature using active inductors, realized by means of a gyrator [9, 10] or by shunting passive spiral inductors with an active bipole presenting a negative resistance [11]. In all of these cases, the Q value is quite low and the dissipated power and/or the noise figure are quite high. Moreover, the possibility of compensating for the effect of the silicon process tolerances and of the temperature variations has not been demonstrated. To this aim, the boot-strapped inductor technique presented in Section II has been recently used by the authors to design a tuned LNA characterized by values of the dissipated power and of the noise figure suitable for wireless applications [4]. The circuit allows the control of the amplifier center frequency in a range of about 60 MHz by means of two external voltages. It has been realized in standard ST’s HSB2 bipolar process (a 0.4 m emitter width trench oxide isolated bipolar process with three layers of metal and 20 GHz bjt’s cut off frequency) and some prototypes have been characterized in terms of frequency response. First measurements confirm the validity of the boot-strapped inductor approach, even if a significant mismatch, about 40%, between simulated and measured resonance frequency of the integrated L-C filter has been observed. The most probable cause of this mismatch is the poor confidence with the technological process as far as the electromagnetic structures is concerned. Unfortunately, at the time of the design, no experimental data were available coming from the characterization of inductors and transformers in ST’s HSB2 technology, so it was not possible to validate the results of the electromagnetic simulations with real data. However, the performances, as observed after measuring ten devices, are well repetitive with the typical spreading of the used silicon bipolar process. This result clearly indicates the presence of a systematic error which should be easily eliminated by a more accurate dimensioning of inductors and transformers. The measured LNA transducer power gain (G T ), defined as the ratio between the power supplied to the load and the available power at the input, is depicted in Fig. 3 versus frequency. The three curves have been obtained by using the same device with different values of the external control voltage. The measured center frequency of the amplifier is tunable between 0.957 and 1.027 GHz with a transducer power gain always greater than 27 dB and a quality factor greater than 15. The Q-factor reaches its maximum value (Qmax = 30), at the higher value of the explored frequency range (i.e., f0= 1.027 GHz for this sample). Ten devices have been characterized in order to give an indication of the repeatability of the design and of the possibility of compensating process parameter tolerances by means of external control voltages. The results of the test campaign are as follows: i) one sample failed, ii) seven devices were tuned to the same nominal resonance frequency (that is f0=1.016 GHz) with an attenuation greater than 15 dB at 1.216 GHz (that is 200 MHz above f0); iii) two samples showed a slightly higher resonance frequency (about 1.09 GHz) which could be tuned to the nominal value f0 (even using the external control voltages) only at the expenses of a degradation in the selectivity (i.e. accepting an attenuation lower than 15 dB). This means that, by using a supereterodyne architecture with 100 MHz of intermediate frequency, and by considering the aforementioned performance in terms of f0 and attenuation as a “pass/reject” criterion, the yield of the process would be 70%. Finally, a comparison between the measured performances and those previously reported in the literature (measured and/or simulated) is summarized in Table I at the end of Section V. The results of this characterization, demonstrate the potentiality of the boot-strapped inductor technique in terms of selectivity, stability, power dissipation, robustness of the design, controllability of the resonance frequency f0 and yield. IV. HIGH Q, GAIN CONTROLLED LNA The main limit of the previously designed LNA based on the boot-strapped inductor [4], whose characterization has been presented in Section III, is the reduced dynamic range: the simulated 1 dB compression point amounts to –46 dB. To overcome this limit and also to improve the selectivity and the robustness versus process parameter tolerances and temperature variations, a new design has been carried out. This new design and the relevant simulated performance results are addressed in this and in the next Sections, respectively. The new LNA circuit scheme is depicted in Fig. 4. It is based on a transconductance stage to drive the current into a shunt LRC resonant filter, where R and L are the real and the imaginary part of ZV respectively, which is realized following the boot-strapped inductor approach described in Section II. The input stage sets the noise figure of the amplifier, while the effective inductance value and the quality factor Q of the boot-strapped inductor, can be controlled by means of VK and VB2. The variable component of the current through L1 has a maximum at the frequency f0 at which the LRC filter resonates. The output stage is a current mirror which transfers this current, multiplied by the current gain of QOUT, to the external load. A PTAT (Proportional To Absolute Temperature) cell to bias the input stage is used in order to counteract temperature variations effects on LNA voltage gain (A v ). As it will be detailed in Section V, the voltage Vc, driven by a signal proportional to the LNA output power level could be used to expand the LNA input dynamic range. The amplifier is designed on ST’s HSB2 bipolar process. The integrated transformer is made up by two identical coupled inductors, the first one in metal 3, the second one in metal 2: square shaped, 225 m per side, three turns each, metal track 10 m wide, 10 m spacing between adjacent metal tracks. The inductor L3 is also square shaped, 120 m per side, 2 turns in metal 3 (10 m wide with 8 m spacing) in series with 3 turns in metal 2 (8 m wide with 8 m spacing). A thick grid of trenches underneath the inductors has been used to reduce the induced currents in the substrate, so allowing a higher value of the Q-factor. The layout of the complete LNA is shown in Fig. 5 (where trenches underneath inductors were removed for a sake of clarity) , the overall chip size is 0.52 mm2 and it is mainly due to the distance (nearly 400 m) between the transformer and the passive inductor, needed to achieve a sufficient magnetic de-coupling between the two structures [12]. V. SIMULATION AND RESULTS The electromagnetic simulation of the transformer and the passive inductor, is described in [13]. The extracted Z parameters of the equivalent circuit of the transformer were input to the Mentor Graphics ELDOTM simulator to obtain the frequency response of the overall circuit. The transducer power gain (G T ) is depicted in Fig. 6 versus frequency. These data are based on post-layout simulations for the case of minimum NF matching. GT reaches a peak value of 25.5 dB at 1.8 GHz for a band-width of 60 MHz, which results in a quality factor of 30. This corresponds to an image-reject filtering of 18.8 dB and 25 dB for a 100 MHz and 200 MHz intermediate frequency respectively. One of the limiting factor in the utilization of highly selective integrated circuit is the reproducibility of the results which is affected mainly by the spreading of the parameters of the active devices. To this end the effect of the process tolerances have been simulated by using typical, as well as slow and fast models for bipolar transistors. In Fig. 7 it is shown as this effect can be quite completely compensated by using the two control voltages VB2 and VK. Particularly, the variation of the resonance frequency and of the bandwidth can be kept below 0.3% and 5% respectively, by acting on VB2 and VK and below 0.8% and 5% by using only VK. By using the PTAT cell of Fig. 4, which determines a negligible silicon area increase, the LNA voltage gain due to temperature variations in the range [0ºC-80ºC] is kept below 6.5%. The amplifier results unconditionally stable at least up to 5 GHz (the upper limit used for circuit analysis). The minimum NF of the LNA, obtained through proper impedance matching with the input signal source, is 1.8 dB and it is mainly due to the input stage according to the Friis formula. Another very critical characteristic for wireless applications is the dynamic range, namely the 1 dB compression point (CP1dB). The proposed circuit is characterized by a CP1dB of –50 dBm. By varying the control voltage VC, in the range [2.6 V – 2.9 V], it is possible to increase the input dynamic range up to -20 dBm without any modification of the resonance frequency and of the bandwidth but at the expenses of a voltage gain reduction. Finally in Table I a comparison among the main characteristics of silicon integrated tuned LNA presented in literature and the solution described in this paper is shown. Also the measured data of the previously designed LNA based on the boot-strapped inductor [4] are reported. To be noted that none of these circuits have been optimized for an operating frequency higher than 1 GHz. The ones with similar and/or higher selectivity than ours exhibit a NF from 2.5 to 4.2 dB higher and a power consumption greater than almost 3 to 4 times. Moreover, the proposed amplifier outperforms the others in terms of voltage gain. V. CONCLUSION The feasibility of tuned integrated LNAs using a new type of active inductor, named “bootstrapped” inductor, has been demonstrated through actual measurement of a previously proposed prototype chip based on the same approach. Then a new design and post layout simulation results of an improved version of tuned LNA have been presented. By using the novel boot-strapped inductor a Q value of 30 at 1.8 GHz has been obtained, while keeping the noise figure very close to its minimum value compatible with the used bipolar silicon technology. The robustness of the design versus temperature variations and silicon process tolerances have been also demonstrated. The integration of such an LNA with a novel image rejection mixer [14] is currently pursued targeting to an integrated RF front-end capable of attenuating more than 60 dB the image frequency without external components. So the conventional bulky off-chip high Q-factor filter will not be longer required. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The financial support of the Italian National Research Council through the Finalized Project “Materials and Devices for Solid State Electronics II” is gratefully acknowledged. The authors specially thank David Nelli of Pisa University, Pisa, Italy for his invaluable support in the measurements of the LNA prototypes. REFERENCES [1] G. D’Angelo, L. Fanucci, A. Monorchio, A. Monterastelli, and B. Neri, “High Quality Active Inductors”, IEE Electronic Letters, N. 20, pp. 1727-1728, September 1999. [2] H. Hayashi, M. Muraguchi, Y. Umeda; and T. Enoki , “A novel loss compensation technique for high-Q broad-band active inductors”, IEEE Microwave and Millimiter wave Monolithic Circircuits Symposium Digest, pp.103-106, 1996. [3] Yei Li, B.L.Ooi, Q.J.Xu, and P.S.Kooi, "High Q active inductor with loss compensation by feedback network", IEE Electronic Letters, N. 35, pp. 1328-1329, August 1999. [4] L. Fanucci, G. D’Angelo, A. Monterastelli, M. Papero and B. Neri “Fully Integrated Low-NoiseAmplifier with High Quality Factor L-C Filter for 1.8 GHz wireless applications Proc IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems, May 2001, Sidney, Austrialia. [5] J. N. Burghartz, K. A. Jenkins, M. Soyuer: “Multilevel Spiral Inductors using VLSI Interconnect Technology”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 17, pp. 428-431, September 1996. [6] F. Mernyei, F. Darrer, M. Pardoen, A. Sibrai: “Reducing The Substrate Losses for RF Integrated Inductors”, IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, Vol. 8, pp. 300-301, September 1998. [7] W. B. Kuhn, N.K. Yanduru, and A. S. Wyszynski: “Q-Enhanced LC Bandpass Filters for Integrated Wireless Applications”, IEEE Trans. MTT, Vol. 46, pp. 2577-2586, December 1998. [8] L. E. Larson, “Integrated circuit technology options for RF IC's - Present status and future directions”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol.33, p.387-399, March 1998. [9] C. Y. Wu, and S. Y. Hsiao, “The Design of a 3-V 900-MHz CMOS Bandpass Amplifier”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 159-167, February 1997. [10] A. Thanachayanont, A. Payne: “A 3-V RF CMOS Bandpass Amplifier using an Active Inductor”, Proc IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems, vol. 1, pp. 440-443, May-June 1998, New York, USA. [11] W. Zhuo, J. Pineda de Gyvez, E. Sànchez-Sinencio: “Programmable Low Noise Amplifier with Active - inductor Load”, Proc IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems, vol. 4, pp. 365-368, May-June 1998, New York, USA. [12] Y. Koutsoyannopoulos, Y. Papanamos, S. Bantas, C. Alemanni: “Novel Si Integrated Inductor and Transformer Structures for RF IC Design”, Proc IEEE Int. Symp. Circ. and Syst., vol. II, pp. 61-64, May 1999, Orlando, Florida. [13] G. D’Angelo, A. Granchi, A. Monorchio, B. Neri: “Design and Simulation of Active Spiral Inductors for RF Integrated Circuits”, Proc of IEEE APS International Symposium, pp. 18361839, July 1999, Orlando, Florida. [14] G. Palmisano et al. “Integrated RF Image Rejection Mixer”, unpublished. LIST OF FIGURES Fig. 1: Boot-strapped inductor Fig. 2: Q versus L for SiGe spiral inductors [7]. Circle with dot represents a typical result obtained by using the boot-strapped inductor described in this paper. Fig. 3: Transducer gain measurement vs. frequency for the LNA prototype presented in [4] for three different external control voltages. Fig. 4: Schematic of the new selective LNA. Fig. 5: Layout of the improved LNA. Fig. 6: LNA transducer gain vs. frequency based on post-layout simulations. Fig. 7: LNA transducer gain variation due to silicon process tolerances based on post-layout simulations (slow, typical and fast process models). LIST OF TABLES Table I: Proposed LNAs Comparison Fig. 1: Boot-strapped inductor Fig. 2:Q versus L for SiGe spiral inductors [8]. Circle with dot represents a typical result obtained by using the boot-strapped inductor described in this paper. Fig. 3: Transducer gain measurement vs. frequency for the LNA prototype presented in [4] for three different external control voltages. Fig. 4: Schematic of the new selective LNA. Fig. 5: Layout of the new LNA. Fig. 6: LNA transducer gain vs. frequency based on post-layout simulations. Fig. 7: LNA transducer gain variation due to silicon process tolerances based on post-layout simulations (slow, typical and fast process models). TABLE I PROPOSED LNAS COMPARISON Technology AV [dB] NF [dB] f0 [GHz] Pd [mW] Q [9] M CMOS 17 6 0.9 78 30 [10] S BiCMOS 18 4.3 1 57 56 [11] S CMOS 20 3.6 1 14 5 [4] M BJT 21.7 M 2.05 S 1M 19.6 M 23.9 M THIS S PAPER BJT 22.5 1.8 1.8 20.7 30 M Measured data S Simulated data