Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Rat osteosarcoma cells as a therapeutic target model for osteoregeneration via sclerostin knockdown Bita Sedaghati1, Roomina Jahroomishirazi2, Annett Starke1, Michael C. Hacker1, Michaela Schulz-Siegmund1 1 Pharmaceutical Technology, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Leipzig, Germany. Department of Cell Techniques and Applied Stem Cell Biology, Center of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, University of Leipzig, Germany 2 Fig.S1. SOST gene expression in growth medium (GM) vs. osteogenic medium (OM) after one week in culture. Statistically significant differences between GM and OM are indicated by ** (p<0.01), n=4. Fig.S2. Comparison of osteogenic stimulatory effects after silencing with four different siRNA sequences (si-scl-1 to si-scl-4) in terms of ALP activity and mineralization in osteogenic medium (OM). A: Absolute ALP activities on day 2 and 3 after seeding showed significantly increased ALP in cultures treated with si-scl-1 and -3 over NC control, whereas ALP activity of cells treated with si-scl-2 was significantly decreased. B: ALP activity normalized to cell number was significantly increased in cells treated with si-scl-1, -2 and -3 compared to NC control. C: Mineralization represented by calcium (µg/well) demonstrates no significant increase after SOST silencing. siscl-2 decreased the absolute calcium significantly compared to the non-coding control, on day 7. D: At the same time point, mineralization normalized to cell number represented by calcium (µg)/ 103cells, showed significantly increased mineralization for cells treated with si-scl-1, si-scl2 and si-scl-3 over NC control. E: Phase contrast images of cultures on day 7 confirmed lower cell number and hence lower mineralization in cultures treated with si-scl-2 compared to other groups. F: Cell number/ well on day 2 and 3 after seeding in osteogenic medium (OM). Statistically significant differences compared to NC control are indicated by ** (p<0.01), n=4. Fig. S3. Proliferation profile of UMR cells over 6 days in growth medium (GM), osteogenic medium (OM), OM plus 100 ng/ml of BMP-2 (BOM-100) and OM with 250 ng/ml BMP-2 (BOM250). After 6 days, higher cell numbers were found in GM than in differentiating media. Statistically significant differences between GM and differentiating media (OM, BOM-100 and BOM-250) are indicated by ** (p<0.01), n=4. Figure S4. ALP activity and cell number analysis in growth medium (GM) and osteogenic medium (OM) on day 3. A: ALP activities were normalized to cell number. B: Cell numbers were quantified by Picogreen DNA assay. Statistically significant differences compared to NC control in relative media are indicated by ** (p <0.01), n=4. Fig. S5. Effect of modified siRNA amounts (si-scl-1) on mineralization in cultures with high seeding density (180,000 cells /cm2) treated with osteogenic medium (OM) on day 7. X: 3 µl lipofectamin RNAimax and 3 pmol siRNA, Y: 6 µl lipofectamin RNAimax and 6 pmol siRNA, Z: 9 µl lipofectamin RNAimax and 9 pmol siRNA. Statistically significant differences compared to NC control are indicated as ** (p<0.01) and * (p<0.05), n=4. A: Calcium amounts (µg) and cell number per well. B: Calcium amounts (µg) normalized to 103 cells.