* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Shakespearean Sonnets and Petrarchan Sonnets
Folger Shakespeare Library wikipedia , lookup
The Taming of the Shrew in performance wikipedia , lookup
Oregon Shakespeare Festival wikipedia , lookup
Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton wikipedia , lookup
Emilia Lanier wikipedia , lookup
First Folio wikipedia , lookup
The Wars of the Roses (adaptation) wikipedia , lookup
Shakespeare authorship question wikipedia , lookup
Boydell Shakespeare Gallery wikipedia , lookup
Riverside Shakespeare Company wikipedia , lookup
Spelling of Shakespeare's name wikipedia , lookup
Ständchen, D 889 (Schubert) wikipedia , lookup
Anonymous (film) wikipedia , lookup
Royal Shakespeare Company wikipedia , lookup
William Shakespeare wikipedia , lookup
Shakespeare in the Park festivals wikipedia , lookup
History of the Shakespeare authorship question wikipedia , lookup
Colorado Shakespeare Festival wikipedia , lookup
Ireland Shakespeare forgeries wikipedia , lookup
Shakespearean Sonnets within the parameters of Petrarchan Sonnets- an Analogy Under the formal modern definition, the sonnet is a fourteen- line poem, usually written in pentameter verse, though Sidney, for example, sometimes used hexameters, and there have been other variations. The fourteen-line sonnet can be divided into two sorts – the Italian or the Petrarchan on the one hand, and the Shakespearean on the other. The Italian poet Petrarch (1304-74) did not invent the Petrarchan form: it was used earlier by Dante (1265-1321) and his circle, but Petrarch use of this form of sonnet to celebrate his beloved Laura made it widely known, and it was imitated much notably in France by Ronsard and Du Belley. The Petrarchan sonnet is composed of an octave – an initial passage of eight lines, rhyming abbaabba – followed by a sestet – six lines requiring that each line have a rhyming mate. In addition to the separation of octave from sestet by rhyme- scheme, there is almost invariably a subtle but dramatic shift, a change of tone or a point of view, introduced by the sestet and bringing to the poem a sort of resolution or revelation. The sever restriction placed on the rhyming words despite the fact that it is very much more difficult to deal with it in English, the Petrarchan Sonnet has become the preferred form used by Milton, Wordsworth and many more recent poets. The Shakespearean sonnet, too, is named after its most famous practitioner, but as a form it was firmly established and was used by Shakespeare's predecessors and contemporaries, including Spenser, Surrey, Sidney, Lodge, Drayton, Fletcher and Lynche. It consists of three quatrains rhyming abab cdcd efef and concluding with a rhymed couplet gg. This form is particularly easy 'catch by ear' and identified when spoken aloud. The final six lines of a sonnet even though written in Shakespearean form can become its sestet, and Shakespeare often seemed to think of his sonnets in terms of the Italian division including the dramatic or rhetorical relationship of octave to sestet. This is clearly the case in Sonnet 35, and Shakespeare enjoyed the rather luxurious advantage of being able to write his sonnets in the spirit of either the form named after him or the Petrarchan fashion, as can be shown by comparing Sonnet 73 and Sonnet 18 Sonnet 73 is the perfect example of the Shakespearean form. Three quatrains each with its own governing figure of decline, serve as incremental parts of a discourse; each parallels and reinforces the other with beauty and delicacy of detail, and describes the inexorable truth of the natural world's mutability. William Empson's imaginative account of the forth line is famous; there is no pun, double syntax or dubiety of feeling in "Bare ruined choirs, where late the birds sang" (73) the cold and narcissistic charm suggested by choir boys suits well with Shakespeare's feeling for the object of the Sonnets, and for various sociological and historical reasons, which it would be hard now to trace out in their proportions. It should be added that while these two canonical varieties of the Sonnet predominate among Shakespeare's ventures in the form, there are individual sonnets that deviate from both; for rhetorical purposes, or under the pressure of overwhelming feelings the 'divisions' of some Sonnets are at odds with both the Petrarchan and the Shakespearean convention, (examples- sonnets 66, 154, 145). Sonnet 18 offers a direct contrast to Sonnet 73 in form and structure. This Sonnet (Shall I Compare…) is decisively Petrarchan, notwithstanding its Shakespearean rhyme -scheme. To begin with it is rhetorically divided into octave and sestet, the change between the two parts is balanced on the fulcrum of the word 'but' at the beginning of the ninth line. The poem is widely and deservedly admired. Great riches of implication are packed into the interrogatory first line, which is a single sentence. The poem disposes us to think of Hamlet's description of his father as "so loving to my mother…/ visit her face too roughly." The octave concludes with a vital distinction between 'chance' and 'nature's changing course'. King Lear abounds in this sort of apocalyptic chaos of vanity and disorder, and it is this chaos of vanity that is quietly implied in Sonnet 18 by the word 'chance'. The relations between Shakespeare's Sonnets and the Petrarchan discourse of love are inextricably initiated in the early poems, the Petrarchan elements of which mingle sometimes harmoniously, sometimes discordantly, with the non-Petrarchan. Although Shakespeare's persona uses the Narcissus myth to suggest the self-absorption of the young man whose beauty he celebrates so elaborately in this and in the early sonnets, he does not use it simply to imply that between himself and the young man there exists a relationship akin to that between a Petrarchan lover and the idealized object of his desire. They imply, of course, that the youth's narcissism exiles him from the world, no matter how resplendent and how prominent he may seem to be within it. Although the first nineteen Sonnets Shakespeare's persona does not celebrate a female object of desire in Petrarchan terms, he does not represent the youth as a counterpart to the ideal lady of Petrarchan tradition. It must be said that Shakespeare's Sonnets are in general metrically regular, especially by comparison with the great liberties he took with meter in his later plays. Since it was at times a part of Shakespeare's poetic strategy to invert, parody or burlesque sonnets in the conventional Petrarchan tradition – for instance, Sonnet 130: 'My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun'- it may be useful to illustrate this device by citing just a model along with Shakespeare's irreverent treatment of the same conventions. The set of metaphors, involving notions of fidelity to the point of death, loyalty, treason, betrayal and triumph- figures with deliberate allowance made for the irony of its deployment, and wittily employs all the ancient metaphors of vassalage and faithful military service, of warfare and victory that had been part of the Petrarchan conventions but which are here adapted to carnal purposes where before they had served the most discarnate and spiritual ends. Varsha Jha English(Hons), Presidency College, Kolkata