* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Controlling ion transport in organic devices Xiaodong Wang (⊚ᲃḻ)
Survey
Document related concepts
Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Nanogenerator wikipedia , lookup
Integrated circuit wikipedia , lookup
Carbon nanotubes in photovoltaics wikipedia , lookup
Index of electronics articles wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Current mirror wikipedia , lookup
RLC circuit wikipedia , lookup
History of the transistor wikipedia , lookup
Molecular scale electronics wikipedia , lookup
Polythiophene wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Hybrid solar cell wikipedia , lookup
Organic solar cell wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Controlling ion transport in organic devices Xiaodong Wang (⊚ᲃḻ) Norrköping 2013 Controlling ion transport in organic devices Xiaodong Wang During the course of the research underlying this thesis, Xiaodong Wang was enrolled in the graduate school Agora Materiae, a multidisciplinary doctoral program within material science at Linköping University, Sweden. Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertation, No.1536 Copyright ©, 2013, Xiaodong Wang, unless otherwise noted Printed by LiU-Tryck, Linköping, Sweden, 2013 ISBN: 978-91-7519-547-6 ISSN: 0345-7524 In memory of my uncle, Shengwu Wang Abstract Organic electronics and printed electronics have been attracting more and more research interest in the past decades. Polymers constitute an important class of materials within the field organic electronics due to their unique physical and chemical properties. One great benefit of the polymers is their solution processability, which provides us the possibility to utilize conventional printing techniques to fabricate devices on flexible substrates. This thesis focuses on utilizing and controlling the ion transport in polyelectrolytes in electronic devices for different applications. A polyelectrolyte is a polymer in which the polymeric backbone includes ionic sites compensated by counter ions. Firstly, we have used a specific property of the polyelectrolyte: its electric polarization is strongly dependent on the humidity level. The ions are screened by water molecules; this improves the mobility and dissociation of ions. A polyelectrolyte-based capacitor is thus ideal to sense humidity. Such a capacitor is integrated into an LC resonant circuit possessing a specific resonant frequency. The wirelessly detected resonant frequencies of the sensing circuit indicate the corresponding humidity levels. With the appropriate choice of materials, the complete sensing circuit (resistor, capacitor, capacitor-like sensor head) can be screen-printed on an antenna manufactured using a roll-to-roll dry phase patterning technique. Secondly, we have modified the polarization characteristics of ions in a polyelectrolyte layer by trapping the ions in molecular macrocycles dispersed in a polymer overlayer. The resulting remanent polarization is read out as a hysteresis loop in the capacitance-voltage characteristic of a capacitor. The strategy is further implemented in an electrolyte-gated organic transistor to control its threshold voltage by applying defined programming voltages. Although the lifetime of the “remanent” polarization is rather short, the concept might be further improved to fit those of memory applications. Finally, we take use of the ionic selectivity of a polyelectrolyte to stabilize the operation of a water-gated organic field-effect transistor. The polyanionic membrane is added onto the semiconductor channel to prevent small anions of the aqueous electrolyte to penetrate into the p-channel semiconductor. Moreover, the polyelectrolyte layer protects the semiconductor and thus strongly stabilizes the shelf lifetime of those transistors. This improved version of the water-gated organic transistor is a candidate for developing transistor-based sensors working in, for instance, biological media. Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning Organisk elektronik och tryckt elektronik har vuxit kraftigt som forskningsområden under de senaste decennierna. Inom organisk elektronik är polymerer en vanligt förekommande klass av material, på grund av deras unika fysikaliska och kemiska egenskaper. Bland annat kan polymerer processas i lösningsform (elektroniskt bläck), vilket gör det möjligt att använda konventionella tryckmetoder (t.ex. screentryck) för att tillverka komponenter och kretsar på flexibla substrat. Denna avhandlings fokus är kontroll och utnyttjande av jontransport i polyelektrolyter för olika typer av tillämpningar. Polyelektrolyter är material bestående av polymerkedjor som innehåller elektriskt laddade kemiska grupper, samt motjoner till dessa. Den första tillämpningen bygger på egenskaper hos polyelektrolyter som gör att deras elektriska polariserbarhet är kraftigt beroende av omgivande luftfuktighet. Vattenmolekyler som tränger in i polyelektrolyten växelverkar med jonerna och bidrar till att öka deras rörlighet. Därför är polyelektrolytbaserade kondensatorer ideala att använda som fuktsensorer. De kan integreras i en LC-resonanskrets för att åstadkomma en komponent som har en resonansfrekvens som varierar beroende på luftfuktighet. Frekvensen kan mätas trådlöst, ungefär på samma sätt som när man detekterar stöldskyddsetiketter i butikslarm. Med genomtänkta materialval kan en hel fuktsensor screentryckas ovanpå en förtillverkad antenn på ett plastsubstrat. Vidare har vi använt en speciell klass av molekyler, ”macrocyles”, för att fånga in joner i en polyelektrolyt och på så sätt modifiera polarisationsegenskaperna. Detta leder till en kvardröjande polarisation som kan detekteras genom elektriska mätningar och därigenom fungerar som minne. Samma strategi är även användbar i transistorer med polyelektrolyt som gateisolator, där tröskelspänningen kan kontrolleras genom att förprogrammera materialet. Livslängden hos den kvardröjande polarisationen är relativt begränsad, men konceptet bör trots det kunna vidareutvecklas för att möjliggöra billiga minnestillämpningar. Slutligen har vi använt polyelektrolyternas jonselektivitet för att stabilisera en särskild typ av organiska transistorer, där styrspänningen verkar genom ett lager av vatten. Här används ett membran med polyelektrolytegenskaper för att skydda halvledaren från små joner från vattnet, vilket stabiliserar de elektriska egenskaperna och även bidrar till att öka livslängden hos lagrade transistorer. Denna förbättrade transistor är en intressant kandidat for utveckling av sensorer som kan användas i biologiska system. Acknowledgements Without the support and help from many people around me, it would not been possible to finish this doctoral thesis. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to: Magnus Berggren, my supervisor, for offering me the opportunity to work in the Organic Electronics group and all your encouragements, inspirations and support. ‘Always be positive and optimistic.’ Xavier Crispin, my co-supervisor, for introducing me to polymers, transistors and chemistry; for your encouragements, help and guidance in my experiments. Isak Engquist, the project leader, for all the collaborations and support in the projects and your help and guidance in my experiments. Sophie Lindesvik, our administrator, for all the help in administrations. Lars Gustavsson, our lab engineer, for knowing everything in the lab and all the support and help. All the co-authors of the included paper, especially, Oscar Larsson and Ari Laiho, for all the valuable scientific discussions and help in the experiments. The entire Organic Electronics (Orgel) group: Daniel for sharing your knowledge in webpages and computers; Erik and Malti for taking care of my plants and fruits; Amanda, Björn, Henrik, Hiam, Jesper, Jun, Loïg, Negar, Olga and Zia for organizing great activities in Norrköping; Klas and Kristin for interesting topics and fun conversations during ‘fika’; Hui, Jiang and Yu for all scientific discussions in Chinese and all your help; Anders and Lars for answers to tricky processing issues; Elina and Simone for being my new ‘neighbors’. Brains and Bricks, research center in Linköping University for high-technology constructions, for financing and support my research work; special thanks to Hans Olson from O&P consulting AB and Lars Gutwasser from PEAB AB for hosting and coordinating the projects. All people from Acreo; especially Duncan Platt for teaching me the knowledge in RF electronics; Mats Sandberg, Jessica Åhlin, Marie Nilsson, Lars-Olov Hennerdal and Staffan Nordlinder for discussing and solving problems in printing. Jinlan Gao and Johan Sidén from Mid Sweden University for great collaborations in the Fuktsensor project. Mats Thunell at Invisense AB for supporting the Fuktsensor project. In the end, I would like to thank Jia Tan, my love, for her endless love and support; My father and mother, Shengxian Wang and Meibao Xu, for always being there and taking care of everything. List of included papers Paper I: Proton motion in a polyelectrolyte: A probe for wireless humidity sensors Oscar Larsson, Xiaodong Wang, Magnus Berggren and Xavier Crispin Sensors and Actuators. B, Chemical, 2010, 143(2), 482-486 Contribution: Half of the experimental work and characterization of the measurements. Paper II: An all-printed wireless humidity sensor label Xiaodong Wang, Oscar Larsson, Duncan Platt, Staffan Nordlinder, Isak Engquist, Magnus Berggren and Xavier Crispin Sensors and Actuators. B, Chemical, 2012, 166-167, 556-561 Contribution: Design of device and all experimental work. Wrote the first draft and was involved in final editing of the manuscript. Paper III: Printed low loss capacitors for use in a wireless humidity sensor label Xiaodong Wang, Duncan Platt, Xavier Crispin, Isak Engquist and Magnus Berggren Manuscript Contribution: All experimental work. Wrote the first draft and was involved in final editing of the manuscript. Paper IV: Remanent polarization in a cryptand-polyanion bilayer implemented in an organic field effect transistor Xiaodong Wang, Ari Laiho, Magnus Berggren and Xavier Crispin Applied Physics Letters, 2012, 100(2), 023305 Contribution: All experimental work. Wrote the first draft and was involved in final editing of the manuscript. Paper V: Improving the stability of water-gated organic transistors for sensing applications Xiaodong Wang, Xavier Crispin and Magnus Berggren Manuscript Contribution: All experimental work. Wrote the first draft and was involved in final editing of the manuscript. Related work not included in this thesis Moisture sensor European Patent: EP2275806, 2011 United States Patent: 8236164, 2012 Table of Contents 1. 2. Introduction..................................................................................... 1 1.1. Organic electronics and printed electronics ............................... 1 1.2. Motivations and goals of this thesis ........................................... 2 Materials .......................................................................................... 5 2.1. Semiconducting polymers .......................................................... 5 2.2. Charge carriers and transport in conjugated polymers ............... 8 2.3. Insulating polymers .................................................................. 10 2.4. Polyelectrolytes and ion exchange membranes ....................... 15 2.4.1. Polyelectrolytes ................................................................ 15 2.4.2. Electric double layers at a metal/electrolyte interface........ 17 2.4.3. Nafion ............................................................................... 17 2.5. 3. Crown ethers ........................................................................... 19 Electronic and ionic devices ........................................................ 21 3.1. Passive components: resistors, capacitors and inductors ........ 21 3.2. Frequency-dependent impedance in an alternating current (AC) circuit ......................................................................................... 22 4. 5. 3.3. Mutual inductance and reflected impedance ............................ 23 3.4. Resonance in an LC circuit ...................................................... 25 3.5. Quality factor in RLC resonant circuits ..................................... 29 3.6. Passive sensor labels .............................................................. 30 3.7. Transistors ............................................................................... 32 Rheology and surface wettability ................................................ 38 4.1. Rheology ................................................................................. 38 4.2. Surface wettability ................................................................... 40 Device manufacture and characterization .................................. 43 5.1. Printing .................................................................................... 43 5.1.1. 5.2. Dry phase patterning ............................................................... 47 5.3. Spin coating ............................................................................. 48 5.4. Photolithography...................................................................... 49 5.5. Impedance spectroscopy ......................................................... 50 5.5.1. 5.6. 6. Screen printing ................................................................. 44 Randles Model.................................................................. 52 Humidity .................................................................................. 53 Conclusions and outlook ............................................................. 55 References ........................................................................................... 58 Background 1. Introduction 1.1. Organic electronics and printed electronics Natural polymers, such as rubber, had been used for many centuries before recognized as polymers. Hermann Staudinger, a German chemist, firstly proposed the hypothesis of polymers in 1920. Polymers are macromolecules which are made up of covalently bonded elementary units, called monomers. This hypothesis was gradually accepted during 1920s. Staudinger was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1953, "for his discoveries in the field of macromolecular chemistry" [1]. Today polymers can be found almost everywhere in our daily life. Because of their unique mechanical and thermal properties and since they are inexpensive, polymers have replaced many other materials like metals, woods, ceramics, textiles, etc. Moreover, in many electronic products, polymers are extensively used as the electrically insulating material. This view, i.e. polymers are electrical insulators, was not changed until 1970s. In 1976, Alan J. Heeger, Alan G. MacDiarmid and Hideki Shirakawa demonstrated that the conductivity of polyacetylene can be enhanced by several orders of magnitude by exposing it to iodine vapors. They were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2000, "for the discovery and development of conductive polymers" [2]. Conductive polymers became the cornerstone for a new type of electronics: organic electronics. Among the electronic devices developed, one can mention polymer-based sensors [3, 4], organic light emitting diodes [5, 6], organic photovoltaic devices [7, 8], organic thin-film transistors [911], organic thermoelectric generators [12, 13], etc. A vast array of applications can be targeted thanks to the versatility of the organic electronic polymers. Indeed, with chemical synthesis, there is a multitude of possibilities to functionalize an electronic polymer; such that their physical (optical, electrical) and chemical properties can be tailor-made for specific applications and features [14]. Besides some similarities in their electrical and optical properties with metals and inorganic semiconductors, the conductive and semiconducting polymers possess both the mechanical properties of plastics and their unique processing advantages [15, 16]. Electronic devices can be fabricated from solutions and without high temperature treatments. As a consequence, organic electronics can be manufactured at a relatively much lower cost than traditional electronics. 1 Organic electronics is now one of the corner stones of the so-called printed electronics technology. This terminology underlines the process used to manufacture electronic devices: printing methods including screen printing, flexography printing, gravure printing, offset printing and inkjet printing, etc. The inks for printed electronics are typically made from solution-based materials, especially conductive polymers, organic semiconductors, inorganic particles with organic vehicles (organic binders), etc. Compared to conventional electronic fabrication methods, using printing techniques to manufacture electronics enables a simple and high-volume production process at very low cost. This makes printed electronics a promising candidate in many cost-sensitive applications [17]. 1.2. Motivations and goals of this thesis Moisture is one of the largest concerns for the construction and building industry today. In Sweden alone, the estimated annual cost for combating moisture-related problems in houses and buildings exceeds 300 million Euros. A significant part of this cost arises because those leakage problems are detected too late, when mould damage has already occurred. Further, the present cumulated value of these escalating problems is estimated to exceed 10 billion Euros [18]. Hence, monitoring moisture variations in construction materials and buildings is necessary and highly desirable. Today, accurate humidity measurements inside walls and floors in buildings necessitate physical damages on the building. For instance, a hole is drilled in the wall, and the humidity sensor is then inserted through the small opening to reach inside the wall. The sensor is then connected to the detecting electronics by cables. Wireless RFID sensors are another option [19, 20] if they are positioned in the wall during its construction. Reading can be realized wirelessly at any time without damaging the wall. The drawback is the high cost and complicated manufacturing processes for the RFID technology, which prevents distributing such RFID sensors on every construction material. In this thesis, one of my goals has been to combine wireless reading and low manufacturing cost for remote humidity sensors. Our approach is to use screen printing technology and low-cost organic materials. The sensor label is passive and can be readout wirelessly. Thus, it is aiming for usage-friendly and low-cost applications in the construction industry and elsewhere. 2 Paper I, II and III are the results of an application-orientated research project initiated by Brains & Bricks, a research center for high-technology constructions and subsequently supported by the Swedish Research Council FORMAS. After utilizing the humidity-controlled migration of ions in polyelectrolytes, the second aim of this thesis is to control and manipulate the ion transport in order to provide new functions in organic electronic devices. One such function is to use the polarization of ions in organic electronics for memory applications. So far, the most successful approach to achieve memories, in the community of printed organic electronics, is to use ferroelectric polymers [21]. The ferroelectric polymer chains can align their dipoles in a collective manner and possess a remanent polarization. An electric field opposite to the polarization direction of these dipoles of the ferroelectric layer does not switch the dipoles. This is however only true for an electric field below a certain threshold [22, 23]. Ferroelectric capacitors can be introduced in 2D matrices including many ferroelectric elements [22, 23]. Such memory elements are typically difficult to address in a large array. This issue can be solved by introducing the memory function of the capacitor in a transistor structure [24, 25]. One of the drawbacks of such transistors is the high operating voltage since it is a challenge to maintain proper ferroelectric properties also for very thin ferroelectric layers. New concepts have been explored and demonstrated to reduce the operating voltage in transistors down to <1 V by using a polyelectrolyte layer as highly polarizable insulator [9]. The polarization of the polyelectrolyte involves the rearrangement of ions in electric double layers of high capacitance. In Paper IV, we investigated the possibility to trap ions from a polyelectrolyte layer to a trapping layer. Our goal was to generate a remanent polarization within the insulating layer, similar to the remnant polarization found in ferroelectrics and investigate the potential for capacitive and transistor memories in organic electronics. In addition to combining a memory effect with an electrolyte-gated organic transistor, a water-insoluble polyanion is also used and investigated in order to improve the shelf lifetime and operation lifetime of a water-gated organic transistor. A few liquid-gated organic transistors have been demonstrated for biological sensing applications. Most of them are operating in the electrochemical mode [26-28]. Although a water-gated organic field-effect transistor is also an attractive candidate for biological sensors [29, 30], the stability of the water-gated organic field-effect transistor is rather poor. The main problem is that the water-gated organic field-effect transistor suffers dramatically 3 from degradation in ambient conditions [31]. For example, photodegradation usually occurs in organic semiconductors when they are directly exposed to air and light [32]. Moreover, when an electrolyte is in contact with the semiconducting channel of the transistor, small ions from the electrolyte start to penetrate into the semiconductor through weak Van der Waals bonds between organic semiconductor chains [33]. In Paper V, we attempted to improve the stability of water-gated organic transistors by including an ion exchange membrane layer that prevents the fast photodegradation and keeps ions in the liquid electrolyte from reaching massively the organic semiconductor channel. 4 2. Materials 2.1. Semiconducting polymers Atoms, the basic units of matter, consist of positively charged nuclei surrounded by a cloud of negatively charged electrons. The electrons occupy atomic orbitals where they are most likely to be found in space. These atomic orbitals represent the only allowed states for electrons owing to quantum mechanics. Each atomic orbital can only accommodate two electrons of different spin states (spin-up Ĺ and spin-down Ļ).The atomic orbitals are arranged in shells around the nucleus due to their different energy levels, characterized by the principle quantum number n = 1, 2…. A shell comprises n2 individual orbitals, which are denoted as s, p, d, f…. Since organic semiconductors are based on light and abundant elements such as carbon, oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen, s and p orbitals are the two most important orbitals. The real part of the wavefunction of the orbital is illustrated in Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1 Illustrations of the atomic (a) s orbital and (b) p orbital. When two atoms A and B approach each other, the electrons of atom A in the outermost shell, which are called valence electrons, start to sense the attraction from the nucleus of atom B, such that their wavefunctions are modified and extend over the two nuclei. Those wavefunctions are called molecular orbitals. In a first approximation, the molecular orbital can be represented as the superposition, the linear combination, of the two atomic orbitals (LCAO). Since the combination of the atomic orbitals is either constructive (higher electron density between two nuclei) or destructive (lower electron density between two nuclei), the original atomic orbitals split into two molecular orbitals, a bonding 5 one and an anti-bonding one, shown in Figure 2.2. The bonding orbital has a lower energy level than the two originally individual atomic orbitals. It is therefore more energy-favorable for the valence electrons to arrange themselves into the bonding orbital to form a stable molecule. However, the anti-bonding orbital has a higher energy level which destabilizes the molecule. If the formed molecular bonding is cylindrically symmetric around the internuclear axis, the bond is termed a bond. But a bond has no cylindrical symmetry around the internuclear axis and has two lobes of electron density separated by a nodal plane. and are denoted as the corresponding anti-bonding molecular orbitals. Figure 2.2 Two 1s atomic orbitals overlap and form a bonding (ı) molecular orbital and an anti-bonding (ı*) molecular orbital. Carbon is the most important element in organic materials. A carbon atom has six electrons filling in its ground-state 1 2 2 2 .The configuration suggests that only two bonds can be formed by a carbon atom, not four. To explain the existence of methane (CH4) which has four equivalent C-H bonds, a notional promotion is required to excite a 2 electron to a vacant 2 orbital resulting in a configuration of 1 2 2 2 2 with four unpaired valence electrons. Moreover, the hybridization of orbitals is explained for identically covalent and stand for three different bonds found in carbon compounds. , types of hybrid orbital in which the 2 orbital interferes with one, two or three of 2 orbitals respectively. For example, the carbon atom in methane forms four 6 bonds with neighboring hydrogen atoms where the angle between identical these hybrid bonds is 109.47° [34]. A polymer consists of a large number of constitutional repeating units which are linked by covalent bonds. The constitutional repeating units are called monomers. Both the nature of the monomer and the configuration (stereostructure) of the polymer influence the properties of a polymer. In a sense, the simplest carbonbased polymer is polyethylene, which comprises only carbon and hydrogen atoms. Each carbon atom in polyethylene has four hybrid orbitals. Two of hybrid orbitals form bonds with two neighboring carbon atoms and these the remaining two are bonded to two hydrogen atoms. Since the bonds are strong and localized, polyethylene is electrically insulating. Unlike polyethylene, semiconducting polymers, also known as conjugated polymers, are composed of alternating single and double carbon-carbon bonds. Trans-polyacetylene is a typical conjugated polymer, in which each carbon atom possesses three orbitals forming bonds in the backbone and one 2 orbital forming bonds perpendicular to the plane of the backbone. The bonds are relatively weak and they can overlap along the backbone. Consequently, the electrons in 2 orbitals are delocalized to a great extent along the polymer chain. Those electrons can be removed or displaced without breaking the polymer chain since its structure is maintained by the bonds. As mentioned in the LCAO model, 2 orbitals start anti-bonds when the number of carbon atom to split up as bonds and increases in the polymer chain. For a very long polymer chain, the energy difference among these splitting (or ) energy levels is considerably small which can be treated as continuous bands in analogy to band structures in inorganic semiconductors. There are two important energy levels in the and bands, i.e. the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). For example, in trans-polyacetylene, the HOMO level locates at the top of the band (the band is filled) and the LUMO level is at the bottom of the band (the band is empty). Assuming that all the 2 orbitals between adjacent carbon atoms equally overlap, i.e. all carboncarbon bonds have the same length, the energy difference between HOMO and LUMO vanishes and the polymer should behave as a one-dimensional metal. However, a one-dimensional metal is energetically unstable as explained in Peierls’ theorem [35]. The stabilization effect known as Peierls’ distortion is visualized as a decrease of the polymer chain symmetry through the alternation of the carbon-carbon bonds, one with single bond character (long) and the 7 adjacent with double bond character (short). The structural distortion can stabilize the polymer since the occupied level at the top of the valence band becomes stabilized. This leads to a certain band gap ( ) between HOMO and LUMO. The band gap is typically found in the range from 1.5 eV to 3 eV [36]. Figure 2.3 shows the evolution of the energy levels when the size of the conjugated molecule increases leading to the band diagram in transpolyacetylene. Figure 2.3 Energy levels and electronic bands in trans-polyacetylene. 2.2. Charge carriers and transport in conjugated polymers Intrinsic (undoped) conjugated polymers have low electrical conductivities, usually in the range from 10-10 to 10-5 S/cm due to their large band gap between HOMO and LUMO, which results in few free charge carriers. The electrical conductivity can be enhanced by several orders of magnitude by introducing more charge carriers in the polymer through either chemical doping [37] or electrochemical doping [38]. Unlike charge carriers (electrons or holes) in inorganic semiconductors, charge carriers in most organic semiconductors (or conducting polymers) are polarons. Polarons are treated as introduced charges accompanied by a delocalized distortion of the electronic and geometric configuration over just a few monomers in the polymer chain. Polarons are in the quinoid form, a state that is 8 less stable than the aromatic form. As a result, a polaron is characterized by localized energy levels in the middle of the band gap. Two polarons can combine and form one bipolaron which sometimes is more energetically stable. Polarons, bipolarons in polythiophene and their associated band diagrams are shown in Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4 The polaron and bipolaron in polythiophene: (a) neutral state; (b) positive polaron; (c) positive bipolaron; (d) the band diagrams for polarons and bipolarons. In organic electronic devices, charge carriers need to travel not only within individual molecules (intramolecular transport) but also in between adjacent molecules (intermolecular transport). In amorphous and semicrystalline materials, 9 such as conjugated polymers, charge transport is usually characterized by thermally activated hopping. However, in highly ordered organic materials, charge transport takes place in a band-like motion as the charge carriers are delocalized. The charge carrier mobility varies from 10-6-10-3 cm2/V·s in disordered organic polymers [39, 40] to 10-102 cm2/V·s in highly ordered organic single crystals [41, 42]. 2.3. Insulating polymers Unlike metals that have a ‘sea of electrons’ which allows electrons to move freely under an electric field to conduct a current, electrons in an insulating polymer are bounded closely to nuclei of the polymer chains through covalent bonds and thus the polymer becomes electrically insulating. With covalent bonds, the polymer can be semiconducting as described in section 2.1, while with exclusively bonds, the band gap of the polymer is very large and the polymer is thus an electrical insulator. The dielectric properties of insulating polymers are useful in many applications, such as in capacitors, electrical encapsulation, switches, etc. The dielectric constant and the dielectric loss are two important parameters characterizing insulating polymers in an alternating current (AC) circuit. Polymers with large intrinsic electric dipole in their monomer unit are polar polymers. Polar and non-polar polymers polarize differently under an alternating electric field. If electrons in a covalent bond are shared equally with two bonding atoms, leading to a symmetrical electron distribution in the bond, such a bond is nonpolar, exemplified by the C-C bond in ethane. But due to the difference in electronegativities (EN) of atoms, which characterize the intrinsic ability to attract the electrons, the bonding electrons in a covalent bond tend to be attracted more strongly by one atom than the other. The asymmetrical distribution of electron density results in a polar bond. The most electronegative atom is fluorine (EN=4) and the least is cesium (EN=0.7). The values of electronegativity for some elements are summarized in Table 2.1. 10 element electronegativity F O N Cl Br I S C H 4.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.1 Table 2.1 The values of electronegativity for some elements [43]. As a rule of thumb, if the electronegativities between two bonding atoms differ less than 0.5, the bond is treated as nonpolar bond. If the difference in electronegativities is between 0.5 and 2, the bond is polar. In an ionic bond, the electronegativities between two atoms differ by more than 2. For instance, C-H bond is non-polar while C-O and C-N bonds are polar. In addition to the bond polarity, the structure of a molecule also determines if it is polar or non-polar. The molecular polarity is the vector sum of all individual bond polarities and lone-pair contributions in a molecule. If the center of all positive charges in a molecule does not coincide with the center of all negative charges in that molecule, the molecule can be considered as a dipole. The dipole moment is a measure of net molecular polarity, which is defined as = × (2.1) where [C·m] is the dipole moment, [C] is the charge at either end of the molecular dipole and [m] is the distance between the charges in the dipole. For example, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is treated as a non-polar polymer. This is due to that the dipole moment of PTFE is zero because of the symmetry in its molecule structure, although C-F bonds in the polymer chain is largely polar. Polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) are non-polar as well but poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polycarbonate (PC) have permanent dipole moments. Figure 2.5 shows their chemical structures. Table 2.2 gives the values of dipole moment for some compounds. 11 Figure 2.5 Chemical structures of some insulating polymers: (a) polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE); (b) polyethylene (PE); (c) polypropylene (PP); (d) polystyrene (PS); (e) poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA); (f) polyvinyl chloride (PVC); (g) polycarbonate (PC). Compound Dipole moment CH3Cl 1.87 H2O 1.85 CH3OH 1.7 CH4 0 C 6H6 0 Table 2.2 The values of dipole moment for some compounds [44]. The dielectric constant ( ) or relative permittivity ( ) represents how well a material screens an external electric field. The dielectric constant is the ratio of the capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor including a dielectric material versus the capacitance of the same capacitor with vacuum in between the plate electrodes. The values of dielectric constant for several materials are listed in Table 2.3. 12 material dielectric constant vacuum teflon polyethylene polystyrene polyvinyl water 1 2 2.3 2.6 4-8.5 81 Table 2.3 The values of dielectric constant for some materials [45]. When an alternating electric field is applied to a parallel-plate capacitor, molecules in the dielectric material are polarized, see Figure 2.6. These molecules attempt to align themselves to the electric field accordingly. Several mechanisms of polarization in a dielectric material are proposed, including electronic polarization, distortion polarization and orientation polarization [46]. Electronic polarization refers to the distortion of electron distribution with respect to the nucleus under an applied electric field. Distortion polarization arises from the displacement of nucleus by an applied electric field. Both electronic and distortion polarizations contribute to an induced electrical dipole moment. Orientation polarization relates to the reorientation of a polar molecule with a permanent electric dipole moment. 13 Figure 2.6 Illustration of the polarization of a parallel-plate capacitor sandwiching a dielectric material and the electric potential profile across the capacitor. In polar polymers, the dipoles require a certain time (>0.1 ns) to align themselves with the applied electric field [47]. Thus the dielectric constant of a polar polymer is usually frequency-dependent with respect to the applied electric field. At very high frequencies (>1010 Hz) the polar polymer does not have sufficient time to align completely with the applied electric field before the electric field varies its direction and the dielectric constant is low. Oppositely, if the applied electric field alternates at lower frequencies (<1010 Hz), the dipoles in the polymer have enough time to align with the electric field before the field changes its direction. Polar polymers have higher dielectric constant at low frequencies. However, non-polar polymers are typically much less dependent on the frequency of the applied electric field because the electronic and distortion polarizations in those polymers take place instantaneously when the direction of electric field is changed. As the always angle ( caused 14 dipoles try to align themselves with an alternating electric field, they slightly ‘lag’ behind the electric field, which is described as the phase ) (see details in section 3.2), and energy is thus absorbed by the friction by rotational motion of dipoles. The absorbed energy in molecular polarizations is measured by the dielectric loss. The amount of dielectric loss in a ( )). capacitor can be characterized quantitatively by the dissipation factor ( ( )= · (2.2) where [°] is called the loss angle which equals 90° ; [rad/s] is the angular frequency; [F] is the capacitance and [ȍ] is the equivalent series resistance in the capacitor. For polar polymers, the energy dissipation is low when the applied electric field has both very high (>1010 Hz) and very low frequencies (<<1010 Hz). This because the dipoles either do not have sufficient time or have enough time to align themselves before the electric field changes its direction. But at intermediate frequencies the dielectric loss is large due to “lag” of polarization. Non-polar polymers usually show much smaller dielectric loss as compared to polar polymers. There is no permanent dipole moment in non-polar polymers and meanwhile the electronic and distortion polarizations are effectively in phase with the applied electric field, which gives very little dielectric loss in general. 2.4. Polyelectrolytes and ion exchange membranes An electrolyte, a substance that dissociates into ions and transport ions, may be a solution, a liquid or a solid material. Moreover, an electrolyte can be strong or weak in terms of the degree of dissociation of the electrolyte. A strong electrolyte can be almost entirely dissociated as ions, such as salts, strong acids and strong bases. In contrast, a weak electrolyte is only partially dissociated as ions, like weak acids and weak bases. 2.4.1. Polyelectrolytes A polyelectrolyte is made up of a polymeric backbone covalently bonded with repeating electrolytic groups which can be acids, bases or salts. The electrolytic groups are able to dissociate into charged polymer chains and oppositely charged counter ions in a polar solvent, such as water. Polyelectrolytes can be classified into two types, polycations and polyanions, in terms of the chemical structure of the polyelectrolyte. Polycations comprise positively charged polymeric backbones and negatively charged counter ions. Conversely, polyanions are composed of negatively charged polymeric backbones and positively charged 15 counter ions. In the solid phase, the charged polymeric backbones are treated as effectively immobile since they are relatively much larger than the counters ions. Therefore, the ionic conductivity of solid state polyelectrolyte is represented by transport of the atomic or molecular counter ions. This unique feature of polyelectrolytes is exploited in an electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistor in order to avoid possible electrochemical doping in the semiconducting channel [9, 48]. Due to the counter ion condensation phenomena [49] in solid polyelectrolytes, not all counter ions are dissociated from the polymeric backbones and can be transported freely. The activation energy of the dissociation strongly depends on the amount of solvent contained in the solid polyelectrolytes. Polyelectrolytes are usually hydroscopic, because of their polarity characteristics, and thus become promising candidates for humidity sensing [50-54]. Based on the specific electrolytic groups, three major categories of polyelectrolytes are used in humidity sensors; they are: quatermary ammonium salts [55-57], sulfonate salts [52, 58-60] and phosphonium salts [61-63]. Figure 2.7 shows three typical polyelectrolytes. Figure 2.7 Chemical structures of three typical polyelectrolytes: (a) poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride); (b) poly (styrene sulfonate) sodium salt; (c) poly (vinyl phosphonic acid). When the counter ions are dissociated from the polymeric backbones, solvent molecules form a shell around mobile ions. Then, the ions can move together with their solvent shells. The ionic charge transport in polyelectrolytes is mainly attributed to the diffusion along concentration gradients and migration under electric fields. During ion transport, dissociated ions experience frictional forces, which are proportional to the viscosity of the solvent and the size of the solvated ion. 16 2.4.2. Electric double layers at a metal/electrolyte interface When a potential difference occurs at the interface of a metal electrode and an electrolyte, the interface is charged. The charges in the metal electrode appear at the outermost surface of the electrode. These charges are compensated by oppositely charged ions in the electrolyte in the vicinity of the interface. These two layers of charges at the interface are called an electric double layer (EDL). The EDL structure is usually characterized by Goüy-Chapman-Stern (CGS) model [64]. In this model, two different layers are considered in the electrolyte [65]. One is the Helmholtz layer which contains solvent molecules, some specifically adsorbed species (ions or molecules) and solvated ions. In analogy to a parallel-plate capacitor, the solvated ions are just a few angstroms away from the oppositely charged electrode. This results in an electric double layer capacitance (EDLC) on the order of tens of ȝF per cm2 [9, 66]. Next to the Helmholtz layer we find the diffuse layer that extends into the bulk electrolyte. The illustration of the EDL and its electric potential profile is given in Figure 2.8. Figure 2.8 Illustration of Goüy-Chapman-Stern model for electric double layer and the electric potential profile at the interface between a metal electrode and an electrolyte. 2.4.3. Nafion 17 Perfluorinated membranes have been extensively used in fuel cells as separators over the last 50 years because of their excellent chemical and thermal stability. Perfluorinated membranes are polyelectrolytes in the membrane phase that are cation permeable. Unlike other conventional ion exchange membranes [67, 68] which are made up of cross-linked polyelectrolytes, perfluorinated membranes are electrolytic polymers with polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) backbones. Similar to Teflon, perfluorinated membranes have an excellent chemical stability and can be kept intact in most solvents. Two important commercially available perfluorinated membranes have been established: Nafion [69] which is perfluorosulphonic and Flemion [70] which is perfluorocarboxylic. Nafion is a cation-conductive material, particularly for protons. Cations in Nafion membrane can jump from one sulfonic acid site to another, whereas anions or electrons cannot pass through the membrane. Therefore, Nafion possesses a unique selectivity and high ionic conductivity for small cations [71]. Figure 2.9 Chemical structure of Nafion. Figure 2.9 shows the chemical structure of Nafion. The morphology in a Nafion membrane is characterized by ion clustering [72]. A cluster network is suggested within the Nafion membrane, which contains inverted spherical micelles interconnected by short narrow channels in the fluorocarbon backbone. These inverted micelles are formed by hydrophobic fluorocarbon backbones and inner surfaces containing sulfonate groups, protons and water. The high hydration of Nafion membrane results in enlarging the size of the cluster (swelling), which 18 lowers the activation energy for transporting ions through the channels and promotes the rate of ion transport [73]. Therefore, Nafion has been used as a humidity sensitive material in many humidity sensors [3, 74, 75] because the variation in the ionic conductivity of Nafion can indicate the change in humidity level. 2.5. Crown ethers Molecular recognition is the most fundamental concept in host-guest chemistry. The importance of molecular recognition was realized as early as during the nineteenth century when Pasteur observed that molds or yeasts can recognize and utilize only one of the chiral isomers of tartaric acid. Later, a ‘lock and key’ mechanism [76] was proposed by Emil Fischer, who pointed out the structure fitting between the recognizing molecule and the recognized molecule. In 1987, Lehn, Pedersen and Cram were together awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their tremendous contributions in host-guest chemistry (also known as supramolecular chemistry), "for their development and use of molecules with structure-specific interactions of high selectivity" [77]. Crown ethers were firstly discovered as artificial host molecules. Pedersen accidentally synthesized the dibenzo 18-crown 6-ether during his experiments and found its affinity to some specific metal ion [78]. He proposed that a complex structure is formed where the metal ion is trapped in a cavity created by the crown ether. The cyclic ether host binds the metal ion guest like ‘wearing’ a crown. Therefore, such cyclic compounds are named as crown ethers. The name of crown ether is expressed as m-crown-n where the “m” indicates the total number of atoms in the ring and the “n” is the number of oxygen atoms in the cyclic structure. Because of the high electronegativity of oxygen atoms in the cyclic crown ether, ion-dipole interactions between ions and the inner cavity of the crown ether contribute to the molecule recognition. Matching the size of ions and the size of the cavity in the crown ether is very critical in order to achieve an efficient binding. In other words, crown ethers with a specific cavity size can only accommodate cations of similar size. In Table 2.4, various crown ethers and their binding constants to metallic cations are summarized. The larger binding constant indicates the higher binding capability between the host crown ether and its guest cation. 19 15-Crown-5 18-Crown-6 21-Crown-7 (0.15-0.22 nm) (0.26-0.32 nm) (0.34-0.43 nm) Na+ (0.194 nm) + K (0.266 nm) + Cs (0.334 nm) 3.32 4.28 2.12 3.5 5.67 4.3 2.74 4.5 5.01 Table 2.4 The values of the binding constant in methanol (log Ka) for three different crown ethers [79]. (The numbers in the brackets represent the diameter of a cation and the size of the cavity in a crown ether.) Monocyclic host-like crown ethers, also called coronands, have relatively flexible rings in their structure. The structural freedom of crown ethers leads to a possible sandwich-type complexation. Two smaller crown ethers surround one larger ion. This is typically a disadvantage of simple crown ethers to form highly selective bindings. More rigid cryptands are thus synthesized. Cryptand is an oligocyclic host. The arm in the middle across the cycle makes cryptands less flexible than crown ethers and defines a three-dimensional binding cavity. So, cryptands can thus only strictly bind size-matched guest ions and possess an enhanced binding selectivity as compared to simple crown ethers. Figure 2.10 shows the chemical structures of 18-crown-6 ether and cryptand 2.2.2. Figure 2.10 Chemical structures of (a) 18-crown-6 ether and (b) cryptand 2.2.2. 20 3. Electronic and ionic devices 3.1. Passive components: resistors, capacitors and inductors A resistor is a piece of conducting material with two terminals. The electrical resistance is defined as the ratio of the potential drop across a resistor versus the current passing through it; this is Ohm’s law. = where [ȍ] is the resistance, the current. (3.1) [V] is the voltage across the resistor and [A] is The resistance of a material depends on both resistivity and geometric factors of that material. = (3.2) where [ȍ·m] is the electrical resistivity of material, [m] is the length of the material and [m2] is the cross-sectional area of the material. The electrical conductivity, ı [S/m], is the reciprocal of resistivity. The symbol and the illustration of a resistor are given in Figure 3.1 (a). A capacitor is a device capable of storing charges. Capacitance is the ratio of the stored charges in a capacitor versus the voltage across it. = (3.3) where [F] is the capacitance, [C] is the stored charges in the capacitor and [V] is the voltage across the capacitor. In its simplest form, the capacitor consists of a pair of parallel conducting plates separated by an insulating layer which is commonly represented by a dielectric material. The capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor is expressed as = (3.4) where is the relative permittivity (also known as dielectric constant), is the vacuum permittivity which equals 8.854×10-12 [F/m], [m2] is the area of each and is plate and [m] is the distance between two plates. The product of also referred to as the permittivity of the dielectric material. Both the symbol of a 21 capacitor and the illustration of a parallel-plate capacitor are given in Figure 3.1 (b). An inductor is a coil of a conducting wire wrapped either around an insulator or a ferromagnetic material. When the current in the coil is changed, the magnetic flux density surrounding the coil is varied correspondingly. Since the coil itself is cut by the changing flux, Lenz’s law states that the polarity of the self-induced voltage opposes the attempt to change the current flowing through it. The inductance is defined as the ratio between the induced voltage and the change in current running through the coil versus time. = ( ) where [H] is the inductance, [V] is the induced voltage and (3.5) [A/s] is the rate of change of current. Both the symbol of an inductor and the illustration of a 6-turn inductor are given in Figure 3.1 (c). Figure 3.1 Symbols and illustrations of (a) a resistor; (b) a parallel-plate capacitor; (c) an inductor. 3.2. Frequency-dependent impedance in an alternating current (AC) circuit An alternating current (AC) circuit is defined as an electrical circuit in which the current periodically reverses its direction, or the voltage periodically reverses its polarity, with a specific frequency ( ). 22 Unlike in a direct current (DC) circuit, the impedances of the passive components in an AC circuit are complex numbers, designated as ( ). The is the angular frequency that equals 2 . The general form for the complex impedance is ( ) ( ) ( )= = ( )+ ( ) (3.6) ( ) where ( ) is the complex voltage and ( ) is the complex current. The ( ) are the real part and the imaginary part of the complex impedance and respectively. represents the imaginary number. The phase angle is defined as ( ) ( ) ( ) = tan (3.7) For an ideal resistor, capacitor and inductor, the impedance can be expressed as = = = = 0° (3.8) = (3.9) 90° = 90° (3.10) 3.3. Mutual inductance and reflected impedance When two coils, a primary coil and a secondary coil, get close to each other and one of the coils is sourced by an AC current, their magnetic fields interact and magnetic coupling occurs. To quantitatively characterize the electromagnetic coupling between these two coils, a mutual inductance is introduced [80]. The mutual inductance is defined as = 1 (3.11) [H] where [H] is the mutual inductance, is the coupling coefficient and [H] stand for the inductance of the primary and secondary coils and respectively. If there is no leakage flux which escapes between the primary and secondary coils, the coupling coefficient equals one. 23 As the result of mutual inductance coupling between the primary coil ( ) and the secondary coil ( ), two equivalent voltage sources, , and , , are introduced on both sides in the equivalent circuit, as given in Figure 3.2 (a). , = (3.12) = (3.13) , where and is the current on the primary and secondary sides respectively. By applying Kirchhoff’s voltage law, the equivalent circuit on the primary side is described as + = , (3.14) And on the secondary side is described as + = (3.15) , Substituting Eq.3.12 and 3.13 into Eq.3.14 and 3.15 respectively, = (3.16) =( (3.17) ) Inserting Eq.3.17 into Eq.3.16, = ( = ) ( +( ) ) is the total impedance on the primary side and If the secondary side, Eq.3.19 can be simplified as = + ( ) = + (3.18) (3.19) is the total impedance on (3.20) where the reflected impedance is defined as = ( ) (3.21) In the equivalent circuit, the reflected impedance effectively replaces the induced voltage source on the primary side, as shown in Figure 3.2 (b). From Eq.3.20, any changes of impedance on the secondary side cause impedance variations on the primary side. The ‘impedance reflection’ phenomenon makes 24 passive wireless detection possible, which is utilized in work reported in the Paper I, II and III. Figure 3.2 Electrical equivalent circuits of (a) electromagnetic coupling between a primary coil and a secondary coil and (b) reflected impedance on the primary side. 3.4. Resonance in an LC circuit If an ideal coil (an inductor) is connected with an ideal capacitor, electrical resonance can be obtained. Such a circuit is called an electrical resonant circuit. The resonant circuit can be as simple as just one inductor and one capacitor that are connected together. Therefore, such a circuit is termed as an inductorcapacitor (LC) resonant circuit. Figure 3.3 displays ideal LC resonant circuits in series and parallel configurations. 25 Figure 3.3 Electrical schematics of (a) a series LC circuit and (b) a parallel LC circuit. The total impedance in the series LC resonant circuit is expressed as = + = (3.22) where [ȍ] is the total impedance of the series LC resonant circuit, [ȍ] is the reactance of the capacitor. the reactance of the inductor and [ȍ] is The total impedance in the parallel LC resonant circuit is expressed as = = = = (3.23) [ȍ] is the total impedance of the parallel LC resonant circuit, [S] is where [S] is the susceptance the total admittance of the parallel LC resonant circuit. of the inductor and [S] is the susceptance of the capacitor. Electrical resonance is defined as when the applied voltage and the resulting current are in phase [81]. Therefore, at resonance, the complex impedance of a circuit consists only the real resistive part and the imaginary part is zero, which means that the inductive reactance (susceptance) and the capacitive reactance (susceptance) cancel each other in a series (parallel) circuit. Hence, the resonant frequency of a series (parallel) LC circuit is given by = where (3.24) [Hz] is the resonant frequency. Figures 3.4 (a) and (b) show the reactance versus angular frequency in a series LC circuit and the susceptance versus angular frequency in a parallel LC circuit, respectively. At resonant frequency , the total reactance (susceptance) is zero. 26 As the frequency varies, the total impedance reaches its minimum or maximum value at resonance for a series or parallel LC circuit respectively, as shown in Figure 3.4 (c). The frequency at the peak (valley) of the curve is referred as the resonant frequency. 27 28 Figure 3.4 (a) The reactance versus angular frequency in a series LC circuit, (b) the susceptance versus angular frequency in a parallel LC circuit and (c) the total impedance versus frequency. 3.5. Quality factor in RLC resonant circuits Electrical resonance is a very useful phenomenon that is utilized in many electronic filters. Selecting desired frequencies and rejecting other unwanted frequencies can thus be achieved by including LC resonant circuits in various systems. The frequency selectivity depends on the quality factor (Q factor) of the LC resonant circuit. A good selectivity requires a high quality factor. The quality factor is defined as =2 × (3.25) From this definition, the Q factor can be considered as a measure of the efficiency of a circuit. The Q factor of an inductor is expressed as = where (3.26) [ȍ] is the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the inductor. Similarly, for a capacitor, the Q factor is given by = where (3.27) [ȍ] is the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the capacitor. In a series RLC circuit (see Figure 3.5 (a)), in which R is equivalent to the total resistive loss, the Q factor at resonance is given by = where = = = (3.28) [rad/s] is the resonant angular frequency. Similarly, in a parallel RLC circuit (see Figure 3.5 (b)), the Q factor at resonance equals = = = (3.29) 29 Figure 3.5 (c) shows the comparison of voltage versus frequency measured on the resistor R in a series RLC circuit with different Q factors. Clearly, a high Q factor results in a sharp voltage versus frequency curve, whereas a low Q factor leads to a flat curve. Figure 3.5 Electrical schematics of (a) a series RLC circuit and (b) a parallel RLC circuit. (c) The curves of voltage versus frequency measured on the resistor R in a series RLC circuit with different Q factors. 3.6. Passive sensor labels Wireless passive sensors are desired in many applications since they provide contactless readout, remote query capability and do not require an internal power 30 supply. The working principle of sensor labels, as the ones reported in the paper II and III, is based on the variation of the resonant frequency of a LC resonant circuit in response to the environmental parameter such as humidity. The LC resonant sensor label consists of a planar inductor (antenna), tuning capacitors and the sensors. The sensor label is wirelessly powered and interrogated by a detecting antenna through the electromagnetic coupling between the sensor label and the reader. The resonant frequency of the sensor label is determined by the voltage spectrum from the reader circuit. Wireless sensing is achieved through the phenomenon of reflected impedance described in section 3.3. The reflected impedance obtained on the reader side is always inversely proportional to the total impedance of the sensor label. Therefore, any changes of the resonant frequency in the sensor label introduce a corresponding shift of the voltage spectrum on the reader side. Figure 3.6 shows the typical resonant curves of the printed humidity sensor label measured on the reader side when the surrounding humidity varies. The resonant frequencies at different humidity levels (wet, moderate humidity and dry) are read out from the bottom of the valley respectively, which are expressed by the data values given in the inset in Figure 3.6. The resonant frequency of the sensor label drops when the humidity level increases, because of the increasing in the capacitance of the sensor head. 31 Figure 3.6 The typical responding curves measured on the reader side at different humidity levels. (Inset: resonant frequency versus Relative Humidity.) In addition to humidity sensing [82-84], LC resonant sensors are also found in temperature sensing [85], biological monitoring [86-88], pressure detecting [8991], etc. 3.7. Transistors Nowadays, transistors can be found in nearly all electronic products. As of 2012, Xilinx has launched its Virtex-7 processors in which 6.8 billion transistors are integrated in a single chip [92]. The first field-effect transistor was invented at AT&T Bell Labs in 1959 [93]. In 1986, the first field-effect transistor, based on an organic semiconductor, was reported by Koezuka et al [94, 95]. A field-effect transistor is essentially a resistor channel in combination with a metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) capacitor. A thin-film transistor is composed of a stack of a gate electrode, an insulating layer and a semiconductor layer in direct contact with a source electrode and a drain electrode. The separation between the source and drain electrodes defines the channel region with a length L and a width W. Figure 3.7 illustrates the principle structure of a thin-film transistor. Figure 3.7 Illustration of a thin-film transistor with a channel length L and width W. 32 If the source electrode is grounded ( = 0 V) which is common in transistor ( ) are designated as gate-source voltage (current) configurations, ( ) and is referred to as the threshold and drain-source voltage (current) respectively. voltage which is the minimum voltage needed at the gate to cause charge carrier accumulation along the channel; thus the transistor is turned on. The threshold voltage is attributed to both the flat-band voltage between the gate metal and the semiconductor and filling of the charge traps at the insulator-semiconductor interface [96]. Since the gate-insulator-semiconductor is usually considered as a capacitor structure, the capacitance per unit area, , is defined as = (3.30) [8.854×10-12 F/m] is the vacuum permittivity; where permittivity and [m] is the thickness of insulating layer. is the relative When the applied gate voltage ( ) exceeds the threshold voltage, either holes or electrons are accumulated at the interface between the insulator and the semiconductor. Thanks to this charge accumulation, a conductive path (channel) is formed between the source and drain electrodes. Since the conducting channel is confined at the first monolayer right next to the insulator-semiconductor interface, by varying the gate voltage results in a significant change of conductance along the entire channel. Hence, the drain-source current is modulated by the gate voltage. If a potential is applied to the drain electrode and the source electrode is grounded, a potential gradient is established between the drain and source electrodes. This potential gradient can be expressed by a function of its position , which varies between 0 and L. The charge density at any position along the channel can be written as ( )= where ( ) and respectively. ( ) 0< < (3.31) ( ) is the charge density and potential at position Further, the drain current at position ( )= , in the channel is derived from ( ) ( ) (3.32) 33 where [cm2V/s] is the charge mobility and ( ) is the electric field at position which equals ( ) . Substituting Eq.3.31 into Eq.3.32 yields ( ) ( ) ( )= (3.33) By integrating, we can obtain ( ) ( ) = ( ) = (3.34) (3.35) Three different operational regimes of transistors can thus be distinguished. When ( ), Eq.3.35 is simplified into = , (3.36) is too small to affect the distribution of charge carrier along the channel; the resistance throughout the entire channel is approximately the same. The drain current is then proportional to the drain-source voltage as shown in Figure 3.8 (a). This is referred to as the linear regime of the transistor. If the drain-source voltage increases continuously until =( ) , the charge carrier density becomes zero right at the drain electrode (There is no charge carrier accumulation at that point in the channel.). This phenomenon causes the channel to pinch off (see Figure 3.8 (b)). As exceeds ( ) , the pinch-off point moves towards the source electrode and a thin depletion region is thus formed between the pinch-off point and the drain electrode. As the result of this pinch-off point movement, the channel length is effectively reduced to L’ (see Figure 3.8 (c)). In the depletion region, the current turns space charge limited. For a long-channel transistor (The channel length is much larger than the thickness of insulating layer.), the drain current remains essentially constant when >( ), given by , = The transistor is then said to be operating in the saturation regime. 34 (3.37) Figure 3.8 The current-voltage characteristics and corresponding illustrations of the channel of a field-effect transistor in (a) the linear regime; (b) the pinch-off point; (c) the saturation regime. There are two important current versus voltage characteristics for a field-effect transistor; the output characteristic ( versus for different ; Figure 3.9 (a)) at a constant ; Figure 3.9 (b)). and the transfer characteristic ( versus 35 Figure 3.9 Two typical characteristics of a field-effect transistor: (a) output curve (Id versus Vd for different Vg) and (b) transfer curve (Id versus Vg at a constant Vd). The transfer characteristic reflects the drain current modulation by the gatesource voltage at a constant drain-source voltage. This is the most fundamental and critical behavior of a transistor, and is utilized in many applications. The on/off current ratio at a specific drain-source voltage is defined as the quotient of the highest current (the “on” current) over the lowest current (the “off” current). By linearly fitting the square root of the drain current curve (the red doted curve in Figure 3.9 (b)) provides an estimate of the threshold voltage ( ) by the 36 intersection of the fitting line at the gate-source voltage axis. Moreover, from the transfer characteristic, the mobility at saturation regime can be calculated by = where , , (3.38) is the slope of the linear fitting line. 37 4. Rheology and surface wettability 4.1. Rheology Rheology is the science of deformation and flow of materials when a force (shear stress) is applied to them. Rheology is fundamental and critical to understand and predict the behavior of ink flow in printing processes. Assuming that a fluid is sandwiched between two parallel plates (see Figure 4.1), where the upper one moves at a constant speed and the lower one is stationary, then the fluid flows following the direction of moving plate. The upper part of the flowing fluid, which is close to the moving plate, flows faster than the lower part. The gradient of velocity in the flowing fluid is called shear rate. = (4.1) where [s-1] is the shear rate; [m/s] is the velocity of the moving plate and [m] is the distance between the two plates. Figure 4.1 Illustration of velocity gradient (as the black horizontal arrows) in a fluid between a moving plate and a stationary plate. Moreover, the viscosity of a fluid is defined as = (4.2) where [Pa·s or poise (P); 1 P = 0.1 Pa·s] is the viscosity; [Pa] is the shear stress; [s-1] is the shear rate. 38 A Newtonian liquid, such as water, displays a constant viscosity when shear rate or shear stress varies. The viscosity of a non-Newtonian liquid, however, changes disproportionately with shear rate and shear stress. Non-Newtonian liquids can be further divided into plastic, pseudoplastic and dilatant liquids. Four different types of flow behavior are given in Figure 4.2 (a). Most printing pastes are considered to be plastic or pseudoplastic liquids. Figure 4.2 Plots of (a) shear stress versus shear rate for newtonian, pseudoplastic, plastic and dilatant fluids; (b) viscosity versus shear rate for thixotropic and rheopexic fluids. 39 In a plastic liquid, the applied force must overcome a threshold stress before the fluid starts to flow. This specific minimum stress is known as the yield stress. As long as the applied shear stress exceeds the yield stress, the viscosity of the plastic fluid decreases as the shear rate increases. Once the shear stress is removed, the viscosity builds up quickly until the fluid stops flowing. This yieldstress phenomenon is very important for printing inks because a proper yield stress provides a needed flow-out and good leveling without excessive bleeding during printing. The bleeding means that the ink flows beyond the printing boundaries defined by the printing template. A pseudoplastic liquid behaves similar to a plastic liquid except that it has no yield stress. The viscosity drops as long as the shear stress is applied. In contrast to plastic liquids, a dilatant liquid shows an increasing in viscosity as the shear rate increases. Dilatant liquid characteristics are rare in printing inks. Thixotropy characterizes the time-dependency of viscosity during shearing in pseudoplastic liquids. The viscosity reduces continuously even if the shear stress is constant, i.e. shear thinning. A thixotropic liquid has a pronounced delay in viscosity after the shear stress is removed. A hysteresis loop in viscosity versus shear rate curve is observed, as shown in Figure 4.2 (b). Oppositely, rheopexic characteristics describe the time-dependency of dilatant liquid. Thus, shear thickening occurs in rheopexic materials. 4.2. Surface wettability Surface wettability plays an important role in printing processes after that the ink has been deposited onto the substrate. Simply, wettability can be considered as the phenomenon that dictates how much a liquid will spread out on a surface, i.e. wet the surface. The concept of wettability is valid for any combination of a liquid material and a solid surface, but in many cases the liquid is represented by water and planar surfaces are typically considered. In Figure 4.3 (a), the wettability between the water droplets and the solid surface can be classified into two general types, hydrophobic (left in Figure 4.3 (a)) and hydrophilic (right). 40 Figure 4.3 Illustrations of (a) the interactions of water droplets with different surfaces, ranging from hydrophobic (very little wetting) to hydrophilic (high wetting) and (b) the contact angle ș between a droplet of liquid and a solid surface. The wettability between the liquid droplet and the substrate is attributed to their surface tensions. In the bulk liquid, a liquid molecule is equally surrounded and interacts with its neighboring molecules in all directions, resulting in a zero net force. However, the molecules at the surface cannot interact with the bulk liquid molecules on all sides and thus the liquid either will tend to keep its surface area small, or to increase it. A sphere has the smallest surface-to-volume ratio. Droplets of liquids are therefore spherical. The work needed to generate a surface is proportional to the surface area. The coefficient of proportionality is defined as surface tension which is = (4.3) where [J/m2] is the surface tension; [J] is the work (energy required) to change the surface area; [m2] is the surface area. The wettability can be represented by the contact angle at the interface and the intersection of the liquid droplet, the surrounding gas and the solid surface (see Figure 4.3 (b)). At equilibrium, the forces at the interface are characterized by Young’s equation. = + cos (4.4) 41 and are the interfacial tensions between the solid and the vapor, where , the solid and the liquid, and the liquid and the vapor, respectively. 42 5. Device manufacture and characterization 5.1. Printing Printing is defined as the process of transferring inks into patterns onto substrates. Today’s dominant printing technology can be classified into four main types, flexography, gravure, offset and screen printing, which refers to the difference in printing plates (image carriers) used in the manufacturing process (see Figure 5.1). The printing plates can be either flat for sheet-to-sheet printing or cylindrical for roll-to-roll printing processes. Flexography printing employs a soft rubber cylinder on which raised printing elements are patterned. Inks adhere to these raised parts and are then transferred onto the substrate by pressure. Gravure printing works in an opposite manner to flexography printing. The printing patterns on the gravure cylinder are recessed. Inks are flooded onto the entire cylinder’s surface and the excessive ink is subsequently removed by a doctor blade. Thus, only the recesses of the cylinder are filled with the ink. By pressing the inked gravure cylinder onto the substrate, the substrate takes up the ink from these recesses. Offset printing exploits a printing cylinder constituted by printing and nonprinting elements. Unlike flexography printing, the surface of the printing cylinder in offset printing is effectively flat. The printing and non-printing elements on the printing cylinder are usually made from different materials with different surface properties, such as metals and polymer coatings. Due to the large differences in the surface properties (wettability), inks can only wet and remain in certain patterns along the printing cylinder. Offset printing is an indirect process. A blanket rubber cylinder is also utilized, as an intermediate carrier, which transfers the ink from the printing cylinder to the substrate. Screen printing utilizes a frame with fine meshes as a printing plate. The meshes are usually made from nylon or polyester. Printing patterns are defined by the opening areas of the mesh. Non-printing areas are blocked by specific polymer coatings. Inks are pressed through the openings of the mesh by a squeegee and then transferred onto the substrate. In this thesis, flat-bed screen printing has been used as the major method to fabricate the sensor labels reported in paper II and III. More details about screen printing are given in the section 5.1.1. 43 Figure 5.1 The printing plates used in (a) flexography printing; (b) gravure printing; (c) offset printing; (d) screen printing. (The blue parts represent inks.) Besides these four conventional printing technologies for high-volume production, ink jet printing and electrophotography printing are also adopted for low-volume print work, typically also in applications which require that the printing image is easily changed for every new copy. 5.1.1. Screen printing Screen printing is a versatile and well developed printing technology. Its main components are the frame with the screen mesh and the stencil (see Figure 5.2 (a)). The printing can be accomplished on various substrates, such as paper, plastics, textiles, and more. Due to its flexibility and simplicity, screen printing has become one of the important processes for producing electronic devices, exemplified by electrodes [97-100], solar cells [101-103], sensors [104-108], etc. Screen printing is a push-through printing method. Since ordinary stencil printing (a printing method that patterns are transferred through the openings of a stencil made by a piece of thin metal or plastic foil) has a general disadvantage which is that all parts of the stencil must be connected together, interconnection bridges must be used for linking inner parts to neighboring parts. By combining screen fabrics with stencils, this disadvantage is eliminated in the screen printing technology. Since the screen mesh carries the stencil, additional interconnection bridges are no longer needed. 44 In a flat-bed screen printing frame, the stencil is glued onto the screen mesh which is attached to the frame. Woods or metals, e.g. aluminum, are often used as the frame scaffold. Fabrics for producing the screen mesh must adhere to the stencil material properly and must also be compatible with ink solvents and cleaning agents. Moreover, the screen mesh must possess sufficient abrasionresistance to the stress created from the squeegee. The two most important parameters of a screen mesh are the thread thickness, which is the diameter (ȝm) of the fabric thread, and the thread counts, which correspond to the number of threads per cm. The mesh width and the open screen area as a percentage of total surface area are consequently determined as = (5.1) (%) = where [ȝm] is the mesh width; thread thickness. × 100% [ȝm] is the thread spacing; (5.2) [ȝm] is the 45 Figure 5.2 Screen printing frame: (a) photo of a flat-bed screen printing frame (inset: the enlarged image of the pattern of the stencil) and (b) illustration of the screen mesh geometry. Screen tension is another important factor in order to achieve a good quality printing. The nature of screen fabric, the adhesion method between the screen mesh and the frame, the shear force and shear time applied by the squeegee during the printing determine the lifetime of a screen printing frame. Dramatically diminished screen tension must be avoided, because uneven tensions on the screen mesh give distortions in the resulting printed images. 46 The stencil used for a screen printing frame is commonly made by photosensitive emulsions. The emulsion is coated uniformly on both the stencil side and the squeegee side. The printing patterns are then transferred from a photomask to the stencil by UV exposure, causing curing of the emulsion where it is exposed to the UV light. The uncured parts on the stencil are subsequently washed off by chemical agents. In addition, there are several other methods to produce stencils [109]. A printing substrate is firstly placed on a flat printing table and fixed by, for instance, vacuum or a special adhesive. The screen printing frame is usually fixed at a certain distance (typically a few millimeters) away and above the substrate by a frame holder. The printing process begins with spreading the ink evenly on the screen printing mesh by the squeegee using a gentle pressure. During the ink spreading, the screen printing mesh and the substrate should not contact each other. The ink is then subsequently pressed through the screen printing stencil by the printing squeegee with a larger pressure and then transferred onto the actual surface to be printed due to the surface wetting. Finally, the screen printing mesh separates from the substrate upon which the ink levels out by itself and forms a uniform ink layer. The screen printing mesh only comes into contact with the substrate during the pressing process, caused by the printing squeegee, and withdraws immediately with the help of the screen tension. In addition to flat-bed screen printing, there is also a rotary screen printing technology which enables screen printing on a web of textile or paper continuously without any seams, using a screen printing cylinder. Figure 5.3 Illustration of the printing process in screen printing. 5.2. Dry phase patterning 47 Dry phase patterning [110] (DPP) is a low-cost manufacturing technique for patterning a conducting layer which is laminated on a flexible carrier layer, e.g. a PET foil or paper. During the processing, the substrate that comprises the conducting layer and the carrier layer passes through a nip which is defined by a patterned cylinder (cliché roll) and a milling cutter cylinder. The milling cutter cylinder contains sharp milling ridges on its cylindrical surface. By forcing the substrate against the envelope of the patterned cylinder’s surface, corresponding ridges and valleys are established perpendicular to the cylindrical surface. Consequently, the ridged parts of the conducting layer are cut away by the milling cutter cylinder and repeating patterns of the conducting material are produced on the substrate. The DPP process combines patterning (analogous to the development in a conventional photolithography) and machining (analogous to the etching in a conventional photolithography) of the conducting layer in a single step and is essentially entirely chemical-free. Therefore, the DPP process is compatible to high speed roll-to-roll printing for high-volume production and also possesses a great environmental benefit compared to conventional wetetching processes which in addition require several steps to finish a pattern on a substrate. The residual materials from the DPP process are in a dry phase and are therefore easily recyclable. The DPP process has been proven to work efficiently with several substrates for producing resistors, inductors and antennas, such as for PEDOT/PET, aluminum/PET, copper/PET substrates, and more [111]. The antennas for the sensor labels in Paper II and III were produced by the DPP process. 5.3. Spin coating Spin coating is a method that is widely used in microfabrication processing to deposit a thin film with a thickness from several tens of nanometers to a few hundreds of micrometers. A small amount of solution, typically a solid material dissolved in a volatile solvent, is deposited on the center of the substrate which is fixed on a vacuum chuck. By rotating the substrate at a certain speed, the solution spreads out on the surface of the substrate. Due to the subsequent evaporation of the solvent, a thin material layer is formed on the substrate. The spin coating process is illustrated in Figure 5.4. Spinning speed, spinning time, the 48 evaporation rate of the solvent and the concentration of the solution together determine the thickness of the spin-coated film. Figure 5.4 Illustration of a spin coating process. 5.4. Photolithography Photolithography is a patterning process used in microfabrication. The steps in photolithography are illustrated in Figure 5.5. Figure 5.5 Illustration of a photolithography process. Photoresist, such as an UV-sensitive material, is firstly deposited on a substrate by spin coating. The photoresist layer subsequently is exposed with the UV light through a photomask. For a positive photoresist which is used in the work of this thesis, the exposed parts become more soluble than the unexposed areas and can be washed away in a specific developer. After developing, the same geometrical patterns as in the photomask have been transferred onto the substrate. In contrast, for a negative photoresist, the exposed photoresist is cross-linked by the UV light and remains on the substrate after developing. Consequently, the inverse geometrical patterns compared to the photomask are transferred onto the substrate. The unprotected parts of the upmost layer on the substrate are removed 49 by wet or dry etching with chemical agents. After the etching process, the remaining photoresist is no longer needed and is then cleaned away by photoresist strippers or by using plasma etching. 5.5. Impedance spectroscopy Impedance measurements over a broad frequency range at different potentials are very helpful in order to understand an electrochemical process, particularly for the processes residing at an electrode/electrolyte interface. Impedance spectroscopy is a powerful technique from which the electrode/electrolyte interface can be modeled using various electrical equivalent circuits. Impedance parameters are usually measured by applying a small AC voltage at a specific frequency to a sample cell, which comprises two parallel metal plates with the sample material sandwiched in between. The responding current is recorded and the phase shift between the voltage and the current is characterized by the phase angle. By changing the frequency, the impedance parameters are measured as a function of frequency. For an ideal resistor, capacitor and inductor, their impedance values are expressed as complex numbers (see details in section 3.2). Two important charts, Bode plot and Nyquist plot, are mainly adopted to characterize the results of impedance measurements. Bode plot shows the measured impedance versus frequency, whereas Nyquist plot reflects the measured impedance as a vector in the vs coordinate diagram. Since inductive components are rarely found in an electrochemical process, the fitting of impedance values into a corresponding electrical equivalent circuit model employs usually resistive and capacitive components only. In Figure 5.6, two basic electrical circuits are given in the Nyquist plots. 50 Figure 5.6 Nyquist plots of (a) a series RC circuit and (b) a parallel RC circuit. For a capacitor connected with a resistor in series, the total impedance of the circuit is expressed as = where , 0 and + = (5.3) 0, 51 Thus, in the Nyquist plot, the series circuit is a straight line perpendicular to the axis. The intersection between the straight line and the axis indicates the value of the resistor. For a capacitor connected with a resistor in parallel, the total admittance of the parallel circuit is = + (5.4) After rationalizing the Eq.5.4, the total impedance of the parallel circuit is + = (5.5) Thus, = (5.6) = (5.7) = (5.8) Inserting Eq.5.7 into Eq.5.8 yields ( ) =( ) (5.9) Eq.5.9 can be also expressed as +( ) = (5.10) which is a function of circle. Therefore, the parallel circuit is displayed as a semicircle in the Nyquist plot. The diameter of the semicircle is . 5.5.1. Randles Model Randles model is the simplest electrical equivalent circuit for characterizing an electrode/electrolyte interface. In Randles model, both the electrical equivalent circuit of the electrode/electrolyte interface and its Nyquist plot are shown in Figure 5.7. The equivalent circuit is composed of impedance elements, which includes the electric double layer capacitance ( ), the charge transfer resistance ( ), the Warburg impedance ( ) and the electrolyte bulk resistance ( ). 52 The Warburg impedance is described as = where (5.11) is a positive constant. The Warburg impedance represents the diffusion process in the electrolyte [112] and appears as a straight line with a slope of 45° at low frequencies in the Nyquist plot. Figure 5.7 The electrical equivalent circuit of an electrode/electrolyte interface in Randles model and its corresponding Nyquist plot. 5.6. Humidity Humidity indicates the amount of water vapor in air or a gas. The measurements of humidity can be absolute or relative. Dew/Frost point (D/F PT) and Parts Per Million (PPM) are absolute measurements, whereas the Relative Humidity (RH) is a relative measurement. D/F PT represents the dew-point temperature at which the water vapor condenses into liquid water and the frost-point temperature at which water vapor condenses to ice. PPM is the amount of water vapor in a gas by volume (PPMv) or weight (PPMw). 53 RH is defined as the ratio of the partial pressure of water vapor in a gas to the saturated vapor pressure of water in the gas at a given temperature. RH is expressed in percentage and most commonly used in daily life. 54 6. Conclusions and outlook The thesis focuses on exploring ionic migration and polarization in polyelectrolytes for different applications, in humidity sensors for construction industry, memory applications and in to improve the stability on water-gated organic transistors for sensing in aqueous media. Paper I proposes a novel concept for wireless humidity sensors that utilizes ionic relaxation in the polyelectrolyte as the sensing probe. The proposed sensor in Paper I is a completely passive device and is powered by an external RF interrogator through electromagnetic coupling. Therefore, the device aims for monitoring humidity levels and alerting moisture problems in the situations where conventionally wired humidity sensors are difficult to apply to, such as inside walls or beneath floors, during logistic transportations or perhaps also for storage of goods, etc. Nowadays the high cost of RFID sensors still hinders their use in many largescale applications, which are usually cost-sensitive. Paper II demonstrates the feasibility of producing the proposed humidity sensor label in a fully printed manufacturing process. Combining dry phase patterning with screen printing processes enables very low-cost production of the passive sensor labels. The fully printed humidity sensor label in Paper II constitutes a significant step towards low-cost and large-volume manufacturing, e.g. a fully roll-to-roll printing production process. In Paper III, I report further development of the humidity sensor by improving the quality factor (Q) of the printed sensor label. The Q factor is a unique and critical characteristic parameter of the sensor label. A high enough Q factor is required in order to achieve a reasonable detecting and readout distance [113], e.g. 10-20 cm is needed. Besides antenna optimization, I also focused on minimizing the loss in the printed tuning capacitor as well. For that purpose, a non-polar insulating polymer is used as the dielectric material in the printed capacitor instead of a polar insulating polymer. The experiment shows that the dielectric loss in the printed capacitor is reduced from 5% (a commercially available dielectric printing ink) to 0.1% (a modified printing solution based on benzocyclobutene). Thanks to the low-loss printed capacitor, the Q factor in the printed sensor label is improved consequently. 55 In the context of a future printed electronics platform, memories are certainly crucial components. Extensive efforts are therefore devoted to develop memories that can be easily printed and integrated into printed electronic circuits and systems. Various materials and device systems are explored for those printed memories. In particular, it is attractive with a printed memory device technology that can both be programmed and read out at low voltages (integration with other printed devices) and that is nonvolatile (No power is needed to maintain information.). One concept, among many, for printed memories suggests utilizing an organic field-effect transistor in which the gate-insulator-semiconductor configuration includes a bistable memory functionality, which can be read out as a non-volatile modulation of the drain current running along the channel. Paper IV is related to a threshold-voltage tunable organic transistor incorporating an ionic trapping layer included on top of an electrolyte-gated organic transistor. This bilayer structure employs an ionic conducting layer (polyelectrolyte) and an ionic trapping layer containing cryptands. A remanent polarization is formed in the bilayer when the cations from the ionic conducting layer (polyanion) migrate into the trapping sites (cryptands) in the ionic trapping layer along an electric field. As the result of the remanent polarization, the organic transistor with the ionic trapping layer can vary its threshold voltage by applying a programming voltage of ±2 V (writing/erasing). We foresee that this work is potentially useful in a memory transistor with relatively low programming voltages and could also provide multilevel memory functionalities. Organic field-effect transistors are explored for a vast array of sensing applications in biological and chemical applications, in cases where the analyte commonly is included in aqueous media. Sensing in aqueous media can be obtained through various device configuration strategies, for instance using a gate-aqueous media-channel configuration. Such configurations are typically associated with large degrees of drift due to bias stress, undesired ionic doping effects and degradations. It is thus important to develop strategies to improve stability and also suppress any undesired stress that will potentially ruin the stability of the sensor. Paper V reports the method to improve the stability of a water-gated organic transistor. The first water-gated organic field-effect transistor was recently proposed [114]. However, the operating instability of this particular device is severe and the organic semiconductor used, P3HT, suffers from a fast degradation in ambient environment [31, 32]. An ion exchange membrane, Nafion, is added to cover the entire semiconducting channel. The water/Nafion56 gated organic transistor shows improved stability to air exposure over time and exhibits also good stability characteristics in neutral (pH=7) standard buffer solutions. Since the stable operation of the transistor in water is crucial for many sensing applications, the development of disposable low-cost sensors based on the water/Nafion-gated organic transistor opens for future work and optimizations. 57 References 1. Staudinger, H. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry. 1953 [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1953/index. html. 2. Heeger, A.J., A.G. MacDiarmid, and H. Shirakawa. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry. 2000 [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/2000/. 3. Nilsson, D., et al., An all-organic sensor–transistor based on a novel electrochemical transducer concept printed electrochemical sensors on paper. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2002. 86(2–3): p. 193-197. 4. Nambiar, S. and J.T.W. Yeow, Conductive polymer-based sensors for biomedical applications. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2011. 26(5): p. 1825-1832. 5. Geffroy, B., P. le Roy, and C. Prat, Organic light-emitting diode (OLED) technology: materials, devices and display technologies. Polymer International, 2006. 55(6): p. 572-582. 6. Gather, M.C., A. Köhnen, and K. Meerholz, White Organic LightEmitting Diodes. Advanced Materials, 2011. 23(2): p. 233-248. 7. Cai, W., X. Gong, and Y. Cao, Polymer solar cells: Recent development and possible routes for improvement in the performance. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2010. 94(2): p. 114-127. 8. Helgesen, M., R. Sondergaard, and F.C. Krebs, Advanced materials and processes for polymer solar cell devices. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2010. 20(1): p. 36-60. 9. Herlogsson, L., et al., Low-Voltage Polymer Field-Effect Transistors Gated via a Proton Conductor. Advanced Materials, 2007. 19(1): p. 97101. 10. Klauk, H., Organic thin-film transistors. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010. 39(7): p. 2643-2666. 11. Herlogsson, L., et al., Low-Voltage Ring Oscillators Based on Polyelectrolyte-Gated Polymer Thin-Film Transistors. Advanced Materials, 2010. 22(1): p. 72-76. 58 12. Bubnova, O., et al., Optimization of the thermoelectric figure of merit in the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Nat Mater, 2011. 10(6): p. 429-433. 13. Bubnova, O. and X. Crispin, Towards polymer-based organic thermoelectric generators. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012. 5(11): p. 9345-9362. 14. Torsi, L., et al., Side-Chain Role in Chemically Sensing Conducting Polymer Field-Effect Transistors. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2003. 107(31): p. 7589-7594. 15. Heeger, A.J., Semiconducting and Metallic Polymers: The Fourth Generation of Polymeric Materials. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2001. 105(36): p. 8475-8491. 16. Heeger, A.J., Semiconducting polymers: the Third Generation. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010. 39(7): p. 2354-2371. 17. Subramanian, V., et al. Printed electronics for low-cost electronic systems: Technology status and application development. in Solid-State Device Research Conference, 2008. ESSDERC 2008. 38th European. 2008. 18. Boverket. God bebyggd miljö – förslag till nytt delmål för fukt och mögel: Resultat om byggnaders fuktskador från projektet BETSI. 2011 [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.boverket.se/Global/Webbokhandel/Dokument/2011/BETSIFukt-och-mogel.pdf. 19. Oprea, A., et al., Capacitive humidity sensors on flexible RFID labels. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2008. 132(2): p. 404-410. 20. López, T.S., RFID and sensor integration standards: State and future prospects. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2011. 33(3): p. 207-213. 21. Naber, R.C.G., et al., Organic Nonvolatile Memory Devices Based on Ferroelectricity. Advanced Materials, 2010. 22(9): p. 933-945. 22. Ling, Q.-D., et al., Polymer electronic memories: Materials, devices and mechanisms. Progress in Polymer Science, 2008. 33(10): p. 917-978. 23. Heremans, P., et al., Polymer and Organic Nonvolatile Memory Devices. Chemistry of Materials, 2010. 23(3): p. 341-358. 24. Konno, K., et al., An organic nonvolatile memory using space charge polarization of a gate dielectric. Thin Solid Films, 2009. 518(2): p. 534536. 59 25. Kim, S.-J. and J.-S. Lee, Flexible Organic Transistor Memory Devices. Nano Letters, 2010. 10(8): p. 2884-2890. 26. Bernards, D.A., et al., Enzymatic sensing with organic electrochemical transistors. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2008. 18(1): p. 116-120. 27. Kumar, A. and J. Sinha, Electrochemical Transistors for Applications in Chemical and Biological Sensing, in Organic Semiconductors in Sensor Applications, D. Bernards, G. Malliaras, and R. Owens, Editors. 2008, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 245-261. 28. Yang, S.Y., et al., Electrochemical transistors with ionic liquids for enzymatic sensing. Chemical Communications, 2010. 46(42): p. 79727974. 29. Kergoat, L., et al., Advances in organic transistor-based biosensors: from organic electrochemical transistors to electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2012. 402(5): p. 1813-1826. 30. Cramer, T., et al., Water-gated organic field effect transistors opportunities for biochemical sensing and extracellular signal transduction. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2013. 31. Scarpa, G., et al., Organic ISFET Based on Poly (3-hexylthiophene). Sensors, 2010. 10(3): p. 2262-2273. 32. Hintz, H., et al., Photodegradation of P3+TíA Systematic Study of Environmental Factors. Chemistry of Materials, 2010. 23(2): p. 145-154. 33. Yuen, J.D., et al., Electrochemical Doping in Electrolyte-Gated Polymer Transistors. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2007. 129(46): p. 14367-14371. 34. McMurry, J., in Organic Chemistry. 2008, Thomson learning. inc.: Belmont, CA, USA. p. 12-13. 35. Peierls, R.E., Quantum Theory of Solids. 1955, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. 36. Fahlman, M. and W.R. Salaneck, Surfaces and interfaces in polymerbased electronics. Surface Science, 2002. 500(1–3): p. 904-922. 37. Chiang, C.K., et al., Electrical Conductivity in Doped Polyacetylene. Physical Review Letters, 1977. 39(17): p. 1098-1101. 38. Gurunathan, K., et al., Electrochemically synthesised conducting polymeric materials for applications towards technology in electronics, optoelectronics and energy storage devices. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 1999. 61(3): p. 173-191. 60 39. Assadi, A., et al., Field-effect mobility of poly(3-hexylthiophene). Applied Physics Letters, 1988. 53(3): p. 195-197. 40. Bao, Z., A. Dodabalapur, and A.J. Lovinger, Soluble and processable regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) for thin film field-effect transistor applications with high mobility. Applied Physics Letters, 1996. 69(26): p. 4108-4110. 41. Podzorov, V., et al., Single-crystal organic field effect transistors with the hole mobility ~ 8 cm[sup 2]/V s. Applied Physics Letters, 2003. 83(17): p. 3504-3506. 42. Jurchescu, O.D., J. Baas, and T.T.M. Palstra, Effect of impurities on the mobility of single crystal pentacene. Applied Physics Letters, 2004. 84(16): p. 3061-3063. 43. McMurry, J., in Organic Chemistry. 2008, Thomson learning. inc.: Belmont, CA, USA. p. 36. 44. McMurry, J., in Organic Chemistry. 2008, Thomson learning. inc.: Belmont, CA, USA. p. 39. 45. Nordling, C. and J. Österman, Physics Handbook for Science and Engineering. 8th ed. 2006, Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur. 46. Atkins, P. and J.d. Paula, in Atkins' Phyical Chemistry. 2010, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. p. 626-628. 47. Bueche, F., Dielectric dispersion of polar polymers. Journal of Polymer Science, 1961. 54(160): p. 597-602. 48. Said, E., et al., Polymer field-effect transistor gated via a poly(styrenesulfonic acid) thin film. Applied Physics Letters, 2006. 89(14): p. 143507. 49. Bordi, F., C. Cametti, and R.H. Colby, Dielectric spectroscopy and conductivity of polyelectrolyte solutions. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2004. 16(49): p. R1423. 50. Li, Y., et al., Humidity sensors based on polymer solid electrolytes: investigation on the capacitive and resistive devices construction. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2001. 77(3): p. 625-631. 51. Lee, C.-W., et al., Polymeric humidity sensor using organic/inorganic hybrid polyelectrolytes. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2005. 109(2): p. 315-322. 52. Rubinger, C.P.L., et al., Sulfonated polystyrene polymer humidity sensor: Synthesis and characterization. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2007. 123(1): p. 42-49. 61 53. Lv, X., et al., A resistive-type humidity sensor based on crosslinked polyelectrolyte prepared by UV irradiation. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2009. 135(2): p. 581-586. 54. Sun, A., Y. Wang, and Y. Li, Stability and water-resistance of humidity sensors using crosslinked and quaternized polyelectrolytes films. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2010. 145(2): p. 680-684. 55. Lee, C.-W., H.-W. Rhee, and M.-S. Gong, Humidity sensor using epoxy resin containing quaternary ammonium salts. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2001. 73(2–3): p. 124-129. 56. Lee, C.-W., H.-S. Park, and M.-S. Gong, Humidity sensitive properties of quaternary ammonium salts containing polyelectrolytes crosslinked with 2-oxazoline crosslinker. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2005. 109(2): p. 256-263. 57. Lv, X., Y. Li, and M. Yang, Humidity sensitive properties of copolymer of quaternary ammonium salt with polyether–salt complex. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2009. 20(6): p. 509-513. 58. Li, Y. and M.J. Yang, Bilayer thin film humidity sensors based on sodium polystyrenesulfonate and substituted polyacetylenes. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2002. 87(1): p. 184-189. 59. Li, Y., M.J. Yang, and Y. She, Humidity sensors using in situ synthesized sodium polystyrenesulfonate/ZnO nanocomposites. Talanta, 2004. 62(4): p. 707-712. 60. Liu, K., et al., Humidity sensitive properties of an anionic conjugated polyelectrolyte. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2008. 129(1): p. 2429. 61. Gong, M.-S., et al., Humidity-sensitive properties of phosphonium saltcontaining polyelectrolytes. Journal of Materials Science, 2002. 37(21): p. 4615-4620. 62. Gong, M.-S., et al., Humidity sensor using cross-linked polyelectrolyte prepared from mutually reactive copolymers containing phosphonium salt. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2002. 86(2–3): p. 160-167. 63. Lee, C.-W. and M.-S. Gong, Resistive humidity sensor using phosphonium salt-containing polyelectrolytes based on the mutually cross-linkable copolymers. Macromolecular Research, 2003. 11(5): p. 322-327. 64. Grahame, D.C., The Electrical Double Layer and the Theory of Electrocapillarity. Chemical Reviews, 1947. 41(3): p. 441-501. 62 65. Bard, A.J. and L.R. Faulkner, in Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications. 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, USA. p. 544-557. 66. Larsson, O., et al., Insulator Polarization Mechanisms in PolyelectrolyteGated Organic Field-Effect Transistors. Advanced Functional Materials, 2009. 19(20): p. 3334-3341. 67. Kwak, N.-S., et al., Synthesis and characteristics of a cross-linked DMSIP-co-HDO-co-MA ion-exchange membrane for redox flow battery applications. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013. 430(0): p. 252-262. 68. Ye, L., et al., Synthesis and characterization of novel cross-linked quaternized poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes based on morpholine for anion exchange membranes. Solid State Ionics, 2013. 240(0): p. 1-9. 69. DuPont. Nafion. [cited 2013 May]; Available http://www2.dupont.com/FuelCells/en_US/products/nafion.html. from: 70. Glass, A. Flemion. [cited 2013 May]; Available http://www.agc.com/english/csr/env/products/11.html. from: 71. Slade, S., et al., Ionic Conductivity of an Extruded Nafion 1100 EW Series of Membranes. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2002. 149(12): p. A1556-A1564. 72. Hsu, W.Y. and T.D. Gierke, Ion transport and clustering in nafion perfluorinated membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1983. 13(3): p. 307-326. 73. Eikerling, M., A.A. Kornyshev, and U. Stimming, Electrophysical Properties of Polymer Electrolyte Membranes: A Random Network Model. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1997. 101(50): p. 1080710820. 74. Tailoka, F., D.J. Fray, and R.V. Kumar, Humidity sensing under aggressive conditions using nafion conductors. Ionics, 2000. 6(5-6): p. 383-388. 75. Tailoka, F., D.J. Fray, and R.V. Kumar, Application of Nafion electrolytes for the detection of humidity in a corrosive atmosphere. Solid State Ionics, 2003. 161(3–4): p. 267-277. 76. Fischer, E., Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme. Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft, 1894. 27(3): p. 29852993. 63 77. Cram, D.J., J.-M. Lehn, and C.J. Pedersen. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1987 [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1987/. 78. Pedersen, C.J., Cyclic polyethers and their complexes with metal salts. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1967. 89(26): p. 7017-7036. 79. Ariga, K. and T. Kunitake, in Supramolecular Chemistry –Fundamentals and Applications. 2006, Springer: Heidelberg. p. 13. 80. Carlson, A.B., in Circuits: Engineering Concepts and Analysis of Linear Electric Circuits. 2000, Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, USA. p. 362-366. 81. Carlson, A.B., in Circuits: Engineering Concepts and Analysis of Linear Electric Circuits. 2000, Brooks/Cole: Pacific Grove, USA. p. 274-281. 82. Harpster, T.J., B. Stark, and K. Najafi, A passive wireless integrated humidity sensor. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2002. 95(2–3): p. 100-107. 83. Marioli, D., E. Sardini, and M. Serpelloni, An inductive telemetric measurement system for humidity sensing. Measurement Science and Technology, 2008. 19(11): p. 115204. 84. Maksimoviü, M., et al., Application of a LTCC sensor for measuring moisture content of building materials. Construction and Building Materials, 2012. 26(1): p. 327-333. 85. Ong, K.G., et al., Design and application of a wireless, passive, resonant-circuit environmental monitoring sensor. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2001. 93(1): p. 33-43. 86. Ong, K.G., et al., Monitoring of bacteria growth using a wireless, remote query resonant-circuit sensor: application to environmental sensing. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2001. 16(4–5): p. 305-312. 87. Riistama, J., et al., Totally passive wireless biopotential measurement sensor by utilizing inductively coupled resonance circuits. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2010. 157(2): p. 313-321. 88. Boutry, C.M., et al., Characterization of miniaturized RLC resonators made of biodegradable materials for wireless implant applications. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2013. 189(0): p. 344-355. 89. Akar, O., T. Akin, and K. Najafi, A wireless batch sealed absolute capacitive pressure sensor. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2001. 95(1): p. 29-38. 64 90. Fonseca, M.A., et al. Flexible wireless passive pressure sensors for biomedical applications. in Tech. Dig. Solid-State Sensor, Actuator, and Microsystems Workshop (Hilton Head 2006). 2006. 91. Zhai, J., T.V. How, and B. Hon, Design and modelling of a passive wireless pressure sensor. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 2010. 59(1): p. 187-190. 92. XILINX. Xilinx Ships World's Highest Capacity FPGA and Shatters Industry Record for Number of Transistors by 2X. 2011 [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://press.xilinx.com/2011-10-25-Xilinx-ShipsWorlds-Highest-Capacity-FPGA-and-Shatters-Industry-Record-forNumber-of-Transistors-by-2X. 93. Kahng, D., Electric Field Controlled Semiconductor Device. 1963, Bell Telephone Laboratories: USA. 94. Tsumura, A., H. Koezuka, and T. Ando, Macromolecular electronic device: Field-effect transistor with a polythiophene thin film. Applied Physics Letters, 1986. 49(18): p. 1210-1212. 95. Koezuka, H., A. Tsumura, and T. Ando, Field-effect transistor with polythiophene thin film. Synthetic Metals, 1987. 18(1–3): p. 699-704. 96. Dhar, B.M., et al., Threshold voltage shifting for memory and tuning in printed transistor circuits. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 2011. 72(4): p. 49-80. 97. Li, M., et al., Recent developments and applications of screen-printed electrodes in environmental assays—A review. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2012. 734(0): p. 31-44. 98. Kawahara, J., et al., Flexible active matrix addressed displays manufactured by printing and coating techniques. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 2013. 51(4): p. 265-271. 99. Kawahara, J., et al., Fast-switching printed organic electrochemical transistors including electronic vias through plastic and paper substrates. Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on, 2013. 60(6): p. 2052-2056. 100. Metters, J.P. and C.E. Banks, Screen Printed Electrodes Open New Vistas in Sensing: Application to Medical Diagnosis, in Applications of Electrochemistry in Medicine. 2013, Springer. p. 83-120. 101. Krebs, F.C., et al., A complete process for production of flexible large area polymer solar cells entirely using screen printing—First public demonstration. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 2009. 93(4): p. 422-441. 65 102. Krebs, F.C., J. Fyenbo, and M. Jørgensen, Product integration of compact roll-to-roll processed polymer solar cell modules: methods and manufacture using flexographic printing, slot-die coating and rotary screen printing. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2010. 20(41): p. 89949001. 103. Romijn, I., et al., Optimizing screen printed n-type solar cells towards 20% efficiency. Solar Energy, 2013. 2012: p. 2011. 104. Goldberg, H.D., et al., Screen printing: a technology for the batch fabrication of integrated chemical-sensor arrays. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 1994. 21(3): p. 171-183. 105. Nagata, R., et al., A glucose sensor fabricated by the screen printing technique. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 1995. 10(3–4): p. 261-267. 106. Soukup, R., A. Hamacek, and J. Reboun. Organic based sensors: Novel screen printing technique for sensing layers deposition. in Electronics Technology (ISSE), 2012 35th International Spring Seminar on. 2012. 107. Wei, Y., et al., Screen Printed Capacitive Free-standing Cantilever Beams used as a Motion Detector for Wearable Sensors. Procedia Engineering, 2012. 47(0): p. 165-169. 108. Narakathu, B.B., et al., Novel fully screen printed flexible electrochemical sensor for the investigation of electron transfer between thiol functionalized viologen and gold clusters. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2013. 176(0): p. 768-774. 109. Kipphan, H., screen printing, in Handbook of Print Media. 2001, Springer: Heidelberg, Germany. p. 409-422. 110. Nordlinder, S. and F. Andersson, Methods and devices for manufacturing of electrical components and laminated structures. 2011, Webshape AB. 111. DPpatterning. Dry phase patterning. [cited 2013 May]; Available from: http://www.dppatterning.com/. 112. Park, S.-M. and J.-S. Yoo, Peer Reviewed: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy for Better Electrochemical Measurements. Analytical Chemistry, 2003. 75(21): p. 455 A-461 A. 113. Lee, J.-W. and B. Lee, Design of high-Q UHF radio-frequency identification tag antennas for an increased read range. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 2008. 2(7): p. 711-717. 114. Kergoat, L., et al., A Water-Gate Organic Field-Effect Transistor. Advanced Materials, 2010. 22(23): p. 2565-2569. 66