Download A Randomised, Double Blind Trial of N- Stapes Surgery

A Randomised, Double Blind Trial of NAcetylcysteine for Hearing Protection during
Stapes Surgery
Dan Bagger-Sjoback, Karin Stromback, Pierre Hakizimana, Jan Plue, Christina Larsson,
Malou Hultcrantz, Georgios Papatziamos, Henrik Smeds, Niklas Danckwardt-Lilliestrom,
Sten Hellstrom, Ann Johansson, Bo Tideholm and Anders Fridberger
Linköping University Post Print
N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original article.
Original Publication:
Dan Bagger-Sjoback, Karin Stromback, Pierre Hakizimana, Jan Plue, Christina Larsson, Malou
Hultcrantz, Georgios Papatziamos, Henrik Smeds, Niklas Danckwardt-Lilliestrom, Sten
Hellstrom, Ann Johansson, Bo Tideholm and Anders Fridberger, A Randomised, Double Blind
Trial of N-Acetylcysteine for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery, 2015, PLoS ONE,
(10), 3, e0115657.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115657
Copyright: Public Library of Science
http://www.plos.org/
Postprint available at: Linköping University Electronic Press
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-117231
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A Randomised, Double Blind Trial of NAcetylcysteine for Hearing Protection during
Stapes Surgery
Dan Bagger-Sjöbäck1,2, Karin Strömbäck3, Pierre Hakizimana1,6, Jan Plue4,
Christina Larsson2, Malou Hultcrantz1,2, Georgios Papatziamos2, Henrik Smeds1,2,
Niklas Danckwardt-Lillieström3, Sten Hellström1,5, Ann Johansson5, Bo Tideholm2,
Anders Fridberger1,6*
1 Center for Hearing and Communication Research, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and
Technology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden, 2 Department of Otolaryngology,
Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden, 3 Department of Otolaryngology, Academic
Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden, 4 Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology,
Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, 5 Department of Audiology and Neurotology,
Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden, 6 Department of Clinical and Experimental
Medicine, Linköping University, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Bagger-Sjöbäck D, Strömbäck K,
Hakizimana P, Plue J, Larsson C, Hultcrantz M, et al.
(2015) A Randomised, Double Blind Trial of NAcetylcysteine for Hearing Protection during Stapes
Surgery. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0115657. doi:10.1371/
journal.pone.0115657
Academic Editor: Berthold Langguth, University of
Regensburg, GERMANY
Received: August 14, 2014
Accepted: September 24, 2014
Published: March 12, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Bagger-Sjöbäck et al. This is an
open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are
credited.
Data Availability Statement: Study data can be
found at http://snd.gu.se/sv/catalogue/study/
SND0974.
Funding: The study was funded by grants awarded
to AF from AFA Försäkrings AB (www.afa.se), the
Swedish Research Council (K2011-63X-14061-11-3;
www.vr.se), the Research Council for Working Life
and Social Research (2006-1526; www.forte.se), the
Swedish National Association for Hard of Hearing
People (www.hrf.se), and the Tysta Skolan foundation
(tystaskolan.se). The study drug was a gift from
AstraZeneca. The funders had no role in study
* [email protected]
Abstract
Background
Otosclerosis is a disorder that impairs middle ear function, leading to conductive hearing
loss. Surgical treatment results in large improvement of hearing at low sound frequencies,
but high-frequency hearing often suffers. A likely reason for this is that inner ear sensory
cells are damaged by surgical trauma and loud sounds generated during the operation. Animal studies have shown that antioxidants such as N-Acetylcysteine can protect the inner
ear from noise, surgical trauma, and some ototoxic substances, but it is not known if this
works in humans. This trial was performed to determine whether antioxidants improve surgical results at high frequencies.
Methods
We performed a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled parallel group clinical
trial at three Swedish university clinics. Using block-stratified randomization, 156 adult patients undergoing stapedotomy were assigned to intravenous N-Acetylcysteine (150 mg/kg
body weight) or matching placebo (1:1 ratio), starting one hour before surgery. The primary
outcome was the hearing threshold at 6 and 8 kHz; secondary outcomes included the severity of tinnitus and vertigo.
Findings
One year after surgery, high-frequency hearing had improved 2.7 ± 3.8 dB in the placebo
group (67 patients analysed) and 2.4 ± 3.7 dB in the treated group (72 patients; means ±
95% confidence interval, p = 0.54; linear mixed model). Surgery improved tinnitus, but there
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
1 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
design, data collection and analysis, decision to
publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
was no significant intergroup difference. Post-operative balance disturbance was common
but improved during the first year, without significant difference between groups. Four patients receiving N-Acetylcysteine experienced mild side effects such as nausea and
vomiting.
Conclusions
N-Acetylcysteine has no effect on hearing thresholds, tinnitus, or balance disturbance
after stapedotomy.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00525551
Introduction
Otosclerosis is a common disorder [1,2] where the stapes gradually fuses with the surrounding
bone, producing conductive hearing loss. Surgery is a well-established treatment option, where
the diseased stapes is bypassed by a prosthesis. This improves low-frequency hearing by 25–30
dB, but high-frequency hearing often suffers [3–10]. For instance, in the study by Bauchet
St. Martin et al [6], the average air conduction thresholds at 8 kHz were 8 dB worse six weeks
after surgery. Improvement was seen in most patients over time, but an average decline of 4 dB
remained at 9 months. Similarly, patients examined by Mair and Laukli [5] had 7 dB deterioration in hearing at 8 kHz one year after surgery; high frequency audiometry demonstrated a 15dB average worsening of hearing thresholds at 10 kHz and even larger losses at 12 and 14 kHz.
In Bauchet St Martin’s study [6], 49% of patients had worse hearing at 8 kHz 9 months after
surgery. Strömbäck et al [3] used a more conservative measure, the average change in hearing
across the three frequencies 4, 6, and 8 kHz, and found that 6.5% of patients had threshold deterioration larger than 10 dB after surgery. Finally, recent studies [11] that extended the frequency range of bone conduction measurements demonstrated that 8-kHz thresholds are
worse in 54% of patients six weeks after surgery; 25% of patients had bone conduction threshold losses that were 10 dB or larger. These studies indicate that deterioration of high-frequency
hearing occurs in a substantial fraction of patients undergoing stapes surgery, despite the great
benefit observed at lower frequencies.
High-frequency loss after stapes surgery may be a result of surgical trauma, perilymph leakage, and loud sounds generated by drilling close to the delicate sensory cells in the inner ear
[3,6,12]. Studies suggest that pharmacological intervention can target some of these factors.
For instance, loud sound causes toxic free radicals to be generated in the hearing organ [13]
and animal studies consequently demonstrate that hearing loss induced by noise can be decreased by antioxidants, such as N-Acetylcysteine [14–17]. N-Acetylcysteine has also shown
some effectiveness against surgical inner ear trauma in animal models [18].
It is not known if the human ear can be protected by antioxidants, but N-Acetylcysteine is
nonetheless incorporated in treatment programs for noise-exposed soldiers, and marketed as a
nutritional supplement for protecting the ear against noise [19].
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
2 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
Hearing loss that follows from noise or other trauma may be temporary or permanent. The
temporary component can last for up to four weeks and is thought to depend on mechanisms
other than free radical generation [20]. Nevertheless, three small, short-term, randomized studies tested the effect of N-Acetylcysteine on temporary threshold shifts in humans [21–23].
Minor but significant effects were observed in one of these trials [21], but the effect of antioxidants on permanent threshold shifts have not been examined.
We performed a clinical trial to determine if N-Acetylcysteine can improve high-frequency
hearing (6 and 8 kHz) after stapedotomy. Patients were followed for one year after surgery,
using audiograms as well as questionnaires designed to probe the severity of tinnitus and balance disturbance and the general satisfaction with surgery.
Methods
Study design, oversight, and ethics statement
This randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind parallel-group trial was performed at
three university clinics in Sweden. The first and last author designed the study with input from
remaining authors. The protocol and patient consent forms were approved by the Regional
Ethics board in Stockholm (2007/305-31/4; S1 CONSORT Checklist S1 and S1 Protocol) and
by the Swedish Medical Products Agency (151:2007/17252); the study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (accession number NCT00525551) and EudraCT (2006-006243-31). Data were
analysed by two statistical consultants (PH and JP) and by the last author. The report was written by the last author, the other authors providing comments and suggestions on several previous drafts as well as approval of the final version.
Eligibility
Eligible patients had a clinical diagnosis of otosclerosis (defined as typical history and audiogram, air-bone gap of at least 20 dB at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz, and normal middle ear status without signs of infection or perforation of the eardrum), had opted for surgical treatment, were
older than 18 years of age, and had signed the consent form. We excluded patients with asthma
[24], hypersensitivity to the study drug, only one functioning ear, and those with previous middle ear surgeries. In premenopausal patients not using hormonal anticonception or intrauterine devices, serum chorionic gonadotropin was measured before administering the study drug;
levels >5 IU / l led to exclusion.
Study procedures
Hearing was measured in soundproof booths with patients wearing calibrated TDH 39 headphones. Pure tones at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 kHz were presented to one ear at a time.
Thresholds for bone-conducted sound (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 4 kHz) were measured by placing a
calibrated vibrator on the mastoid process. Patients indicated stimulus perception by pressing
a button; the threshold was identified using the modified Hughson-Westlake method as recommended by the International Standards Organization (ISO8253-1). Speech discrimination was
tested using a set of 50 phonemically balanced words presented at the patient’s most comfortable level (commonly located 30 dB above the average hearing threshold at 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz).
Patients graded the severity of tinnitus during the past week using a rating scale where zero
was defined as no tinnitus and 10 as a high degree of disturbing tinnitus. A similar strategy assessed subjective vertigo. Satisfaction with hearing quality was estimated using a scale where
zero corresponded to very low and ten indicated very high satisfaction.
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
3 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
The measures listed above were performed before surgery, 6–8 weeks thereafter, and at one
year. At the last two time points, patients also graded the overall outcome, zero corresponding
to very poor and 10 indicating a very good result.
On the evening after surgery, physicians scored facial nerve function and gustation as normal or abnormal and nystagmus as present or absent. Patients also scored tinnitus and vertigo
at this time point.
Randomisation and masking
Subjects eligible for the study were divided in four strata based on age (over or under 45 years)
and hearing threshold for bone-conducted sound at 4 kHz (better or worse than 40 dB hearing
level). Stratified randomization with a block size of 6 was used to assign patients to intravenous
N-Acetylcysteine (150 mg/kg body weight, mixed with physiological saline to a final volume of
300 ml) or matching placebo (300 ml of identical-appearing saline solution; the allocation ratio
was 1:1). Infusions started one hour before surgery at a rate of 100 ml/h. The randomization
lists were computer-generated by the pharmacy prior to the start of the study and kept at a central facility. Patients and all personnel involved in the study were unaware of treatment
assignments.
Surgery
Eight experienced otologic surgeons performed operations. Surgeons were free to choose the
technique they deemed best. Hence, in 35 of 156 cases a laser was used for thinning the stapes
footplate and for vaporizing the tendon and the posterior and anterior crus of the stapes, and a
skeeter microdrill utilized for stapedotomy. A microdrill was used throughout surgery in remaining cases. Periauricular infiltration of lidocaine-epinephrine was used in all patients; 10%
also received general anaesthesia. Sedatives and antiemetics were used liberally, including betamethasone in 17 patients in the actively treated group and 25 patients in the placebo group. A
separate statistical analysis showed that betamethasone lacked effect on primary or secondary
outcomes. A teflon / platinum Fisch prosthesis with 0.4 mm diameter was used in 98% of cases.
Outcomes
In animal experiments, N-Acetylcysteine protects from loss of sensory cells but is less effective
against the reversible hearing impairment that follows immediately after trauma [25]. Because
the 6–8 week data may reflect temporary effects, the primary outcome was the hearing threshold at 6 and 8 kHz one year after surgery.
Secondary measures of efficacy included hearing thresholds at those frequencies 8 weeks
after surgery, and the severity of tinnitus and vertigo at these two time points. Tinnitus was included as a secondary outcome measure because of its well-established relation to high-frequency hearing loss [26], and balance problems appear to be more common in patients where
the inner ear is subject to greater surgical trauma.
To assess safety, we monitored facial nerve problems, gustation loss, and nystagmus, and
the incidence of side effects from N-Acetylcysteine, such as exanthema, urticaria, bronchospasm, and anaphylactoid reactions [27].
Statistical analysis
Estimations showed that 150 patients would result in 90% power to detect an intergroup difference in hearing thresholds of 10 dB at a significance level of 0.05. A protocol-specified interim
analysis was conducted after recruitment of 75 patients; this analysis showed no significant
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
4 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
intergroup difference. The trial therefore continued until the number of patients dictated by
the power analysis had been reached.
Data were analysed using linear mixed models with Gaussian error distribution [28]. To
correct for patient age, sex, weight and the fact that the postoperative hearing recovery depended on stimulus frequency, we included these terms as independent variables. Pearson correlation, ANOVAs and χ2-tests were used to test for collinearity among predictor variables.
T-tests, the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the χ2-test were used to compare baseline patient
characteristics.
Linear mixed models were used to analyse the effect of medical treatment on the change in
hearing thresholds after surgery. To account for the autocorrelation arising from the longitudinal data collection performed during audiometry, a patient-specific intercept was used as the
random effect, and predictor variables mentioned above treated as fixed effects. Likelihood
ratio testing (χ2 test) was used to construct the optimal linear mixed model by starting from a
full model and removing model terms in a stepwise manner. Finally, a likelihood ratio test
compared the null model (including patient-specific intercept) to the final model, to evaluate
the significance of adding that set of predictor variables. The intercept was significant (p <
0.001), confirming the appropriateness of the linear mixed model.
Tinnitus, dizziness and the perceived quality of hearing were analysed using ordered logistic
regression. The dependent variable was the change in scores as compared to baseline. All analyses were performed in the R Environment for Statistical Computing (v2.12.1).
Results
Patients
Between November 2007 and April 2012, 605 patients with otosclerosis were assessed for eligibility (Fig. 1). From these patients, 26% (156 patients) were randomized to either N-Acetylcysteine or matching placebo. Data for the primary outcome was available for 139 subjects (89%);
72 patients in the treated group and 67 in the placebo group finalized the study and were included in statistical analyses. A common reason for dropouts was that patients lived far from
the clinic and were unwilling to travel.
Patient characteristics are given in Table 1 Age, sex, and weight did not differ significantly
between groups. Both groups rated their hearing as poor; some patients also suffered from tinnitus, while balance problems were uncommon before surgery. There were no significant intergroup differences in any of these parameters.
The largest benefit from drug treatment is expected when surgery is complicated, since this
may be associated with greater trauma. Surgeons therefore rated each operation as complicated
or uncomplicated, and provided details in cases deemed difficult. There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of complicated surgeries, duration of the operation, or
length of the implanted prosthesis. The most common perioperative problem was transient
gustation change, which affected 15–20% of patients, and dizziness. Dizziness increased immediately after the operation with the N-Acetylcysteine group reporting more severe balance disturbance (p = 0.045, Wilcoxon rank sum test).
Before surgery, thresholds for air-conducted sound (Fig. 2, lower set of points) reveal a flat
loss around 60 dB HL, whereas bone-conduction thresholds (top set of points in Fig. 2) have
the notch pattern common in otosclerotic ears; the mean preoperative air-bone gap was 29 dB.
Hearing did not differ significantly between the groups.
Overall, the two groups were well balanced with regard to patient characteristics, parameters
reflecting surgical difficulties, and hearing.
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
5 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
Fig 1. Consort flow diagram. A common reason for declining trial participation was that long travel distances made patients unwilling to return to the
hospital for the 1-year follow-up visit. Otosclerosis is a clinical diagnosis, and 4 patients were found at surgery to have middle ear disorders where
stapedotomy is not indicated. One patient in the placebo group was excluded in violation of the protocol because of a fracture of the stapes footplate. A total
of 5 patients never received the study drug because their operations were postponed after study drugs had been delivered to the ward (but before drug
infusion started).
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657.g001
Outcomes
Stapedotomy improved low-frequency hearing in both groups. At 250 Hz, patients receiving
N-Acetylcysteine gained 26 ± 3.3 dB and those given placebo 28 ± 3 dB at 6 weeks (means ±
95% confidence intervals; Fig. 3; the standard deviation was 14 and 13 dB, respectively). The
benefit from surgery decreased at higher frequencies (p<0.001; slope = −0.0032 dB / Hz; linear
mixed model) and at 8 kHz, the average change was 2.7 ± 3.8 dB in the treated group and 0.9 ±
3.8 dB in the placebo group (standard deviation 16 dB in both groups). At this frequency, 34%
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
6 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
Table 1. Demographic characteristics, hearing, and surgical factors in study patients.
NAC group (mean ± 95% CI, n =
72)
Placebo group (mean ± 95% CI, n =
67)
Age—yr
49.1 ± 2.7NS
50.0 ± 2.8
t-test
Female sex—no (%)
48 (65) NS
48 (68)
χ2-test
Weight—kg
72.9 ± 3.6 NS
73.5 ± 3.2
t-test
Hearing threshold for bone-conducted sound at 4 kHz—dB
HL
22.5 ± 3.6 NS
21.3 ± 4.0
t-test
Air-Bone gap—dB
29.3 ± 2.0 NS
29.1 ± 2.2
t-test
Speech comprehension—%
94.8 ± 1.3 NS
93.5 ± 2.4
t-test
Perceived hearing quality before surgery2
4 (0–9) NS
5 (0–9)
Wilcoxon
Tinnitus grade before surgery3
3 (0–10) NS
3 (0–10)
Wilcoxon
0 (0–4) NS
0 (0–8)
Wilcoxon
16 (22) NS
Demographic characteristics
Hearing
1
3
Dizziness grade before surgery
Surgical characteristics
Complicated surgery4—no (%)
10 (14)
χ2-test
Fractured footplate—no (%)
1 (1.4)
NS
1 (1.4)
χ2-test
Chorda tympani lesion—no (%)
2 (2.7) NS
1 (1.4)
χ2-test
Problematic facial nerve anatomy—no (%)
4 (1.4) NS
2 (2.8)
χ2-test
Bleeding—no (%)
1 (1.4) NS
2 (2.8)
χ2-test
Duration of surgery—min
51.5 ± 5.6 NS
50.3 ± 3.2
t-test
Prosthesis length—mm
4.68 ± 0.1 NS
4.58 ± 0.1
t-test
Change in gustation5—no (%)
11 (15) NS
14 (20)
χ2-test
Facial nerve dysfunction5—no (%)
0 (0) NS
2 (3)
χ2-test
NS
Nystagmus —no (%)
2 (3)
0 (0)
χ2-test
Perioperative tinnitus grade3
1 (0–10) NS
1 (0–10)
Wilcoxon
Perioperative dizziness grade3
3 (0–10)*
1 (0–10)
Wilcoxon
5
N.S. denotes not significant.
* denotes P<0.05.
1. Measured with a standard 50-item phonemically balanced word list
2 Measured with a 10-grade scale where 10 represent the best possible hearing quality. Numbers are medians and ranges.
3. Measured with a 10-grade scale where 10 represents very disturbing tinnitus or dizziness. Numbers are medians and ranges.
4 As reported by the surgeon performing the operation.
5 Reported by physician after examining the patient on the evening after the operation.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657.t001
of patients in the placebo group and 43% of those in the treated group lost hearing after surgery. The loss was 15 dB or larger in 19% of patients. At 6 kHz, 17% of patients in the placebo
group and 21% of those in the N-Acetylcysteine group lost hearing; the loss was 15 dB or larger
in 9%. The linear mixed model indicated a non-significant negative effect from N-Acetylcysteine (p = 0.69).
The improvement at one year (Fig. 4) correlated to the improvement observed at 6 weeks,
which depended on frequency. To avoid predictor variable collinearity, we analysed the difference in hearing thresholds between these two time points. A small additional improvement, most
pronounced at low frequencies, was evident during the first year (model slope −0.0003 dB / Hz;
p<0.001; linear mixed model), but N-Acetylcysteine had no significant effect (p = 0.68; 38% of
patients in the placebo group and 36% of patients in the treated group lost hearing at 8 kHz; the
corresponding values at 6 kHz were 20 and 21%).
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
7 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
Fig 2. Hearing thresholds of the placebo group and the N-Acetyl cysteine group (“Treated group”) at baseline. Thresholds for air-conducted sound
(lower set of points) are measured by standard headphones covering the ears; thresholds for bone-conducted sound (top data set) are determined by placing
a vibrator on the mastoid process. Bone-conducted sound was not measured at frequencies higher than 4000 Hz as this is not part of normal clinical routine.
Rings represent the mean values; vertical lines are 95% confidence intervals for the mean. Hearing was measured at the same set of frequencies in all
patients, but a horizontal offset was added when plotting to improve the clarity of presentation.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657.g002
In exploratory analyses not specified in the protocol, we computed the number of patients
who lost hearing at most frequencies. In each group, 4 patients had average change in hearing
less than 0 dB across all frequencies (P = 1, χ2-test). One patient in the N-Acetylcysteine group
had complete sensorineural hearing loss; there were no deaf ears in the placebo group.
Other outcomes
Stapedotomy decreased tinnitus severity. At both 6 weeks and 1 year, tinnitus scores were
about one unit better (on a 10-grade scale; Table 2), but there was no significant difference between the groups. The improvement was evident soon after surgery, with a small further gain
over the first year.
Many patients experienced vertigo on the day of surgery (see Table 1), an effect that remains
noticeable at 6 weeks (Table 2), where scores indicated a small residual vertigo sensation that
was more pronounced in the placebo group. This intergroup difference was borderline significant (p = 0.048, ordered logistic regression) but vertigo improved over the course of the first
year and on average, patients reported less dizziness at 1 year than they did before surgery.
This improvement was similar in both groups.
When grading their hearing quality, patients reported a substantial improvement after surgery. The improvement was larger in the placebo group at both time points; this difference was
borderline significant at 6 weeks (p = 0.047), but not at 1 year (p = 0.051). A similar trend was
evident for the general satisfaction with surgery, where the average was an 8 out of 10 grading
at one year, without significant differences between groups.
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
8 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
Fig 3. (Upper graph) Change in hearing thresholds 6 weeks after surgery (as compared to measurements before the operation). Hearing was
measured at the same set of frequencies as in Fig. 2. The size of each dot corresponds to the number of patients, obtained from the histogram for each
frequency (5 dB bins) and boxes enclose the 95% confidence interval. Horizontal lines show the mean value at each frequency. One patient with complete
sensorineural hearing loss after surgery is omitted from the plot (but included in all statistical analyses). (Lower graph). Change in bone-conduction
thresholds at 6 weeks. The scaling of the dots is the same in both panels.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657.g003
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
9 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
Fig 4. (Upper graph). Change in hearing thresholds one year after surgery (as compared to measurements obtained before the operation). The size of each
dot corresponds to the number of patients (obtained from the histogram for each frequency; 5 dB bins). Boxes enclose the 95% confidence interval and the
horizontal lines give the mean at each frequency. One patient with complete sensorineural hearing loss after surgery is omitted from the plot. (Lower graph).
Change in bone-conduction thresholds at 1 year. Dot scaling is identical in both graphs.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657.g004
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
10 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
Table 2. Changes in scores for tinnitus, dizziness, and other variables.
NAC group (n =
72)
Placebo group (n =
67)
Change in tinnitus grade from baseline to 6 weeks6
0.99 ± 1.2NS
0.93 ± 1.5
OLR
Change in tinnitus grade from baseline to 1 year6
1.07 ± 1.1NS
1.24 ± 1.5
OLR
Change in dizziness grade from baseline to 6
weeks6
−0.07 ± 0.7*
−0.42 ± 0.8
OLR
Change in dizziness grade from baseline to 1 year6
1.72 ± 0.9NS
1.88 ± 0.8
OLR
Change in hearing quality from baseline to 6
weeks6
2.3 ± 1.2*
3.1 ± 1.4
OLR
Change in hearing quality from baseline to 1 year6
2.67 ± 1.2NS
3.31 ± 1.3
OLR
Satisfaction with surgery at 6 weeks
7.0 ± 1.3NS
7.7 ± 1.2
OLR
Satisfaction with surgery at 1 year7
7.9 ± 1.3NS
8.2 ± 1.1
OLR
Air-bone gap at 6 weeks—dB8
10.3 ± 1.4NS
10.8 ± 1.6
ttest
Air-bone gap at 1 year—dB8
10.8 ± 1.7NS
11.3 ± 1.7
ttest
7
N.S. denotes not significant; OLR, ordered logistic regression.
* = p < 0.05
6. Positive changes denote improvement on the 10-grade scale used in Table 1.
7. Patients graded the outcome on a 10-grade scale where 10 corresponded to a very good outcome and 0
to a very poor one.
8. The air-bone gap is the average difference between air conduction thresholds and bone conduction ones
at the frequencies 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz. Data are means ± 95% CI.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657.t002
Air-bone gaps were stable over the course of the first year. At one year, 57% of patients in
the placebo group and 62% of patients in the treated group had air-bone gap less than or equal
to 10 dB. This difference was not significant.
Side effects
Four patients, all in the N-Acetylcysteine group, experienced side effects (vomiting, flush,
thrombophlebitis, and pain at the infusion site). Pain at the infusion site led one patient to
withdraw consent; the pain subsided promptly upon termination of the infusion. The remaining three patients completed the study.
Discussion
Although stapes surgery improves low-frequency hearing by 25–30 dB on average, it is well established that this operation also can lead to sensorineural hearing loss. The incidence of profound hearing loss after stapes surgery appears to be 0.2–1% [9], but the present study was not
powered to detect a difference in the incidence of such rare events. However, it is also clear that
surgical results are worse at stimulus frequencies >4 kHz than they are at low frequencies [4–
7]; a recent study showed that 54% of patients had decline in bone-conduction thresholds at
8 kHz six weeks after surgery [8]. The relatively poor high-frequency results may be an effect of
surgical trauma and loud sounds generated during perforation of the stapes footplate. Some patients describe the sound of the microdrill as the “worst I ever heard”, and attempts at measuring the sound pressure generated by drilling has shown values in the range between 117 and
131 dB SPL [9], which is loud enough to cause significant hearing loss. Barotrauma, accidental
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
11 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
suctioning of perilymph, and leakage of perilymph during prosthesis insertion may also contribute [6,8]. These trauma-related components are a potential target for
pharmacological interventions.
Animal studies showed that many pathways can be manipulated in order to protect inner
ear sensory cells [29]. Antioxidants have shown significant promise, with a protective effect on
the order of 10–30 dB after standardized noise trauma. N-Acetylcysteine has also shown some
effectiveness against surgical trauma in animal models [15]. We therefore expected antioxidants to improve surgical results by modifying the effects of surgical trauma and any loud
sound generated during footplate perforation. However, high-dose N-Acetylcysteine did not
improve hearing thresholds or tinnitus. The perceived quality of hearing was worse in the NAcetylcysteine group at 6 weeks, but this difference was only marginally significant and not
present at 1 year. Vertigo was worse in the placebo group at 6 weeks, but again the difference
was only marginally significant and not sustained. Given their inconsistency and low magnitude, it is likely that these differences were the result of chance.
Previous studies suggest that patients with normal or near normal high-frequency hearing
thresholds have the highest risk of developing post-surgical hearing loss [3,6]. These patients
may have normally functioning sensory cells at the base of the cochlea and a small loss of such
cells may be sufficient to measurably decrease hearing. Hence, a protective effect from antioxidants could be present in this subgroup of patients, but the group is not large, making recruitment for such a trial a challenge.
Short follow-up times were used in all previous human trials of antioxidants for hearing
protection [19–21]. This is problematic, because temporary threshold shifts are thought to depend on mechanisms where antioxidants are not expected to be optimally effective [18]. A long
follow-uptime is therefore important, although we note that there were only minor changes in
hearing between weeks 6 and 52 in the present study. Hence, future trials in this area could
probably be restricted to a 6-week time window without significant loss of power.
Previous trials also used relatively low oral doses of antioxidants. In the case of N-Acetylcysteine, this is a problem because only 6–10% of an oral dose reaches the systemic circulation
[30], and the half-life is approximately 2 h. Intravenous treatment was therefore used in the
current study. Although it is difficult to extrapolate doses from animals to humans, the dose
used here is within the range found effective in animals [10], and the average dose is around 9
times that used in human trials published to date [20,21].
Pharmacological inner ear protection is difficult to study in humans, since people cannot be
exposed to loud sounds to determine if their ears will be protected. A potential solution is to
study military personnel or other groups with frequent noise exposure, but hearing loss will
often develop slowly even in these groups, which makes studies time-consuming, expensive,
and prone to compliance problems. Stapes surgery may be a setting where the effects of protective drugs can be studied, since the operation leads to a temporally well-defined trauma on the
high-frequency parts of the inner ear.
Supporting Information
S1 CONSORT Checklist. Consort 2010 checklist.
(DOC)
S1 Protocol. English translation of study protocol as approved by the Regional Ethics
Board in Stockholm.
(PDF)
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
12 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
Acknowledgments
We thank study nurses Maria Axelsson and Carina Jankevics and audiologist Zohreh Nekoei
for excellent assistance throughout the study.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: DBS AF. Performed the experiments: DBS KS CL
MH GP HS NDL SH AJ BT. Analyzed the data: PH JP AF. Wrote the paper: AF.
References
1.
Hannula S, Bloigu R, Majamaa K, Sorri M, Mäki-Torkko E (2012) Ear diseases and other risk factors for
hearing impairment among adults: An epidemiological study. Int J Audiol 51; 833–840. doi: 10.3109/
14992027.2012.707334 PMID: 22934931
2.
Browning GG, Gatehouse S (1992) The prevalence of middle ear disease in the adult British population. Clin Otolaryngol All Sci 17; 317–21. PMID: 1526050
3.
Strömbäck K, Köbler S, Rask-Andersen H (2012) High frequency hearing following stapes surgery.
Acta Otolaryngol 132: 944–50 doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.677859 PMID: 22691041
4.
Meyer SE (1999) The effect of stapes surgery on high frequency hearing in patients with otosclerosis.
Am J Otol 20: 36–40. PMID: 9918169
5.
Mair IW, Laukli E (1986) Air conduction thresholds after myringoplasty and stapes surgery: a conventional and high frequency audiometric comparison. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 95: 327–30. PMID:
3740705
6.
Bauchet St Martin M, Rubinstein EN, Hirsch BE (2008) High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss
After Stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 29: 447–452. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318172d6a3 PMID:
18520581
7.
Gerard J-M, Serry P, Gersdorff MC (2008) Outcome and lack of prognostic factors in stapes surgery.
Otol Neurotol 29: 290–294. PMID: 18097333
8.
Somers T, Vercruysse JP, Zarowski A, Verstreken M, Schatteman I, et al. (2007) Transient depression
of inner ear function after stapedotomy: Skeeter versus CO2 laser technique. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65:
267–272. PMID: 17245057
9.
Tange RA, Dreschler WA (1990) Pre- and postoperative high-freqeuncy audiometry in otosclerosis.
ORL 52: 16–20. PMID: 2304757
10.
Mann WJ, Amedee RG, Fuerst G, Tabb HG (1998) Hearing loss as a complication of stapes surgery.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115: 324–328.
11.
Just T, Guder E, Pau HW (2012) Effect of the stapedotomy technique on early post-operative hearing
results—Preliminary results. Auris Nasus Larynx 39: 383–86. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2011.07.009 PMID:
21862257
12.
Yin X, Strömbäck A-K, Duan M (2011) Evaluation of the noise generated by otological electrical drills
and suction during cadaver surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 131: 1132–1135. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2011.
600725 PMID: 21756022
13.
Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH (2006) The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear 27: 1–9. PMID: 16446561
14.
Bielefeld EC, Kopke RD, Jackson RL, Coleman JK, Liu J, et al. (2007) Noise protection with N-acetyl-lcysteine (NAC) using a variety of noise exposures, NAC doses, and routes of administration. Acta Otolaryngol 127: 914–9. PMID: 17712668
15.
Duan M, Qiu J, Laurell G, Olofsson Å, Counter SA, et al. (2004) Dose and time-dependent protection of
the antioxidant N-L-acetylcysteine against impulse noise trauma. Hear Res 192: 1–9. PMID: 15157958
16.
Ohinata Y, Miller JM, Schacht J (2003) Protection from noise-induced lipid peroxidation and hair cell
loss in the cochlea. Brain Res 966: 265–73. PMID: 12618349
17.
Yamasoba T, Nuttall AL, Harris C, Raphael Y, Miller JM (1998) Role of glutathione in protection against
noise-induced hearing loss. Brain Res 784: 82–90. PMID: 9518561
18.
Eastwood H, Pinder D, James D, Chang A, Galloway S, et al. (2010) Permanent and transient effects of
locally delivered n-acetyl cysteine in a guinea pig model of cochlear implantation. Hear Res 259: 24–
30. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.08.010 PMID: 19732818
19.
http://www.thehearingpill.com/ Web page accessed Sept 6, 2013.
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
13 / 14
NAC for Hearing Protection during Stapes Surgery
20.
Oishi N, Schacht J (2011) Emerging treatments for noise-induced hearing loss. Exp Op Emerg Drugs
16: 235–245. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2011.552427 PMID: 21247358
21.
Le Prell CG, Johnson AC, Lindblad AC, Skjönsberg Å, Ulfendahl M, et al. (2011) Increased vitamin
plasma levels in Swedish military personnel treated with nutrients prior to automatic weapon training.
Noise Health 13: 432–43. PMID: 22122960
22.
Kramer S, Dreisbach L, Lockwood J, Baldwin K, Kopke R, et al (2006) Efficacy of the antioxidant Nacetylcysteine (NAC) in protecting ears exposed to loud music. J Am Acad Audiol 17: 265–78. PMID:
16761701
23.
Lin CY, Wu JL, Shih TS, Tsai PJ, Sun YM, et al. (2010) N-Acetyl-cysteine against noise-induced temporary threshold shift in male workers. Hear Res 269: 42–7. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.07.005 PMID:
20638463
24.
Schmidt LE, Dalhoff K (2001) Risk factors in the development of adverse reactions to N-acetylcysteine
in patients with paracetamol poisoning. Br J Clin Pharm 51: 87–91. PMID: 11167669
25.
Fetoni AR, Ralli M, Sergi B, Parrilla C, Troiani D, et al. (2009) Protective effects of N-acetylcysteine on
noise-induced hearing loss in guinea pigs. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 29: 70–5. PMID: 20111615
26.
Langguth B, Kreuzer PM, Kleinjung T, De Ridder D (2013) Tinnitus: causes and clinical management.
Lancet Neurology 12: 920–30. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70160-1 PMID: 23948178
27.
Sandilands EA, Bateman DN (2009) Adverse reactions associated with acetylcysteine. Clin Toxicol
47: 81–88. doi: 10.1080/15563650802665587 PMID: 19280424
28.
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in
ecology with R. New York: Springer.
29.
Le Prell CG, Yamashita D, Minami SB, Yamasoba T, Miller JM (2007) Mechanisms of noise-induced
hearing loss indicate multiple methods of prevention. Hearing Res 226: 22–43 PMID: 17141991
30.
Borgström L, Kågedal B, Paulsen O (1986) Pharmacokinetics of N-Acetylcysteine in man. Eur J Clin
Pharmacol 31: 217–222. PMID: 3803419
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0115657 March 12, 2015
14 / 14