Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Undergraduate Category:PhysicalandHealthSciences DegreeLevel:B.S.inPhysics AbstractID#1254 Beyond Images: Characterizing Melanoma Tumors in FDG-PET/CT Scans Dena Guo1, Keisha McCall2,4, Amanda Abbott2,4, Heather Jacene2, Christopher Sakellis2, F. Stephen Hodi3., Annick D. Van den Abbeele2,4 1Northeastern University Dept. of Physics; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 2Dept .of Imaging, 3Dept. of Medical Oncology, and 4 Center for Biomedical Imaging New Therapies, New Measures Melanoma Characterization Relevance to Nanomedicine Melanoma is an aggressive form of skin cancer: 5-year survival rates plummet from 90% in early stages to 10% in advanced, metastatic melanoma.1 Immunotherapy is a novel approach that does improve survival rates.2 However, traditional anatomic and functional tumor response assessment criteria do not fully describe tumor response to immunotherapy because of its novel action mechanisms on the microenvironment. Radiomics aims to analyze imaging features to assess tumor's phenotype changes.3 All Metastatic Melanoma Tumors With the development of novel therapeutics such as nanoparticles and immunotherapy, and new hybrid imaging technologies such as PET/CT and PET/MRI, there are new opportunities to better assess response to treatment. These opportunities include radiomics features of medical imaging, which allow clinicians to design therapies that are personalized to each patient. Radiomics Approach 7 measures showed a significant change in all tumors from baseline to the first follow up (signed-rank, p < 0.05). • SUVpeak, SULpeak, SUVmedian, Energy, Mean Absolute Deviation, Root Mean Square, Entropy 1 measure showed a significant change in all tumors from baseline to the second follow up (signed-rank, p < 0.05). • SUVmin No measure showed a significant change from baseline to both follow up sessions. 44 patients | 189 tumors | 3 FDG-PET/CT Scans Baseline Scan(S0) Immunotherapy Tumors Identifiedby Radiologist 8 weeks FollowUp Scan(S1) Tumors Contouredby Reader Immunotherapy 8 weeks PETSUV Information Exported FollowUp Scan(S2) Analysis Tumors Grouped by Patient Outcome At baseline, both outcome groups did not have significantly different medians for any measure. The characteristics of metastatic melanoma tumors and their response to immunotherapy were successfully described using radiomics measures. • SUVmax, SUVpeak, SULpeak, SUVmedian, Energy, Range, Root Mean Square, Uniformity Although none of the 15 radiomics measures had predictive value, 8 measures had prognostic value in categorizing positive versus negative outcome groups after initiation of treatment. Further studies and comprehensive statistical analysis are still required to confirm these observations and explore the potential of radiomics in assessing therapeutic response. • Standardized Uptake Values: SUVmax, SUVmin, SUVmedian, SUVpeak, SULpeak, Energy These measures were then compared at S0, S1, and S2 for: • All 189 metastatic melanoma tumors • Tumors were grouped based on the clinical outcome of the patients (- outcome, + outcome). Conclusions However, 8 measures showed a significant difference between the two outcome groups in both follow up sessions (rank sum, p < 0.05). Analyzed 15 first-order gray level statistics radiomics measures: • Heterogeneity Values: Kurtosis, Skewness, Mean Absolute Deviation, Range, Root Mean Square, Standard Deviation, Variation, Entropy, Uniformity Hybrid imaging FDG-PET/CT. Anatomical (CT) and functional (PET) imaging provide two complementary components for characterizing the effect of therapies. Bibliography Radiomics Measures Over Time. The SUVmax and Uniformity of individual tumors did not significantly change (signed-rank, p > 0.05) from baseline to either follow up session. However, there were significant differences (rank sum, p < 0.05) in the average SUVmax and average Uniformity between the two outcome groups, as shown by the asterisks. Acknowledgments This CaNCURE co-op research project was supported by National Cancer Institute grant #1CA174650-02. 1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2014. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2014 Jan; 64(1): 9-29. 2. Hodi FS et al. Bevacizumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014 Jul; 2(7): 632-42. 3. Haralick RM, Shanmug K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb. 1973; SMC-3: 610-21. 4. Leijenaar RT et al. Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: an integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability. Acta Oncol. 2013 Oct; 52(7): 1392-7.