Download Overcoming the Challenge of  Rehabilitating Older Adults with  Combined Vision and Hearing Loss Walter Wittich, PhD FAAO CLVT

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Earplug wikipedia , lookup

Telecommunications relay service wikipedia , lookup

Lip reading wikipedia , lookup

Hearing loss wikipedia , lookup

Sensorineural hearing loss wikipedia , lookup

Noise-induced hearing loss wikipedia , lookup

Audiology and hearing health professionals in developed and developing countries wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
5/28/2014
April 25th 2014
Overcoming the Challenge of Rehabilitating Older Adults with Combined Vision and Hearing Loss
Walter Wittich, PhD FAAO CLVT
MAB‐Mackay Rehabilitation Centre
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University
Department of Psychology, Concordia University
My life in 3 sentences
• 1991 Diploma in Musical Theatre Performance
• 2004 B.Sc. Psychology
• 2006 M.A. Psychology
• 2010 Ph.D. Neuroscience
• 2012 Post‐doc Audiology
• 2013 Certified Low Vision Therapist
• At MMRC since 2012
1
5/28/2014
MAB‐Mackay Rehabilitation Centre
Mackay Centre since 1869
Montreal Association for the Blind since 1908
Outline
• The story of demographics
– Who are our clients?
• The story of assistive technology
– Can you use your devices?
• The story of stigma
– What are people talking about?
2
5/28/2014
The Canadian Picture
The Canadian Picture
3
5/28/2014
The Canadian Picture
The Canadian Picture
• The Population is Aging!
• 15% population 65+ in Canada (2011)
• Projections predict 27.2% of population in 2056
• More seniors with Hearing and Vision loss
• Prevalence estimates
• 6-20% in older adults (Slaets, 2007; Smith et al., 2008; Schneider et al., 2012)
• 8-30% in older adults with hip fractures (Lieberman et al. 2004)
4
5/28/2014
Aging and Sensory Impairment
• Across 11 European countries (n = 27,536; age 50+)
– 10.2% vision difficulties only (mostly AMD)
– 13.5% hearing difficulties only (presbycusis)
– 5.9% combined vision and hearing difficulties
• Persons with combined loss are 2.2 times as likely to be socially inactive
Viljanen et al., 2013
Some Vocabulary
• Combined vision and hearing loss
• Dual sensory impairment
• Acquired deafblindness
• Deafblindness – umbrella term in clinic
• Dual sensory impairment ‐ researchers
Wittich et al., BJVI 2013
5
5/28/2014
Trends in Time
…the trend in America is away from blindness as
a sole disability…We are increasingly called
upon to serve individuals for whom blindness is
only one aspect of a more complex and difficult
disability configuration.
Peter J. Salmon,
Executive Director of the Industrial Home for the Blind, NY
The New Outlook for the Blind,
January 1965, p.15
Definition
• “Deaf-blind, or deafblind, is a combination
of hearing and vision loss of any varying
degrees that affects a person’s ability to
communicate, get environmental
information, participate in the community,
obtain and keep a job, and maintain
independence.”
American Association of the Deaf-Blind, 2010
6
5/28/2014
Dual Sensory Rehabilitation:
Who are our Clients?
Funding provided by Prevalence
• In Canada
7
5/28/2014
DSI Space
Quebec Eligibility Criteria
8
5/28/2014
Unique Opportunity
• DSI Rehabilitation in Montreal
– MAB-Mackay Rehabilitation Centre (E)
• Hearing, vision, paediatric motor, communication
– Institut Nazareth et Louis-Braille (F)
• Vision only
– Institut Raymond-Dewar (F)
• Hearing only
– All services free of charge to client
Eligibility - Vision
• In the better eye with standard optical correction
of less than four dioptres,
• VA (ETDRS or Feinbloom)
– < 20/70 (6/21)
– ≤ 20/60 (6/18) for individuals with a degenerative
visual problem & perception of impairment
• Continuous visual field < 60° including fixation
measured on Goldmann or Octopus perimetry
either horizontally or vertically
• Complete hemianopia/loss of half the visual field
9
5/28/2014
Eligibility - Hearing
• Average hearing detection thresholds (dB HL 35)
measured at four audiometric frequencies (i.e., 500,
1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) in the better ear, without
assistive technology.
• Children under the age of 12 years, if sufficient to be a
potential threat to language development.
• Youth between 12-18 years of age if the average hearing
loss, in the better ear, is at least 25 dB HL
• Working-age adults if the average hearing loss, in the
better ear is at least 25 dB HL and if sufficient to have an
effect on ability to study or work
• Any individual, irrespective of age and degree of hearing
loss, if they experience functional limitations due to
hearing loss at school, at work, or in society in general
Method
• Electronic and paper chart review of all
active DSI client files across the three
agencies for the Montreal region
• Multiple Impairment Program (0 – 21)
• Dual Sensorial Program (21 – 100+)
• Programme Surdicecité (0 – 100+)
10
5/28/2014
Results
• N = 614 charts
– excluded 50 who lived > 75 km from Montreal
• N = 564 in analysis
– 209 males (37.1%), 355 females (62.9%)
– Range 4 months to 105 years
– Montreal Census data for 2010
– Prevalence 15/100,000
Age Distribution
11
5/28/2014
Prevalence
• In Canada
Aging
Legal Blindness
20/200 (6/60)
12
5/28/2014
Aging
Legal Blindness
60 degrees
Aging
Profound HL
81 dB
13
5/28/2014
Dual Impairment
The “deafblind”
“Norma” VA
Dual Impairment
The “deafblind”
14
5/28/2014
Diagnostic Categories
Wittich et al., 2012
Summary
• 69.1% of clients over age 65
• 43.1% over the age of 85
• Statistics for the last year BEFORE the
baby boomers reach retirement age
• These older adults represent their parents
15
5/28/2014
Summary
• Older adults have unique rehabilitation
needs
• Rarely only vision and hearing
• The CAN be rehabilitated
• But: Do we succeed?
Visibility and Usability of Assistive Hearing Devices
for Persons with Visual Impairment
Funding provided by 16
5/28/2014
Assistive Technology
• “…an umbrella term for any device or system that allows individuals to perform tasks they would otherwise be unable to do, or increases the ease and safety with which tasks can be performed.”
World Health Organization, 2002
Assistive Technology Devices (ATDs)
• For older adults, utilization of ATDs is low
• Hearing: – 1 in 4 eligible to use hearing aids do so
– 1 in 7 use hearing assistive technologies
• Vision:
– 1 in 4 devices are abandoned
– 1 in 4 users are dissatisfied with the devices they use
• DSI: ???
Cushman et al., 1996; Edwards et a., 1998; Gitlin et al., 1993; Mann et al., 1993
17
5/28/2014
Assistive Technology
• Assistive Devices are designed with ONE impairment in mind
• Use and usability of Assistive Devices for Hearing Loss are likely compromised by the presence of Vision Loss
– e.g. client cannot see buttons on hearing aid or cannot change batteries on a pocket talker
Setting the time on a vibrating alarm clock
18
5/28/2014
Our Question
• Can individuals with vision loss successfully use assistive hearing devices?
• Hypotheses:
• Minimal rehabilitation techniques improve success of use
• Minimal rehabilitation techniques improve speed of use
Study Participants
• Control participants: n = 8 age 66‐87
• 38 Clients of the MMRC Day Centre
– All have vision loss (mostly AMD)
– All use some type of Assistive Devices
• VI Only: n = 19 age 67‐95
• VI and HI: n = 19 age 60‐100
19
5/28/2014
Study Components
• Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in its Blind version (Wittich et al., JVIB, 2010)
• Purdue Pegboard Test for manual dexterity
• Qualitative Interview –
client perspective
Study Components
• Functional tests
– Assemble pocket talker
– Use amplified telephone
– Adjust daylight saving time on a talking clock
20
5/28/2014
Two Conditions
Results ‐ MoCA
PASS at 18+
Failure Rates
Controls: 2/8 = 25%
Visual Impairment: 9/19 = 47%
Dual Impairment: 6/19 = 32%
42
21
5/28/2014
Minimal rehabilitation techniques improve success of use
Minimal rehabilitation techniques reduces failure – Pocket Talker 22
5/28/2014
Minimal rehabilitation techniques reduces failure – Telephone
Minimal rehabilitation techniques reduces failure – Talking Clock
23
5/28/2014
Minimal rehabilitation techniques improve speed of use – Pocket Talker
Main effect of time: F(1, 42) = 11.11, p < .002, η = .21, Overall improvement with time
Main effect of group: F(2, 42) = 85.00, p < .0001, η = .67, Controls are faster that VI/DSI
Minimal rehabilitation techniques improve speed of use – Telephone
Main effect of time: F(1, 42) = 7.89, p < .008, η = .16, Overall improvement with time
Main effect of group: F(2, 42) = 160.71, p < .0001, η = .78, Controls are faster that VI/DSI
24
5/28/2014
Minimal rehabilitation techniques improve speed of use – Talking Clock
Main effect of time: F(1, 42) = 22.11, p < .0001, η = .35, Overall improvement with time
Main effect of group: F(2, 42) = 71.89, p < .0001, η = .63, Controls are faster that VI/DSI
Our Question
• Can individuals with vision loss successfully use assistive hearing devices? • Yes but there is room for improvement!
• Hypotheses:
• Minimal rehabilitation techniques improve success of use • Most likely
• Minimal rehabilitation techniques improve speed of use • Most likely
25
5/28/2014
Some Extras
• Does it matter if you have experience with the device? – Talking Clock
NO mistakes either time
Open Questions
• Is the improvement of speed due to repetition, intervention or both?
• How about other assistive hearing technologies?
• But: Do our clients actually WANT to use these devices?
26
5/28/2014
Does public discourse in the media shape our perception of deafblindness, aging, and assistive devices?
Funding provided by
Introduction
• Dual sensory loss has important implications for:
•
•
•
•
•
Social-emotional well-being
Cognitive function
Independence in daily activities
Health and mortality
Communication
Saunders & Echt, 2007; Schneider, et al.,2011
27
5/28/2014
Assistive Technology
• The Good: – Devices can improve functional ability and independence
• The Bad: – Abandonment rates are high (30-70%)
– The stigma of using, or being seen with the device(s)
Gittlin, 1995; Philips & Zhao, 1993; Mann et al., 2002
From a social point of view…
• Stigma is “the possession of, or belief that one possesses, some attribute or characteristic that conveys a social identity that is devalued in a particular social context” (Crocker, Major, & Steele, 1998)
28
5/28/2014
Ageist Stereotypes
• Weak, frail, and disabled
• Greater social value given to people who do not have impairments
• Make older adults feel unwelcome, marginalized, invisible
Canadian Network for the prevention of Elder Abuse
Research Question
Does public discourse contribute to the creation and maintenance of ageist stereotypes about dual sensory loss and assistive technology devices? If so, how?
29
5/28/2014
Critical Discourse Analysis
• Discourses shape identity possibilities
through constructing “new categories of
people and new ways for people to be”
• Newspapers …are the most commonly
accessed type of print media by Canadians,
particularly middle-aged and older persons.
Rudman & Molke, 2009
Methods
Media portion: English component
• Searched for articles from The Globe and Mail using Factiva database for June 2009‐2013
– Using various search strings related to aging, vision, hearing, technology, assistive devices, for example:
• seniors and technology
• old and disabled
• blind and deaf
• Discourse analysis in progress to code and examine themes in these articles that are relevant to the research question
30
5/28/2014
Discourse Analysis
ARTICLE INCLUSION CRITERIA:
• MUST include stereotype(s), e.g. ageism, (dis)ableism. • The stereotype MUST be related to a health condition.
• Mention health condition, e.g., macular degeneration
• Optional content:
– Aging (include if stereotypes might effect perceptions about aging)
– Assistive technology
Discourse Analysis
• Coding of selected text by:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Health condition (i.e., vision, hearing, dual sensory loss)
Context (i.e., employment, policy, relationships)
Stereotype (i.e., inevitable decline, incompetent)
Consequences of stereotype (if discussed)
•
Isolation, discrimination, advocacy
• Coding unit = sentence
– Exception offensive terminology can be coded on its own (For example: “mental defectives”)
31
5/28/2014
Results
• Out of 8951 articles, 168 were found to be directly or indirectly related to the research question
• After examining all articles, 68 included for final discourse analysis
Health condition: Hearing loss
Context: Asking for help – Air Travel
Stereotype: They’re all the same
“Sometimes, that means I'll be met at my destination by a smiling woman holding a sign with my name on it – and a wheelchair. I've yet to figure out how my deafness renders me unable to walk. ”
The Globe and Mail, Beverly Biderman, The Globe Life Column, L8, 12/07/2012
32
5/28/2014
Health condition: Hearing loss
Context: Asking for help – Hotel accommodation
Stereotype: They’re all the same
“when I ask for this visible alarm, I’m often put in a special all purpose “handicapped room” complete with a gigantic bathroom with low toilet, grab bars everywhere, large print signage and extra wide doorways. One size fits all – deaf, mobility impaired, blind whatever”
The Globe and Mail, Beverly Biderman, The Globe Life Column, L8, 12/07/2012
Health Condition: Vision loss (retinitis pigmentosa)
Context: social support (‐); and assistive technology
Consequences of stigma
“As her vision faded, Ms. Burke started using a white cane, something that left her friends embarrassed. The bullying began, invitations dried up and some people told her to kill herself. She got a guide dog, hoping it would draw people in, where the cane had driven them away.”
(The Globe and Mail, Sunny Dhillon, National News: Folio Bullying, A12, 13/10/2012)
33
5/28/2014
The Golden Quote:
...my golden age has slowly turned into a Band‐Aid age...The magnifying glass became quite useful (Band‐Aid 1)... The eyesight and the hearing diminished…The cataract was removed (No. 6)...So I gave myself the push and asked for Band‐Aid 7, a hearing aid. People tell me I look well rested and have not changed a bit. I don't tell friends about the Band‐Aids I use, though.”
The Globe and Mail, Lelia Sponsel, Globe Life, L6, 4/6/2010
Conclusions
• Little found encompassing all aspects of research question
• Older adults recognize the benefits of assistive technology but seem to be reluctant to disclose the use of these devices
• Negative discourse in the media may be contributing to societal attitudes associated with assistive devices
• Public education could reduce negative attitudes and increase the use of assistive technologies
34
5/28/2014
We fight an uphill battle
•
•
•
•
Dual rehabilitation services still rare
If available, people are not aware
If aware, people do not want to access
If access, – Devices are abandoned
– Clients are embarrassed to use them in public
But: Change is possible
• The story of the white cane
• The low vision technician and reversed psychology...
35
5/28/2014
Parallel Projects
• Media portion: French component
– Analysis with same search strings using articles from La Presse
• Website portion
(English and French)
– Analysis of websites designed to inform persons with acquired deafblindness
Three Things to Remember
• The large majority of persons receiving rehabilitation for vision and hearing loss are over 65
• Even minimal rehabilitation interventions can help these individuals when using devices
• Be a role model ! – Help us overcome the stigma attached to assistive devices.
36
5/28/2014
Thank you ‐ Merci
• Collaborators
– Kenneth Southall (IRD)
– Martine Lagacé (U Ottawa)
– Jean‐Pierre Gagné (U Montréal)
• Post‐doc
– Sarah Fraser (McGill)
• Research Assistants
– Don Watanabe (MMRC)
– Geneviève Groulx (MMRC)
– Alexandre Beaulieu (MMRC)
– Eve‐Julie Rioux (IRD)
– Johanne St.‐Gelais (IRD)
– Martine Gendron (IRD)
– Jonathan Jarry (MMRC)
– Rollande Grondin (INLB)
– Les employées du service des Archives de l'INLB
37